Implementing Suicide Prevention Into Primary Care in Nepal

Browse trials for

• Suicide 607Registry's first term
• Suicide Prevention 186Primary · reclassified

Keywords

• suicide prevention
• primary care
• implementation science
• Nepal

Suicide Prevention Reclassified

186 studies on the registry are indexed under Suicide Prevention; 92 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 147 is close to the median of 140 across 167 interventional studies indexed under Suicide Prevention.

Lead sponsor

Yale University is the lead sponsor of 1,770 studies on the registry; 294 are open to participants now.

Of its 221 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 129 (58%) have results posted.

Study arms

• No intervention
  Treatment As Usual

  PCPs will receive standard or refresher mhGAP training. The training follows Nepal's district mental health plan for primary care workers with prescribing credentials. Paramedical staff are included because most primary healthcare facilities lack doctors, making them the primary frontline primary care providers. The training is based on the WHO mhGAP Intervention Guide and focuses on five priority conditions in Nepal: depression, psychosis, epilepsy, alcohol use disorder, and suicide. Training is delivered over 5 days by a Nepali psychiatrist with government issued credentials to facilitate mhGap training and subsequent ongoing supervision. After training, PCPs receive psychiatric supervision approximately every three months as per the Nepal government mhGap protocol. Patient participants in the TAU arm will receive the services based on mhGAP treatment protocols.

• Experimental
  TAU+Suicide Prevention Package (PSuPP)

  PCPs will receive all components of TAU. In addition, they receive an implementation package to optimize mhGAP siucide prevention delivery. The implementation package includes: \[assessment optimization\] systematic assessment training using systematized screening questions, an embedded decision-support tool, \[risk management optimization\] culturally adapted safety planning, and \[follow up care optimization\] a collaborative care protocol with Community Health Workers (CHWs) to support patient follow-up uptake and continued care. Participants in the PSuPP arm will receive all TAU services with aforementioned implementation strategies.

  Behavioral: Suicide Prevention Package (PSuPP)

Interventions

• BehavioralSuicide Prevention Package (PSuPP)

  Implementation package to optimize mhGAP siucide prevention delivery which includes: \[assessment optimization\] systematic assessment training using systematized screening questions, an embedded decision-support tool, \[risk management optimization\] culturally adapted safety planning, and \[follow up care optimization\] a collaborative care protocol with CHWs to support patient follow-up uptake and continued care.

Primary outcomes

1. Percent intervention arm uptake to assess feasibility

   Percent primary care providers (PCPs) that attend the implementation training. Feasibility will be defined as 70% or more uptake.

   Time frame: 6 months

2. Percentage of interviews that hold themes

   Qualitative feasibility acceptability data will be deemed acceptable if it demonstrates provider and patient perceptions of P-SuPP benefits to clinical care and mhGAP implementation and the absence of themes that suggest -SuPP is disruptive, unlikeable, and unacceptable. Acceptability will be assessed as the percentage of interviews that hold themes suggesting SuPP is disruptive, unlikeable, and unacceptable.

   Time frame: 6 months

3. Percent retention to assess feasibility

   Percent participants enrolled (PCPs and Patients) who complete the study of all enrolled. Feasibility is established as retention of at least 65% completion of 6 month follow up of patients and PCPs.

   Time frame: 6 months

4. Structured checklist to assess fidelity

   18-item structured checklist assessed in a standardized behavioral rehearsal to assess fidelity to the mhGAP suicide module protocol

   Time frame: 6 months

5. Percent successful allocation procedures

   Percent successful allocation procedures followed

   Time frame: 6 months

6. Percent adherence to the randomization protocol

   Percent adherence to the randomization protocol

   Time frame: 6 months

7. Percent deviations to the randomization protocol

   Percent deviations to the randomization protocol

   Time frame: 6 months

8. Percent participants who completed all follow up measures

   Percent participants who completed all follow up measures

   Time frame: 6 months

9. Percent missing measure items per participant

   Percent missing measure items per participant

   Time frame: 6 months

10. Mean Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSSI) score

    Suicide ideation severity measured with BSSI. BSSI is a 19-item self-report instrument for detecting and measuring the current intensity of the patients' specific attitudes, behaviors, and plans to commit suicide during the past week. The first 19 items consist of three options graded are on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 to 2. These items are then summed to yield a total score, which ranges from 0 to 36. Higher scores indicate higher severity of suicide ideation. Assessed in patients only.

    Time frame: Baseline; 3 months; 6 months

Secondary outcomes

1. Suicide Prevention Knowledge survey

   The mhGAP knowledge survey includes 9 items related to suicide specific knowledge related to suicide risk presentation, management, and carer engagement aligned with the mhGAP suicide prevention protocol. Total score range XXXXX. Higher scores indicate more knowledge. Assessed in PCPs only.

   Time frame: Baseline, 3 months; 6 months

2. Mean Self-Efficacy in Mental Health Care survey score

   The mhGAP Self Efficacy is a self-administered measure assessing healthcare providers' confidence in assessing, diagnosing, and managing mental health conditions. Our adapted tool has 45 items across all domains and 8 items that focus specifically on suicide. Respondents select a range of responses between 1 and 5 with 1 feeling totally unable to do the domain and 5 feeling totally able to do the domain. Higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy. Assessed in PCPs only.

   Time frame: Baseline; 3 month; 6 month

3. Mean Clinical Competency and Communication Skills (ENACT) score

   This is an observed role play with a trained rater to assess competence and interpersonal skills in delivering mental health interventions. The tool evaluates core competencies in psychological care delivery including: Communication, Emotional Engagement, Assessment, Social Relations, Planning and Process. communication skills, empathy, active listening, and patient engagement. Total score range 0-3. Higher scores indicate higher competence. Assessed in PCPs only.

   Time frame: Baseline; 6 months

4. Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale

   The CSSRS asks about self-reported suicide attempt, aborted attempt, preparatory behavior, and interrupted attempt with "yes" or "no" questions branching format. Any positive responses to these behaviors will be coded as 'yes'. Behaviors are assessed at baseline as the past 3 months and lifetime and subsequent assessments have a window of the past three months. Participants will be categorized as low, medium or high risk based on their answers to specific questions. Assessed in patients only.

   Time frame: Baseline; 3 months; 6 months

5. Mean Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) score

   Depression measured with PHQ-9. PHQ-9 is a 9-item validated questionnaire. Each item asks about the frequency of specific depressive symptoms experienced over the past two weeks. The response options are scored from 0 to 3, indicating "not at all" to "nearly every day." The item scores are summed with total score on the PHQ-9 ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms.

   Time frame: Baseline; 3 months; 6 months

6. Mean Suicide Cognitions Scale (SCS) score

   The SCS includes 21 items that assess suicide-related cognitions, including negative expectations about the future, maladaptive self-perceptions, and emotional pain. The scale asks respondents to rate the extent to which they agree with experience specific suicide-related thoughts and beliefs. Responses are recorded on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 5 from strongly disagree to strongly agree, and item scores are summed to produce a total score (21-105), with higher scores indicating greater severity of suicide-related cognitive distress. Assessed in patients only.

   Time frame: Baseline; 3 months; 6 months

7. Suicide-Related Coping Scale (SRCS) - Internal Coping Skills

   Assess suicide-related internal coping skills (7 items on 5-point scales; scores range from 0 to 28 with higher scores indicating better internal coping). Assessed in patients only.

   Time frame: Baseline; 3 months; 6 months

8. Suicide-Related Coping Scale (SRCS) - External Coping Skills

   Assess suicide-related internal coping skills (7 items on 5-point scales; scores range from 0 to 28 with higher scores indicating better external coping). Assessed in patients only.

   Time frame: Baseline; 3 months; 6 months

9. Mean Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) score

   Anxiety measured with GAD-7, a 7 item self report instrument that measures anxiety Items are scored on a 4-point scale, ranging from "not at all (0)" to "nearly everyday (3)". Item scores are summed with a total score ranging from 0 to 21: 0-4 Minimal anxiety; 5-9 Mild anxiety; 10-14 Moderate anxiety; 15-21 Severe anxiety. Assessed in patients only.

   Time frame: Baseline; 3 months; 6 months

10. Mean Social Connectedness Scale score

    The Social Connectedness Scale consists of 8 items that assess perceived sense of closeness, belonging, and connection with others. The scale consists of multiple items that ask respondents to rate their agreement on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 indicating strong disagreement and 5 indicating strong agreement. Higher scores indicate higher social connection. Assessed in patients only.

    Time frame: Baseline; 3 months; 6 months

11. Client Service Receipt Inventory to assess health service uptake

    Percent services utilized will be assessed using the Client Services Receipt Inventory which measures use of health and social care services ranging from community delivered care from community health workers, to primary care services, to specialist services, and traditional health services. Assessed in patients only.

    Time frame: Baseline; 3 months; 6 months

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Only de-identified data will be shared through NIH designated data repositories consistent with data sharing under the NIH GDS policy. Clinical data of those research participants who will provide consent for sharing their data will be be included.