ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07358832MULTICAMPOUpdated Jan 22, 2026

Neuromodulation Through Multisensory Stimulation for Visual Field Deficits in the Subacute Stage of Disease

An interventional study of tDCS and Audio-visual training in Homonymous Hemianopsia and Stroke, sponsored by Istituto Auxologico Italiano. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-22.

Sponsored by Istituto Auxologico Italiano · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Homonymous visual field defects (HVFDs) after acquired brain injuries affect daily life by impairing reading, navigation, and social activities, often impacting anxiety and depression. Spontaneous recovery is rare. Rehabilitation approaches include restorative treatments, which aim to expand the visual field through the stimulation of the so-called transition zone, and compensatory strategies, such as audio-visual training (AVT), which combines eye movement exercises with synchronized visual and auditory cues to train oculomotor scanning and overcome the visual field loss. Combining AVT with non-invasive brain stimulation, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), may enhance recovery by promoting brain plasticity. Early evidence suggests that tDCS applied to the lesioned visual cortex during AVT can speed and stabilize improvements, potentially also restoring parts of the visual field. However, most studies on AVT have focused on chronic patients, whereas several clinical trials and international guidelines indicate that early treatment of HVFDs in the subacute phase can optimally exploit the window of maximal neural plasticity and prevent secondary degenerative processes, thereby maximizing visual recovery.

In the present randomized clinical trial, we assess the efficacy of a multisensory audio-visual training (AVT) combined with tDCS in patients with subacute HVFDs after stroke (\<3 months post-lesion). Participants are randomly assigned to two groups: AVT combined with real anodal tDCS applied to the lesioned occipital cortex (Group 1), or AVT combined with sham tDCS (Group 2).

The AVT requires participants to orient their gaze toward spatio-temporally congruent, cross-modal audio-visual stimuli (starting from a central fixation) and press a button as quickly as possible upon detecting the visual target. All stimuli are presented on 2mx2m panel embedded with 40 LEDs and loudspeakers (Diana, Casati, Melzi, Marzoli, et al., 2024). The training will be administered for 90 minutes daily over 10 consecutive days.

All participants underwent a neuro-ophthalmological evaluation and neuropsychological assessment of visuospatial functions before the beginning of the training (t0), at the end of the training (t1), at 2 months (t2) and after 1 year (t3).

02

Conditions studied

  • Homonymous Hemianopsia
  • Stroke
03

In context

Hemianopsia

63 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemianopsia; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 48 is above the median of 32 across 53 interventional studies indexed under Hemianopsia.

Browse Hemianopsia studies →

Lead sponsor

Istituto Auxologico Italiano is the lead sponsor of 202 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

- Presence of subacute acquired brain injury (\< 3 months) with HVFD according to Neurophthalmological evaluation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of hemispatial neglect (indexed by pathological asymmetries on paper-and-pencil tests)
  • Disorders of conjugated eye movements
  • Other neurological disorders (e.g., dementia)
  • Exclusion criteria for brain stimulation (i.e., epilepsy or family history of epilepsy; implanted electrodes, stimulators, pacemakers, infusion pumps, or any implanted metal device; pregnancy)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
48 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Anodal Occipital tDCS + audio-visual training

    Anodal tDCS on ipsilesional occipital cortex. Anode electrode placed on O1/O2 (10-20 EEG system) and reference electrode placed on the contralateral forehead. Stimulation delivered at 2mA during the first 30 minutes of the audio-visual training.

    Device: tDCS · Behavioral: Audio-visual training

  • Sham comparator
    Sham tDCS + audio-visual training

    Same montage as for Experimental group. Stimulator is turned off after 30s of the audio-visual training.

    Device: tDCS · Behavioral: Audio-visual training

Interventions

  • DevicetDCS

    Anodal or sham tDCS (see "Arms") is applied during the execution of an audio-visual training.

  • BehavioralAudio-visual training

    90 min/day x 10 days. Participants are seated in front of a 2 m × 2 m training board, at a distance of 1.2 m, in a dimly lit room. The board features 48 red light-emitting diodes (LED, diameter 1 cm, luminance 90 cd m2), distributed in six horizontal rows (eight lights per row). Forty-eight piezoelectric loudspeakers (0.4 W, 8Ω) are located above each light, producing a white-noise (80 dB, duration 100 ms). Spatio-temporally congruent, cross-modal, audio-visual stimuli are presented at one out of 48 possible positions on the board. Participants are instructed to look at the fixation point - at the center of the apparatus - and to move their eyes to detect the presence of the visual stimulus (duration=100 ms) by pressing right button of a wireless mouse.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in Humphrey Visual Field perimetry

    Mean Deviation (MD) values of both eyes will be averaged and used for the analyses. Negative values will reflect a deviation from the expected performance in the participant's age group, hence a visual field defect.

    Time frame: At baseline (at the beginning of the treatment), at the end of the treatment, at 2- and 12-month follow-ups

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in Accuracy and reaction time on the EF Task

    Computerized visual search task. Participants have to search for the target letter "F" surrounded by distractors "E"s. Accuracy: the proportion of correct responses (range 0-1). RTs: median search times (seconds) of correct responses.

    Time frame: At baseline (at the beginning of the treatment), at the end of the treatment, at 2- and 12-month follow-ups

  2. Change from baseline in Accuracy and Reaction times on the Triangle Task

    Computerized visual search task. Participants have to report the number of triangles (targets) surrounded by square distractors. Accuracy: the proportion of correct responses (range 0-1). RTs: median search times (seconds) of correct responses.

    Time frame: At baseline (at the beginning of the treatment), at the end of the treatment, at 2- and 12-month follow-ups

  3. Change from baseline in Accuracy and RTs on the Visual Detection Task

    Detection of visual stimuli presented on the same panel employed for the training. Accuracy (the proportion of detected stimuli; range 0-1) is calculated for both the sighted and the blind hemifields. RTs: median search times of the detected stimuli are calculated for both the sighted and the blind hemifields.

    Time frame: At baseline (at the beginning of the treatment), at the end of the treatment, at 2- and 12-month follow-ups

  4. Change in retinal layers thickness assessed with Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

    Non-invasive medical imaging technique that uses light waves to create high-resolution, cross-sectional pictures (tomograms) of retinal layers. We will assess the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber and the macular ganglion cell complex layers

    Time frame: At baseline (at the beginning of the treatment), at 2- and 12-month follow-ups

  5. Change in Visual Evoked Potential amplitude

    We will record with electroencephalography pattern reversal VEPs from monocular stimulation of each visual hemifield. We will analyzed the amplitude of P100 component.

    Time frame: At baseline (at the beginning of the treatment), at the end of the treatment and at 12-month follow-ups

  6. Change from baseline in the functional scale assessing the impact of vision loss in everyday life activities

    We will use the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 100.

    Time frame: At baseline (at the beginning of the treatment), at the end of the treatment, at 12-month follow-ups

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Feb 2026; primary completion for Feb 2028, 24 months later.

Of 36 interventional studies with no phase under Hemianopsia, half reached primary completion within 47 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 95. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 14, 2026
First posted
Jan 22, 2026
StartEst.
Feb 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Feb 28, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jan 31, 2029
Last update
Jan 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07358832
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 22, 2026
Start date
Feb 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 22, 2026

Study contacts

Nadia Bolognini, PhD
Contact
n.bolognini@auxologico.it
02619116127 ext. +39

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion