CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07320092LUS-ATELECUpdated Jul 6, 2026

Supine vs Prone Position and Atelectasis Assessed by Lung Ultrasound

An observational study in Postoperative Atelectasis, sponsored by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-06.

Sponsored by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
80
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Atelectasis frequently develops during and after general anesthesia due to factors such as anesthesia-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction, reduced functional residual capacity, altered ventilation-perfusion matching, and surgical positioning. The development of atelectasis has been associated with postoperative hypoxemia and other pulmonary complications.

Lung ultrasound (LUS) has emerged as a reliable, radiation-free bedside imaging modality for the detection and monitoring of atelectasis. LUS allows assessment of lung aeration through standardized ultrasound patterns and scoring systems, enabling dynamic evaluation in the perioperative period.

This is a prospective, observational cohort study designed to compare the incidence and severity of atelectasis in patients undergoing surgery in the supine position versus the prone position under general anesthesia. Adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures will be enrolled. No experimental intervention will be applied, and all anesthetic and surgical management will follow routine clinical practice.

Lung ultrasound examinations will be performed at predefined time points after induction of anesthesia and before extubation. A standardized lung ultrasound protocol and scoring system will be used to assess lung aeration loss and detect the presence of atelectasis.

The primary outcome of the study is the difference in atelectasis detected by lung ultrasound between supine and prone surgical positions. The secondary outcome is the change in lung ultrasound scores over time.

This study aims to clarify the effects of supine and prone positions on perioperative atelectasis and to support the clinical use of lung ultrasound as a noninvasive monitoring tool in perioperative and anesthetic practice..

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Atelectasis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Lung Ultrasound
  • Atelectasis
  • Supine Position
  • Prone Position
  • General Anesthesia
  • Perioperative Care
03

In context

Pulmonary Atelectasis

301 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Atelectasis; 80 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 80 is above the median of 72 across 73 observational studies indexed under Pulmonary Atelectasis.

Browse Pulmonary Atelectasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa is the lead sponsor of 680 studies on the registry; 208 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population consists of adult patients aged 18 years and older who are scheduled to undergo elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia. Patients will be evaluated according to surgical positioning (supine or prone) during routine perioperative care.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients aged 18 years or older.
  • Patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia.
  • Patients undergoing surgery in the supine or prone position.
  • Patients able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency surgical procedures.
  • Pre-existing severe pulmonary disease affecting lung ultrasound assessment.
  • Hemodynamic instability requiring urgent intervention.
  • Contraindications to lung ultrasound examination.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Supine Position

    Patients undergoing surgery in the supine position under general anesthesia.

  • Prone Position

    Patients undergoing surgery in the prone position under general anesthesia.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in lung ultrasound-detected atelectasis between supine and prone surgical positions

    Lung aeration will be evaluated using the Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS), a semiquantitative scoring system assessing aeration loss in 12 lung regions. In the supine position, lung ultrasound assessment will be performed along: the parasternal line (intercostal spaces 1-4 and 4-8), the anterior axillary line (intercostal spaces 1-6 and 6-12), and the posterior axillary line (intercostal spaces 1-6 and 6-12). In the prone position, lung ultrasound assessment will be performed along: the paravertebral line (intercostal spaces 1-6 and 6-12), the posterior axillary line (intercostal spaces 1-6 and 6-12), and the anterior axillary line (intercostal spaces 1-6 and 6-12). Each lung region will be scored from 0 to 3, resulting in a total LUS ranging from 0 to 36, where higher scores indicate greater loss of aeration and more severe atelectasis. Assessments will be performed after induction of general anesthesia and before extubation.

    Time frame: Perioperative (After induction of general anesthesia and before extubation)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine
    Istanbul, Istanbul 34320, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bouhemad B, Brisson H, Le-Guen M, Arbelot C, Lu Q, Rouby JJ. Bedside ultrasound assessment of positive end-expiratory pressure-induced lung recruitment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb 1;183(3):341-7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201003-0369OC. Epub 2010 Sep 17. PubMed 20851923 ↗
  • Tusman G, Böhm SH, Warner DO, Sprung J. Atelectasis and perioperative pulmonary complications in general anesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(2):229-240. PMID: 22156255.
  • Acosta CM, Maidana GA, Jacovitti D, Belaunzaran A, Cereceda S, Rae E, Molina A, Gonorazky S, Bohm SH, Tusman G. Accuracy of transthoracic lung ultrasound for diagnosing anesthesia-induced atelectasis in children. Anesthesiology. 2014 Jun;120(6):1370-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000231. PubMed 24662376 ↗
  • Monastesse A, Girard F, Massicotte N, Chartrand-Lefebvre C, Girard M. Lung Ultrasonography for the Assessment of Perioperative Atelectasis: A Pilot Feasibility Study. Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):494-504. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001603. PubMed 27669555 ↗
  • Lichtenstein DA. Lung ultrasound in the critically ill. Ann Intensive Care. 2014 Jan 9;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-4-1. PubMed 24401163 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared, as this is a single-center observational study conducted for a postgraduate thesis.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07320092
Lead sponsor
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
Responsible party
CHINARA NAMAZOVA (Research Assistant, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 6, 2026
Start date
Sep 15, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2026
Completion
Apr 15, 2026
Last update
Jul 6, 2026

Study contacts

ÖZLEM KORKMAZ DİLMEN, PROFESSOR
principal investigator · Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion