ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07369570REMRIUpdated Feb 24, 2026

Evolution of Lesions in Repeated Biparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging

An interventional study of MRI in Prostate Cancer (Diagnosis), sponsored by University of Eastern Finland. Recruiting at 1 site in Finland. Open to male participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-24.

Sponsored by University of Eastern Finland · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to prospectively investigate the evolution of lesions in biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) of the prostate in men with no clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in their initial biopsy. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does lesion progression in bpMRI predict a diagnosis of csPCa in per-protocol follow-up biopsies?

What are the radiological and clinical risk factors for csPCa in per-protocol follow-up biopsies?

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer (Diagnosis)

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • mri
  • evolution
  • progression
  • pi-rads
  • significant
  • likert
  • pirads
  • biparametric
  • bpmri
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

7,046 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,580 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 60 across 5,348 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Eastern Finland is the lead sponsor of 54 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Suspicion of a local prostate cancer
  • Patient have 1-2 PI-RADS 3-5 lesion/lesions in biparametric prostate MRI, with no ISUP 2-5 prostate cancer in an initial systematic or lesion-targeted (at least two cores per lesion) biopsy
  • Prostate biopsies can be taken via transrectal approach in an outpatient clinic
  • An estimated life expentancy exceeding 10 years
  • The patient is cooperative, fluent in Finnish and understands the significance of the study
  • The patient signs an form approved by the ethics committee.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient had undergone prostate prior to the biopsies that led to recruitment for the current study.
  • The physician's suspicion of a locally advanced or a high risk prostate cancer. Absolute exclusion criteria are PSA >20 ng/ml or T4 staged prostate finding MRI or clinical examination
  • Seriuos infectious or non-infectious complication after initial biopsy
  • Deep due to organ transplant, hematologic disease, or related causes.
  • Any treatment given for prostate cancer diagnosed in initial biopsy
  • Hip prosthesis or any other object in the pelvic area that affects high-quality MRI
  • Claustrophobia or other absolute or relative for high-quality MRI
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Follow up arm

    Follow-up MRI and biopsy

    Diagnostic Test: MRI

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testMRI

    Biparametric follow-up prostate MRI and biopsies (systematic and targeted) for all study patients within one year, or earlier if the PSA value measured every three months increases by more than 50% from the baseline level in study inclusion, or if the physician has any other suspicion of high-risk prostate cancer.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evolution of MRI lesions

    The evolution of biparametric prostate MRI findings during follow-up, assessed by the PRECISE score (1-5) using repeated biparametric prostate MRI-scan. Higher PRECISE score is associated with a higher risk of significant prostate cancer in prostate biopsy.

    Time frame: 3-12 months

  2. Evolution of MRI lesions

    The evolution of biparametric prostate MRI findings (lesions) during follow-up, assessed by PI-RADS version 2.1 score (1-5), using repeated biparametric prostate MRI-scan. Higher PI-RADS score is associated with a higher risk of significant prostate cancer in prostate biopsy.

    Time frame: 3-12 months

  3. Evolution of MRI lesions

    The evolution of biparametric prostate MRI findings during follow-up, assessed by lesional ADC value (s/mm2) using repeated biparametric prostate MRI-scan.

    Time frame: 3-12 months

  4. Evolution of MRI lesions

    The evolution of biparametric prostate MRI lesions appearance in transrectal ultrasound (visible/non-visible) during follow up using repeated transrectal ultrasound.

    Time frame: 3-12 months

  5. Evolution of clinical factors

    Assessment the effect of age (years) to the biopsy result in follow up prostate biopsy.

    Time frame: 3-12 months

  6. Evolution of clinical factors

    Assessment the effect of PSA (ng/ml) level in baseline and during a follow up to the follow up prostate biopsy result using repeated laboratory tests and repeated prostate biopsy

    Time frame: 3-12 months

  7. Evolution of clinical factors

    Assessment the effect of prostate size (g) to the biopsy result in follow up prostate biopsy. These factors will be measured by repeated biparametric prostate MRI scan and repeated prostate biopsy.

    Time frame: 3-12 months

  8. Evolution of clinical factors

    Assessment the effect of PSA density (prostate size \[g\]/PSA value \[ng/ml\]) in baseline and follow up to the biopsy result in follow up prostate biopsy. These factors will be measured by repeated biparametric prostate MRI scan, repeated laboratory tests and repeated prostate biopsy.

    Time frame: 3-12 months

  9. Biopsy result during follow up

    Amount of prostate cancer and prostate cancer upgrade/downgrade in repeated systematic and lesion targeted prostate biopsy during the follow up. Prostate biopsy result will be graded using ISUP Gleason Grade Group (benign, 1-5). Higher ISUP Gleason Grade Groups score is associated with a worse oncological outcomes.

    Time frame: 3-12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07369570
Lead sponsor
University of Eastern Finland
Responsible party
Juha Knaapila (MD, PhD, University of Eastern Finland) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 27, 2026
Start date
Feb 23, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2037 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 24, 2026

Study contacts

Juha Knaapila, MD, PhD
Contact
juha.knaapila@pshyvinvointialue.fi
+358447178679

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion