CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07307079Updated Dec 29, 2025

Non-Invasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation vs Conventional Ventilation for Preterm Neonates.

An interventional study of Non-Invasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Conventional Mechanical Ventilation in Respiratory Distress Syndrome, sponsored by Muhammad Aamir Latif. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 1 Day to 28 Days. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-29.

Sponsored by Muhammad Aamir Latif · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2025, registered Dec 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Day to 28 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Given the high burden of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and its complications in resource-constrained settings, identifying effective, low-risk interventions is imperative. The study aimed to assess the improvement in oxygenation and ventilation parameters initiating non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) or conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) and to compare the incidence of air leaks, sepsis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), prolonged hospital stays, and short-term survival rates.

Read the detailed description

Global neonatal care is moving toward lung-protective ventilation strategies to improve outcomes for preterm neonates. Evaluating the role of nHFOV in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Pakistan not only helps address local healthcare challenges but also contributes to global efforts to optimize neonatal care across diverse settings. To best of my knowledge no such type of study has been conducted in Pakistan. This study is non-invasive and cost effective. The findings of this study could inform policy decisions and resource allocation in NICUs across Pakistan and other middle-income countries (LMICs).

02

Conditions studied

  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome
03

In context

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1,597 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 312 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is above the median of 60 across 961 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Muhammad Aamir Latif is the lead sponsor of 56 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Day to 28 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Neonates of any gender
  • Gestational age between 26 and 36 weeks
  • Diagnosed with RDS.
  • Failed to respond to nCPAP treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major congenital anomalies like congenital diaphragmatic hernia, dysmorphism and congenital heart diseases
  • Early onset sepsis at the time of enrollment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Non-Invasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Group

    Neonates were managed using a high-frequency oscillatory ventilator with a noninvasive nasal interface. Ventilator settings were adjusted to a mean airway pressure (MAP) of 8-12 cmH₂O, a frequency of 10 Hz, an amplitude adjusted to maintain optimal chest vibration, and an FiO₂ titrated to maintain SpO₂ between 90-94%.

    Procedure: Non-Invasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation

  • Experimental
    Conventional Ventilation Group

    Neonates received invasive ventilation through an endotracheal tube. Settings were adjusted to an initial tidal volume of 4-6 mL/kg, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 4-6 cmH₂O, a respiratory rate of 30-50 breaths per minute, and FiO₂ titrated to maintain SpO₂ between 90-94%.

    Procedure: Conventional Mechanical Ventilation

Interventions

  • ProcedureNon-Invasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation

    Neonates were managed using a high-frequency oscillatory ventilator with a noninvasive nasal interface. Ventilator settings were adjusted to a mean airway pressure (MAP) of 8-12 cmH₂O, a frequency of 10 Hz, an amplitude adjusted to maintain optimal chest vibration, and an FiO₂ titrated to maintain SpO₂ between 90-94%.

  • ProcedureConventional Mechanical Ventilation

    Neonates received invasive ventilation through an endotracheal tube. Settings were adjusted to an initial tidal volume of 4-6 mL/kg, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 4-6 cmH₂O, a respiratory rate of 30-50 breaths per minute, and FiO₂ titrated to maintain SpO₂ between 90-94%.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Improvement in ventilation parameter

    Improvement in ventilation parameter, measured by arterial blood gas analysis of the assigned ventilation modality was noted.

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia

    Bronchopulmonary dysplasia was considered 'yes' if the patient required supplemental oxygen (\>21% FiO₂) for ≥28 days to maintain oxygen saturation between 90-94%.

    Time frame: 36 weeks post-menstrual age

  2. Sepsis

    At least 1 abnormality in laboratory findings of WBC \<5,000/mm³, I/T ratio \>0.2, and platelets \<100,000/mm³. or CRP elevated (\>10 mg/L), or procalcitonin elevated (\>2 ng/mL). or blood gas analysis metabolic acidosis (pH \<7.25) was taken as 'yes'.

    Time frame: 28 days

  3. Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

    Clinically, pneumonia was labeled 'yes' as a new or persistent respiratory distress or worsening gas exchange, increased ventilator requirements (e.g., higher FiO₂ or positive end-expiratory pressure \[PEEP\]), signs of infection (fever (\>38°C) or hypothermia (\<36°C), apnea or bradycardia episodes, tachycardia or hypotension).

    Time frame: 48 hours

  4. Duration of respiratory support

    Total days on modality were noted.

    Time frame: 28 days

  5. Survival Status at Discharge

    The survival status of the patient was noted as 'alive' or 'deceased'.

    Time frame: 28 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Indus Hospital - Recep Tayyip Erdogan Campus, Muzaffargarh
    Muzaffargarh, Punjab Province 32400, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data can be shared on a reasonable request.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 29, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07307079
Lead sponsor
Muhammad Aamir Latif
Responsible party
Muhammad Aamir Latif (Research Consultant, RESnTEC, Institute of Research) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Dec 29, 2025
Start date
Jun 1, 2025
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2025
Completion
Nov 30, 2025
Last update
Dec 29, 2025

Study contacts

Muhammad Farhan, FCPS
principal investigator · Indus Hospital - Recep Tayyip Erdogan Campus, Muzaffargarh
Athar Razzaq, FCPS
study director · Indus Hospital - Recep Tayyip Erdogan Campus, Muzaffargarh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion