ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07387627COPCAUpdated Apr 29, 2026

Effectiveness of the COPCA Program in Infants at Risk of Neurodevelopmental Disorders

An interventional study of Coping with and Caring for Infants with Special Needs and Parental Education Program in Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Developmental Abnormalities, sponsored by University of Seville. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged Up to 12 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-29.

Sponsored by University of Seville · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 12 Months
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 20 studies in Neurodevelopmental Disorders with a site in Spain — 7 open to participants now, 12 under way, 5 of them phase 3. Neurodevelopmental Disorders · Spain.

Planned enrollment
11th of 16
40 · median 60
Started
2026
with 4 others
No phase
9 of 20
3 open now
Primary completion
2027-02
later than 5 of 11 live
Registered
17th of 20
by date

Among the 20 studies in Neurodevelopmental Disorders with a site in Spain, this one is the 11th largest by planned enrollment of the 16 interventional ones, is one of 5 that started in 2026, is one of 9 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 5 of the 11 other live ones, and was the 17th registered.

By phase

20 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study9 · 3 open
Phase 35 · 2 open
Observational4 · 1 open
Phase 11 · 0 open
Phase 21 · 1 open

By the year they started

First in 2016; this study’s year is marked. 5 started in 2026.

Size and results

Median enrollment 60 across the 16 interventional studies, 75 across the 4 observational. Of the 7 that completed or were terminated, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 20 studies in Neurodevelopmental Disorders with a site in Spain, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether the COPCA® program (Coping with and Caring for Infants with Special Needs) is more effective than conventional pediatric physiotherapy and parent education in improving development in infants at risk of neurodevelopmental disorders, as well as empowering their families.

This study will include infants younger than 12 months of corrected age who are at risk of neurodevelopmental disorders and are currently receiving early intervention or pediatric physiotherapy services, together with their parents or primary caregivers.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

Does the COPCA® program improve motor development and functional abilities in infants at risk of neurodevelopmental disorders more than conventional pediatric physiotherapy or parent education?

Does the COPCA® program increase family empowerment and improve parents' perception of the care they receive compared with traditional intervention models?

The researchers will compare outcomes across four study groups:

In-person COPCA® intervention

Online COPCA® intervention

Parent education group

Conventional pediatric physiotherapy group

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the four groups. The intervention period will last 6 months, with assessments conducted at the start of the study, during the intervention, and during follow-up.

Infants will take part in age-appropriate daily activities and play situations. Parents or caregivers will actively participate in the intervention sessions and will be supported in learning how to promote their child's development during everyday routines.

The study will assess infant motor development, functional abilities, overall development, family empowerment, and parents' perception of family-centered care using validated assessment tools and interviews. The results of this study may help improve early intervention strategies for infants at risk of neurodevelopmental disorders and support more family-centered approaches to care.

03

Conditions studied

  • Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Developmental Abnormalities
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 12 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Infants at risk of neurodevelopmental disorders.
  • Participation in pediatric physiotherapy and/or Early Intervention programs at the time of study inclusion, regardless of the reference center.
  • Corrected age under 12 months at the time of recruitment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants with confirmed neurodevelopmental disorders at the time of inclusion.
  • Presence of additional medical conditions requiring complex medical or surgical interventions that could interfere with participation in the study (e.g., recent or planned surgery).
  • Severe family socio-communicative difficulties that limit participation in coaching sessions (e.g., significant language barriers).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    In-person COPCA® Intervention

    COPCA®-based intervention focused on caregiver coaching and promotion of infant motor initiative and variability. One weekly in-person session at the family home, up to 45 minutes, for 6 months.

    Other: Coping with and Caring for Infants with Special Needs

  • Active comparator
    Online COPCA® Intervention

    COPCA®-based intervention delivered via videoconferencing, focused on caregiver coaching and infant motor initiative and variability. One weekly session of up to 45 minutes for 6 months, following an initial in-person assessment.

    Other: Parental Education Program

  • Active comparator
    Parental Education Group

    Online group-based parental education on motor development and home stimulation, without individualized child intervention. Sessions of 90 minutes every two weeks for 6 months.

    Other: Conventional Pediatric Physiotherapy

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Pediatric Physiotherapy

    Standard pediatric physiotherapy delivered according to usual clinical practice in Early Intervention services, with therapist-led sessions using structured exercises and movement facilitation techniques.

    Other: Coping with and Caring for Infants with Special Needs

Interventions

  • OtherCoping with and Caring for Infants with Special Needs

    COPCA®-based intervention focused on caregiver coaching and promotion of infant motor initiative and variability. Delivered weekly for up to 45 minutes over 6 months, either in person or online after an initial in-person assessment, integrated into daily routines and emphasizing self-exploration.

  • OtherParental Education Program

    Online group-based parental education on motor development and home stimulation, delivered in 90-minute sessions every two weeks for 6 months, without individualized child intervention.

  • OtherConventional Pediatric Physiotherapy

    Standard pediatric physiotherapy delivered according to routine clinical practice in Early Intervention services. The intervention consists of therapist-led sessions using structured exercises and movement facilitation techniques, with frequency and duration determined by the reference center.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Infant Motor Profile (IMP)

    Assessment of motor development and quality of motor behavior in infants. The IMP total score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better motor performance and motor behavior quality.

    Time frame: Baseline, during intervention (3 months), post-intervention (6 months) and follow up (3 and 6 months after intervention)

  2. Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI)

    Assessment of functional abilities and performance in daily activities. Scaled scores range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better functional performance and greater independence.

    Time frame: Baseline, during intervention (3 months), post-intervention (6 months) and follow-up after intervention (3 and 6 months)

  3. Merrill-Palmer-Revised Scales of Development (MP-R)

    Assessment of overall development across cognitive, motor, and socio-emotional domains. Higher scores indicate higher developmental functioning. The score varies according to age so it does not have a general fixed minimum or maximum value.

    Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention (6 months) and follow-up (6 months after intervention)

  4. Measurement of Processes of Care (MPOC-20)

    Assessment of caregivers' perception of family-centered care. Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale (1 to 7), where higher scores indicate a higher perception of family-centered care.

    Time frame: Post-intervention (6 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Family Empowerment Scale (FES)

    Assessment of family empowerment and perceived impact of the intervention. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 to 5), where higher scores indicate greater family empowerment.

    Time frame: Post-intervention (6 months)

  2. Semi-structured interview

    Qualitative exploration of family experiences, perceived usefulness of the intervention, and challenges in home implementation. This outcome does not use a numerical scale. Data will be analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

    Time frame: Post-intervention (6 months)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Escuela Infantil El Nido de los Perdigones
    Seville, Seville 41009, Spain
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Sharing data

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: For a year since the study ends

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2027, 11 months after the start.

Of 142 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Neurodevelopmental Disorders, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 52. This study's planned 11 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 148 studies reached it within 30 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 27, 2026
First posted
Feb 4, 2026
StartActual
Feb 10, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Feb 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2027
Last update
Apr 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07387627
Responsible party
Elena Piñero Pinto (PT, PhD, University of Seville) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 4, 2026
Start date
Feb 10, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 29, 2026

Study contacts

Miryam Quintano-Villar, PT
Contact
mquintano@us.es
+34 633665237

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion