CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07337135Updated Feb 25, 2026Results posted

Opioid-Free vs Opioid-Based Anesthesia in Bariatric Surgery

An interventional study of Opioid-Based Anesthesia (Remifentanil-Based Protocol) and Opioid-Free Anesthesia (Dexmedetomidine-Ketamine-Lidocaine Protocol) in Morbid Obesity, Postoperative Pain and Opioid Free Anesthesia, sponsored by Hospital dos Lusíadas. Completed at 1 site in Portugal. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-25.

Sponsored by Hospital dos Lusíadas · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2023, registered Dec 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) versus traditional opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. The study evaluates postoperative pain, need for rescue analgesia, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), intraoperative nociception monitoring (NOL index), and patient satisfaction. A total of 60 patients were randomized into two parallel groups receiving either OFA or OBA according to standardized anesthetic protocols.

Read the detailed description

Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for severe and morbid obesity, but perioperative pain management and PONV remain significant challenges. Traditional opioid-based anesthesia is associated with adverse effects such as respiratory depression, postoperative hyperalgesia, ileus, and delayed recovery.

Opioid-free anesthesia is an emerging strategy based on the use of multimodal, non-opioid agents-including dexmedetomidine, lidocaine, and ketamine-aimed at providing adequate analgesia while reducing opioid-related complications.

This randomized controlled trial evaluates whether OFA improves postoperative pain control, reduces the requirement for rescue analgesia, and promotes better perioperative outcomes compared to OBA in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Outcomes include NRS pain scores at multiple time points, NOL monitoring during surgery, PONV occurrence, and patient satisfaction at discharge.

02

Conditions studied

  • Morbid Obesity
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Opioid Free Anesthesia
  • Bariatric Surgery

Keywords

  • Opioid-free anesthesia
  • Bariatric surgery
  • Morbid obesity
  • Nausea and Vomiting
  • Postoperative pain
03

In context

Obesity, Morbid

922 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity, Morbid; 172 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 60 across 590 interventional studies indexed under Obesity, Morbid.

Browse Obesity, Morbid studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital dos Lusíadas is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Body mass index (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m² with associated comorbidities) or BMI ≥ 40 kg/m²;
  • Scheduled for elective laparoscopic bariatric surgery;
  • Ability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy;
  • History of substance abuse;
  • Severe psychiatric disease;
  • Contraindications to any of the drugs used in either anesthetic protocol (dexmedetomidine, ketamine, lidocaine, remifentanil, etc.);
  • Inability to comply with study procedures;
  • Refusal or inability to provide informed consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Opioid-Based Anesthesia (OBA)

    Standard opioid-based anesthesia using remifentanil infusion plus propofol induction, desflurane maintenance, and conventional multimodal analgesia, with opioids permitted for rescue.

    Drug: Opioid-Based Anesthesia (Remifentanil-Based Protocol)

  • Experimental
    Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA)

    Opioid-free anesthesia using dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and lidocaine infusion, combined with propofol induction, desflurane maintenance, and opioid-free multimodal analgesia, continued into early recovery.

    Drug: Opioid-Free Anesthesia (Dexmedetomidine-Ketamine-Lidocaine Protocol)

Interventions

  • DrugOpioid-Based Anesthesia (Remifentanil-Based Protocol)

    Participants receive standard opioid-based general anesthesia consisting of: * Continuous remifentanil infusion (2 mg diluted in 40 mL saline), * Propofol for induction, * Rocuronium for neuromuscular blockade, * Desflurane for maintenance, * Dexamethasone 4-8 mg for PONV prophylaxis, * Cefazolin for antibiotic prophylaxis, * Esomeprazole for stress-ulcer prevention. Postoperative analgesia includes paracetamol + ketorolac/parecoxib + metamizole, with tramadol and/or morphine provided as rescue. NOL, BIS, TOF, and standard monitoring are used.

  • DrugOpioid-Free Anesthesia (Dexmedetomidine-Ketamine-Lidocaine Protocol)

    Participants receive opioid-free anesthesia consisting of: * Dexmedetomidine bolus (15-20 μg), * Continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine 50 μg + ketamine 50 mg + lidocaine 500 mg in 50 mL saline (rate: 1 mL/10 kg), * Propofol for induction, * Rocuronium for neuromuscular blockade, * Desflurane for maintenance, * Dexamethasone for PONV prophylaxis, * Cefazolin and esomeprazole for prophylaxis. * The analgesic infusion is reduced by half 30 min before end of surgery and continued for 1 hour in PACU. Postoperative analgesia includes paracetamol + ketorolac/parecoxib + metamizole, with tramadol 100 mg as rescue. Monitoring includes NOL, BIS, TOF.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Intensity Measured by the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain (NRS)

    Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain (NRS), a validated 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome, reflecting greater pain intensity. Pain intensity will be compared between the opioid-free anesthesia group and the opioid-based anesthesia group at predefined postoperative time points.

    Time frame: Time Frame: - Within 30 minutes of arrival at the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU); - At PACU discharge (assessed up to 2 hours after PACU admission); - Within the first 24 postoperative hours; - 48 hours postoperatively (at hospital discharge).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intraoperative Nociception (NOL Index)

    Nociception will be assessed using the NOL (Nociception Level) Index, a multiparametric autonomic signal-based monitor. Lower values reflect better nociceptive control. Comparisons will be made between OFA and OBA groups at all recorded time points.

    Time frame: Multiple standardized time points during surgery (15 to 180 minutes)

  2. Need for Rescue Analgesia

    The proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesia (tramadol and/or morphine) will be compared between the opioid-free anesthesia group and the opioid-based anesthesia group.

    Time frame: - During PACU stay (assessed up to 2 hours after PACU admission).

  3. Opioid Consumption

    Need for opioid administration as rescue analgesia will be recorded and compared between groups.

    Time frame: - During PACU stay (assessed up to 2 hours after PACU admission).

  4. Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)

    PONV will be assessed using the Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Impact Scale, comparing frequency and severity between groups. The total score ranges from 0 (no nausea or vomiting) to 6 (maximum impact). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome, reflecting greater severity and clinical impact of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

    Time frame: At 6 hours and 24 hours after surgery

  5. Need for PONV Treatment

    Proportion of patients requiring antiemetic treatment will be evaluated and compared.

    Time frame: First 24 postoperative hours

  6. Patient Satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a Numerical Satisfaction Rating Scale and compared between groups. Total score ranges from 1 (minimum satisfaction) to 10 (maximum satisfaction). Higher scores indicate a better outcome, reflecting greater patient satisfaction.

    Time frame: 48 hours postoperatively (at hospital discharge).

  7. Postoperative Complications

    Occurrence of perioperative complications (respiratory, cardiovascular, surgical, or anesthesia-related) will be recorded.

    Time frame: Periprocedurally, up to 48 hours postoperatively.

07

Results

Posted Feb 25, 2026
Limitations and caveats
This study was conducted at a single center with a relatively small sample size, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. The trial was retrospectively registered, and some intraoperative measurements (NOL index) were available only for a subset of participants, with the number of observations varying across time points due to differences in surgical duration. Differences in antiemetic prophylaxis between groups may also have influenced postoperative nausea and vomiting outcomes.

Participant flow

Participants were consecutively recruited at a single tertiary bariatric surgery center (Hospital Lusíadas Amadora, Portugal). Eligible adult patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic bariatric surgery were identified during routine preoperative outpatient consultations. All patients received verbal and written study information, and written informed consent was obtained prior to enrollment. Recruitment continued until the target sample size of 60 participants was achieved.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOpioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA)Opioid-Based Anesthesia (OBA)
Started3030
Completed3030
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPostoperative Pain Intensity Measured by the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain (NRS)

Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain (NRS), a validated 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome, reflecting greater pain intensity. Pain intensity will be compared between the opioid-free anesthesia group and the opioid-based anesthesia group at predefined postoperative time points.

Time frame:
Time Frame: - Within 30 minutes of arrival at the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU); - At PACU discharge (assessed up to 2 hours after PACU admission); - Within the first 24 postoperative hours; - 48 hours postoperatively (at hospital discharge).
Reported as:
Median · Score on a scale (0-10)
Postoperative Pain Intensity Measured by the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain (NRS)
Score on a scale (0-10)Opioid-Based Anesthesia (OBA)Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA)
Within 30 minutes of arrival at the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)2.5 (0 to 5.5)0 (0 to 2)
At PACU discharge (assessed up to 2 hours after PACU admission)3 (1 to 5)1 (0 to 3)
Within the first 24 postoperative hours;3 (2 to 4)1 (0 to 3)
48 hours postoperatively (at hospital discharge)0 (0 to 2)0 (0 to 0)
SecondaryIntraoperative Nociception (NOL Index)

Nociception will be assessed using the NOL (Nociception Level) Index, a multiparametric autonomic signal-based monitor. Lower values reflect better nociceptive control. Comparisons will be made between OFA and OBA groups at all recorded time points.

Time frame:
Multiple standardized time points during surgery (15 to 180 minutes)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Intraoperative Nociception (NOL Index)
ParticipantsOpioid-Based Anesthesia (OBA)Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA)
NOL index at 15 minutes: <10511
NOL index at 15 minutes: 10-2572
NOL index at 30 minutes: <10612
NOL index at 30 minutes: 10-2541
NOL index at 30 minutes: 26-4520
NOL index at 45 minutes: <101011
NOL index at 45 minutes: 10-2512
NOL index at 45 minutes: 26-4510
NOL index at 60 minutes: < 10813
NOL index at 60 minutes: 10-2520
NOL index at 60 minutes: 26-4510
NOL index at 75 minutes: < 10812
NOL index at 75 minutes: 10-2511
NOL index at 75 minutes: 26-4510
NOL index at 90 minutes: < 10510
NOL index at 90 minutes: 10-2531
NOL index at 90 minutes: 26-4510
NOL index at 105 minutes: < 1057
NOL index at 105 minutes: 10-2511
NOL index at 105 minutes: 26-4510
NOL index at 120 minutes: < 1037
NOL index at 120 minutes: 10-2531
NOL index at 135 minutes: < 1026
NOL index at 135 minutes: 10-2511
NOL index at 150 minutes: < 1011
NOL index at 150 minutes: 10-2510
NOL index at 165 minutes: < 1011
NOL index at 180 minutes: < 1001
NOL index at 180 minutes: 10-2510
SecondaryNeed for Rescue Analgesia

The proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesia (tramadol and/or morphine) will be compared between the opioid-free anesthesia group and the opioid-based anesthesia group.

Time frame:
- During PACU stay (assessed up to 2 hours after PACU admission).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Need for Rescue Analgesia
ParticipantsOpioid-Based Anesthesia (OBA)Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA)
Yes - Required rescue analgesia229
No - Did not require rescue analgesia821
SecondaryOpioid Consumption

Need for opioid administration as rescue analgesia will be recorded and compared between groups.

Time frame:
- During PACU stay (assessed up to 2 hours after PACU admission).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Opioid Consumption
ParticipantsOpioid-Based Anesthesia (OBA)Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA)
Yes - Received opioids218
No - Did not receive opioids11
SecondaryIncidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)

PONV will be assessed using the Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Impact Scale, comparing frequency and severity between groups. The total score ranges from 0 (no nausea or vomiting) to 6 (maximum impact). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome, reflecting greater severity and clinical impact of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Time frame:
At 6 hours and 24 hours after surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)
ParticipantsOpioid-Based Anesthesia (OBA)Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA)
PONV Impact Scale score at 6 hours: 02222
PONV Impact Scale score at 6 hours: 134
PONV Impact Scale score at 6 hours: 243
PONV Impact Scale score at 6 hours: ≥311
PONV Impact Scale score at 24 hours: 02627
PONV Impact Scale score at 24 hours: 111
PONV Impact Scale score at 24 hours: 212
PONV Impact Scale score at 24 hours: ≥320
SecondaryNeed for PONV Treatment

Proportion of patients requiring antiemetic treatment will be evaluated and compared.

Time frame:
First 24 postoperative hours
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Need for PONV Treatment
ParticipantsOpioid-Based Anesthesia (OBA)Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA)
Yes - Required PONV treatment45
No - Did not require PONV treatment2625
SecondaryPatient Satisfaction

Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a Numerical Satisfaction Rating Scale and compared between groups. Total score ranges from 1 (minimum satisfaction) to 10 (maximum satisfaction). Higher scores indicate a better outcome, reflecting greater patient satisfaction.

Time frame:
48 hours postoperatively (at hospital discharge).
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale (1-10)
Patient Satisfaction
Score on a scale (1-10)Opioid-Based Anesthesia (OBA)Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA)
Patient Satisfaction9.2 ± 0.99.5 ± 0.7
SecondaryPostoperative Complications

Occurrence of perioperative complications (respiratory, cardiovascular, surgical, or anesthesia-related) will be recorded.

Time frame:
Periprocedurally, up to 48 hours postoperatively.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Postoperative Complications
ParticipantsOpioid-Based Anesthesia (OBA)Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA)
Yes - Experienced postoperative complications00
No - No postoperative complications3030

Adverse events

Collected over Periprocedurally, up to 48 hours postoperatively.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA)0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)
Opioid-Based Anesthesia (OBA)0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

All randomized participants were included in the baseline analysis. No participants or units were excluded from baseline analyses.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA)Opioid-Based Anesthesia (OBA)Total
Mean47.2 ± 10.342.7 ± 10.544.9 ± 10.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA)Opioid-Based Anesthesia (OBA)Total
Female222446
Male8614
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA)Opioid-Based Anesthesia (OBA)Total
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA)Opioid-Based Anesthesia (OBA)Total
Portugal303060
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/m²)Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA)Opioid-Based Anesthesia (OBA)Total
Mean39.3 ± 5.039.0 ± 5.039.1 ± 5.0
Relevant Comorbidities
Relevant Comorbidities(Participants)Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA)Opioid-Based Anesthesia (OBA)Total
Hypertension13922
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus437
OSAS / OHS7613
Depression13619
Dyslipidemia12820
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Lusíadas Amadora - Lusíadas Saúde, S.A.
    Amadora, 2724-002, Portugal
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Almeida E, Almeida F, Rossoni C, Ribeiro R. Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an exploratory randomized pilot trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2026 May 25. doi: 10.1186/s12871-026-03838-4. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42185786 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Feb 4, 2026
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jul 1, 2023
  • Informed consent form · Jul 1, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared due to privacy restrictions and institutional regulations. Only aggregated results will be made available in publications.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07337135
Lead sponsor
Hospital dos Lusíadas
Responsible party
Emanuel João Gonçalves Ferreira de Almeida (Consultant Anesthesiologist, Hospital dos Lusíadas) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 13, 2026
Start date
Oct 2, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 19, 2024
Completion
Apr 21, 2024
Results posted
Feb 25, 2026
Last update
Feb 25, 2026

Study contacts

Emanuel J Almeida, MD
principal investigator · Hospital dos Lusíadas

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion