CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07403474SMART-VAPUpdated Feb 12, 2026

Combined Use of a Respiratory Multiplex PCR and Algorithm-based Therapy to Improve Early Optimization of Antibiotic Therapy in Critically Ill Patients With Ventilator-associated Pneumonia

A Phase 4 interventional study of strategy combining respiratory mPCR and algorithm-based therapy developed using local epidemiology in Ventilator Associated Pneumonia ( VAP), sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-12.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
124
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Assess the impact of a strategy combining respiratory mPCR and algorithm-based therapy developed using local epidemiology on the early optimization of initial antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (intervention), compared to a conventional strategy (control).

A bicentric, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. The primary assessment criterion is the proportion of early optimized antibiotic therapy within 24 hours of respiratory sampling.

Read the detailed description

In both arms, for eligible patients with VAP, a deep respiratory sample collection is performed prior to inclusion. This collection is carried out either by mini bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) via bronchoscopy or by blind mini BAL in alignment with the protocolized procedure. Initial antibiotic therapy is initiated after the deep sample has been taken according to the discretion of the attending clinician and in accordance with good practice recommendations. Both groups have their samples analyzed using conventional techniques. First, there is a direct examination, followed by culture and susceptibility testing, which is used as the gold standard technique for evaluating the primary endpoint.

In the intervention arm, in addition to conventional techniques, a broad-panel respiratory mPCR is performed before the 12th hour following achievement of the deep respiratory sample on the collected BAL. Once the mPCR results are received, the clinician adjusts the initial antibiotic therapy using algorithm-based therapy developed using local epidemiology in order to optimize treatment as early as possible.

In the control arm, the strategy is based on the clinician's choice in accordance with best practice recommendations without the combined use of respiratory mPCR and algorithm-based therapy. The deep respiratory sample is analyzed using conventional methods. Initial antibiotic treatment is therefore adapted by the clinician in charge of the patient according to departmental practices based on best practice recommendations, taking into account the results of the direct examination, culture, and susceptibility testing.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ventilator Associated Pneumonia ( VAP)

Keywords

  • mPCR
  • ventilator associated pneumonia
  • algorithm-based therapy
03

In context

Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated

392 studies on the registry are indexed under Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated; 81 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 124 is close to the median of 122 across 254 interventional studies indexed under Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated.

Browse Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes is the lead sponsor of 587 studies on the registry; 96 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults (≥18 years) with VAP (mechanical ventilation and hospitalization ≥ 48 hours) and deep respiratory sample by mini BAL \< 12 hours. The diagnosis of pneumonia includes two clinical criteria among fever (≥38.3°C), purulent sputum or aspiration, hyperleukocytosis (>12,000 WBC/mm³) or leukopenia (\<4,000 WBC/mm³), hypoxemia, auscultatory signs in the affected area, and a newly-appeared parenchymal infiltrate
  • Patient receiving initial probabilistic antibiotic therapy for VAP suspicion
  • Informed consent or emergency procedure
  • Patient affiliated with or beneficiary of a health insurance plan.

Non inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Congenital immunodeficiency;
  • HIV infection with the lymphocyte CD4 count below 200/mm3 or unknown in the last year;
  • Acute hematologic malignancy;
  • Neutropenia (\<1 leucocyte/mL or \< 0.5 neutrophil/mL);
  • Immunosuppressive drugs within the previous 30 days, including anti-cancer - Chemotherapy and anti-rejection drugs for organ/bone marrow transplant
  • Corticosteroids ≥ 20 mg/d of prednisone equivalent for more than 14 days
  • Known allergy to beta-lactams
  • Moribund patient or death expected from underlying disease during the current admission;
  • Patient deprived of liberty or under legal protection measure;
  • Participation in another interventional trial.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria :

  • mPCR non available
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
124 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    combined use of mPCR and algorithm-based therapy

    strategy combining respiratory mPCR on a deep respiratory sample obtained by mini bronchoalveolar lavage and algorithm-based therapy developed using local epidemiology

    Procedure: strategy combining respiratory mPCR and algorithm-based therapy developed using local epidemiology

  • No intervention
    Conventional strategy for antibiotic therapy at discretion of ICU physicians

    The conventional strategy is based on the clinician's choice in accordance with best practice recommendations, without the combined use of respiratory mPCR and algorithm-based therapy.

Interventions

  • Procedurestrategy combining respiratory mPCR and algorithm-based therapy developed using local epidemiology

    strategy combining respiratory mPCR carried out either by mini bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) via bronchoscopy or by blind mini BAL, and algorithm-based therapy developed using local epidemiology for the early optimization of initial antibiotic therapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The effectiveness of a combined use a broad panel respiratory mPCR and an algorithm-based therapy developed using local epidemiology on the early optimization of initial antibiotic therapy for VAP, as compared to a conventional strategy

    Proportion of patients receiving optimized antibiotic therapy defined as effective antibiotic therapy and for which antibiotic de-escalation, when recommended, was performed early, within 24 hours after deep respiratory sampling.

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy.

    Average number of days of broad-spectrum antibiotic administration per patient at day 28

    Time frame: Day 28

  2. Compare expected and actual time frames for optimizing antibiotic therapy in the two arms.

    Time in hours between deep respiratory sampling and optimization of antibiotic therapy.

    Time frame: day 28

  3. Quantify early antibiotic de-escalation in the two groups under study

    Early and broad-spectrum antibiotic sparing according to the modified Antibiotic Spectrum Index (ASIm) de-escalation score (from No antibiotics (0) to very broad (≥8))

    Time frame: day 1 and day 7

  4. Rate of Clinical Cure at Day

    use test of cure at day 7

    Time frame: day 7

  5. Mechanical ventilation at day 28

    mechanical ventilation free-days at day 28

    Time frame: day 28

  6. lenght of stay in ICU at day 28

    ICU free-days at day 28

    Time frame: day 28

  7. Number of organ-failure free days (based on SOFA) at day 28

    Number of organ-failure free days (based on SOFA) at day 28

    Time frame: day 28

  8. Mortality at day 28

    Mortality at 28

    Time frame: day 28

  9. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of the broad panel mPCR Film Array for the diagnosis of pneumonia, taking the conventional microbiological tests as reference

    Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of the broad panel mPCR Film Array for the diagnosis of pneumonia, taking the conventional microbiological tests as reference

    Time frame: day 28

  10. Incidence rates of infection or colonization with multidrug resistant bacteria and Clostridium difficile infections at day 28

    Incidence rates of infection or colonization with multidrug resistant bacteria and Clostridium difficile infections at day 28

    Time frame: day 28

  11. Cost of the total hospital admissions

    Total Hospitalization Cost per Participant at Day 28 (Including ICU Stay, Antimicrobial Therapy, Microbiological Diagnostic Workup, and Infection Relapse Costs)

    Time frame: day 28

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHU Nîmes
    Nîmes, 34070, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07403474
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 11, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 12, 2026

Study contacts

Hugo MARTINIERE, PH
Contact
hugo.martiniere@chu-nimes.fr
+33 4 66 68 33 31

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion