ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07288944PROMPTUpdated Dec 17, 2025

Protocolised Management of Phosphate Replacement Trial

An interventional study of Liberal Phosphate Replacement Protocol and Restrictive Phosphate Replacement Protocol in Phosphate Deficiency, Hypophosphatemia and Protocol Optimization, sponsored by Caboolture Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-17.

Sponsored by Caboolture Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this cluster, crossover, randomised controlled trial is to compare two standard arms of treatment for the replacement of phosphate in critically ill patients.

We hypothesise that protocolised restricted phosphate replacement, compared to protocolised liberal phosphate replacement, will result in reduced administration of phosphate with similar clinical outcomes.

All eligible Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients will be included during their admission with the selected protocol for that period as per usual practice and treatment standards.

Read the detailed description

This study looks to compare liberal and restrictive phosphate replacement protocols (each arm is a current "standard of care" already used in practice) to investigate whether restrictive phosphate replacement in critically ill patients leads to reduced phosphate administration and/or equivalent patient outcomes.

Derangements of serum phosphate concentrations are common among ICU patients; high and low levels variably associated with worse outcomes. The PROMPT trial will compare two standard arms of treatment for the replacement of phosphate in critically ill patients. Phosphate is currently replaced routinely in ICU's however there is not a standardised evidence-based guideline to effectively guide phosphate administration for ICU patients

This is a cluster, crossover, electronic medical record integrated, randomised, controlled trial. Sites (not patients) will be randomised to wither the liberal or restrictive phosphate replacement protocol for a 6-month period, followed by a 1-month washout period, before switching to the next protocol for the preceding 6-month period. The allocated phosphate replacement protocol will be updated in the electronic medical record to be followed; this process is already part of normal clinical practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Phosphate Deficiency
  • Hypophosphatemia
  • Protocol Optimization
  • Critical Care, Intensive Care

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Phosphate Protocol
  • Critical Care
  • Intensive Care
  • Hypophosphatemia
  • Phosphate Deficiency
03

In context

Hypophosphatemia

53 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypophosphatemia; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,400 is above the median of 46 across 26 interventional studies indexed under Hypophosphatemia.

Browse Hypophosphatemia studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Caboolture Hospital as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All adult patients admitted to participating intensive care units during the study period.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • There will be no specific exclusion criteria
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Liberal Phosphate Replacement Protocol

    The liberal group, a recommendation for phosphate replacement would be given if the serum phosphate concentration was 0.79 mmol/L, but not if 0.80 mmol/L.

    Other: Liberal Phosphate Replacement Protocol

  • Active comparator
    Conservative Phosphate Replacement Protocol

    The restrictive protocol will recommend phosphate replacement to commence at a threshold of 0.50 mmol/L, and the liberal protocol at 0.80 mmol/L.

    Other: Restrictive Phosphate Replacement Protocol

Interventions

  • OtherLiberal Phosphate Replacement Protocol

    The liberal group, a recommendation for phosphate replacement would be given if the serum phosphate concentration was 0.79 mmol/L, but not if 0.80 mmol/L.

  • OtherRestrictive Phosphate Replacement Protocol

    The restrictive protocol will recommend phosphate replacement to commence at a threshold of 0.50 mmol/L, and the liberal protocol at 0.80 mmol/L.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. non-inferiority for days alive and free of the intensive care unit (ICU) up to 30 days (DAF-ICU-30)

    The primary outcome will be assessed as non-inferiority in the number of days alive and free of ICU within 30 days from study enrolment. ICU length of stay will be used to calculate. This measure is reported on a continuous scale ranging from 0 (worst outcome: death or full ICU stay) to 30 (best outcome: alive and ICU-free for all 30 days), where higher scores indicate a better outcome. The difference between groups will be expressed as a mean difference with 95% confidence intervals.

    Time frame: 30 Days post study enrolment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Phosphate usage

    Quantities of intravenous and oral phosphate replaced (total and individually)

    Time frame: individual arm and total quantities used over 12-month study period

  2. Patients receiving phosphate

    Proportion of patients receiving any phosphate replacement

    Time frame: total proportion of patients receiving phosphate throughout 12-month study period

  3. Hospital Length of Stay

    Total time spent in hospital - hospital admission time to hospital discharge time

    Time frame: hospital admission to hospital discharge throughout 12-month study period

  4. Hospital Mortality

    hospital mortality rates for all participants throughout study period

    Time frame: hospital admission to hospital discharge throughout 12-month study period

  5. cardiac rhythm disturbance

    Symptomatic cardiac rhythm disturbance (cardiac arrhythmia that requires treatment with chemical or electric cardioversion)

    Time frame: ICU admission to ICU discharge, throughout 12-month study period

  6. Mechanical ventilation hours

    Hours of invasive mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: hospital admission to hospital discharge, throughout 12-month study period

  7. Tracheal reintubation

    Tracheal intubation requirement during admission

    Time frame: hospital admission to hospital discharge, throughout 12-month study period

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ramanan M, Tabah A, Affleck J, Edwards F, White KC, Attokaran A, Laupland K. Hypophosphataemia in Critical Illness: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 26;13(23):7165. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237165. PubMed 39685625 ↗
  • Sin JCK, Laupland KB, Ramanan M, Tabah A. Phosphate abnormalities and outcomes among admissions to the intensive care unit: A retrospective multicentre cohort study. J Crit Care. 2021 Aug;64:154-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Apr 18. PubMed 33906104 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jan 2026; primary completion for Feb 2027, 13 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 20, 2025
First posted
Dec 17, 2025
StartEst.
Jan 2026
Primary completionEst.
Feb 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2027
Last update
Dec 17, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 17, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07288944
Lead sponsor
Caboolture Hospital
Collaborators
Queensland University of Technology
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 17, 2025
Start date
Jan 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 17, 2025

Study contacts

Mahesh Ramanan
Contact
mahesh.ramanan@health.qld.gov.au
+61 7 5433 8888
Emma L Williams
Contact
emma.williams6@health.qld.gov.au
+61 488 474 254
Mahesh Ramanan
principal investigator · +61 7 5433 8888

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion