CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07312032CDOCFPlateUpdated Dec 31, 2025

The Effects of Footplate Stiffness on Foot Loading Within Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthoses

An interventional study of Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis and Carbon Fiber Footplate in Trauma Injury, sponsored by Jason Wilken. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-31.

Sponsored by Jason Wilken · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2025; still recruiting 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) improve function, reduce pain, and offload the foot and ankle. CDOs include a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg just below the knee, a posterior carbon fiber strut that bends to store and return energy, and a semi-rigid carbon fiber footplate. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of CDO use and CDO footplate stiffness on foot loading, limb mechanics, pain, and comfort.

Read the detailed description

Carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) have been used to improve function, reduce pain, and offload the foot and ankle for individuals with a number of conditions affecting the lower extremity.[1-3] CDOs consist of a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg just below the knee, a posterior carbon fiber strut that bends to store and return energy during mid to late stance, a semi-rigid carbon fiber footplate, and, in some cases, a foam heel wedge placed in the shoe. Studies have previously investigated the effects of design characteristics on gait biomechanics and foot loading, however, the effect of foot plate stiffness on resulting foot loading is unknown.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of CDO use and CDO footplate stiffness on foot loading, limb mechanics, pain, and comfort. In this study, forces acting under the foot will be measured using wireless Loadsol insoles (Novel GMBH, St. Paul, MN) and limb mechanics will be measured using motion capture cameras and force plates as participants walk without an orthosis (NoCDO), with a CDO, and with a CDO plus added carbon fiber stiffening inserts (1/2) at a controlled walking speed. Participants will be provided a heel lift for the contralateral limb to prevent leg length discrepancies during walking if necessary. After walking in each condition, participants will complete questionnaires concerning pain and orthosis comfort.

02

Conditions studied

  • Trauma Injury

Keywords

  • carbon fiber
  • traumatic injury
  • ankle foot orthosis
03

In context

Accidental Injuries

51 studies on the registry are indexed under Accidental Injuries; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 115 across 30 interventional studies indexed under Accidental Injuries.

Browse Accidental Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Jason Wilken is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Between the ages of 18 and 65
  • Healthy without current complaint of lower extremity pain, spine pain, open wounds or active infections, or medical or neuromusculoskeletal disorders that have limited their participation in work or exercise in the last 6 months
  • Able to hop without pain
  • Able to perform a full squat without pain
  • Ability to read and write in English and provide written informed consent
  • Ability to fit in a generic sized CDO

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosed with a moderate or severe brain injury
  • Lower extremity injury resulting in surgery or limiting function for greater than 6 weeks
  • Injuries that would limit performance in this study
  • Diagnosed with a physical or psychological condition that would preclude functional testing (e.g. cardiac condition, clotting disorder, pulmonary condition)
  • Visual or hearing impairments that limit walking ability or limit the ability to comply with instructions given during testing
  • Require use of an assistive device
  • Unhealed wounds (cuts/abrasions) that would prevent AFO use
  • BMI > 40
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    NoCDO

    Participants will complete study activities without a CDO

  • Experimental
    CDO

    Participants will complete study activities while wearing a CDO with standard footplate stiffness

    Device: Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis

  • Experimental
    1CFPlate

    Participants will complete study activities while wearing a CDO with standard footplate stiffness and one additional carbon fiber footplate to increase footplate stiffness

    Device: Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis · Device: Carbon Fiber Footplate

  • Experimental
    2CFPlate

    Participants will complete study activities while wearing a CDO with standard footplate stiffness and two additional carbon fiber footplates to increase footplate stiffness

    Device: Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis · Device: Carbon Fiber Footplate

Interventions

  • DeviceCarbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis

    The carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis (CDO) used in this study will consist of a semi-rigid carbon fiber footplate, a carbon fiber posterior strut, and a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg below the knee.

    Also known as: ankle foot orthosis

  • DeviceCarbon Fiber Footplate

    One or two additional full-length carbon fiber footplates will be placed under the CDO footplate to increase the effective footplate stiffness

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Peak Forefoot Force

    Plantar forces (N) will be measured across the forefoot (distal 40% of sensor).

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Forefoot Force Impulse

    Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the forefoot (distal 40% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Peak Hindfoot Force

    Plantar forces (N) will be measured across the hindfoot (proximal 30% sensor).

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Hindfoot Force Impulse

    Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the hindfoot (proximal 30% sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Peak Ankle Power

    Peak sagittal plane ankle push-off power (W/kg) during gait.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Peak Midfoot Force

    Plantar forces (N) will be measured across the midfoot (middle 30% of sensor).

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Midfoot Force Impulse

    Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the midfoot (middle 30% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Peak Total Foot Force

    Plantar forces (N) will be measured across the total foot (100% of sensors).

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Total Foot Force Impulse

    Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the total foot (100% of sensors) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Peak Ankle Dorsiflexion

    Peak ankle dorsiflexion (degrees) during gait.

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Peak Ankle Plantarflexion

    Peak ankle plantarflexion (degrees) during gait.

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. Ankle Range of Motion

    Range of ankle motion (degrees) during gait.

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Peak Ankle Dorsiflexion Moment

    Peak ankle dorsiflexion moment (Nm/kg) during gait.

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. Peak Ankle Plantarflexion Moment

    Peak ankle plantarflexion moment (Nm/kg) during gait.

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. Numerical Pain Rating Scale

    Pain will be assessed using a standard 11-point numerical pain rating scale, in which 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable

    Time frame: Baseline

  11. Modified Socket Comfort Score (Comfort)

    Comfort scores range from 0 = most uncomfortable to 10= most comfortable

    Time frame: Baseline

Other outcomes

  1. Modified Socket Comfort Score (Smoothness)

    Smoothness scores range from 0 = least smooth to 10 = most smooth

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 31, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07312032
Lead sponsor
Jason Wilken
Collaborators
University of Iowa
Responsible party
Jason Wilken (Associate Professor, University of Iowa) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Dec 31, 2025
Start date
Dec 13, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 31, 2025

Study contacts

Jason M Wilken, PT, PhD
Contact
jason-wilken@uiowa.edu
+1 319 3356857
Kirsten M Anderson, PhD
Contact
kirsten-m-anderson@uiowa.edu
3193530431

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion