ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07322666Updated Jan 7, 2026

Non-Thermal Plasma vs. Low-Level Laser Therapy for Recurrent Oral Ulcers

An interventional study of Non-Thermal Plasma (NTP) and Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) in Stomatitis and Aphthous Ulcer, sponsored by National Institute of Nuclear Research - Mexico. Completed at 1 site in Mexico. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-07.

Primary conditionStomatitis, AphthousRegistry: StomatitisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Stomatitis — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Stomatitis, Aphthous
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Stomatitis, Aphthous, a narrower term within Stomatitis.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by National Institute of Nuclear Research - Mexico · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 years 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2019, registered Dec 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial (pilot study) is to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of Non-Thermal Plasma (NTP) in treating pain and accelerating healing in 50 patients with Recurrent Oral Ulcers (ROUs). The main questions it aims to answer are:

Is the study design feasible for a future large-scale trial?

Does NTP show promising preliminary results in reducing ulcer size and healing time compared to standard laser therapy and placebo?

Does NTP provide superior pain relief compared to standard laser therapy and placebo?

Researchers will compare the NTP group (n=20) to the Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) group (n=20) and the placebo group (n=10) to see if NTP is more effective in accelerating healing and reducing pain.

Participants will:

Be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups (NTP, LLLT, or placebo).

Receive their assigned treatment for their oral ulcers.

Undergo measurements of their ulcer size, report their pain perception using a visual analog scale (VAS), and have their time to complete healing recorded.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stomatitis
  • Aphthous Ulcer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Oral Ulcers
  • Non-Thermal Plasma
  • Low-Level Laser Therapy
  • Placebo
  • Healing
  • Pain
03

In context

Stomatitis, Aphthous Reclassified

63 studies on the registry are indexed under Stomatitis, Aphthous; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is above the median of 41 across 54 interventional studies indexed under Stomatitis, Aphthous.

Browse Stomatitis, Aphthous studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Nuclear Research - Mexico is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Compared within Stomatitis, Aphthous, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Stomatitis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients over 18 years of age
  • Patients of both sexes
  • Patients with recurrent oral ulcers (ROU)
  • Patients without oral soft tissue diseases
  • Patients with at least one recurrent ulcer

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under 18 years of age
  • Patients with ROU of more than 48 hours' duration
  • Patients with gingivitis and/or periodontitis
  • Patients undergoing maxillofacial orthopedic and/or orthodontic treatment
  • Patients with ill-fitting dentures
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment with Non-Thermal Plasma (NTP)

    Device: Non-Thermal Plasma (NTP)

  • Active comparator
    Treatment with Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT)

    Device: Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT)

  • Placebo comparator
    Treatment with Placebo

    Procedure: Placebo

Interventions

  • DeviceNon-Thermal Plasma (NTP)

    Topical application of cold (non-thermal) plasma to the oral ulcer using a plasma generator, with specific time and power parameters.

  • DeviceLow-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT)

    Topical application of low-power laser radiation (low-level laser therapy) to the oral ulcer, following a standardized time and wavelength protocol.

  • ProcedurePlacebo

    Simulation of the application procedure (e.g., turning on a device without active plasma or laser emission, or application with the device turned off) to mask group assignment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility - Patient recruitment rate

    Proportion of the target sample size successfully recruited within the recruitment period. Unit of Measure: Percentage (%)

    Time frame: From the start of enrollment to the end of the recruitment period, an average of 1 month.

  2. Feasibility - Patient adherence to the intervention protocol

    Proportion of prescribed treatment sessions completed by enrolled participants. Unit of Measure: Percentage (%)

    Time frame: From the first intervention to the last planned session for each participant.

  3. Preliminary efficacy - Time to complete ulcer re-epithelialization

    Number of days required for the ulcer to achieve complete re-epithelialization (visual absence of ulcer crater) confirmed by clinical examination. Unit of Measure: Days

    Time frame: From baseline (day of intervention) until complete healing, assessed daily up to 30 days.

  4. Preliminary efficacy - Change in pain intensity measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a 0 to 10 scale, where "0" represents "no pain" and "10" represents "the worst pain". A higher score indicates worse pain. The change score (post-intervention minus baseline) will be calculated. Unit of Measure: 0-10 VAS

    Time frame: From baseline (pre-intervention) to 48 hours post-intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in ulcer surface area

    Ulcer size will be measured by calculating the surface area from perpendicular diameters (length and width in millimeters) using a standard periodontal probe or digital caliper. Unit of Measure: Square millimeters (mm²)

    Time frame: From baseline (day of intervention) to days 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 post-intervention

  2. Safety - Incidence and severity of treatment-related adverse events

    All adverse events and local reactions (e.g., erythema, edema, pain exacerbation) will be recorded and graded for severity using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 or a similar standardized scale. The relationship to the intervention will be assessed. Unit of Measure: Number of participants with adverse events, and severity grade.

    Time frame: From the first intervention until the end of the follow-up period (up to 7 days post-intervention)

  3. Cumulative use of rescue analgesic medication

    The total amount of rescue analgesic medication (e.g., acetaminophen/paracetamol) consumed by each participant, recorded in a daily diary. Unit of Measure: Milligrams (mg) of medication

    Time frame: From baseline to complete healing or up to 30 days, whichever comes first

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Plasma Physics Laboratory, National Institute of Nuclear Research
    Ocoyoacac, State of Mexico 52750, Mexico
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2019 to primary completion in Nov 2023, 57 months.

Of 13 interventional studies with no phase under Stomatitis, Aphthous, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 19. This study's 57 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 15, 2025
First posted
Jan 7, 2026
StartActual
Feb 4, 2019
Primary completionActual
Nov 30, 2023
CompletionActual
Feb 28, 2024
Last update
Jan 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07322666
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Nuclear Research - Mexico
Collaborators
Autonomous University of the State of Mexico
Responsible party
Benjamín Gonzalo Rodríguez Méndez (Professional B, Level 19, National Institute of Nuclear Research - Mexico) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 7, 2026
Start date
Feb 4, 2019
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2023
Completion
Feb 28, 2024
Last update
Jan 7, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion