ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07308457CRONOSUpdated Dec 29, 2025

Enhanced Molecular Microbiological Surveillance Versus Ceftriaxone Prophylaxis in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Patients

An interventional study of Ceftriaxone 1000 MG in Incidence of Infectious Diseases, sponsored by Pomeranian Medical University Szczecin. Recruiting at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-29.

Sponsored by Pomeranian Medical University Szczecin · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2024, registered Dec 2025).
  • Started Sep 2024; still recruiting 2 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether close microbiological monitoring without preventive antibiotics works as well as preventive treatment with ceftriaxone in adults receiving stem cell transplants. The study focuses on people with blood cancers or other conditions who need either autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

The main questions the study aims to answer are:

What percentage of participants develop an infection when they do not receive preventive antibiotics compared with those who receive daily ceftriaxone?

Does preventive ceftriaxone lower the chance of specific complications such as bloodstream infections, pneumonia, or severe sepsis?

Researchers will compare two groups:

one group will not receive preventive antibiotics

one group will receive ceftriaxone once a day until their white blood cells recover or until signs of infection appear

All participants will:

have their body temperature monitored continuously starting one day before the transplant

have blood, urine, or other samples collected if they develop fever or symptoms of infection

receive standard medical care during and after the transplant

start standard antibiotic treatment if they develop signs of infection

This study will include 100 adults. The information collected will help determine whether skipping preventive antibiotics is safe in hospitals where bacteria often show resistance to commonly used drugs such as fluoroquinolones.

Read the detailed description

This study compares two common strategies for preventing infections in adults who receive hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT). People who undergo these transplants often have very low levels of white blood cells for several days or weeks. During this time, they have a high risk of developing serious infections. Many hospitals give preventive antibiotics, but increasing resistance to these drugs has raised questions about whether this approach is still effective.

In this study, participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives daily ceftriaxone as preventive treatment. The other group does not receive preventive antibiotics and instead is closely monitored using continuous temperature sensors and frequent microbiological testing. If any participant shows signs of infection, the medical team begins standard antibiotic treatment based on the person's symptoms, test results, and the hospital's local patterns of bacterial resistance.

The study uses modern laboratory methods, including genetic tests to identify bacteria and antibiotic resistance markers. These tests are performed when a participant develops fever or other symptoms of infection. Researchers will track how often infections occur, how severe they are, and whether bacteria are resistant to antibiotics. They will also monitor recovery of blood counts, the length of hospital stay, and whether participants develop complications related to the transplant.

The results of this study may help hospitals choose the safest and most effective approach to preventing infections in transplant patients, especially in settings where resistance to commonly used antibiotics is increasing.

02

Conditions studied

  • Incidence of Infectious Diseases

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
  • Bloodstream Infections
03

In context

Sepsis

2,416 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 541 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 102 across 1,165 interventional studies indexed under Sepsis.

Browse Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

Pomeranian Medical University Szczecin is the lead sponsor of 69 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Recipient of autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells from peripheral blood, bone marrow, or cord blood.
  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Ability to provide written .
  • No active infection for at least 2 weeks prior to transplantation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Controlled fungal infection.
  • Fever of unknown origin.
  • Ongoing antibiotic therapy (except cotrimoxazole).
  • Participation in any clinical study or experiment at the time of inclusion.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ceftriaxone Prophylaxis

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive prophylactic ceftriaxone 1 g intravenously once daily, administered at a fixed morning time, starting 24 hours before hematopoietic stem cell infusion (Day -1) and continued until neutrophil recovery or the onset of infection symptoms. All participants undergo continuous body temperature monitoring and standardized microbiological diagnostics in case of fever or suspected infection.

    Drug: Ceftriaxone 1000 MG

  • No intervention
    No Prophylaxis

    Participants in this arm will not receive prophylactic antibacterial therapy. They will undergo the same continuous body temperature monitoring as the intervention group. In case of fever or other indicators of infection, full microbiological diagnostics will be initiated and empirical antibiotic therapy will be started according to clinical judgment and local epidemiology.

Interventions

  • Participants in this arm receive prophylactic ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 1 g once daily. The infusion begins on Day -1 (24 hours before hematopoietic stem cell infusion) and continues until neutrophil recovery (ANC \>500/µl for 3 consecutive days) or until signs of infection occur. Ceftriaxone is infused over at least 30 minutes after dissolving 1 g of the drug in 20-40 ml of an intravenous solution that does not contain calcium ions (e.g., 0.9% sodium chloride, 5% glucose, 10% glucose, or other compatible diluents specified in the protocol). Continuous real-time temperature monitoring is performed throughout the intervention period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of infections in the no-prophylaxis group versus the ceftriaxone prophylaxis group

    The primary outcome is the proportion of patients who develop an infection in the group receiving no antibacterial prophylaxis compared with the group receiving prophylactic ceftriaxone 1 g once daily. Infection is defined in the protocol as the occurrence of: neutropenic fever (single temperature \>38.3°C or ≥38.0°C for ≥1 hour with ANC \<500/µl or anticipated decline to \<500/µl within 48 hours); bloodstream infection/bacteremia confirmed by blood culture; sepsis or septic shock; or clinically/microbiologically confirmed localized infection (respiratory, urinary, gastrointestinal, or other site). Assessment continues until neutrophil recovery (\>500/µl for 3 consecutive days).

    Time frame: From Day -1 (24h before transplant) until neutrophil recovery (>500/µl for 3 consecutive days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of infectious complications

    Proportion of patients experiencing infectious complications defined in the protocol as: neutropenic fever, sepsis, septic shock, pneumonia, sinus infection, urinary tract infection, and gastrointestinal infection. Neutropenic fever is defined as a single temperature \>38.3°C or temperature ≥38.0°C for at least one hour with ANC \<500/µl or expected decline to \<500/µl within 48 hours. Bloodstream infection/bacteremia refers to growth of a microorganism in blood culture with exclusion of contamination. Sepsis and septic shock are defined according to protocol criteria.

    Time frame: From Day -1 until neutrophil recovery or start of empirical antibiotic therapy (up to ~28 days)

  2. Incidence of infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens

    Proportion of patients with infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens, as determined by microbiological and molecular diagnostics performed at the onset of infection.

    Time frame: From Day -1 until neutrophil recovery or start of empirical antibiotic therapy

  3. Incidence of organ failure

    Proportion of patients who develop organ failure, defined in the protocol as: * Respiratory failure: PaO₂ \<60 mmHg or PaCO₂ ≥45 mmHg. * Circulatory failure: need for vasopressors or inotropes and fluid therapy to maintain systolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg. * Renal failure: acute kidney injury defined as increase in serum creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dl within 48 hours, or ≥1.5-fold increase within 7 days, or urine output \<0.5 ml/kg/h for 6 hours. * Liver failure: acute hepatic failure \<26 weeks with encephalopathy and INR ≥1.5.

    Time frame: From Day -1 until neutrophil recovery or start of empirical antibiotic therapy

  4. Incidence of death

    Proportion of patients who die during the study period in the prophylactic ceftriaxone group compared with the no-prophylaxis group.

    Time frame: From Day -1 until neutrophil recovery (or earlier if death occurs)

  5. Time to neutrophil recovery

    Time from Day -1 to achievement of neutrophil recovery, defined as three consecutive days with ANC \>500/µl.

    Time frame: From Day -1 until neutrophil recovery

  6. Time to platelet recovery

    Time to achievement of platelet recovery, defined as three consecutive days with platelet count \>20,000/µl without platelet transfusions.

    Time frame: From Day -1 until platelet recovery

  7. Duration of hospitalization

    Total number of days of hospitalization during the transplant period for each participant.

    Time frame: Through hospital discharge (up to approximately 6 weeks)

  8. Incidence and severity of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD)

    Proportion of patients who develop acute GvHD and its severity, assessed according to MAGIC criteria. Acute GvHD involves skin, liver, and gastrointestinal tract and is evaluated up to Day 100 after transplantation.

    Time frame: Up to Day 100 after transplantation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Uniwersytecki zpital Kliniczny nr 1 im. prof. Tadeusza Sokołowskiego Pomorskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Szczecinie
    Szczecin, West Pomeranian Voivodeship 71-252, Poland
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 33 months after the start.

Of 301 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Sepsis, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 42. This study's planned 33 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 324 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 40.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 8, 2025
First posted
Dec 29, 2025
StartActual
Sep 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 31, 2027
Last update
Dec 29, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 29, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07308457
Lead sponsor
Pomeranian Medical University Szczecin
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 29, 2025
Start date
Sep 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 29, 2025

Study contacts

Sławomir Milczarek, MD
Contact
slawomir.milczarek@pum.edu.pl
+48 881 241 284

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ceftriaxone

Start the discussion