CClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07343375PREGENERATEUpdated Apr 2, 2026

Effect of High-intensity Interval Training on the Lung in Patients With COPD Referred for Lung Volume Reduction Surgery: The PREGENERATE Trial

An interventional study of High Intensity interval training (HIIT) in COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), sponsored by Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Denmark. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-02.

Sponsored by Rigshospitalet, Denmark · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) suffer from a progressive loss of lung function that leads to poor quality of life, and often invalidity and early death. Regular exercise can improve quality of life in these patients, but there is a lack in understanding the underlying mechanism of exercise-induced improvement in COPD and it is widely thought not to have any effect on the lung as such. In the present study, the investigators aim to investigate the impact of an extensive high-intensity interval training (HIIT)-based exercise scheme on the regenerative capacity of the lung in patients with COPD on waiting list for lung volume reduction surgery.

Design: Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

Intervention: 24 persons with COPD referred for lung volume reduction surgery will randomly be allocated (1:1) to prehabilitation with high intensity interval training (HIIT) or non-exercise control.

Outcomes: The primary outcome is differences in change in differential protein composition in distal lung tissue between HIIT and control groups post-intervention using spatial multimodal proteomics. Furthermore, lung tissue mass, protein composition (mass spectrometry and spatial omics e.g. MACSima), pulmonary blood volume, blood protein profile (biomarkers), diffusion capacity at rest and during exercise, oxygen consumption tests, body composition scan, distal airspace radii and physical functional tests will be measured before and after the intervention.

Perspective: This study may fundamentally change the view on the regenerative potential of the lungs in COPD.

Read the detailed description

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) suffer from a progressive loss of lung function that leads to low physical performance, poor quality of life, and early death. Pulmonary rehabilitation, including exercise training, is considered the most effective non-pharmacological intervention for improving quality of life in patients with COPD. However, its use is halted by the lack of understanding of the mechanism of exercise-induced improvement in COPD, and is widely thought not to have any effect on lung function, at least as measured by dynamic spirometry and diffusion capacity measured at rest in the upright position. It is thus mainly considered a mean to alleviate symptoms, primarily by improving skeletal muscle function, but without the potential to reverse any structural changes within the pulmonary system which are seen in patients with COPD. The rationale for recommending exercise as a way to reduce symptom burden and increase quality of life, is based on the finding from the most recent Cochrane review. The authors stated that no additional studies comparing exercise with control were warranted, as exercise per se leads to improvements, regardless of the type of exercise.

The reasoning for not prescribing exercise more widely to patients with COPD is based on two assumptions: 1) new tissue cannot be formed in the adult lung, and 2) no consistent exercise training-induced changes in lung function have previously been documented.

However, de novo tissue formation has repeatedly been demonstrated in the adult lung, both in animals and humans, primarily in response to prolonged hypoxia and pneumonectomy. It has recently been reported that interval-based training counteracts the progressive loss of lung tissue in animal models of experimental COPD. The most likely stimulus is the mechanical strain, and if any measurable changes are to be induced by training, a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) scheme is preferable to be initiated in pulmonary rehabilitation.

An aspect of the progressive lung tissue loss in COPD that sets in from the very early stages of disease, seemingly before any ventilatory disturbance can be observed, is pulmonary vascular dysfunction and loss of pulmonary capillaries, driven by a seemingly disease-specific imbalance between angiogenetic and angiostatic processes in the pulmonary vasculature. Indeed, this is likely a mechanism that drives the concomitant loss of lung tissue, and also limits exercise capacity as the ability to expand the alveolar-capillary membrane though pulmonary capillary recruitment and distension becomes limited, thus critically attenuating oxygen uptake during exercise.

It is now well-established that the human lung conceals a diverse population of mechanosensitive progenitor and stem cells that appear to be dormant in COPD. Their reactivation by the stretch and strain as well as high vascular pressures associated with for example physical activity may likely explain why interval-based training has been found to counteract the progressive loss of lung tissue in animal models of experimental COPD. The investigators have developed in vitro protocols for assessing the regenerative capacity of the lung, and the next step will be to develop similar protocols for the human lung, both in the healthy state and from patients with COPD. In the present pilot study, the investigators will investigate the effects of an extensive high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on the regenerative capacity of the lung as determined by in vitro lung organoid culture and vascular tissue engineering 3D methods on patients with COPD on waiting list for lung volume reduction surgery.

Primary objective: To investigate whether prehabilitation with supervised HIIT while on waiting list for lung volume reduction surgery affects regenerative pathways in the lung. The investigators aim to determine if these effects can be detected non-invasively using blood biomarkers and spatial omics technologies to map region-specific molecular changes, cellular composition, and structural remodelling in lung tissue.

Secondary objectives: To determine whether an increase in blood volume is associated with an increased lung tissue mass (LTM), pulmonary blood volume (PBV), reduced symptom severity, and pulmonary diffusing capacity at rest and during exercise. To use explanted tissue to develop ex vivo models for disease and repair mechanisms.

Research hypotheses:

Primary: Prehabilitation while on waiting list for lung volume reduction surgery is superior to a non-exercise control group for increasing activating regenerative pathways in the lung with concomitant changes in LTM and PBV.

Secondary: Diffusing capacity during exercise and quality of life increases following prehabilitation with HIIT compared to a non-exercise control group. Finally, it is hypothesized that functional outcomes, V̇O2peak, body composition and cardiac output will be improved despite no/or limited changes in lung function in the HIIT group.

02

Conditions studied

  • COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
03

In context

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

4,131 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 697 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 70 across 2,926 interventional studies indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive.

Browse Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

Rigshospitalet, Denmark is the lead sponsor of 1,017 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women
  • Referred for lung volume reduction surgery at Rigshospitalet because of emphysematous COPD.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  • Symptoms of ischaemic heart disease
  • Known heart failure
  • Unable to complete or understand HIIT training
  • Claudication
  • Symptoms of acute disease within 2 weeks prior to the study
  • Known malignant disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Unstable cardiac arrhythmic disease
  • Renal or liver dysfunction

    • Known chronic kidney or liver disease
    • Elevated creatinine, urea, alanine transaminase (ALAT), aspartate transaminase (ASAT), bilirubin, basic phosphatases at blood test
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Exercise group

    The HIIT intervention group includes three supervised sessions per week over the period while on waitinglist for lung volumen reduction surgery. These will take place at either CFAS or at home and will be supervised

    Behavioral: High Intensity interval training (HIIT)

  • No intervention
    Control group

    Controls will be encouraged to maintain current exercise habits for the duration of the study.

Interventions

  • BehavioralHigh Intensity interval training (HIIT)

    The HIIT intervention consist of 4 intervals with each lasting 4 minutes (4x4min). If a participant reports discomfort related to the length of the intervals or start to feel unmotivated by performing the same exercise, we will use another HIIT protocol: 10x1min. The 4x4min HIIT consists of a warm-up period of 10 minutes with a target heart rate at 60-70% of HRmax, followed by 4 HIIT intervals with a target HR ≥85%. The intervals are separated by three minutes of active rest, in which the HR should drop to 60% of maximum. Following this, a cool down period of three minutes at warm up intensity is performed. The 10x1min HIIT consists of a 10-minute warm-up period.The warm-up is followed by 10 intervals, each lasting 1 min at 100% of maximal workload, separated by three minutes of active rest, in which the HR should drop to 60% of maximum. Following the intervals, a cool down period of three minutes at warm up intensity is performed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Differential protein composition

    Differences in change in differential protein composition in distal lung tissue between HIIT and control group post-intervention using spatial multimodal proteomics.

    Time frame: At surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Differential protein composition

    Differences in change in differential protein composition in distal lung tissue between HIIT and control group post-intervention using mass spectrometry.

    Time frame: At surgery

  2. Lung tissue protein composition

    Differences in change in distal lung tissue protein composition pre- and post-HIIT intervention via mass spectrometry.

    Time frame: At surgery

  3. Serum protein profiles

    Differences in change in serum protein profiles between HIIT and control groups after intervention using mass spectrometry.

    Time frame: At surgery

  4. Tissue niche and cellular composition

    Tissue niche and cellular composition in the lung will be determined

    Time frame: At surgery

  5. Translational regions

    Healthy, diseased and transitional (''border zones'') regions in the lung will be deliniated/identified by using spation omic analysis. This will be done both at a gene level, protein level and glycosaminoglycan level.

    Time frame: At surgery

  6. Inflammatory and remodelling factors (blood samples)

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in inflammatory and remodelling factor proteins in blood samples measured by mass spectrometry

    Time frame: From time of inclusion in the study and until surgery (up to 8 months)

  7. Protein markers

    Protein markers will be identified by mass spectrometry and the difference in the spatial localisation of these will be identified between the groups after the intervention. This will be done using Pentachrome and/or multiplexed inmunofluorescence stainings.

    Time frame: At surgery

  8. Lung cell population

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in lung cell populations by single cell-RNA sequencing.

    Time frame: At surgery

  9. Lung tissue mass

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in total LTM (g)

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study and until surgery (up to 8 months)

  10. Pulmonary blood volume at rest

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in pulmonary blood volume (mL) at rest

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study and until surgery (up to 8 months)

  11. DLNO at rest and during exercise

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in DL,NO (mmol/(min kPa)) as a function of V̇O2 measured at rest, 60% of current maximal workload (relative), and at follow-up including 60% of maximal workload at baseline (absolute)

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study and until surgery (up to 8 months)

  12. DLNO during exercise

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in DL,NO (mmol/(min kPa)) during exercise at 60% of current maximal workload (relative)

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study and until surgery (up to 8 months)

  13. DLNO during exercise

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in DL,NO (mmol/(min kPa)) during exercise at 60% of the maximal workload measured at baseline (absolute)

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study and until surgery (up to 8 months)

  14. Pulmonary blood volume / total blood volume ratio

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in pulmonary blood volume / total blood volume ratio

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study and until surgery (up to 8 months)

  15. Health related quality of life

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in health-related quality of life - COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score, and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post-surgery

  16. Extra cellular matrix structure

    Extracellular matrix structure

    Time frame: At surgery

  17. Inflammatory and remodelling factors (lung tissue)

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in inflammatory and remodelling factor proteins in lung tissue measured by mass spectrometry

    Time frame: At surgery

Other outcomes

  1. Tissue morphology

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in tissue morphology

    Time frame: At surgery

  2. Mechanotransduction pathways

    Detect increased activation of mechanotransduction pathways, marked by YAP/TAZ co-transcription factors, in lung tissue post-HIIT using spatial omics and advanced image analysis.

    Time frame: At surgery

  3. Mesenchymal stromal cells

    Difference in mesenchymal stromal cells from baseline until follow-up between the two groups

    Time frame: At surgery

  4. Inflammatory patterns

    Inflammatory patterns will be assessed understanding the difference in these inflammatory patterns from baseline until follow-up and the differences between the two groups

    Time frame: At surgery

  5. Distal airspace dimensions

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in distal airspace dimensions (rAiDA and R0) as measured by AiDA

    Time frame: From enrollment to surgery

  6. Neo-epitopes

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in neo-epitopes (degraded fragments of proteins) in lung tissue measured by mass spectrometry

    Time frame: At surgery

  7. Changes in X-ray and electron-based imaging techniques

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in elemental and structural changes by X-Ray and electron-based imaging techniques

    Time frame: At surgery

  8. Biophysical properties

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in biophysical properties (stiffness/elasticity) using tensile or atomic force microscopy (AFM

    Time frame: At surgery

  9. Lung function

    Differences in above measurements linked to lung function

    Time frame: At surgery

  10. Cell activity

    Differences in above measurements linked to cell activity

    Time frame: At surgery

  11. Lobal lung tissue mass

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in lobar LTM (g)

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  12. LTM/1.73 m2 BSA

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in LTM/1.73 m2 BSA (g/m2)

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  13. Total blood volume

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in total blood volume

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  14. DLNO during rest

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in DL,NO (mmol/(min kPa)) during upright rest

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study and until surgery (up to 8 months)

  15. DLCOc during rest

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in DL,CO,5s (mmol/(min kPa)) during upright rest

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  16. Pulmonary capillary blood volume

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in pulmonary capillary blood volume (VC, mL) during upright rest

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  17. Membrane diffusing capacity

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in alveolar-capillary membrane diffusing capacity (DM, mmol/(min kPa)) during upright rest

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  18. Cardiac hemodynamics during exercise

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in cardiac output (L/min) during exercise at 60% of current maximal workload and 60% of baseline maximal workload, and during upright rest

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  19. VO2 during diffusing capacity measurements

    DL,CO,NO-based V̇O2 during exercise at 60% of current maximal workload and 60% of baseline maximal workload, and during upright rest

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  20. Cardiac pulmonary exercise test outcomes

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in relative (mL/kg/min) V̇O2peak

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  21. Handgrip-strength

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in hand-grip strength (kg)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  22. Sit-to-stand

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in numbers of completed 60 seconds sit-to-stand test (n)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  23. Body composition

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in body composition: total mass (kg)

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study and until surgery (up to 8 months)

  24. Lung function

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in lung function: FEV1 (L and %pred)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  25. 6-minutes walking distance

    Difference in change in the distance (m) walked from baseline to follow-up between groups in a 6-minute walking test

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  26. Exercise-induced cytokine response

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in exercise-induced cytokine responses (interleukin-6 (pg/mL)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  27. Mean bolus transit time - rest

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in mean bolus transit time (s) (supine rest)

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  28. Mean bolus transit time exercise

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in mean bolus transit time (s) (adenosine infusion)

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  29. Coronary flow reserve

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in global coronary flow reserve (mL/min)

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  30. Pulmonary blood volume reserve

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in pulmonary blood volume reserve (mL)

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  31. Ejection fraction

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in left ventricular ejection fraction (%)

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  32. Cardiac dynamics - rest

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in cardiac output (L/min) (supine rest)

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  33. Cardiac dynamics - exercise

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in cardiac output (L/min)

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  34. Total plasma volume

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in total plasma volume

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  35. Red blood cells

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in red blood cells

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  36. Coronary calcium score

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in coronary calcium score

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  37. Blood samples

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in blood samples: lipids (cholesterol (mmol/l)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  38. Lung resistance

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in resistance (Rrs, R5-R20) measured by IOS

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  39. Lung reactance

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in reactance (Xrs, X5) measured by IOS

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  40. Cardiac function and structure

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in cardiac structure and function including

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  41. Progenitor cell changes

    Difference in progenitor cells from baseline until follow-up between the two groups

    Time frame: At surgery

  42. Cardio pulmonary test outcomes

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in absolute (mL/min) V̇O2peak

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  43. Cardiac pulmonary exercise test outcomes

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between group in ventilatory threshold (%)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  44. Cardiac pulmonary exercise test outcomes

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in ventilatory reserve (%)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  45. Body composition

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in body composition: total fat mass (kg and %)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  46. Body composition

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in body composition: lean body mass (kg)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  47. Body composition

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in body composition: fat percentage (%)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  48. Lung function

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in lung function: FVC (L and %pred)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  49. Lung function

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in lung function: RV (L and %pred)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  50. Lung function

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in lung function: , TLC (L and %pred)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  51. Lung function

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in lung function: single-breath diffusion capacity to carbon monoxide (mmol/(min kPa) and %pred)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  52. Exercise-induced cytokine response

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in tumour necrosis factor-α (pg/mL)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  53. Exercise-induced cytokine response

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in C-reactive protein (μg/mL)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  54. Exercise-induced cytokine response

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in interleukin-8 (pg/mL)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  55. Exercise-induced cytokine response

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in interleukin-10 (pg/mL))

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  56. Cardiac dynamics - rest

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in heart rate (bpm) (supine rest)

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  57. Cardiac dynamics - rest

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in stroke volume (mL) (supine rest)

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  58. Cardiac dynamics - exercise

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in cardiac output (L/min) (adenosine infusion)

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  59. Cardiac dynamics - exercise

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in stroke volume (mL) (adenosine infusion)

    Time frame: From inclusion in the study until surgery (up to 8 months)

  60. Blood samples

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in blood samples: LDL (mmol/l)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  61. Blood samples

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in blood samples: HDL (mmol/l))

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  62. Blood samples

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in blood samples: HbA1C (mmol/l)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  63. Blood samples

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in blood samples: HsCRP (mg/L)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  64. Blood samples

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in blood samples: pro-BNP (pmol/L)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

  65. Blood samples

    Difference in change from baseline to follow-up between groups in blood samples: TSH (10-3 IU/L)

    Time frame: From enrollment until 3 months post surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Centre for Physical Activity Research, Copenhagen University Hospital
    Copenhagen, Denmark
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07343375
Lead sponsor
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Collaborators
Lund University
Responsible party
Ronan Berg (MD, DMSc, Professor, Rigshospitalet, Denmark) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 15, 2026
Start date
Apr 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 2, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion