ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07389265CAPRI-3 GOIMUpdated Feb 5, 2026

Continuation of Cetuximab Beyond First-Line Progression in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

A Phase 3 interventional study of Erbitux (Cetuximab) and Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC), sponsored by University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli. Recruiting at 41 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-05.

Sponsored by University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2025; still recruiting 1 year 1 month later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
480
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this Phase 3 clinical trial is to evaluate whether continuing cetuximab treatment beyond first-line progression can improve outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer whose tumors are RAS and BRAF wild-type. The study will compare the effectiveness of chemotherapy given together with cetuximab versus chemotherapy given together with bevacizumab. Researchers aim to determine whether cetuximab continuation improves tumor response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety in this patient population.

Eligible participants are adults with metastatic colorectal cancer who have previously responded to first-line treatment with chemotherapy combined with an anti-EGFR antibody. Before starting therapy, patients will undergo molecular testing using liquid biopsy to confirm tumor characteristics. They will then receive chemotherapy with either cetuximab or bevacizumab every two weeks, and their disease will be monitored regularly with CT or MRI scans, laboratory tests, and clinical evaluations. During the study, patients will also provide biological samples for translational research.

This trial will enroll about 360 patients across sites in Italy and Spain and is designed to provide new evidence on whether cetuximab continuation beyond first-line treatment can offer a meaningful clinical benefit compared with standard therapy.

Read the detailed description

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is one of the most common and lethal cancers worldwide. Despite progress with chemotherapy and targeted therapies, many patients experience disease progression after first-line treatment. In recent years, drugs targeting the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), such as cetuximab, have shown significant benefit in patients with RAS and BRAF wild-type tumors. However, it remains unclear whether continuing cetuximab beyond progression, while changing the chemotherapy backbone, can provide additional benefit compared to switching to an alternative targeted treatment.

The CAPRI-3 study is a randomized, multicenter, open-label Phase 3 clinical trial designed to address this question. The study will enroll approximately 360 adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Italy and Spain. All participants must have tumors that are RAS and BRAF wild-type, as well as PIK3CA and EGFR extracellular domain wild-type and HER2 non-amplified, as determined by next-generation sequencing on liquid biopsy at the time of screening. Eligible patients will have previously received a first-line regimen with chemotherapy plus an anti-EGFR antibody (cetuximab or panitumumab) and achieved either a complete or partial response, or prolonged stable disease, before disease progression.

Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a standard chemotherapy doublet (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI, depending on the regimen used in the first line) combined either with cetuximab (experimental arm) or with bevacizumab (control arm). Treatment will be continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Tumor response will be assessed according to RECIST 1.1 criteria by independent central review.

The primary endpoint of the study is objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profile assessed according to NCI CTCAE version 5.0. Exploratory objectives include biomarker and translational research, involving the collection and analysis of tumor tissue, blood, and stool samples to better understand resistance mechanisms and the role of the gut microbiome in treatment response.

This study builds on promising results from the earlier CAPRI and CAPRI-2 trials, which suggested that continuing cetuximab in second-line therapy may improve patient outcomes. If successful, CAPRI-3 could establish cetuximab continuation beyond first-line progression as a new treatment option for a large proportion of molecularly selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC)
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

6,541 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,667 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 480 is above the median of 76 across 4,800 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli is the lead sponsor of 174 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. proven diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma.
  2. Diagnosis of disease.
  3. Efficacy of a therapy containing anti-EGFR drug with a major response achieved (i.e. complete or partial response according to criteria v1.1) or a prolonged (at least 6 months) stable disease.
  4. Progression to first line therapy.
  5. RAS and BRAF wild-type status of FFPE analysis of primary colorectal cancer and/or related metastasis.
  6. RAS (NRAS and KRAS exon 2,3 and 4), BRAFV600E, PIK3CA, EGFR ECD wild-type and not amplified in liquid at the time of screening (according to NGS, Foundation/Roche).
  7. according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST criteria, vers.1.1).
  8. Male or female patients ≥ 18 years of age.
  9. Performance Status 0-1.
  10. Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function assessed within 14 days before starting study treatment as defined by the following parameters:

    Bone marrow:

    • (ANC) ≥ 1.5 x 109/L
    • (Hgb) ≥ 9 g/dL
    • ≥ 100 x 109/L

    Liver function:

    • Serum total ≤ 1.5 x (ULN) (AST) (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT]) and ALT (SGPT) ≤ 2.5 x ULN, except in patients with tumor involvement of the liver who must have AST and ALT ≤ 5 x ULN

    Renal function:

    • Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN or 24-hour clearance ≥ 50 mL/min
  11. If female and of *, have a negative result on a pregnancy test performed a maximum of 7 days before initiation of study treatment.

    *A woman is considered of childbearing potential (WOCBP), i.e. fertile, following menarche and until becoming unless permanently sterile. Permanent sterilisation methods include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral oophorectomy.

  12. If female and of childbearing potential, or if male, agreement to use adequate (e.g., abstinence, intrauterine device, oral contraceptive, or double-barrier method), during the study and until at least 6 months after last dose of study treatment administration, based on the judgment of the Investigator or a designated associate.
  13. Signed obtained before screening.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any to the use of cetuximab, bevacizumab, Irinotecan, 5-FU, oxaliplatin, folic acid.
  2. Active uncontrolled infections, active disseminated intravascular coagulation or history of interstitial lung disease.
  3. Past or current history of other than colorectal carcinoma, except for curatively treated basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin cancer or in situ carcinoma of the cervix.
  4. Pregnancy (exclusion to be ascertained by a beta hCG test).
  5. Breastfeeding.
  6. Fertile women (\<2 years after last menstruation) and men of not willing to use effective means of .
  7. Myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, balloon angioplasty (PTCA) with or without stenting within the past 12 months before inclusion in the study, Grade III or IV heart failure ( classification).
  8. Cardiac arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy, with the exception of beta blockers or digoxin.
  9. Medical or psychological impairments associated with restricted ability to give consent or not allowing conduct of the study.
  10. Participation in a clinical study or experimental drug treatment within 30 days prior to study inclusion or during participation in the study.
  11. Known or clinically suspected .
  12. History of acute or subacute intestinal occlusion or chronic inflammatory bowel disease or chronic diarrhea.
  13. Severe, non-healing wounds, ulcers or bone fractures.
  14. Marked proteinuria (nephrotic syndrome).
  15. Known DPD deficiency (specific screening not required).
  16. Known history of alcohol or drug abuse.
  17. A significant concomitant disease which, in the investigating physician's opinion, rules out the patient's participation in the study.
  18. Absent or restricted legal capacity.
  19. Patients with known dMMR or MSI-H tumors who are eligible for approved therapy will be excluded from the trial, unless ICI therapy is contraindicated or declined by the patient. This ensures alignment with current standard of care.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(23)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

HER2

HER2 is a protein, made from the ERBB2 gene, that drives the growth of some cancers. A study may look for a level of the protein, extra copies of the gene, or a particular change in it.

In breast cancer, protein tests are read as HER2-positive, HER2-low or HER2-negative; other cancers use their own rules. Check which test result the study requires.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

PD-1, PD-L1 and checkpoint inhibitors

PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are proteins that act as brakes on the immune system. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab, block them so the immune system can attack a cancer.

PD-L1 can also be measured in a tumour sample. Some scores count stained tumour cells only (TPS); others also count certain immune cells (CPS). The study names the score and the minimum it uses.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
480 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ARM A Chemo-doublet (FOLFIRI or FOLFOX) + Cetuximab

    This arm is for participants with RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer who have progressed after first-line anti-EGFR therapy. They will receive a second-line chemotherapy regimen (either FOLFIRI or FOLFOX) in combination with cetuximab. The objective is to evaluate the efficacy of continuing cetuximab beyond progression.

    Drug: Erbitux (Cetuximab) · Drug: FOLFOX (Folinic acid + Fluorouracil + Oxaliplatin) · Drug: FOLFIRI (5-Fluorouracil, Folinic acid, Irinotecan)

  • Active comparator
    ARM B Chemo-doublet (FOLFIRI or FOLFOX) + Bevacizumab

    This arm is for participants with RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer who have progressed after first-line anti-EGFR therapy. They will receive a second-line chemotherapy regimen (either FOLFIRI or FOLFOX) in combination with bevacizumab. This arm serves as the control group to compare the outcomes with the experimental arm.

    Drug: Bevacizumab · Drug: FOLFOX (Folinic acid + Fluorouracil + Oxaliplatin) · Drug: FOLFIRI (5-Fluorouracil, Folinic acid, Irinotecan)

Interventions

  • This is an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody administered in combination with chemotherapy. The dose is 500 mg/m² administered every 14 days as a 120-minute intravenous infusion on cycle 1 day 1, infusion rate not faster than 5mg/min.

  • This is an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody used as an active comparator in the control arm of the study. The dose is 5 mg/kg of body weight, administered every 14 days

  • DrugFOLFOX (Folinic acid + Fluorouracil + Oxaliplatin)

    Drug page: Folfox protocol

    This is a standard chemotherapy regimen containing irinotecan, fluorouracil, and folinic acid. It is used as the backbone chemotherapy in both study arms. The dose includes 200 mg/m2 L-folinic acid given concurrently with 85 mg/ m² oxaliplatin over 2 h IV, followed by a 400 mg/ m² IV bolus of fluorouracil followed by 2400 mg/ m² fluorouracil IV infusion every 14 days.

  • DrugFOLFIRI (5-Fluorouracil, Folinic acid, Irinotecan)

    This is a standard chemotherapy regimen containing folinic acid, oxaliplatin, and fluorouracil. It is used as the backbone chemotherapy in both study arms. The dose includes 200 mg/m2 L-folinic acid given concurrently with 180 mg/ m² irinotecan over 1.30 h IV infusion, followed by a 400 mg/ m² IV bolus of fluorouracil followed by 2400 mg/ m² fluorouracil IV infusion over 46 h every 14 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Response Rate (ORR)

    The primary outcome is the Objective Response Rate, which will be evaluated according to the RECIST criteria 1.1. The study aims to determine if the continuous use of cetuximab in the experimental arm results in a superior Response Rate compared to the control arm with bevacizumab.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, or study completion whichever came first, assessed until 48 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    Time from randomization until death due to any cause. Patients alive at last follow-up will be censored at that date.

    Time frame: From randomization (Day 0) until death from any cause, assessed through study completion (up to 36 months of survival follow-up)

  2. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    Time from randomization until the date of first documented disease progression, as assessed by central independent review according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 48 months from last patient randomized.

  3. Safety Profile: Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    The safety profile of the trial drugs as measured by the incidence of AEs, SAEs, clinical laboratory assessments, vital signs, physical examination, ECG parameters, and ECOG PS.

    Time frame: From first treatment administration until 30 days after the last dose.

07

Study locations

1 of 41 sites recruiting
  • A.O.U. Ospedali Riuniti
    Ancona, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Rossana Berardi · Principal investigator
  • AORN S. Giuseppe Moscati
    Avellino, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Giuseppe Santabarbara · Principal investigator
  • Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (C.R.O.) IRCCS
    Aviano, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Michela Guardascione · Principal investigator
  • IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II"
    Bari, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Nicola Silvestris · Principal investigator
  • Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero
    Brescia, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Michela Libertini · Principal investigator
  • Ospedale IRCCS 'Saverio de Bellis'
    Castellana Grotte, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Claudio Lotesoriere · Principal investigator
  • Nome EnteA.R.N.A.S. Garibaldi - P.O. Garibaldi-Nesima
    Catania, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Roberto Bordonaro · Principal investigator
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Renato Dulbecco
    Catanzaro, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Pierosandro Tagliaferri · Principal investigator
  • A.O.U. Careggi
    Florence, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Lorenzo Antonuzzo · Principal investigator
  • P.O. 'Vito Fazzi'
    Lecce, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Silvana Leo · Principal investigator
  • Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori 'Dino Amadori'
    Meldola, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Alessandro Passardi · Principal investigator
  • ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
    Milan, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Andrea Sartore Bianchi · Principal investigator
  • Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
    Milan, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Filippo Pietrantonio · Principal investigator
  • Istituto Europeo di Oncologia
    Milan, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Maria Giulia Zampino · Principal investigator
  • Casa di Cura Villa Maria
    Mirabella Eclano, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Antonio Febbraro · Principal investigator
  • A.O.U. dell'Università degli studi della Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli'
    Naples, Italy
    Recruiting
    • Fortunato Ciardiello · Principal investigator
  • A.O.U. Federico II
    Naples, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Chiara Carlomagno · Principal investigator
  • IRCCS I.N.T. 'Fondazione G. Pascale'
    Naples, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Antonio Avallone · Principal investigator
  • Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS
    Padova, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Francesca Bergamo · Principal investigator
  • ARNAS Civico - Di Cristina-Benfratelli - P. O. 'Civico e Benfratelli'
    Palermo, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Marco Messina · Principal investigator
  • Casa di cura Macchiarella
    Palermo, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Alfredo Colombo · Principal investigator
  • A.O.U. Pisana
    Pisa, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Chiara Cremolini · Principal investigator
  • Azienda USL IRCCS di Reggio Emilia
    Reggio Emilia, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Maria Banzi · Principal investigator
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'Agostino Gemelli' IRCCS
    Roma, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Giampaolo Tortora · Principal investigator
  • IRCCS Istituto clinico Humanitas
    Rozzano, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Alberto Puccini · Principal investigator
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza
    San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Tiziana Pia Latiano · Principal investigator
  • A.O.U. Sassari
    Sassari, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Alessio Cogoni · Principal investigator
  • Ospedale San Giuseppe Moscati
    Statte, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Salvatore Pisconti · Principal investigator
  • A.O. 'Pia Fondazione Cardinale G.Panico'
    Tricase, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Emiliano Tamburini · Principal investigator
  • IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria
    Veneto, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Stefania Gori · Principal investigator
  • Hospital del Mar
    Barcelona, Spain
    Not yet recruiting
    • Clara Montagut Viladot · Principal investigator
  • Hospital Universitari Vall d´Hebron
    Barcelona, Spain
    Not yet recruiting
    • Francesc Salvà Ballabrera · Principal investigator
  • Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucía
    Cartagena, Spain
    Not yet recruiting
    • Paola Pimentel Càceres · Principal investigator
  • Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía
    Córdoba, Spain
    Not yet recruiting
    • Maria Jose Ortiz Morales · Principal investigator
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
    Granada, Spain
    Not yet recruiting
    • Encarnaciòn Gonzàles Flores · Principal investigator
  • Instituto Catalán de Oncología. Hospital Duran i Reynals
    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
    Not yet recruiting
    • Cristina Santos Vivas · Principal investigator
  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
    Madrid, Spain
    Not yet recruiting
    • Cristina Grávalos Castro · Principal investigator
  • Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón
    Madrid, Spain
    Not yet recruiting
    • Pilar Garcìa Alfonso · Principal investigator
  • Hospital Universitario Regional de Málaga
    Málaga, Spain
    Not yet recruiting
    • Julia Alcaide Garcìa · Principal investigator
  • Hospital Universitario de Navarra
    Pamplona, Spain
    Not yet recruiting
    • Ruth Vera Garcìa · Principal investigator
  • Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
    Santander, Spain
    Not yet recruiting
    • Fernando Rivera Herrero · Principal investigator
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2030, 60 months after the start.

Of 106 non-industry phase 3 interventional studies under Colorectal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 65 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 42 and three quarters within 116. This study's planned 60 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 175 studies reached it within 50 months; a quarter within 35 and three quarters within 79.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 30, 2025
First posted
Feb 5, 2026
StartActual
Oct 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2030
CompletionEst.
Oct 2030
Last update
Feb 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07389265
Responsible party
Fortunato Ciardiello (Principal Investigator, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 5, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 5, 2026

Study contacts

Fortunato Ciardiello
Contact
fortunato.ciardiello@unicampania.it
0815666760
Stefania Napolitano
Contact
stefania.napolitano@unicampania.it
Fortunato Ciardiello
principal investigator · A.O.U. dell'Università degli studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cetuximab

Start the discussion