CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07309679Updated Jan 9, 2026

Effectiveness of Herbal vs Chlorhexidine Mouthwashes in Improving Oral Health in Schoolchildren

An interventional study of Chlorhexidine Digluconate 0.2% Mouthwash and Pomegranate Peel Extract Mouthwash in Plaque Score, Gingival Health and Streptococcus Mutans, sponsored by Mansoura University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 12 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-09.

Sponsored by Mansoura University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2023, registered Dec 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
156
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
8 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Dental plaque and gingivitis are common oral health problems among school children. Mechanical plaque control, such as tooth brushing, is essential but may be insufficient for maintaining optimal oral hygiene. Chlorhexidine mouthwash is considered the gold standard chemical plaque control agent; however, its long-term use is limited by side effects such as tooth staining and taste alteration. In recent years, herbal mouthwashes have gained attention as natural alternatives with fewer adverse effects.

This randomized, single-blinded clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of two herbal mouthwashes - pomegranate peel extract and neem extract - compared with 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash on oral health among school children aged 8-12 years in Mansoura City, Egypt. A total of 156 participants were divided into three groups based on the type of mouthwash used. Plaque index, gingival index, and salivary Streptococcus mutans levels were assessed at baseline and after three weeks.

The study aimed to determine whether herbal mouthwashes could provide comparable benefits to chlorhexidine in reducing plaque, gingivitis, and bacterial load, while offering better safety and compliance in children.

Read the detailed description

Dental plaque is a biofilm composed of microbial communities that play a central role in the development of gingivitis and dental caries. Gingivitis is one of the most prevalent oral diseases among children, often resulting from the interaction between bacterial accumulation and host factors. Although mechanical plaque control through toothbrushing is the primary preventive measure, its effectiveness depends on manual skill and motivation, especially in children. Chemical plaque control using antimicrobial mouthwashes is therefore recommended as an adjunct.

Chlorhexidine (CHX) is considered the "gold standard" chemical agent for controlling plaque and gingival inflammation due to its broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity and substantivity. However, its long-term use is associated with side effects such as tooth staining, altered taste, and burning sensations, which can affect compliance. These limitations have encouraged the search for natural alternatives with fewer adverse effects and good acceptability, particularly for pediatric use.

This clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness of two herbal mouthwashes-pomegranate peel extract (Punica granatum Linn.) and neem extract (Azadirachta indica)-compared with chlorhexidine 0.2% mouthwash on oral health among school children in Mansoura City, Egypt. A randomized, single-blinded, parallel-group clinical trial design was adopted. A total of 156 children aged 8-12 years with a plaque index ≥1 were included and randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group I (chlorhexidine), Group II (pomegranate peel extract), and Group III (neem extract). Each participant used 5 ml of the assigned mouthwash twice daily for three weeks under parental supervision.

Plaque index (Silness and Löe), gingival index (Löe and Silness), and salivary Streptococcus mutans levels were measured at baseline and after three weeks. Compliance was monitored weekly. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 24 with a significance level of 0.05.

The study aimed to assess whether pomegranate peel and neem mouthwashes could produce plaque, gingival, and microbial reductions comparable to those of chlorhexidine, while providing improved safety and patient acceptability. Findings from this trial are expected to support the potential use of herbal mouthwashes as effective and natural alternatives for maintaining oral hygiene in children.

02

Conditions studied

  • Plaque Score
  • Gingival Health
  • Streptococcus Mutans
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Mansoura University is the lead sponsor of 1,077 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 8 to 12 years (common age group for gingivitis).
  • Both male and female participants.
  • Plaque Index ≥ 1 according to Silness and Löe index.
  • Regular brushing habit (once per day).
  • Parental consent obtained prior to participation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with systemic diseases or conditions affecting salivary flow.
  • Children with a history of antibiotic use within the last month before the study.
  • Those with known allergy or intolerance to any mouthwash ingredients.
  • Children currently using any other mouthwash or oral antiseptic.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
156 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Chlorhexidine Mouthwash Group

    Participants used 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash . Each child rinsed with 5 ml twice daily (after breakfast and before bedtime) for 30 seconds under parental supervision for three weeks. This group served as the gold-standard control for evaluating the efficacy of herbal mouthwashes

    Drug: Chlorhexidine Digluconate 0.2% Mouthwash

  • Experimental
    Pomegranate Peel Extract Mouthwash Group

    Participants used a pomegranate peel extract (Punica granatum Linn.) mouthwash, prepared at Nanogate company. Each child rinsed with 5 ml twice daily (after breakfast and before bedtime) for 30 seconds under parental supervision for three weeks. The purpose was to evaluate its natural antimicrobial and anti-gingivitis effects compared to chlorhexidine.

    Drug: Pomegranate Peel Extract Mouthwash

  • Experimental
    Neem Extract Mouthwash Group

    Participants used a neem (Azadirachta indica) extract mouthwash, prepared at Nanogate company. Each child rinsed with 5 ml twice daily (after breakfast and before bedtime) for 30 seconds under parental supervision for three weeks. This group was designed to assess neem's potential antimicrobial and plaque-reducing effects relative to chlorhexidine and pomegranate mouthwashes.

    Drug: Neem Extract Mouthwash

Interventions

  • DrugChlorhexidine Digluconate 0.2% Mouthwash

    Commercially available 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate mouthwash used as the gold standard control. Participants rinsed with 5 ml twice daily (after breakfast and before bedtime) for 30 seconds under parental supervision for three weeks. Used to compare the antimicrobial and anti-plaque effectiveness against herbal mouthwashes.

    Also known as: CHX, 0.2% CHX Mouthrinse

  • DrugPomegranate Peel Extract Mouthwash

    Mouthwash containing pomegranate peel extract (Punica granatum Linn.), prepared at Nanogate company. Participants rinsed with 5 ml twice daily for 30 seconds for three weeks under parental supervision. The intervention aimed to evaluate pomegranate's natural anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial effects on plaque, gingivitis, and Streptococcus mutans levels

    Also known as: PPE Mouthwash, Punica granatum Mouthrinse

  • DrugNeem Extract Mouthwash

    Mouthwash containing neem extract (Azadirachta indica), prepared at Nanogate company. Participants rinsed with 5 ml twice daily for 30 seconds for three weeks under parental supervision. The intervention was designed to assess neem's antibacterial and plaque-reducing properties compared with chlorhexidine and pomegranate mouthwashes.

    Also known as: Azadirachta indica Mouthrinse, Neem Herbal Mouthwash

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Plaque Index (Silness & Löe)

    Outcome measure: Mean change in Plaque Index score (Silness \& Löe) from baseline to 3 weeks.

    Time frame: baseline , 1 week , 2 weeks, 3 weeks

  2. Gingival Index (Löe & Silness)

    Mean change in Gingival Index score (Löe \& Silness) from baseline to 3 weeks.

    Time frame: baseline , 1 week , 2 weeks, 3 weeks

  3. Salivary Streptococcus mutans Level

    Change in salivary Streptococcus mutans count (CFU/ml) from baseline to 3 weeks

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 weeks after start of intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of Dentistry,Mansoura university
    Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate 35516, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — individual participant data will not be shared because the study involves children and contains sensitive health information.only aggregated results will be published.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07309679
Lead sponsor
Mansoura University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 30, 2025
Start date
Mar 7, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 7, 2023
Completion
Nov 7, 2023
Last update
Jan 9, 2026

Study contacts

Rabab I Salama, professor
principal investigator · Faculty of Dentistry,Mansoura University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion