ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07379190Updated Jun 25, 2026

HR-MRI-Directed Tirofiban Therapy for Late-Window Acute Ischemic Stroke (TIAN)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Tirofiban and dual antiplatelet therapy in Stroke, Acute, Stroke, Ischemic and Cerebral Infarction, sponsored by Weifang Medical University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-25.

Sponsored by Weifang Medical University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
458
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to address the existing clinical challenges by introducing high-resolution magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging (HR-MRI), an advanced imaging technology, to achieve precise etiological classification in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) beyond the time window. HR-MRI allows clear visualization of intracranial arterial wall structures and direct identification of key pathological features of the culprit vessel, including atherosclerotic plaques, vascular wall remodeling, and intracranial hemorrhage, thereby enabling reliable differentiation between intracranial atherosclerotic large artery atherosclerosis (ICAS-LAA) stroke and other etiological subtypes such as cardiogenic embolism. Based on the latest clinical demands and advances in imaging technology, this study intends to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tirofiban in patients with ICAS-LAA stroke beyond the time window under the precise guidance of HR-MRI. It is expected to provide high-level evidence-based medical evidence for this specific patient population and further optimize clinical diagnosis and treatment strategies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke, Acute
  • Stroke, Ischemic
  • Cerebral Infarction
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 458 is above the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Weifang Medical University is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 years old;
  2. Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in the anterior intracranial circulation (internal carotid artery system) confirmed by clinical symptoms and imaging examinations;
  3. Time from symptom onset or last known normal state to randomization: > 24 hours and ≤ 7 days;
  4. Stroke subtype confirmed as intracranial large artery atherosclerosis (ICAS) by high-resolution vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI) according to the TOAST classification, with cardiogenic embolism and other etiologies excluded;
  5. Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 4-20 at the time of randomization;
  6. Signed form obtained from the patient or their legal representative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Planned to receive reperfusion therapy (endovascular therapy or intravenous thrombolysis);
  2. Intracranial hemorrhage confirmed by computed tomography (CT);
  3. Definite or suspected cardiogenic embolism;
  4. History of atrial fibrillation or current indicating atrial fibrillation;
  5. Acute ischemic stroke caused by other etiologies, such as Moyamoya disease, arterial dissection, arteritis, etc;
  6. Imaging examinations indicating that the area of the current cerebral infarction exceeds 1/2 of the area of a single cerebral lobe;
  7. Known to antiplatelet therapy, including hematochezia, gastrointestinal bleeding, or any other hemorrhagic disorders;
  8. History of to aspirin;
  9. Definite indication for anticoagulant therapy expected during the study period (e.g., atrial fibrillation, mechanical heart valve, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, hypercoagulable state, etc.);
  10. Complicated with malignant tumors, chronic hemodialysis, severe renal insufficiency ( [GFR] \< 30 ml/min or serum creatinine [Cr] > 220 μmol/L (2.5 mg/dl)), or severe hepatic insufficiency (serum [ALT] > 2 times the [ULN], or serum aspartate aminotransferase [AST] > 2 times the ULN);
  11. Severe heart failure ( [NYHA] Functional Classification Class III or IV);
  12. Complicated with severe non-cardiovascular comorbidities, with an estimated survival time \< 6 months;
  13. Concurrent new cerebral infarction in both anterior and posterior circulations;
  14. Inability to complete the follow-up procedures;
  15. Presence of other known neurological disorders that may complicate the follow-up;
  16. Concurrent participation in other therapeutic clinical trials with incomplete treatment and follow-up;
  17. Other conditions that the investigators consider inappropriate for enrollment in this study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
458 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tirofiban Combined with Standard Medication Therapy Group

    Patients were randomized to the Tirofiban Combined with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Group. Intravenous tirofiban was administered within 30 minutes of randomization, with an initial bolus infusion at a rate of 0.4 μg/(kg·min) for 30 minutes, followed by a continuous infusion at 0.1 μg/(kg·min) for 47.5 hours. During this period, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was initiated at a dose of aspirin 100 mg/day plus clopidogrel 75 mg/day, with an overlapping duration of 4-6 hours. After the completion of tirofiban infusion, dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin 100 mg/day plus clopidogrel 75 mg/day) was continued for a total of 21 days, followed by long-term maintenance with aspirin 100 mg/day alone.

    Drug: Tirofiban · Drug: dual antiplatelet therapy

  • Active comparator
    Standard Medication Therapy Group

    Patients were randomized to the control group, with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) initiated as early as possible at a dose of aspirin 100 mg/day plus clopidogrel 75 mg/day for a total of 21 days, followed by long-term maintenance with aspirin 100 mg/day alone.

    Drug: dual antiplatelet therapy

Interventions

  • Intravenous tirofiban was administered within 30 minutes of randomization, with an initial bolus infusion at a rate of 0.4 μg/(kg·min) for 30 minutes, followed by a continuous infusion at 0.1 μg/(kg·min) for 47.5 hours.

  • Drugdual antiplatelet therapy

    Initiate dual antiplatelet therapy as early as possible (aspirin 100 mg/day plus clopidogrel 75 mg/day) for a total of 21 days, followed by long-term maintenance with aspirin 100 mg/day alone. For patients at high risk of stroke, such as those with severe stenosis of major blood vessels, dual antiplatelet therapy should be administered for 90 days.

    Also known as: aspirin, clopidogrel

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of participants with functional independence outcome [modified Rankin Scale(mRS) score 0-1]

    the mRs is an ordinal disability score of 7 categories (0=no symptoms to 5=severe disability,and 6=death); a lower score indicates a better prognosis.

    Time frame: 90 ± 7 days after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of participants with good prognosis (mRS score 0-2)

    the mRs is an ordinal disability score of 7 categories (0=no symptoms to 5=severe disability,and 6=death);a lower score indicates a better prognosis.

    Time frame: 90 ± 7 days after randomization

  2. Proportion of participants with mRS score 0-3

    the mRs is an ordinal disability score of 7 categories (0=no symptoms to 5=severe disability,and 6=death);a lower score indicates a better prognosis.

    Time frame: 90 ± 7 days after randomization

  3. Distribution of mRS scores

    the mRs is an ordinal disability score of 7 categories (0=no symptoms to 5=severe disability,and 6=death);a lower score indicates a better prognosis.

    Time frame: 90 ± 7 days after randomization

  4. EuroQol Five-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) score

    The EQ-5D is a standardized patient-reported outcome measure for evaluating health-related quality of life (HRQoL), consisting of the EQ-5D descriptive system (assessing mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and the EQ visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). The utility score derived from the descriptive system will be adopted for statistical analysis, with a range of -0.594 to 1.0 based on the applicable value set. A higher score indicates better health-related quality of life: a score of 1.0 represents perfect health, 0 equates to a health state equivalent to death, and negative scores reflect health states worse than death. The EQ-VAS (0-100 scale, 0 = worst imaginable health state; 100 = best imaginable health state) will be analyzed as a supplementary index.

    Time frame: 90 ± 7 days after randomization

  5. Barthel Index (BI) score

    the BI is an ordinal disability score of 10 categories(range from 0 to 100, higher values indicate better prognosis);

    Time frame: 90 ± 7 days after randomization

  6. Proportion of participants with neurological improvement within 24 hours of randomization [≥2-point reduction in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score from baseline]

    the NIHSS is a stroke severity score composed of 11 items (range from 0 to 42, higher values indicate more severe deficits);

    Time frame: 24 ± 6 hours

  7. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores

    NIHSS score increased by more than 4 points);the NIHSS is a stroke severity score composed of 11 items (range from 0 to 42, higher values indicate more severe deficits)

    Time frame: Time Frame: 24h; before discharge; day7

  8. Proportion of participants with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 24 hours of randomization

    clinical safety endpoint

    Time frame: 24 ± 6 hours

  9. Early neurological deterioration(END)

    defined as NIHSS score increased by #4 points within 24 hours

    Time frame: 24 ± 6 hours

  10. Incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs)

    clinical safety endpoint

    Time frame: 24 ± 6 hours;

  11. Incidence of any adverse events

    clinical safety endpoint

    Time frame: 24 ± 6 hours;

  12. Recurrent stroke

    clinical safety endpoint;the new neurological deficit must be accompanied by corresponding new ischemic or hemorrhagic lesions on brain CT or MRI, which are not contiguous with the index stroke lesion and do not correspond to the vascular territory of the index stroke.

    Time frame: 90 ± 7 days after randomization

  13. all-cause mortality;

    clinical safety endpoint; to observe the proportion of all patients who died in each group

    Time frame: 90 ± 7 days after randomization

  14. stroke-related mortality

    clinical safety endpoint;The proportion of stroke related deaths in each group

    Time frame: 90 ± 7 days after randomization

  15. Proportion of participants with any intracranial hemorrhage

    imaging safety endpoints; to observe the proportion of intracranial hemorrhage patients in each group

    Time frame: 24 ± 6 hours

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2029, 31 months after the start.

Of 92 non-industry phase 3 interventional studies under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 44 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 27 and three quarters within 71. This study's planned 31 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 129 studies reached it within 44 months; a quarter within 27 and three quarters within 68.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 22, 2026
First posted
Jan 30, 2026
StartActual
Jun 22, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Feb 1, 2029
CompletionEst.
May 1, 2029
Last update
Jun 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07379190
Lead sponsor
Weifang Medical University
Collaborators
Linyi People's Hospital, Qianfoshan Hospital
Responsible party
Weili Li (Professor, Weifang Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 30, 2026
Start date
Jun 22, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
May 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 25, 2026

Study contacts

Weili Li, MD
Contact
wfsrmyy_ky@163.com
86-0536-8192680

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Tirofiban

Start the discussion