CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT073703240841Updated Jan 29, 2026

Stoma Educational Program on Self-Care Practices

An interventional study of education in Urostomy Patients and Self-Care Practices, sponsored by Mansoura University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-29.

Sponsored by Mansoura University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2026, 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

provide a stoma educational program and evaluate the self-care practices and life satisfaction of urostomy patients.

Read the detailed description

The data will be collected from urostomy patients and their medical records to establish a baseline for their knowledge and educational needs. The researcher will provide an illustrated colored instructional booklet. designed educational intervention will be implemented on urostomy patients in multiple sessions

02

Conditions studied

  • Urostomy Patients
  • Self-Care Practices
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Mansoura University is the lead sponsor of 1,077 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • can communicate verbally
  • accepted to engage in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • psychiatric patients
  • patient with chronic diseases that interfere with their self-care activities as
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    control

    routine hospital care

  • Experimental
    study group

    receive educational intervention

    Other: education

Interventions

  • Othereducation

    Educational intervention will be implemented to urostomy patients in multiple sessions, which will be divided into theoretical and practical sessions as following: Theoretical session: This part will include knowledge about anatomy and physiology of urinary system, pre and post operative care, complication and life style modifications…etc. Practical session: This session will cover care of urostomy including pouch system, changing of pouch, empty of pouch, self- catheterization and irrigation of urostomy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. knowledge mean score

    measured by a questionnaire designed in the form of multiple-choice questions. Each answer receives one degree, with the exception of unknown and missed answers, which receive zero points. The scores obtained for each question were summed up to get the total score for the patients' knowledge.

    Time frame: Evaluation of patients' knowledge immediately post and 3 months later

  2. Self-care mean score

    Standardized, numerical, validated, and evidence-based measures are used to assess the stoma self-care abilities of patients undergoing UD. It comprises seven skills required to change a urostomy pouch system. Each ability was graded on a four-point scale, with values ranging from 0 to 3.

    Time frame: Evaluation of patients' knowledge immediately and 3 months later

  3. Self-efficacy mean score

    It is designed to assess a general sense of perceived self-efficacy, aiming to predict how individuals cope with daily hassles and adapt after experiencing various stressful life events, in addition to the challenges posed by the disease. Patients' responses will be categorized as follows: 1 = not being confident at all, 2 = slightly confident, 3 = fairly confident, 4 = highly confident, and 5 = extremely confident. High scores refer to positive self-efficacy, i.e., the subjective presence of ability. So the total score is 100, whereas less than 50 = low (-ve) self-efficacy and more than 50 = high (+ve) self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Evaluation of patient self- efficacy immediately post- operative and 3 months later

Secondary outcomes

  1. quality-of-life mean score

    The urinary diversion quality of life questionnaire designed to assess quality of life for urinary diversion patients. It consists of questions that explored general condition and physical condition, reconstruction-related symptoms, psychological status, sexual life, social status, and satisfaction with the treatment. Patients' responses were categorized as follows: 1- not at all, 2- a little, 3- much, 4- very much.

    Time frame: Assess patients' quality of life 3 months later

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of Nursing
    Al Mansurah, 35516, Egypt
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07370324
Lead sponsor
Mansoura University
Responsible party
Heba Abubakr Mohamed Salama (Assist prof, Mansoura University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 27, 2026
Start date
Dec 10, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 29, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion