CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07378371Updated Jan 30, 2026

Proactive Temperature Management in CRS-HIPEC for Prevention of Delirium

An interventional study of Proactive Goal-Directed Temperature Management and Standard Reactive Temperature Management in Pseudomyxoma Peritonei and Postoperative Delirium (POD), sponsored by Aerospace Center Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-30.

Sponsored by Aerospace Center Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2026, 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
174
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial evaluates the efficacy of a proactive Goal-Directed Temperature Management (GDTM) protocol in reducing postoperative delirium among patients undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for pseudomyxoma peritonei.

CRS-HIPEC presents a unique physiological challenge characterized by a biphasic thermal trajectory: potential hypothermia during extensive surgery followed by rapid iatrogenic hyperthermia during perfusion. This study compares a standardized GDTM strategy-which incorporates strict normothermia maintenance and anticipatory pre-cooling prior to perfusion-against standard reactive thermal management. The primary objective is to determine if optimized thermoregulation can attenuate thermal variability and improve early neurocognitive recovery.

Read the detailed description

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) imposes a formidable physiologic burden, involving extensive resections and a distinctive thermal paradox. Patients typically experience a prolonged cytoreductive phase prone to inadvertent hypothermia, followed by protocol-driven hyperthermia during the perfusion phase. This rapid thermal fluctuation may disrupt blood-brain barrier integrity and amplify neuroinflammation, potentially contributing to postoperative delirium (POD).

Despite these risks, perioperative thermoregulation often remains reactive, with interventions initiated only after temperature thresholds are violated. Evidence-based recommendations for managing the iatrogenic heat load inherent to HIPEC remain undefined.

This single-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial aims to address this gap. Eligible adult patients scheduled for elective CRS-HIPEC are randomized to receive either proactive Goal-Directed Temperature Management (GDTM) or Usual Care. The GDTM protocol utilizes a phase-based algorithm, including specific targets for normothermia during resection and a "thermal buffer" created by anticipatory cooling prior to the hyperthermic phase. The Usual Care group receives standard reactive management where interventions are triggered primarily by observed threshold violations.

The primary endpoint is the incidence of POD within the first 7 postoperative days. Secondary endpoints include delirium-free days, intraoperative thermal exposure metrics, delayed neurocognitive recovery, and 30-day major complications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pseudomyxoma Peritonei
  • Postoperative Delirium (POD)

Keywords

  • Cytoreductive Surgery
  • HIPEC
  • Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
  • Temperature Management
  • Goal-Directed Therapy
03

In context

Pseudomyxoma Peritonei

35 studies on the registry are indexed under Pseudomyxoma Peritonei; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 174 is above the median of 38 across 25 interventional studies indexed under Pseudomyxoma Peritonei.

Browse Pseudomyxoma Peritonei studies →

Lead sponsor

Aerospace Center Hospital is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (aged 18-80 years).

American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I to III.

Scheduled for elective Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Pseudomyxoma Peritonei (PMP).

Written informed consent obtained from the participant or legally authorized representative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known diagnosis of dementia, major neurocognitive disorder, or severe psychiatric illness (e.g., schizophrenia) documented in the medical record.

Acute central nervous system pathology likely to confound delirium assessment (e.g., recent stroke, active seizure disorder, or traumatic brain injury).

Severe sensory or language barriers precluding valid cognitive screening (e.g., profound deafness or blindness, or language barriers not correctable with translation).

Preoperative coma, mechanical ventilation, or deep sedation precluding reliable baseline assessment.

Emergency surgery or repeat CRS-HIPEC during the same hospital admission.

History of alcohol or substance abuse likely to precipitate withdrawal symptoms.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
174 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    GDTM Group

    Participants assigned to this group receive a protocolized, phase-based temperature management algorithm. This includes strict normothermia maintenance during cytoreduction, anticipatory pre-cooling prior to HIPEC perfusion, and proactive cooling during the hyperthermic phase to attenuate thermal variability .

    Procedure: Proactive Goal-Directed Temperature Management

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care Group

    Participants receive standard institutional thermal management characterized by a reactive approach. Therapeutic interventions (warming or cooling) are determined by the attending anesthesiologist based on observed threshold violations (e.g., core temperature \<36.0°C or \>38.5°C) rather than a prespecified goal-directed algorithm .

    Procedure: Standard Reactive Temperature Management

Interventions

  • ProcedureProactive Goal-Directed Temperature Management

    The protocol consists of four phases: Cytoreductive Phase: Maintain core temperature 36.5-37.5°C. Pre-cooling Phase: Initiated \~30 min before HIPEC (e.g., during closure), targeting 36.0-36.3°C. HIPEC Phase: Proactive cooling to target 37.5-38.0°C; escalation triggered at 37.8°C. 4. Rewarming Phase: Restore 36.5-37.5°C prior to ICU transfer .

  • ProcedureStandard Reactive Temperature Management

    Hypothermia Management: Active warming initiated reactively only when core temperature falls below 36.0°C. Pre-cooling: No anticipatory pre-cooling is performed. 3. HIPEC Phase: Active cooling withheld unless core temperature exceeds standard safety thresholds (typically \>38.5°C) or for immediate safety indications .

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Postoperative Delirium

    Delirium is assessed twice daily (08:00-10:00 and 18:00-20:00) using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) for mechanically ventilated or ICU patients, and the standard CAM for ward patients. Postoperative delirium is defined as at least one positive CAM-ICU or CAM assessment during the assessment window .

    Time frame: From ICU admission through postoperative day 7 (or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Delirium- and Coma-Free Days (DCFDs)

    Calculated as the number of days alive and free of both delirium and coma. A day is scored as "free" only if the patient is alive, not comatose, and delirium-negative on all assessments .

    Time frame: Within 7 days postoperatively

  2. Intraoperative Thermal Exposure (AUC >38.5°C)

    Calculated as the Area Under the Curve (AUC) for core temperature \>38.5°C during the HIPEC phase to quantify physiologic thermal load.

    Time frame: From the initiation of HIPEC perfusion until the completion of perfusion, approximately 90 minutes.

  3. 30-Day Major Complications Composite

    A composite of Clavien-Dindo grade III-V complications (including mortality).

    Time frame: Within 30 days postoperatively

  4. Delayed Neurocognitive Recovery (DNR)

    Assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). DNR is defined as a decline in MoCA score of ≥1 SD from the preoperative baseline mean, adjusted for age and education .

    Time frame: Discharge (or postoperative day 7) and 1 month postoperatively

  5. Quality of Recovery (QoR-15 Score)

    Evaluated using the QoR-15 questionnaire, a 15-item patient-reported outcome measure. Scores range from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better quality of recovery.

    Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 3, and 7

  6. Postoperative Pain Intensity (NRS Score)

    Assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, and 3

  7. Length of Stay (ICU and Hospital)

    Duration of stay in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and total hospital length of stay from surgery to discharge

    Time frame: From date of surgery until date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days.

  8. Cumulative Opioid Consumption

    Total postoperative opioid consumption converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME).

    Time frame: From the end of surgery up to 72 hours postoperatively.

  9. Incidence of Severe Thermal Excursions

    Defined as core temperature \<35.0°C (severe hypothermia) or \>39.0°C (severe hyperthermia)

    Time frame: From the start of anesthesia induction until the end of surgery, approximately 10 hours

  10. Incidence of Thermal-Related Adverse Events

    Includes postoperative shivering requiring pharmacologic treatment and device-related skin injury (e.g., thermal burns, cold injury, pressure ulcers).

    Time frame: From the end of surgery until hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Aerospace Center Hospital
    Beijing, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07378371
Lead sponsor
Aerospace Center Hospital
Responsible party
Xinrui Yin (Principal Investigator, Aerospace Center Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 30, 2026
Start date
Feb 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 20, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
May 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 30, 2026

Study contacts

Xinrui Yin
Contact
ahywvn@pku.org.cn
+86-13029315156
Xiangli Zheng
study chair · Aerospace Center Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion