ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07375420OPTIMUSUpdated Feb 2, 2026

Will a Pre-therapy Exercise Intervention Improve the Outcomes of Patients With Advanced Oesophageal Cancer?

An interventional study of Low intensity exercise and High intensity exercise in Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma, T Cells and Tumor Microenvironment, sponsored by University of Surrey. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-02.

Sponsored by University of Surrey · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2024, registered Jan 2026).
  • Started Apr 2024; still recruiting 2 years 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background

Regular exercise can significantly improve physical and mental health during cancer treatment and reduce the time needed in the hospital. Animal studies suggest that exercise training can also reduce the number of cancer cells. For example, exercise training in mice produces more immune cells in the tumour. These immune cells in the tumour contribute to the destruction and reduction of the size of the tumour and are a vital component of effective immunotherapy (cancer treatment that helps the immune system fight cancer).

In humans, exercise training and the immune response in tumours are less understood. Only 1 study has investigated the effect of a single exercise session before surgical removal of the prostate in prostate cancer patients. As the benefits of exercise are gained from weeks/months of exercise, no effect on the immune cells in the tumours were found.

The investigators have carried out a previous study looking at how exercise affects fitness before major surgery. After this they used state-of-the-art methods to detect and visualise immune cells within the tumour. Compared with the patients who did not exercise, the exercise group had significantly more immune cells in their tumours, consisting of a group of cells that are important for killing cancerous cells called CD8+ T cells. CD8+ T cells in tumours are associated with improved survival outcomes.

Importantly, they found a link between changes in fitness and the amount of these cells in the tumour. This suggests that if there is increase in fitness, there also an increase in the frequency of these cells in the tumour. Therefore, the investigators propose performing a clinical trial to find out the best level of exercise patients need to sustain before surgery to produce this improved immune response.

The trial will aim to understand how this happens and how the entry of immune cells into the tumour changes the environment around a tumour. The investigators consist of a team of exercise immunologists, tumour immunologists and clinicians working with the Human Performance Institute at the University of Surrey in collaboration with the Royal Surrey NHS Trust.

How it will be done

The investigators will assess immune cell response in blood samples obtained from oesophageal cancer patients before, during and after a high or low intensity exercise programme. Following the exercise programme, tumour tissue removed at surgery from these patients will be used to investigate the the presence and quantity of these immune cells.

Potential impact

A better understanding of this is important, as current anti-cancer immune-based therapeutics work best when there is a an immune response within the patient's tumour. Generating evidence that exercise can improve the immune response against the tumour in patients with oesophageal cancer would provide significant justification for introducing "personalised" exercise programmes to improve treatment outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Oesophageal cancer is one of the most challenging cancers to treat, with low survival rates, even when people receive intensive treatments such as chemotherapy and surgery. New treatment strategies could therefore lead to significant benefits to patients.

One of the most promising new treatments is immunotherapy, which works by "releasing the brakes" on immune cells. Immunotherapy has transformed outcomes in some cancers, but its impact in oesophageal cancer has been modest so far. One important reason may be that many oesophageal tumours contain few active immune cells to begin with. Finding safe, practical ways to ''wake up'' the immune system and draw immune cells into the tumour could make existing treatments more effective.

Exercise is a simple, low-cost option that could help. Exercise programmes are already used before major surgery to improve fitness and help people cope better with treatment. Research in other cancers shows that exercise can increase the number and activity of key immune cells in the blood and, in some cases, inside tumours. Exercise also affects the gut microbiome. This is the community of bacteria and other microorganisms in our intestines, and the chemicals they produce. These microbial products can travel through the bloodstream and shape how the immune system behaves. However, it is still unclear yhow these changes work together in people with oesophageal cancer receiving chemotherapy.

In this study, people with oesophageal cancer who are due to receive chemotherapy before surgery will be invited to join a supervised exercise programme. All patients will exercise under the guidance of specialist staff while they are on chemotherapy. One group will follow a lower-intensity programme similar to current NHS prehabilitation. The other group will complete higher-intensity sessions, within safe limits. Comparing these two realistic options will allow us to test whether exercise intensity makes a difference.

The investigators will collect blood and stool samples at key time points before and during treatment. From blood, there will be an analysis of the changes in immune cells and proteins that signal how "switched on" the immune system is. From stool, the investigators will study the gut microbiome and the metabolites (small molecules) they produce. After surgery, the removed tumour will be examined under the microscope to see whether exercise is linked to differences in the number and type of immune cells inside the tumour. By bringing these measurements together, we hope to understand whether more intensive exercise leads to a more immune-active tumour, and how the change in immune cells alongside systemic signalling molecules are related to these states.

02

Conditions studied

  • Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
  • T Cells
  • Tumor Microenvironment
  • Exercise

Keywords

  • oesophageal cancer
  • exercise
  • tumour microenvironment
03

In context

Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus

354 studies on the registry are indexed under Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus; 81 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is close to the median of 51 across 277 interventional studies indexed under Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus.

Browse Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Surrey is the lead sponsor of 91 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults with resectable oesophageal adenocarcinoma who are planned for chemotherapy followed by surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to carry out CPET or exercise due to underlying health conditions
  • pregnancy
  • \<18 years old
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Low intensity/Low amount (LAM) arm

    Behavioral: Low intensity exercise

  • Experimental
    moderate-vigorous-intensity/moderate-high-amount (MAM) arm

    Behavioral: High intensity exercise

Interventions

  • BehavioralLow intensity exercise

    Participants undertake supervised cycling twice weekly. Each session comprises 5 min warm-up at 30% heart rate reserve (HRR), then 20 min continuous cycling starting at 40% HRR. After participants complete two supervised sessions/week at 40% HRR without adverse events, intensity increases by 5% HRR per session to a target of 60% HRR, which is maintained for the remainder of the pre-operative period (until surgery). After cycling, participants complete flexibility and resistance exercises targeting six major muscle groups (2 sets of 12 repetitions, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) 12-14), with load increased when RPE \<12. Participants also complete a home programme three times weekly (60 min/session) focusing on resistance and core stability using appropriately weighted bands.

  • BehavioralHigh intensity exercise

    Exercise Group 2 (moderate-vigorous-intensity/moderate-high-amount (MAM)) is a progressive, individualised programme with two supervised aerobic sessions/week using harness-supported treadmill walking where possible, or cycle ergometry if needed. Each session begins with 5 min at 40% heart rate reserve (HRR). For \~2 weeks, participants complete 15 min of intervals (30 s at 80% HRR then 1 min at 50% HRR), followed by 5 min cool-down at 40% HRR. Training then progresses by increasing hard bouts to 1 min, building to 20 intervals, then targeting 90%/50% HRR with gradual increases in time spent at 90% HRR. After aerobic exercise, flexibility plus resistance (chest press, leg press, seated row) is performed for 2 sets to fatigue at rating of perceived exertion (RPE) 15-17, increasing load when 2x25 reps are achieved. Home aerobic exercise is prescribed for 60 min, 3x/week at \~60% HRR using heart-rate telemetry (home cycle provided if walking not feasible).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Tumour immune infiltration

    Percentage increase of CD8 T Cells within the tumour

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 16 weeks

  2. Improvement in cardiorespiratory function

    Measured through VO2 peak

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)

    We will analyse longitudinal shifts in PBMC subsets and phenotypes.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 16 weeks

  2. Change in plasma cytokines

    We will analyse longitudinal shifts in PBMC subsets and phenotypes.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 16 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Surrey
    Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Jamal Dirie, MD · Contactjd01928@surrey.ac.uk · +446944688517
    • Jamal Dirie, MD · Sub investigator
    • Adam Frampton, PhD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2027, 36 months after the start.

Of 27 interventional studies with no phase under Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus, half reached primary completion within 52 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 41 and three quarters within 70. This study's planned 36 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 21, 2026
First posted
Jan 29, 2026
StartActual
Apr 26, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Apr 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 30, 2028
Last update
Feb 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07375420
Lead sponsor
University of Surrey
Collaborators
World Cancer Research Fund International
Responsible party
Adam Frampton (Professor Adam Frampton, University of Surrey) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 29, 2026
Start date
Apr 26, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 2, 2026

Study contacts

Jamal Dirie, MD
Contact
jd01928@surrey.ac.uk
+447944688517
Adam Frampton, PhD
principal investigator · University of Surrey

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion