ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07386782Updated Apr 17, 2026

Palpatory and Ultrasonographic Assessment of Tissue Compressibility: Validation and Learning Effects in Phantom Models

An observational study in Exanimation, Diagnostic Ultrasound and Palpation, sponsored by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-17.

Sponsored by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2026, 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This validation study compares clinical palpation and ultrasonographic measurements of tissue compressibility using standardized phantom models. Operators with different levels of clinical and ultrasound experience perform repeated, blinded assessments across multiple sessions. The study evaluates accuracy, reliability, agreement between modalities, and learning effects over time, aiming to support standardized and more objective assessment of tissue compressibility in clinical practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Exanimation
  • Diagnostic Ultrasound
  • Palpation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Exanimation
  • Diagnostic Ultrasound
  • Palpation
03

In context

Coma

138 studies on the registry are indexed under Coma; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 100 across 58 observational studies indexed under Coma.

Browse Coma studies →

Lead sponsor

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern is the lead sponsor of 741 studies on the registry; 180 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants with different years of clinical experience and levels of experience in ultrasound diagnostics (medical students, residents, and attendings) will be included. Age >= 18 years.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Medical professionals and medical students

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \<18 years
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • BehavioralUltrasonographic Compression Measurment and Palpation of Standardized Phantom Models

    Repeated ultrasonographic compression measurements and palpation of standardized phantom models

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy and reliability of palpation and ultrasonographic compression measurements

    Intraoperator and interoperator accuracy and reliability of palpation and ultrasonographic compression measurements on two phantom models as intraclass correlation coefficient and linear mixed-effects model

    Time frame: Over 3 sessions, seperated by at least 1 day and at most 1 week (study duration: 3 days to 2 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effect of operator characteristics on the measurement accuracy and reliability.

    Operator characteristics (age, gender, level of experience) will be introduced as fixed effects in a linear mixed-effects model with a random effect for participants to account for repeated measurements

    Time frame: Over 3 sessions, seperated by at least 1 day and at most 1 week (study duration: 3 days to 2 weeks)

  2. Assess the learning curve in palpation and ultrasound measurements

    Changes in accuracy of both modalities using linear mixed-effects model with a random effect for participants to account for repeated measurements. To test possible confounding factors, they will be introduced as fixed effects.

    Time frame: Over 3 sessions, seperated by at least 1 day and at most 1 week (study duration: 3 days to 2 weeks)

  3. Correlate the compression measurements with palpatory assessment

    Correlation of both modalities using linear mixed-effects model with a random effect for participants to account for repeated measurements. To test possible confounding factors, they will be introduced as fixed effects.

    Time frame: Over 3 sessions, seperated by at least 1 day and at most 1 week (study duration: 3 days to 2 weeks)

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data supporting this study's findings are available upon request from Samuel Tschopp, the corresponding author.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Analytic code

Access criteria: The data supporting this study's findings are available upon request from Samuel Tschopp, the corresponding author.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2026, 2 months after the start.

Of 24 observational studies under Coma, half reached primary completion within 34 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60. This study's planned 2 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 20, 2026
First posted
Feb 4, 2026
StartActual
Jan 31, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
May 31, 2026
Last update
Apr 17, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07386782
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 4, 2026
Start date
Jan 31, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
May 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 17, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion