An interventional study of Water Safety Plans in Water Quality, Water Treatment and Diarrhea, sponsored by The Aquaya Institute. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Ghana. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-05.
Sponsored by The Aquaya Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of water safety plans (WSPs) in rural Ghana. The investigators aim to evaluate the effects of WSPs on water supply system infrastructure, water availability and reliability, water quality, consumer perceptions, water service provider management and financial sustainability, climate resilience, equity, and consumer health.
Much of the global population is exposed to contaminated drinking water. In piped systems, it is often easier to mitigate at the water supplier level where it can be centrally managed. A water safety plan (WSP) is a holistic tool for proactively ensuring the safety of drinking water supplies from source to tap, and the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends this systematic risk assessment and preventive management approach for water systems.
While application of WSPs has spread, systematic evidence for their implementation and effectiveness in improving water quality and health is limited, particularly in low-resource settings.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of WSPs on water supply system infrastructure, water availability and reliability, water quality, consumer perceptions, water service provider management and financial sustainability, climate resilience, equity, and consumer health. The investigators will use a randomized controlled trial across 92 piped water supply systems serving small towns and rural areas in Ghana to test the effectiveness of WSPs. The investigators will collect data at baseline before the intervention is implemented, and at endline approximately 2 years after implementation begins. The investigators will also conduct a process evaluation of the WSP implementation quality.
877 studies on the registry are indexed under Diarrhea; 76 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 4,500 is above the median of 137 across 738 interventional studies indexed under Diarrhea.
Browse Diarrhea studies →The Aquaya Institute is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Eligibility to receive the intervention was determined by water system criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
To be eligible to participate in household surveys or focus group discussions, participants need to be at least 18 years of age and a customer of a eligible water system. To be eligible to participate in health care facility interviews, participants must be at least 18 years of age and work at a health care facility that serves community members using the included water system.
Exclusion Criteria:
Water Safety Plans
Other: Water Safety Plans
No Water Safety Plans: Water systems will continue to manage their water supplies without the introduction of water safety plans.
Water safety plans will be implemented at the water system level as a holistic tool for ensuring the safety of drinking water supplies from source to tap. World Health Organization guidance will be followed for implementation and recommended water safety planning steps will be followed such as assembling a WSP Team, describing the water supply, hazard identification and risk assessment, developing and implementing an incremental improvement plan, monitoring control measures to verify the effectiveness of the WSP, and continuously documenting, reviewing, and improving WSP implementation.
Free chlorine residue in water at point of collection (water quality impacts)
Free chlorine residue in water at point of collection (public standpipes and private taps) at or above target level of 0.2 mg/L, and at or above detectable level of 0.1 mg/L
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
E. coli in water at point of collection (water quality impacts)
E. coli in water at point of collection (binary and categorical)
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Total coliform in water at point of collection (water quality impacts)
Total coliform in water at point of collection (binary)
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Turbidity of water at point of collection (water quality impacts)
Turbidity measured in NTU in water at point of collection
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Reliability/availability of water (water supply impacts)
Reliability/availability of water based on (1) service provider documented interruptions, and (2) consumer reported service interruptions
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Consumer satisfaction (consumer perception impacts)
Household respondent satisfaction with water supplier. They will be considered satisfied if they report they are either satisfied or very satisfied with the water supplier. They will be considered dissatisfied if they report they are either dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with the water supplier.
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Household use of enrolled piped water system for drinking (consumer perception impacts)
Household use of enrolled piped water system for drinking (binary).
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Households perceive water quality issues with piped water system (consumer perception impacts)
Household respondents report water quality issues with the taste, odor, or appearance of supplied water.
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Number of complaints (consumer perception impacts)
Number of complaints regarding the service or quality of water. This will be measured based on (1) household self-reporting, and (2) water system reports or records.
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Prevalence of diarrhea (health impacts)
Prevalence of reported diarrhea in the past two weeks. Diarrhea is defined as 3 or more loose or watery stools within 24 hours. Measured for a household's youngest child \<5 years old, and any household member showing symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Blood in stool (health impacts)
Prevalence of reported blood in stool in the past two weeks. Measured for a household's youngest child \<5 years old, and any household member showing symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Prevalence of severe diarrhea (health impacts)
Prevalence of reported severe diarrhea in the past two weeks. Defined as having a fever and either diarrhea or blood in stool. Measured for a household's youngest child \<5 years old.
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Prevalence of acute respiratory infection (health impacts)
Prevalence of reported severe or non-severe acute respiratory infection (ARI) in the past two weeks. A severe ARI is defined as having a fever and either a cough or difficulty breathing. A non-severe ARI is defined as having a cough or difficulty breathing. Measured for a household's youngest child \<5 years old.
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Number of clinic visits for water-related illness (health impacts)
Clinical visits will be assessed based on (1) the number of clinic visits reported by households for diarrhea-related illness, and (2) records for the number of cases of water-related illness in patients who visited healthcare facilities serving the included communities.
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
E. coli in stored water at point of consumption (water quality impacts)
E. coli in stored household water at point of consumption (binary and categorical)
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Total coliform in stored water at point of consumption (water quality impacts)
Total coliform in stored household water at point of consumption (binary)
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Free chlorine residue in stored water at point of consumption (water quality impacts)
Free chlorine residue in stored household water at point of consumption at or above target level of 0.2 mg/L, and at or above detectable level of 0.1 mg/L
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Total chlorine residue in stored water at point of consumption (water quality impacts)
Total chlorine residue in stored household water at point of consumption at or above target level of 0.2 mg/L, and at or above detectable level of 0.1 mg/L
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Number of risk factors identified by sanitary inspections (operational outcomes)
Number of risk factors identified by sanitary inspections of water system infrastructure including the water source, water tank, distribution system, and standpipes.
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Quality and use of written documentation for water system management (operational outcomes)
Quality and use of written documentation for water system management including an operational monitoring plan, compliance monitoring plan, standard operating procedures, troubleshooting manual, maintenance schedule, and operator training program. It will be assessed whether written documentation exists, and if yes, whether it is detailed or incomplete and lacking detail. Water operators will also report if the written procedures are fully implemented in practice or not. This is intended to evaluate the professionalization and management of the water systems.
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Cost recovery (financial outcomes)
Financial sustainability/cost recovery (ratio of revenue collected to operating costs) of the system
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Number of meetings (institutional outcomes)
(1) Number of internal and external water safety meetings, and (2) Number of consumer water safety training or awareness events
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Documentation of climate related risks and response (climate resilience outcomes)
Documentation of climate related risks and response including whether climate-related information for the water supply system has been identified and documented, climate-related hazards related to events like heavy rainfall, flooding, and drought have been identified and prioritized, and an emergency response plan has been prepared. It will be assessed whether each aspect has been completed, and if yes whether it has been partially undertaken, but not documented; or fully undertaken and documented.
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Identification and prioritization of disadvantaged groups by the water supplier (equity outcomes)
Identification of disadvantaged groups in the water service area has been completed by the water supplier and they have been prioritized for participation or the service provider has made improvements to the water system to address inequalities between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged groups. It will be assessed whether each aspect has been completed, and if yes whether it has been partially undertaken, but not documented; or fully undertaken and documented.
Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), Endline (approximately 24-months after the start of the intervention)
Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data will be made available.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Started Mar 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2026, 35 months after the start.
Of 129 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Diarrhea, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 35 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 164 studies reached it within 14 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 35.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.