ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07401966NAPEUpdated Feb 23, 2026

Amputations in Childhood and Neuropathic Pain

An observational study in Pediatric, Neuropathic Pain and Phantom Limb Pain, sponsored by Hopitaux de Saint-Maurice. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-23.

Sponsored by Hopitaux de Saint-Maurice · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
50
Ages
5 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This observational study aims to assess the presence of neuropathic pain in children and adolescents who underwent limb amputation during childhood.

The study focuses on two types of neuropathic pain: phantom limb pain and residual limb pain. It also evaluates quality of life and functional autonomy in this population and explores potential associations between neuropathic pain, autonomy, quality of life, and age at amputation.

Using a mixed retrospective and prospective design, data are collected from medical records and standardized questionnaires administered during routine follow-up visits at a specialized pediatric limb anomaly center. The study seeks to improve understanding of neuropathic pain after pediatric amputation and its impact on daily functioning.

Read the detailed description

Pediatric limb amputations are rare and may occur in the context of trauma, infection, tumors, or congenital malformations. In some congenital conditions, such as proximal femoral focal deficiency, therapeutic amputation may be proposed to improve prosthetic fitting, functional outcomes, and autonomy. One of the potential complications associated with limb amputation is the development of neuropathic pain, including phantom limb pain and residual limb pain. While these conditions are well documented in adults, their prevalence and impact in pediatric populations remain poorly understood.

Neuropathic pain may interfere with prosthetic use, functional abilities, quality of life, and long-term autonomy. In children who undergo amputation for functional purposes, the presence and consequences of neuropathic pain are important factors to consider when weighing the expected benefits of surgery. Early identification and management of neuropathic pain may also allow better anticipation and implementation of preventive or therapeutic strategies.

This monocentric observational study aims to describe the presence of neuropathic pain in children and adolescents who underwent limb amputation during childhood. Neuropathic pain is assessed using validated questionnaires, distinguishing between phantom limb pain and residual limb pain. The study also evaluates quality of life and functional autonomy using age-appropriate standardized assessment tools.

In addition, the study explores associations between neuropathic pain and functional autonomy, quality of life, age at amputation, and preoperative preventive treatments when applicable. Data are collected through a mixed retrospective and prospective approach, combining extraction of medical record information and a single administration of questionnaires during routine follow-up visits. No intervention or modification of standard clinical care is performed.

By providing descriptive data on neuropathic pain and its functional consequences after pediatric amputation, this study aims to contribute to improved clinical decision-making, pain management strategies, and long-term follow-up of children with limb amputations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pediatric
  • Neuropathic Pain
  • Phantom Limb Pain
  • Amputation
03

In context

Neuralgia

1,100 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuralgia; 241 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 102 across 231 observational studies indexed under Neuralgia.

Browse Neuralgia studies →

Lead sponsor

Hopitaux de Saint-Maurice is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population consists of children and adolescents aged 5 to 18 years who underwent limb amputation during childhood and are followed at a specialized pediatric referral center for limb anomalies.

Participants include individuals with upper limb and/or lower limb amputation, regardless of the etiology of amputation. The study population includes both prosthesis users and non-prosthesis users. Data are collected using retrospective medical record review and a single prospective assessment with standardized questionnaires administered during routine follow-up visits, without any modification of standard clinical care.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged between 5 and 18 years (inclusive) (Piaget's concrete operational stage to be able to complete the self-assessment questionnaires)
  • Patients who underwent amputation before the age of 15 for girls and 16 for boys (average age of completion of lower limb growth)
  • Patients who have not undergone surgery on the amputated limb for at least one year (to avoid bias, as any surgery involving incision can cause temporary neuropathic pain unrelated to the amputation)
  • Have obtained the signature of the non-objection form by both parents/legal guardians
  • Have obtained the child's consent (verbal consent but recorded)
  • Be affiliated with a health insurance plan.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not speak French
  • Patients whose cognitive abilities are insufficient (as determined by a clinician or reported by parents) to be able to complete self-assessment questionnaires
  • Patients undergoing chemotherapy (due to transient neuropathic pain)
  • Patients who have received chemotherapy and whose side effects have not yet subsided (on a case-by-case basis depending on the chemotherapy used)
  • Patients who have received chemotherapy causing neuropathic pain due to this treatment that has not disappeared.
  • Patients placed under protective custody.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Pediatric limb amputation cohort

    This cohort includes children and adolescents aged 5 to 18 years who underwent limb amputation during childhood and are followed at a specialized pediatric limb anomaly referral center. Participants are evaluated at a single time point using retrospective medical record data and standardized questionnaires administered during routine follow-up visits, without any modification of standard clinical care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Presence of neuropathic pain after pediatric limb amputation

    Presence of neuropathic pain assessed using the DN4 questionnaire, including phantom limb pain and residual limb pain. A DN4 score of 4 or higher is considered indicative of neuropathic pain.

    Time frame: Single assessment at study inclusion (variable time after amputation)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Type of neuropathic pain after pediatric limb amputation

    Type of neuropathic pain reported after limb amputation, distinguishing phantom limb pain and residual limb pain, assessed using the DN4 questionnaire.

    Time frame: At study inclusion

  2. Health-related quality of life

    Health-related quality of life assessed using the SF-15 Generic Core Scales questionnaire, adapted to the participant's age, in children and adolescents with limb amputation.

    Time frame: At study inclusion

  3. Locomotor capability in lower limb amputees

    Locomotor capability assessed using the Locomotor Capability Index (LCI) in children and adolescents with lower limb amputation. The LCI score is analyzed in prosthesis users, for whom the scale is validated. For non-prosthesis users, a descriptive analysis of individual items is performed.

    Time frame: At study inclusion

  4. Upper limb functional ability

    Upper limb functional ability assessed using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire in children and adolescents with upper limb amputation.

    Time frame: At study inclusion

  5. Correlation between DN4 neuropathic pain score and SF-15 health-related quality of life score

    Neuropathic pain will be assessed using the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire (score range 0-10; score ≥4 indicating neuropathic pain). Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the SF-15 Generic Core Scales questionnaire (score range 0-100; higher scores indicating better quality of life). The correlation between DN4 total score (continuous variable) and SF-15 total score (continuous variable) will be analyzed using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients, as appropriate. The strength of correlation will be expressed as Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient (r), ranging from -1 to +1.

    Time frame: At study inclusion

  6. Correlation between DN4 neuropathic pain score and functional outcome scores (LCI and QuickDASH)

    Neuropathic pain will be assessed using the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire (score range 0-10; higher scores indicate greater neuropathic pain). Functional outcomes will be assessed using: Locomotor Capability Index (LCI) in lower limb amputees (score range 0-100; higher scores indicate better locomotor capability) Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire in upper limb amputees (score range 0-100; higher scores indicate greater disability). Correlations between DN4 total score and functional outcome scores will be analyzed using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients (r).

    Time frame: At study inclusion

  7. Correlation between DN4 neuropathic pain score and age at amputation

    Neuropathic pain will be assessed using the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire (score range 0-10; higher scores indicate greater neuropathic pain). Age at amputation (years) will be recorded from medical records. Correlation between DN4 total score and age at amputation will be analyzed using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients (r).

    Time frame: At study inclusion

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared due to the observational design of the study, the pediatric population involved, and the need to protect sensitive medical and functional data. Data are pseudonymized and handled in accordance with applicable data protection regulations, and no public data-sharing plan is planned.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07401966
Lead sponsor
Hopitaux de Saint-Maurice
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 11, 2026
Start date
Feb 19, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 9, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 23, 2026

Study contacts

Auriane AS SLAMA
Contact
auriane.slama@ght94n.fr
+33143967556 ext. +33607317969
Margaux MM Modjbafan
principal investigator · Hôpitaux Paris Est Val-de-Marne, centre de référence des malformations des membres, Saint-Maurice 94410
Maïwenn MF Feldmann
study director · Hôpitaux Paris Est Val-de-Marne, centre de référence des malformations des membres, Saint-Maurice 94410

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion