ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07291856Updated Dec 18, 2025

Exploring the Impact of Dynamic Defocus Display Schemes on Ocular Health Indicators

An interventional study of Dynamic Defocus Mode in Visual Fatigue and Myopia, sponsored by Beijing Tongren Hospital. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-18.

Sponsored by Beijing Tongren Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The present study is designed to explore the effects of dynamic defocus display technology on ocular health parameters using rigorous scientific approaches. It further examines the mechanisms through which this technology alleviates visual fatigue, thereby providing robust clinical evidence to support its practical application and widespread adoption.

Read the detailed description

Research Content Recruit adults who meet the inclusion criteria and have long-term use of VDT (Visual Display Terminal) devices for the trial.

Compare the impact of different dynamic defocus modes on the visual fatigue symptoms of the subjects.

Analyze the mechanisms through which dynamic defocus modes alleviate visual fatigue.

Research Outcome Measures Primary Outcome Measures and Definitions Binocular Visual Function: A series of assessments of visual ability, including accommodative function (amplitude of accommodation, accommodative facility) and vergence function (near point of convergence, AC/A ratio).

Secondary Outcome Measures and Definitions Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency (CFF): To evaluate the degree of eye fatigue, with lower measured values indicating a higher degree of fatigue.

Visual Fatigue Questionnaire Score: To assess the subjective level of visual fatigue experienced by the subjects.

Refraction Results: To monitor changes in refractive status during the trial and evaluate the impact of different dynamic defocus modes on refractive state when using VDT devices at near distance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Visual Fatigue
  • Myopia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Dynamic Defocus Display Technology
  • Visual Fatigue
  • visual function
  • Repeated Measures Design
  • Longitudinal Chromatic Aberration
03

In context

Asthenopia

67 studies on the registry are indexed under Asthenopia; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36 is below the median of 56 across 56 interventional studies indexed under Asthenopia.

Browse Asthenopia studies →

Lead sponsor

Beijing Tongren Hospital is the lead sponsor of 164 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Adults aged between 20 and 40 years, regardless of gender;

Refractive anisometropia ≤2.5D and corrected visual acuity of 1.0 or above in both eyes;

Habitual long-term use of electronic devices with LED light sources, such as computers and smartphones;

Currently not using any other blue light protection products or having ceased the use of such products for at least 2 weeks;

No known visually significant ophthalmic diseases;

Willing to participate in the trial and having signed the form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Abnormal accommodative function or other visual function abnormalities (e.g., strabismus, amblyopia);

Severe dry eye or history of ocular medication use;

Acute or chronic ocular surface inflammation, keratoconus, history of ocular surgery (e.g., refractive surgery), systemic diseases, or other conditions (e.g., wearing orthokeratology lenses and using atropine);

Photosensitivity, history of epilepsy, etc.;

Individuals unable to cooperate with the examination.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control group

    This group serves as the baseline comparison. Participants will perform the video-watching task on a conventional display with no intervention, allowing for the assessment of typical visual fatigue and ocular health indicators under standard conditions.

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group A (Low defocus amplitude and high frequency)

    Participants will use a display with Dynamic Defocus Mode with low defocus amplitude and high frequency to perform a video browsing task. This group is designed with a specific dynamic defocus adjustment scheme, aimed at investigating the extent to which different dynamic defocus schemes can improve visual fatigue. Participants will be single-blinded to their group assignment. The intervention involves Dynamic Defocus Mode 1 and follows the VDT task protocol as designed in the trial.

    Behavioral: Dynamic Defocus Mode

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group B (low defocus amplitude and low frequency)

    Participants will use a display with Dynamic Defocus Mode with low defocus amplitude and low frequency to perform a video browsing task. This group is designed with a specific dynamic defocus adjustment scheme, aimed at investigating the extent to which different dynamic defocus schemes can improve visual fatigue. Participants will be single-blinded to their group assignment. The intervention involves Dynamic Defocus Mode 1 and follows the VDT task protocol as designed in the trial.

    Behavioral: Dynamic Defocus Mode

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group C (high defocus amplitude and high frequency)

    Participants will use a display with Dynamic Defocus Mode with high defocus amplitude and high frequency to perform a video browsing task. This group is designed with a specific dynamic defocus adjustment scheme, aimed at investigating the extent to which different dynamic defocus schemes can improve visual fatigue. Participants will be single-blinded to their group assignment. The intervention involves Dynamic Defocus Mode 1 and follows the VDT task protocol as designed in the trial.

    Behavioral: Dynamic Defocus Mode

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group D (high defocus amplitude and low frequency)

    Participants will use a display with Dynamic Defocus Mode with high defocus amplitude and low frequency to perform a video browsing task. This group is designed with a specific dynamic defocus adjustment scheme, aimed at investigating the extent to which different dynamic defocus schemes can improve visual fatigue. Participants will be single-blinded to their group assignment. The intervention involves Dynamic Defocus Mode 1 and follows the VDT task protocol as designed in the trial.

    Behavioral: Dynamic Defocus Mode

Interventions

  • BehavioralDynamic Defocus Mode

    Participants are required to complete a 50-minute video-watching task using a terminal display device that contains video content processed with different dynamic defocus modes. Specifically, participants will watch the same series of videos in different dynamic defocus modes. Participants will complete a total of 5 sets of video tasks (including the control group) in a random order.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Binocular Visual Function(amplitude of accommodation)

    The amplitude of accommodation refers to the maximum amount of accommodative power that the eye can exert to focus on near objects, typically measured in diopters.

    Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), immediately after the 50-minute video-watching task for each of the five sessions, totaling ten completions per participant.

  2. Binocular Visual Function(accommodative facility)

    Accommodative facility, measured using a 2D flipper in cycles per minute (cpm), reflects the eye's ability to rapidly and efficiently change focus between near and far objects, indicating the dynamic functioning of the accommodative system.

    Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), immediately after the 50-minute video-watching task for each of the five sessions, totaling ten completions per participant.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency(CFF)

    To evaluate the degree of eye fatigue, with lower measured values indicating a higher degree of fatigue.

    Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), immediately after the 50-minute video-watching task for each of the five sessions, totaling ten completions per participant.

  2. Visual Fatigue Questionnaire Score

    The Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS-Q), which has been independently modified, comprises 16 response items. Participants will complete the questionnaire before and after the task to assess changes in ocular strain symptoms. By comparing the questionnaire scores obtained when using different dynamic defocus modes of the VDT devices, the effectiveness of dynamic defocus modes in alleviating subjective symptoms of ocular strain will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), immediately after the 50-minute video-watching task for each of the five sessions, totaling ten completions per participant.

  3. Refractive error status

    The refractive error status of the subjects was determined using a combination of automatic refractometer and subjective refraction, with results expressed in diopters.

    Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), immediately after the 50-minute video-watching task for each of the five sessions, totaling ten completions per participant.

Other outcomes

  1. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

    Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA) is a non-invasive imaging technique that provides detailed cross-sectional images of retinal and choroidal structures. It is particularly useful for evaluating the choroidal thickness, which can be measured precisely in micrometers.

    Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), immediately after the 50-minute video-watching task for each of the five sessions, totaling ten completions per participant.

  2. Multispectral refraction topography

    Multispectral Refraction Topography (MRT) is an advanced imaging technique used to map the refractive properties of the eye across multiple wavelengths. By analyzing the eye's refractive profile at different spectral ranges, MRT offers a comprehensive understanding of the eye's optical characteristics.

    Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), immediately after the 50-minute video-watching task for each of the five sessions, totaling ten completions per participant.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Beijing Tongren Hospitol,Capital Medical University
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100730, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2025 to primary completion in Nov 2025, 3 months.

Of 31 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Asthenopia, half reached primary completion within 3 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 2 and three quarters within 9. This study's 3 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 38 studies reached it within 3 months; a quarter within 2 and three quarters within 9.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 20, 2025
First posted
Dec 18, 2025
StartActual
Aug 20, 2025
Primary completionActual
Nov 20, 2025
CompletionActual
Nov 30, 2025
Last update
Dec 18, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07291856
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 18, 2025
Start date
Aug 20, 2025
Primary completion
Nov 20, 2025
Completion
Nov 30, 2025
Last update
Dec 18, 2025

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion