CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07368517Updated Jan 26, 2026

Dry Needling for Mechanical Neck Pain

An interventional study of Dry Needling with Exercise and Conventional Physiotherapy with Exercise in Mechanical Neck Pain, Neck Pain and Musculoskeletal Disorders, sponsored by Deraya University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 25 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-26.

Sponsored by Deraya University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2025, registered Jan 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Mechanical neck pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders among adults. It is characterized by pain and stiffness in the cervical region, often related to poor posture, repetitive movements, or prolonged sitting. The condition can lead to functional limitations and decreased quality of life.

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of dry needling therapy on pain intensity, cervical range of motion, and functional ability in patients with mechanical neck pain. Forty participants aged 25 - 65 years will be randomly assigned to two groups. Group A will receive dry needling combined with neck exercises, while Group B will receive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), ultrasound, and the same neck exercise program. Both groups will undergo treatment three times per week for four weeks.

Primary outcomes include changes in the Neck Disability Index (NDI), pressure pain threshold (PPT) measured by algometer, and cervical range of motion (CROM). The study will determine whether dry needling provides superior clinical improvement compared with conventional electrotherapy and exercise.

Read the detailed description

Mechanical neck pain (MNP) affects a large proportion of adults between 25 and 65 years of age. It is commonly associated with sustained poor posture, repetitive movement, or prolonged sitting, leading to muscular tightness and joint stiffness in the cervical region. Patients typically present with pain, limited cervical mobility, and decreased ability to perform daily activities.

Dry needling is a minimally invasive technique that involves inserting fine monofilament needles into myofascial trigger points to reduce muscle tension, improve circulation, and alleviate pain. It is increasingly used in physiotherapy practice as a targeted intervention for musculoskeletal pain conditions. By releasing taut muscle bands, dry needling is believed to normalize muscle tone and restore normal movement patterns.

The current randomized controlled trial is designed to assess the effectiveness of dry needling combined with therapeutic exercise compared with conventional physiotherapy including TENS, ultrasound, and the same exercise regimen. Forty participants with mechanical neck pain will be randomly allocated into two equal groups (n = 20 per group).

Group A (Experimental): Dry needling will be applied to the upper trapezius and deltoid muscles under aseptic technique. Each needle will be inserted 5 - 10 mm deep and retained for approximately 30 seconds. This intervention will be combined with a neck exercise program consisting of chin-in exercises (3 sets × 10 repetitions, 5-second hold) and a muscle-energy technique for the upper trapezius (3 repetitions per side, 5 - 10 second holds).

Group B (Active Comparator): Participants will receive TENS at 80 - 100 Hz frequency, 100 µs pulse duration for 20 minutes, and pulsed ultrasound at 1 MHz, 1.0 - 1.5 W/cm² for 5 minutes. The same chin-in and muscle-energy exercise protocol will be applied.

Both groups will receive three sessions per week for four weeks. Assessments will include:

Pain and disability using the Neck Disability Index (NDI).

Pressure pain threshold (PPT) using a handheld algometer.

Cervical range of motion (CROM) using a cervical range-of-motion device.

Outcomes will be recorded at baseline and after four weeks of treatment. It is hypothesized that dry needling will produce greater reductions in pain and disability and larger improvements in cervical motion compared with conventional therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mechanical Neck Pain
  • Neck Pain
  • Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Cervical Spine Dysfunction

Keywords

  • Mechanical Neck Pain
  • Dry Needling
  • Myofascial Trigger Points
  • Cervical Spine
  • Cervical Range of Motion
  • Physical Therapy
03

In context

Neck Pain

1,232 studies on the registry are indexed under Neck Pain; 255 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 52 across 1,004 interventional studies indexed under Neck Pain.

Browse Neck Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Deraya University is the lead sponsor of 48 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Medically stable individuals who provide written informed consent to participate in the study.
  • Age between 25 and 65 years.
  • Both male and female participants.
  • Patients diagnosed with mechanical neck pain lasting more than three months.
  • Presence of myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius or cervical muscles confirmed by palpation.
  • Ability to follow treatment instructions and attend all scheduled sessions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of neck surgery or cervical spine fracture.
  • Previous dry needling or invasive therapy for neck pain in the past six months.
  • History of neurological disorders (e.g., cervical radiculopathy, myelopathy).
  • Current acute infection, skin disease, or open wound in the neck or shoulder region.
  • Use of anticoagulant medication or any bleeding disorder.
  • Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy.
  • Any systemic illness (e.g., diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis) that may affect healing or pain perception.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dry Needling with Exercise

    Participants in this group will receive dry needling to the upper trapezius and deltoid muscles under aseptic conditions. Needles will be inserted 5-10 mm deep and held for approximately 30 seconds, then discarded. This intervention will be combined with a neck exercise program including chin-in exercises (3 sets × 10 repetitions, 5-second holds) and a muscle energy technique (3 repetitions per side, holding 5-10 seconds). Sessions: three per week for four weeks.

    Other: Dry Needling with Exercise

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Physiotherapy with Exercise

    Participants in this group will receive conventional physiotherapy including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) at 80-100 Hz, 100 µs pulse duration for 20 minutes, and pulsed ultrasound at 1 MHz, 1.0-1.5 W/cm² for 5 minutes. The same exercise program will be applied (chin-in and muscle-energy technique). Sessions: three per week for four weeks.

    Other: Conventional Physiotherapy with Exercise

Interventions

  • OtherDry Needling with Exercise

    Manual therapy procedure using sterile, single-use needles inserted into the upper trapezius and deltoid muscles for approximately 30 seconds to reduce trigger point activity. Combined with neck exercises (chin-in and muscle-energy technique). Administered three times per week for four weeks.

  • OtherConventional Physiotherapy with Exercise

    Standard physiotherapy treatment consisting of TENS (80-100 Hz, 100 µs, 20 min) and ultrasound (1 MHz, 1.0-1.5 W/cm², 5 min) combined with neck exercises (chin-in and muscle-energy technique). Administered three times per week for four weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a 10-item self-reported questionnaire used to assess how mechanical neck pain affects daily activities. Each item is scored from 0 to 5, and total scores are converted to a percentage, with higher values indicating greater disability. It is a valid and reliable tool for monitoring functional improvement after physiotherapy interventions.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment

  2. Change in Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)

    Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) will be measured using a digital algometer. It represents the minimum pressure that elicits pain and provides an objective assessment of muscle tenderness and trigger point sensitivity. Higher values indicate reduced pain sensitivity. Measurements will be taken over the upper trapezius muscle in kg/cm².

    Time frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment

  3. Change in Cervical Range of Motion (CROM)

    Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) will be assessed using a CROM device that quantifies cervical flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation. Measurements will be taken in degrees. The device provides objective and reproducible data on cervical spine mobility and is used to evaluate the effect of treatment on movement limitations.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • faculty of physical therapy, Deraya University
    Minya, Menia Governorate, Egypt
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ebadi, S., Ansari, N. N., Naghdi, S., & Jalaie, S. (2018). The effect of therapeutic ultrasound on neck pain: A systematic review. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 44(3), 566-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.11.014
  • Audette I, Dumas JP, Cote JN, De Serres SJ. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 May;40(5):318-23. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3180. PubMed 20436238 ↗
  • Tousignant-Laflamme, Y., Boutin, A., Dion, A. M., & Vallée, C. A. (2017). Reliability and criterion validity of two applications of the cervical range of motion device. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 33(2), 140-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2016.1271845
  • Vaegter HB, Handberg G, Graven-Nielsen T. Similarities between exercise-induced hypoalgesia and conditioned pain modulation in humans. Pain. 2014 Jan;155(1):158-167. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.09.023. Epub 2013 Sep 26. PubMed 24076045 ↗
  • Walton DM, Macdermid JC, Nielson W, Teasell RW, Chiasson M, Brown L. Reliability, standard error, and minimum detectable change of clinical pressure pain threshold testing in people with and without acute neck pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011 Sep;41(9):644-50. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3666. Epub 2011 Sep 1. PubMed 21885906 ↗
  • Vernon H. The Neck Disability Index: state-of-the-art, 1991-2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Sep;31(7):491-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.006. PubMed 18803999 ↗
  • Navarro-Santana MJ, Sanchez-Infante J, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Cleland JA, Martin-Casas P, Plaza-Manzano G. Effectiveness of Dry Needling for Myofascial Trigger Points Associated with Neck Pain Symptoms: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 14;9(10):3300. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103300. PubMed 33066556 ↗
  • Liu L, Huang QM, Liu QG, Ye G, Bo CZ, Chen MJ, Li P. Effectiveness of dry needling for myofascial trigger points associated with neck and shoulder pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;96(5):944-55. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.015. Epub 2015 Jan 7. PubMed 25576642 ↗
  • Gross AR, Paquin JP, Dupont G, Blanchette S, Lalonde P, Cristie T, Graham N, Kay TM, Burnie SJ, Gelley G, Goldsmith CH, Forget M, Santaguida PL, Yee AJ, Radisic GG, Hoving JL, Bronfort G; Cervical Overview Group. Exercises for mechanical neck disorders: A Cochrane review update. Man Ther. 2016 Aug;24:25-45. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 Apr 20. PubMed 27317503 ↗
  • Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, Devaney LL, Clewley D, Walton DM, Sparks C, Robertson EK. Neck Pain: Revision 2017. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jul;47(7):A1-A83. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.0302. PubMed 28666405 ↗
  • Cote P, Wong JJ, Sutton D, Shearer HM, Mior S, Randhawa K, Ameis A, Carroll LJ, Nordin M, Yu H, Lindsay GM, Southerst D, Varatharajan S, Jacobs C, Stupar M, Taylor-Vaisey A, van der Velde G, Gross DP, Brison RJ, Paulden M, Ammendolia C, David Cassidy J, Loisel P, Marshall S, Bohay RN, Stapleton J, Lacerte M, Krahn M, Salhany R. Management of neck pain and associated disorders: A clinical practice guideline from the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2000-22. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4467-7. Epub 2016 Mar 16. PubMed 26984876 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 26, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07368517
Lead sponsor
Deraya University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 26, 2026
Start date
Oct 5, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2025
Completion
Dec 15, 2025
Last update
Jan 26, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion