ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07286344Updated Jun 2, 2026

Effect of Fluoride Varnish Formulation on the Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity

An interventional study of Aqueous fluoride varnish, 9,500 ppm NaF and Resin/rosin-based varnish, 22,600 ppm NaF in Hypersensitivity Dentin and Fluoride Varnishes, sponsored by University of Concepcion, Chile. Recruiting at 1 site in Chile. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-02.

Sponsored by University of Concepcion, Chile · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Dec 2025; still recruiting 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
92
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to determine whether different fluoride varnish formulations reduce dentin hypersensitivity (DH) in young adults diagnosed with DH. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of two commercially available fluoride varnishes.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

  • Does Clinpro Clear® (aqueous base, 9,500 ppm NaF) lead to a greater reduction in dentin hypersensitivity compared with Duraphat® (rosin/resin base, 22,600 ppm NaF)?
  • Do these varnish formulations improve oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction?

Researchers will compare a single application of Duraphat® with a single application of Clinpro Clear® to assess differences in hypersensitivity reduction, quality-of-life outcomes, and patient satisfaction.

Participants will:

  • Receive one application of either Duraphat® or Clinpro Clear® under standardized clinical conditions.
  • Complete baseline and post-treatment evaluations, including:
  • Dentin hypersensitivity intensity using a visual analogue scale (VAS)
  • Air-blast response using the Schiff scale
  • Oral health-related quality of life using the OHIP-14
  • Patient satisfaction using the CSAT survey
02

Conditions studied

  • Hypersensitivity Dentin
  • Fluoride Varnishes

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Dentin hypersensitivity
  • Fluoride varnishes
  • Visual analogue scale (VAS)
  • Schiff scale
  • OHIP-14
  • Desensitizing agents
  • Aqueous fluoride varnish
03

In context

Dentin Sensitivity

288 studies on the registry are indexed under Dentin Sensitivity; 46 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 92 is above the median of 60 across 279 interventional studies indexed under Dentin Sensitivity.

Browse Dentin Sensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Concepcion, Chile is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 40 years
  • Absence of systemic diseases with oral manifestations or requiring medications with antisialagogue effects
  • Fully dentate (excluding third molars or teeth extracted for orthodontic reasons)
  • Absence of periodontal disease, or periodontal condition in a stable state
  • Presence of at least one cervical lesion with a Schiff sensitivity score ≥ 1
  • No previous treatment or restorative procedures on the target lesions (including no topical fluoride application within the last 6 months)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients requiring long-term use of NSAIDs or other analgesic/anti-inflammatory medications
  • Patients with allergy to milk proteins
  • Patients with allergy to organic resins or pine-derived substances
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding individuals
  • Patients with fixed orthodontic appliances in place
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
92 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Resin/rosin-based varnish, 22,600 ppm NaF (Duraphat® Fluoride Varnish)

    Application procedure: * The tooth surface will be cleaned and saliva gently removed. * The appropriate amount of varnish will be dispensed onto an application tray. * The varnish will be applied with a cotton applicator, probe, or brush, forming a thin film. * The patient will remain seated with lip retractors in place for 15 minutes. * Patients will be instructed not to brush their teeth or chew hard foods for at least 4 hours post-application.

    Device: Resin/rosin-based varnish, 22,600 ppm NaF

  • Experimental
    Aqueous fluoride varnish, 9,500 ppm NaF (Clinpro Clear® Fluoride Varnish)

    Application procedure: * The tooth surface will be cleaned and dried; a lip retractor will be used. * The varnish will be expressed fully into the dispensing chamber of the unit-dose package. * Using the applicator brush, the varnish will be applied to fully cover the hypersensitive area. * Patients will be instructed not to touch the teeth with the tongue or attempt to remove the varnish. * After application, patients will remain with lip retractors in place for 15 minutes.

    Device: Aqueous fluoride varnish, 9,500 ppm NaF

Interventions

  • DeviceAqueous fluoride varnish, 9,500 ppm NaF

    The tooth surface will be cleaned and dried with a lip retractor in place. The varnish will be dispensed into the unit-dose chamber and applied with a brush to fully cover the hypersensitive area. Patients will be instructed not to disturb the varnish and will remain with the lip retractors in place for 15 minutes.

  • DeviceResin/rosin-based varnish, 22,600 ppm NaF

    The tooth surface will be cleaned and dried, and the varnish will be dispensed onto an application tray. A thin film will be applied using a cotton applicator, probe, or brush. Patients will remain seated with lip retractors in place for 15 minutes and will be advised to avoid toothbrushing and hard foods for at least 4 hours after application.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in dentin hypersensitivity to mechanical stimulation from baseline to post-fluoride varnish application

    Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) With the tooth isolated and dry, a curved dental probe will be gently passed in a mesiodistal direction across the lesion area. Pain perception will be assessed using a VAS, on which the patient indicates the perceived pain intensity, ranging from no pain (0) to the worst pain imaginable (100). The score, measured on a 0-100 mm scale, will be recorded for each lesion.

    Time frame: Baseline; 7 and 28 days after the intervention.

  2. Change in dentin hypersensitivity to air stimulation from baseline to post-fluoride varnish application

    Air blast test (Schiff test) An air stimulus will be applied for 4 seconds from a distance of 3-4 mm using a triple syringe with standardized air pressure (40-60 psi) at room temperature. In cases of cervical lesions on adjacent teeth, neighboring lesions will be isolated with cotton to ensure tooth-specific responses. Pain response will be assessed using the Schiff sensitivity scale: * Score 0: No response to the air stimulus. * Score 1: A response is perceived, but the subject does not request discontinuation of the stimulus and does not move away. * Score 2: A response is perceived and the subject requests discontinuation of the stimulus or involuntarily moves away. * Score 3: An intense pain response occurs, with immediate request to stop the stimulus or marked withdrawal from it.

    Time frame: Baseline; 7 and 28 days after the intervention.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in oral health-related quality of life from baseline to post-fluoride varnish application

    This outcome will be measured using a validated translation to Spanish of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), evaluating the impact of dentin hypersensitivity on quality of life across seven domains: functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability, and handicap. Patients report how frequently they experienced dentin hypersensitivity-related problems using a 5-point Likert scale (0 = never to 4 = very often). Total scores range from 0-56, with higher scores indicating poorer oral health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline; 28 days after intervention

  2. Patient satisfaction following fluoride varnish application

    Client Satisfaction Assessment Tool (CSAT) CSAT will assess patient satisfaction using three items evaluating comfort during fluoride varnish application, ease of adherence to post-application instructions, and likelihood of recommending the treatment to others with dentin hypersensitivity. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from negative to positive perceptions (1 = very uncomfortable/difficult/improbable to 5 = very comfortable/easy/probable), with higher scores indicating greater patient satisfaction.

    Time frame: 7 days after intervention.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Clinica de Rehabilitación Avanzada e Implantologia (CRAI)
    Concepción, Biobio 4070420, Chile
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tenuta LMA, Capalbo LC, Yoshino EY. Enamel Fluoride Reactivity of Professional Fluoride Products Is Not Correlated With Their Total Fluoride Content. Pediatr Dent. 2025 May 15;47(3):178-182. PubMed 40533917 ↗
  • Sharan A, Pawar B, Bagde H, Chawla TK, Dhan AV, Shyamsukha B, Sharma S. Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Hypersensitivity Reduction Over One Month after a Single Topical Application of Three Different Materials: A Prospective Experimental Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 4):S3405-S3407. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_848_24. Epub 2024 Oct 29. PubMed 39926954 ↗
  • Sgreccia PC, Dame-Teixeira N, Barbosa RES, Araujo PF, Zanatta RF, Garcia FCP. Assessment of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) improvement of different treatments for dentin hypersensitivity in noncarious cervical lesions-a randomized clinical study. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Nov;26(11):6583-6591. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04610-x. Epub 2022 Jul 7. PubMed 35796800 ↗
  • Porto IC, Andrade AK, Montes MA. Diagnosis and treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Oral Sci. 2009 Sep;51(3):323-32. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.51.323. PubMed 19776498 ↗
  • Machado AC, Maximiano V, Yoshida ML, Freitas JG, Mendes FM, Aranha ACC, Scaramucci T. Efficacy of a calcium-phosphate/fluoride varnish and ionomeric sealant on cervical dentin hypersensitivity: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study. J Oral Rehabil. 2022 Jan;49(1):62-70. doi: 10.1111/joor.13270. Epub 2021 Nov 2. PubMed 34676918 ↗
  • Lopez R, Baelum V. Spanish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-Sp). BMC Oral Health. 2006 Jul 7;6:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-6-11. PubMed 16827940 ↗
  • Garofalo SA, Sakae LO, Machado AC, Cunha SR, Zezell DM, Scaramucci T, Aranha AC. In Vitro Effect of Innovative Desensitizing Agents on Dentin Tubule Occlusion and Erosive Wear. Oper Dent. 2019 Mar/Apr;44(2):168-177. doi: 10.2341/17-284-L. Epub 2018 Jun 28. PubMed 29953338 ↗
  • Fernandez CE, Tenuta LM, Zarate P, Cury JA. Insoluble NaF in Duraphat(R) may prolong fluoride reactivity of varnish retained on dental surfaces. Braz Dent J. 2014;25(2):160-4. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201302405. PubMed 25140722 ↗
  • Douglas-de-Oliveira DW, Vitor GP, Silveira JO, Martins CC, Costa FO, Cota LOM. Effect of dentin hypersensitivity treatment on oral health related quality of life - A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2018 Apr;71:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.12.007. Epub 2017 Dec 17. PubMed 29262305 ↗
  • Dall Agnol MA, Battiston C, Tenuta LMA, Cury JA. Fluoride Formed on Enamel by Fluoride Varnish or Gel Application: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Caries Res. 2022;56(1):73-80. doi: 10.1159/000521454. Epub 2021 Dec 13. PubMed 34915485 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared. Only aggregated and de-identified summary data may be included in publications and scientific presentations. IPD will not be shared because the study is small in scale, involves sensitive clinical information, and sharing participant-level data may pose privacy risks that cannot be fully mitigated. Additionally, the research objectives can be addressed through summary-level reporting without requiring access to individual datasets.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2026, 7 months after the start.

Of 111 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Dentin Sensitivity, half reached primary completion within 7 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 12. This study's planned 7 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 144 studies reached it within 6 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 10.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 10, 2025
First posted
Dec 16, 2025
StartActual
Dec 4, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jul 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Aug 30, 2026
Last update
Jun 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07286344
Lead sponsor
University of Concepcion, Chile
Collaborators
Solventum
Responsible party
Michael Wendler Ernst (Associate Professor, University of Concepcion, Chile) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 16, 2025
Start date
Dec 4, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 2, 2026

Study contacts

Fernando Zurita, DDS
Contact
proyectonccl@gmail.com
+56996403566
Sebastian Muñoz, DDS
principal investigator · Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Concepcion
Michael Wendler, DDS, PhD
study director · Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Concepcion

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion