An interventional study of Fish Oil and Camelina oil in Cardiovascualr Disease, Lipids and Inflammation, sponsored by Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research. Recruiting at 5 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 55 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-09.
Sponsored by Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
Hyperlipidemia is the main driver of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), both through direct effects and as trigger of the chronic inflammation behind a cardiovascular health-to-disease transition. While lipid-lowering is an effective way to reduce the ASCVD risk, the residual risk remains high. In addition, a substantial proportion of ASCVD events occur in the absence of overt hyperlipidemia. Several lines of evidence ranging from experimental models to population studies and interventional clinical trials support chronic inflammation as the causal residual risk of CVD. The CVD risk-associated lipid classes contain fatty acids that can be liberated and metabolized into both inflammation-promoting as well as inflammation-resolving drivers, providing the rationale for focusing on this balance in the present project. Above all, the omega-3 fatty acid class can resolve inflammation but the potential impact is currently largely underestimated in CVD preventive recommendations. As cardiovascular preventive measures ease the burden placed on the individual, population, and on the health care system, it is critical to raise public awareness for chronic inflammation as a causative and modifiable cardiovascular risk factor and to provide tools for how to control and monitor it. As an alternative to marine sources, principally eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and less docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) can be endogenously produced from alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) found in plant oils. Secondarily the possibility to increase the consumption of vegetable oil may possibly decrease the environmental impacts of an intensive fishing and consecutive marine system imbalance. The overarching objective of CARE-IN-HEALTH is to assess if PUFAs may contribute to the resolution of the chronic lipid-driven/-regulated vascular inflammation in order to develop and test, in a real-life setting, tools for use in health care and by citizens to stay healthy by an adequate resolution of the chronic inflammation. The primary objective of the present study is to compare the effect on a lipid/inflammation-derived risk score of diets supplemented with polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) of animal or vegetal origin with a nonenriched diet. The secondary objectives are a) to assess the acceptance of supplementation of diet with animal-derived or plant-derived PUFAs; b) to improve circulating lipid, inflammatory glycemic profile based on serial measurements of circulating biomarkers by means of PUFA supplementation. The study aims to identify a blueprint for how to control lipid-driven chronic inflammation by simple dietary interventions. Study population Participants to be considered for eligibility in the trial are adults aged >55 y, of both sexes (>=40% women), at moderate to high cardiovascular risk. The inclusion criteria are: Eligible participants will be at moderate to high SCORE2, SCORE2-OP and SCORE2-Diabetes risk level.
Non-eligible subjects will be those with:
This study aims to identify a blueprint for how to control lipid-driven chronic inflammation as well as tools to support the deployment of innovative personalized prevention of ASCVD by simple, easy dietary changes. In particular the primary endpoint is to compare the effect on a lipid/inflammation-derived risk score, of diets with supplementation of PUFA of animal or of vegetal origin with a non-enriched diet.
The secondary end points are: a) to assess the acceptance of supplementation of diet with animalderived or plant-derived PUFAs; b) to improve, by means of PUFA dietary supplementation, circulating lipidic/glycemic inflammatory profile based on serial measurements of circulating biomarkers. All subjects meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria will be centrally randomized by a web-based system to one of the three interventions:
1) supplementation with 4 grams of fish oil (containing 2262.5 mg DHA plus 1739.1 mg EPA, although a 10% variability due to the natural origin of the product must be considered), 2) diet enriched with 10 grams ALA of vegetable origin (Camelina Sativa Oil) + Vitamin E 24 mg, 3) regular non-enriched diet + Vitamin E 24 mg. Participants in RESOLVIN study will receive study agents from enrolment until 12 weeks follow-up.
The daily intake of EPA will be 1739 mg in participants assigned to fish oil, approximately 1500 mg for those assigned to 30 ml of camelina oil. The daily volume of camelina oil cannot be increased further without jeopardizing participant's compliance. The addition of vitamin E is aimed at supplementing the same amount of this vitamin to participants. The differential supplementation with vitamin E is requested by the different content of the vitamin in fish oil vs camelina oil. Both the fish oil and the camelina oil will be administered before food ingestion.
The study oils are ready to be ingested. Storage and dispensing of the study products will be done by the site pharmacists or by the responsible physician. The study oil ingestion will begin at randomization and will continue for 12 weeks. The addition of vitamin E is aimed at supplementing the same amount of this vitamin to participants assigned to camelina oil and controls. Vitamin E will be administered as solution, corresponding approx. to a daily dose of 24 mg.
At baseline, a blood sample for fatty acid analysis will be taken, demographic, clinical and treatment data will be collected, heart rate and blood pressure and waist circumference will be measured. At 12 weeks follow-up, clinical information about tolerance of diets enriched by PUFAs and any clinical event will be collected. Heart rate, blood pressure and waist circumference will be measured; blood will be sampled at baseline and 12 weeks to be processed stored and then shipped to the central biobank. All participants will be asking to complete a 15-item dietary assessment questionnaire at baseline and 12 weeks follow-up. Central randomization will be performed in a 1:1:1 ratio. The following information will be required:
3,439 studies on the registry are indexed under Inflammation; 629 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 324 is above the median of 50 across 2,437 interventional studies indexed under Inflammation.
Browse Inflammation studies →Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research is the lead sponsor of 159 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
A total daily volume of 23.19 mL/day of fish oil.
Dietary Supplement: Fish Oil
a total volume of 30 mL/day + Vitamin E 24 mg.
Dietary Supplement: Camelina oil
regular non-enriched diet + Vitamin E 24 mg
Dietary Supplement: Vitamin E
2262.5 mg DHA plus 1739.1 mh EPA
10g/day of ALA for a total volume of 30 mL/day
a dose of 24 mg for the control group
the effect on a lipidomic/inflammation- derived risk score based on plasma biomarkers
to compare the effect on a lipid/inflammation-derived risk scoremoderate= 50-69 years: 5 to 10%; \>70 years: 7.5 to \<15%; high=50-69 years: \>10%; 70 years \>15%), based on circulating molecules, of diets enriched with PUFA of animal or vegetal origin with a non-enriched diet.
Time frame: up to 12 weeks
Primary objective
The primary endpoint is to compare the effect on a lipidomic/inflammation-derived risk score based on plasma biomarkers, of diets with supplementation with PUFA of animal or vegetal origin with a non-enriched diet.
Time frame: 18 months
Plan to share: No
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research