ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07385599Updated Jun 10, 2026

FIM Study of the LAmbre™ II LAA Occluder in Non-Valvular AF Patients

An interventional study of LAmbre™ II Left Atrial Appendage Occluder and Occluder Delivery System in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF), sponsored by Lifetech Scientific (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.. Recruiting at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-10.

Sponsored by Lifetech Scientific (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (part of LifeTech Scientific Corporation) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate the preliminary safety and feasibility of the LAmbreTM II Left Atrial Appendage Occluder and the Occluder Delivery System in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who are at increased risk for stroke and systemic embolism.

Read the detailed description

Worldwide, atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in adults. The prevalence of AF gradually increases with age; its prevalence is 0.5% \~ 0.8% among 45 \~ 59 year-olds, 1.8% \~ 5.9% among 60 \~ 69 year-olds, and 6.7% \~ 17.9% among > 79 year-olds. Thromboembolic complications are the leading cause of death and disability in patients with AF, with ischemic stroke being the most common complication. AF significantly increases the risk of stroke by 3- to 5-fold due to thrombosis caused by abnormal atrial beat. The overall risk of ischemic stroke in patients with AF is 20% \~ 30%, and strokes due to atrial fibrillation account for 20% of all strokes.

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is the standard of care in the management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation for stroke prevention and is recommended in the USA and European guidelines. However, the use of warfarin, a traditional oral anticoagulant, requires frequent and careful monitoring to ensure adequate anticoagulation as well as to prevent over-anticoagulation. This necessitates frequent laboratory blood tests to maintain the International Normalization Ratio (INR), a measure of the efficacy of the warfarin regimen, which can lead to patient non-adherence. Sub-therapeutic INR does not prevent systemic embolization, and supratherapeutic INR is a risk for haemorrhage. Moreover, the impact of interactions with other drugs, diet, narrow therapeutic window, and other reasons limit the use of warfarin. Several studies have shown that in clinical practice anticoagulation is given to less than 50% \~ 60% of patients with indications and discontinuation rates of warfarin approach 33% per year. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have been shown to have a non-inferiority or superior effect in stroke reduction compared to warfarin without the need for routine laboratory monitoring. However, due to the high cost of NOACs and the lack of stable and effective antagonists, treatment discontinuation rates of up to 20% have been reported, and there is still an absolute risk of bleeding of 2% to 3% per year. A safe and effective alternative to anticoagulation for the stroke prevention in AF is needed, as the bleeding risk of anticoagulation and the presence of patient refusal/non-adherence/intolerance to long-term anticoagulation.

For a majority of patients with atrial fibrillation, it appears that thrombus formation would be located in the Left atrial appendage (LAA). Previous studies have suggested that more than 90% of thrombi in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are located in the LAA. Therefore, surgical and percutaneous techniques to occlude the LAA could be a solution to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke for patients with AF. Surgical ligation of the LAA during the mitral valve surgery can reduce the risk of stroke, however, it is difficult to completely close the LAA by surgical ligation. Studies evaluating the incidence of incomplete ligation of the LAA during mitral valve surgery have shown that TEE-detected incidence of incomplete LAA ligation is about 36%. The WATCHMAN device (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) is the most studied percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) device and has shown that safety and efficacy are non-inferior to warfarin. In the current 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline, percutaneous LAAC has been classified as a Class 2a indication for stroke prevention in patients with AF, a moderate to high risk of stroke, and a contraindication to long-term oral anticoagulation due to a non-reversible cause. However, the implantation procedure does have adverse effects which include serious pericardial effusion, procedure-related ischemic stroke, and device embolization. Due to the anatomical diversity of the LAA, certain patients are not candidates for this device.

The LAmbre™ Left Atrial Appendage Closure System, manufactured by Lifetech Scientific (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd., is the first generation of LAmbre LAAO device which is CE-marked and is current approved in Hong Kong Hospital Authority for regular clinical use. It consists of a LAA Occluder and a Delivery System and is a percutaneous transcatheter device intended to prevent thrombus embolization from the left atrial appendage in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. This self-expanding LAA Occluder consists of an umbrella and a cover connected by a central waist. Although the first generation of LAmbre LAAO device is associated with high implantation success rate of 99.7% and a relatively low major procedure-related complication rate of 2.9%, to better match the challenging anatomy of the LAA and to further improve procedural safety, the first generation of LAmbre LAA O device has been upgraded.

The LAmbre™ II Left Atrial Appendage Occluder is the second generation of LAmbre LAAO device which is used with the Occluder Delivery System to seal off the left atrial appendage to prevent thrombus embolization from the left atrial appendage (LAA) in patients who have non-valvular atrial fibrillation. As an upgraded version of the LAmbre™ Left Atrial Appendage Occluder, the LAmbre™ II Left Atrial Appendage Occluder has a number of modifications including: the connection of Umbrella and Cover has been changed from the welded connection to the snap connection, which allows the Umbrella and Cover to be freely combined; the PET Membrane of the Cover has been added with a PC coating; the shape of the Cover has been changed from conical shape to disc shape; the structure of the end of U-shaped hook has been changed from a single beam structure to a diamond shape structure; the material of the Cover changed from 72 NiTi wires to 144 NiTi wires This study is a first-in-man study aimed at preliminary assessing the safety and feasibility of the LAmbre™ II Left Atrial Appendage Occluder and Occluder Delivery System. The results of this study will be the basis for the design of subsequent confirmatory studies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Lifetech
  • FIM study
  • LAmbre™ II Left Atrial Appendage Occluder and Occluder Delivery System
  • LAmbre™ II
  • LAmbre™ II Left Atrial Appendage Occluder
  • Left Atrial Appendage Occluder
  • LAmbre™ II LAAO
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

4,009 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 961 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10 is below the median of 150 across 2,476 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Lifetech Scientific (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. is the lead sponsor of 44 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. The patient age ≥18 years;
  2. The patient has documented paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent non-valvular atrial fibrillation;
  3. The patient has a CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥ 2 in men and CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥ 3 in women;
  4. The patient is recommended for oral anticoagulation therapy, but there is an appropriate rationale for seeking a non-pharmacologic alternative to oral anticoagulation;
  5. The patient is deemed suitable for LAA closure by the site investigator and a clinician not a part of the procedural team in the shared decision-making process, and this determination has been documented in the patient's medical record;
  6. The patient is willing and able to comply with the required medication post-procedure and follow-up evaluations;
  7. The patient (or his or her legally authorized representative) has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions, and has been provided written approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Ethics Committee (EC)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or nursing patients and those who plan pregnancy during the study period. Female patients of must have a negative pregnancy test (per site standard test) within 7 days prior to the index procedure;
  2. Patients with atrial fibrillation that is defined by a single occurrence, or that is transient or reversible (e.g., secondary to CABG, an interventional procedure, pneumonia, or hyperthyroidism);
  3. Patients who require long-term anticoagulation for a condition other than atrial fibrillation;
  4. Bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy;
  5. Patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease, known severe mitral stenosis requiring surgical or percutaneous valve replacement, or existing mechanical valve prosthesis;
  6. Active infection with bacteremia;
  7. Known or to aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, any device material or component (nickel titanium, PET, polypropylene), and/or contrast sensitivity;
  8. Prior atrial septal defect (ASD) or patient foramen ovale (PFO) surgical repair or implantation of closure device;
  9. Left atrial appendage is obliterated and surgical ligated;
  10. Underwent any cardiac or non-cardiac interventional or surgical procedure within 30 days prior to the procedure or planned to have the interventional or surgical procedure within 60 days after implant procedure (e.g., cardioversion, ablation, percutaneous coronary intervention, cataract surgery, etc.);
  11. Recent (within 90 days prior to procedure) stroke, , or myocardial infarction;
  12. Class IV;
  13. Patients with severe renal failure (estimated \<30 ml/min/1.73m2);
  14. Known asymptomatic carotid artery disease with>70% diameter stenosis OR symptomatic carotid disease (>50% diameter stenosis with ipsilateral stroke or TIA). Subjects with prior carotid endarterectomy or carotid stent placement may be enrolled, provided that known diameter stenosis is \<50%;
  15. is less than 1 year;
  16. Current participation in another drug or device study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    LAmbre™ II Left Atrial Appendage Occluder and Occluder Delivery System

    Device: LAmbre™ II Left Atrial Appendage Occluder and Occluder Delivery System

Interventions

  • DeviceLAmbre™ II Left Atrial Appendage Occluder and Occluder Delivery System

    To evaluate the preliminary safety and feasibility of the LAmbreTM II Left Atrial Appendage Occluder and the Occluder Delivery System in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who are at increased risk for stroke and systemic embolism.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary effective endpoint is closure success

    Defined as complete LAA closure or peri-device residual leak ≤ 3 mm measured by TEE.

    Time frame: 12 months post-procedure.

  2. The primary safety endpoint is major peri-procedural complications

    Including cardiac perforation, pericardial effusion with tamponade or requiring drainage, device embolization, death, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, and major vascular complications occurring within 7 days following the implant procedure or by hospital discharge, whichever is later.

    Time frame: Within 7 days following the implant procedure or by hospital discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Major adverse events

    Defined as death, stroke, systemic embolism, pericardial effusion with tamponade or requiring drainage, device embolization, and major bleeding (BARC defined 3 or 5)

    Time frame: Evaluated within 7 days following the implant procedure or by hospital discharge and 30 days and 3, 6, 12 months post-procedure

  2. Closure success

    Assessed by TEE or cardiac computed tomography

    Time frame: Evaluated at 30 days and 3, 6 months post-procedure

  3. Rate of bleeding complications

    Evaluated as major bleeding (BARC Type 3 or 5) and minor bleeding (BARC type 2)

    Time frame: Evaluated within 7 days following the implant procedure or by hospital discharge, 30 days and 3, 6, 12 months post-procedure

  4. Cardiovascular death

    (cardiovascular and/or unexplained cause)

    Time frame: Evaluated within 7 days following the implant procedure or by hospital discharge, 30 days and 3, 6, 12 months post-procedure

  5. Rate of ischemic stroke and systemic embolization

    Time frame: Evaluated within 7 days following the implant procedure or by hospital discharge, 30 days and 3, 6, 12 months post-procedure

  6. Technical success rate

    Defined as successful delivery and release of study device with acceptable device position and stability, and closure success

    Time frame: Evaluated immediately after the procedure

  7. Procedural success rate

    Defined as technical success without major peri-procedural complications

    Time frame: Evaluated at 7 days following the implant procedure or by hospital discharge, whichever comes later

  8. Device-related thrombosis

    Defined as the detection of thrombus adherent to the left atrial side of the device by TEE or cardiac computed tomography

    Time frame: Evaluated at 30 days and 3, 6, 12 months post-procedure

  9. Occluder Delivery System related complication

    Time frame: Evaluated immediately after the procedure and within 7 days following the implant procedure or by hospital discharge

  10. Performance Assessment of the Occluder Delivery System

    Including accuracy, flexibility, pushability, withdrawal of delivery system (Grade I-V, V represents the best).

    Time frame: Evaluated during the procedure

  11. Performance Assessment of the Occluder Delivery System: Puncture success

    Defined as the successful puncture of the oval fossa region of the interatrial septum under fluoroscopy or TEE guidance, without changing the puncture needle or puncture site. The delivery sheath and dilator are then successfully advanced into the left atrium.

    Time frame: Evaluated during the procedure

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 23 months after the start.

Of 255 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Atrial Fibrillation, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 23 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,051 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 54.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 21, 2025
First posted
Feb 4, 2026
StartActual
Jan 19, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 1, 2028
Last update
Jun 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07385599
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 4, 2026
Start date
Jan 19, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 10, 2026

Study contacts

Kent CY So, Professor
Contact
Scy309@ha.org.hk
0852-3505-1518
Kadir Shemsi, CTM
Contact
KaDirr@lifetechmed.com
0852-9142-6007
Kent CY So, Professor
principal investigator · Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, HKSAR

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion