ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07284719Updated Jan 7, 2026

MRgFUS for Parkinson's Tremor

An interventional study of MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy in Parkinson s Disease and Tremor, sponsored by Aarhus University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-07.

Sponsored by Aarhus University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2025; still recruiting 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
50 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study investigates magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy (MRgFUSth) for people with Parkinson's disease (PD) and tremor not responding to conventional standard doses of dopamine replacement therapy. The aim is to identify clinical and imaging biomarkers predictive of sustained tremor control up to 24 months after MRgFUSth treatment. Participants will undergo a suprathreshold levodopa test and ¹⁸F-DOPA PET imaging to evaluate dopaminergic and serotonergic involvement in tremor. All participants will receive MRgFUSth and be followed for 24 months with standardized clinical, cognitive, and quality-of-life assessments. The study seeks to improve understanding the possible mechanisms of tremor relapse and inform patient selection for MRgFUSth in PD.

Read the detailed description

Background

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder worldwide, affecting approximately 2% of people over 65 years of age. The pathological hallmark of PD is the progressive degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, and the cardinal clinical features are bradykinesia, rigidity, and resting tremor.

Dopaminergic dysfunction within the striatum closely correlates with the severity of bradykinesia and rigidity. However, this relationship is less consistent for resting tremor, which likely reflects the involvement of additional neurotransmitter systems. While dopamine replacement therapy (DRT) is mostly effective for bradykinesia and rigidity, the effect on resting tremor is more variable.

Positron emission tomography (PET) findings indicate that tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease (TDPD), compared with the akinetic-rigid subtype, is characterized by relatively greater serotonergic than dopaminergic dysfunction. Previous studies have used the raphe nuclei and putamen as markers of serotonergic and dopaminergic terminal integrity, respectively. The interindividual relationship between serotonergic and dopaminergic terminal integrity can thus be expressed by the raphe/putamen specific binding ratio. Reduced integrity of the serotonergic system relative to dopaminergic integrity (low raphe/putamen ratio) has been associated with higher tremor amplitude and may partly account for the limited responsiveness of tremor to DRT compared with bradykinesia and rigidity.

Medical-refractory tremor is a clinical challenge and highlights the need for non-pharmacological treatment.

Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy (MRgFUSth) is an incisionless treatment for both essential tremor and PD tremor. The procedure creates a focal lesion in the ventral intermediate (VIM) nucleus of the thalamus. MRgFUSth has been shown to effectively reduce PD tremor and to have a favorable safety profile. However, approximately 20% of treated patients experience tremor relapse within one to two years. The prevalence and causes of relapse are not well defined.

Hypothesis The investigators hypothesize that underlying differences in neurochemical and neuronal network integrity explain the variability in long-term response and relapse of tremor following MRgFUSth in PD.

Specifically, the expectation is that dopamine-resistant patients with lower raphe/putamen ratios will show more durable tremor control. In contrast, dopamine-responsive patients with higher raphe/putamen ratios may be more prone to relapse as nigrostriatal degeneration progresses.

Objective To increase understanding of tremor relapse following MRgFUSth in PD and to identify clinical and imaging biomarkers associated with sustained tremor control, thereby supporting improved patient selection and optimized therapeutic outcomes.

Study design This is a prospective, interventional cohort study conducted at Aarhus University Hospital.

Eligible participants are 50-80 years old and have established diagnosis of PD and tremor unsatisfactory controlled with conventional standard doses of dopamine replacement therapy.

All screened patients undergo a standardized levodopa test using an oral suprathreshold levodopa/carbidopa dose (300/75 mg) to classify dopaminergic responsiveness of tremor.

The test is performed after ≥8 hours of dopaminergic medication withdrawal ("OFF" state). The Movement Disorder Society version of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III will be administered before and after levodopa/carbidopa administration.

A total of 20 participants will be enrolled, equally divided into two predefined groups based on the outcomes of the levodopa test:

  • Dopamine-responsive group (n=10) >30% improvement in MDS-UPDRS III tremor subscore (items 3.15-18)
  • Dopamine-resistant group (n=10) ≤30% improvement in MDS-UPDRS III tremor subscore

Although all enrolled participants have tremor insufficiently controlled by their usual dopaminergic treatment, some demonstrate marked tremor improvement under the standardized suprathreshold levodopa/carbidopa challenge ('dopamine-responsive'), while others do not ('dopamine-resistant'). These classifications apply solely to the high-dose test conditions and do not reflect real-world treatment effectiveness

A ¹⁸F-DOPA PET (along with an MRI for PET co-registration) will be performed at baseline to further characterize individual serotonergic and dopaminergic specific binding ratios (raphe/putamen ratio) in these patients. A repeat ¹⁸F-DOPA PET will be performed 18 months after MRgFUSth to assess progression of nigrostriatal and/or serotonergic dysfunctions.

All participants will receive unilateral MRgFUSth targeting the ventral intermediate (VIM) nucleus contralateral to the most affected limb.

The procedure is performed using the Exablate Neuro 4000 system (Insightec Ltd.) under MR guidance within its CE-marked clinical indication.

Clinical assessment will be performed at baseline (pre-MRgFUSth) and 24 hours, 6, 12, 18 and 24 month post-MRgFUSth.

Assessment battery:

  • MDS-UPDRS Parts I-IV
  • Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM)
  • Mini-BESTest, 20-meter walk test and Timed Up and Go (TUG) for balance and gait
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
  • Patient and Clinician Global Impression of Change (PGIC, CGI-I)
  • Quality of life (QoL) questionnaires
  • Neuropsychological evaluations

Clinical assessment of FTM part A and B and MDS-UPDS part III will be video recorded.

MDS UPDRS tremor scores (item 3.15-3.18) and FTM part A and B of upper extremities will be rated by a movement disorder specialist blinded to dopamine-responsiveness status of the participant.

Safety and ethics Adverse events, neurological symptoms, and medication adjustments will be recorded at each time point.

Safety monitoring is coordinated by the study's clinical research coordinator, and all events will be reviewed by the investigator team.

All participants will provide written informed consent before enrollment. Data will be recorded in REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) hosted by Aarhus University Hospital, where participant data will be anonymized by randomly assigned project ID. Only the clinical investigators will have access to the data. Data handling complies with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Danish Data Protection Act.

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson s Disease
  • Tremor

Keywords

  • MRgFUS
  • MR-guided focused ultrasound
  • Parkinson's disease
  • tremor
  • Parkinson's tremor
  • Relapse
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,573 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,086 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 40 across 3,353 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Aarhus University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 298 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Established diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease
  • Tremor not manageable with optimal medication
  • Clinical Indication for MRgFUSth
  • Able to understand study requirements and provide consent
  • HOEHN and YAHR \<3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dementia or severe cognitive impairment
  • The presence of another significant neurological/psychiatric disorder or significant disease
  • Severe psychopathology, not medically managed
  • Poor balance and gait function based on neurological examination
  • Epilepsy
  • Active drug abuse
  • History of stroke or structural lesions on MRI that could interfere with image analysis.
  • for MRI
  • Cardiac pacemaker
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • Claustrophobia
  • Patients unable to lie on the back for 2-4 hours in the MR-scanner-setting
  • Patients who do not want information about findings of unknown disease during the trial
  • SDR (Skull density rate) lower than 0.35
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy (MRgFUSth) in Parkinson's tremor

    MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus in participants with Parkinson's and tremor. Baseline and follow-up assessments for 24 months

    Procedure: MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureMR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy

    MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sustained tremor reduction at 24 months

    Number of participants with sustained tremor reduction (defined as ≥50% improvement from pre-surgical baseline) at 24 months in each group. Tremor will be evaluated using the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Part III: Motor Examination Part III total tremor subscore, items 3.15-3.18 (0-40 points, lower scores indicate better outcome) The main analysis will compare the number of patients with sustained tremor control at 24 months between the Dopamine-responsive and the Dopamine-resistant group

    Time frame: From pre-intervention baseline and 24 months after intervention

  2. Mean Tremor Reduction (%)

    Mean percent change from pre-surgical baseline in Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Part III: Motor Examination Part III total tremor subscore, items 3.15-3.18 (0-40 points, lower scores indicate better outcome) at each follow-up visit (24 hours, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months) in the Dopamine-responsive and Dopamine-resistant groups.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24-months after intervention

  3. Time to relapse of tremor

    Proportion of participants who have relapse of tremor at any post-operative follow-up over 24 months in the Dopamine-responsive and Dopamine-resistant groups. Main analysis will evaluate the time points of which relapse occur and differences between the groups Relapse is defined as a decline of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Part III: Motor Examination Part III total tremor subscore, items 3.15-3.18 (0-40 points) to \<50% improvement relative to the pre-surgical baseline

    Time frame: From intervention until 24-month after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Troublesome Tremor Relapse (PGIC-Defined)

    Proportion of participants reporting their tremor as "much worse" or "very much worse" compared with the previous visit on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale (ranging from "very much better" to "very much worse"). Reflects clinically meaningful recurrence of tremor from the patient perspective.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention

  2. Changes in Activity of daily living

    Comparison of changes in Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Part II (Activities of Daily Living; range 0-52, lower scores indicate better functioning) from baseline through 24 month of follow-up between the two groups.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention

  3. Change in quality-of-life (QoL) scores from baseline to 24 months

    Change of QoL at 24 month compared to baseline. Comparison of differences between the two groups

    Time frame: Baseline until 24 month post-intervention

  4. Adverse effects

    Incidence, type, and severity of treatment-related and non-treatment-related adverse events recorded during the procedure, at 24 hours, and at each follow-up visit. Baseline neurological deficits are documented preoperatively and are not reclassified as adverse events unless worsened post-procedure.

    Time frame: Baseline until 24 months post-intervention

  5. Change in cognitive performance (MoCA score) from baseline to follow-up

    Change in cognitive performance from baseline to 24 months measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; range 0-30, where higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning).

    Time frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention

  6. Change in Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose (LEDD) from baseline to 24 months.

    Change in Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose (LEDD) from baseline to 24 months.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention

Other outcomes

  1. Association between baseline Raphe/Putamen specific binding ratio (SBR) and sustained tremor control at 24 months

    Baseline raphe/putamen ratio will be derived from ¹⁸F-DOPA PET as an index of relative serotonergic-to-dopaminergic terminal integrity. The association between baseline raphe/putamen ratio and sustained tremor control at 24 months will be analyzed.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention

  2. Association between baseline levodopa-test outcomes and sustained tremor control at 24 months

    The association between baseline levodopa-test responsiveness and sustained tremor control at 24 months will be analyzed.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2028, 36 months after the start.

Of 1,291 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Parkinson Disease, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 44. This study's planned 36 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,367 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 44.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 3, 2025
First posted
Dec 16, 2025
StartActual
Dec 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2028
CompletionEst.
Feb 2029
Last update
Jan 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07284719
Responsible party
Andreas Nørgaard Glud (Associate Professor of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 16, 2025
Start date
Dec 1, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 7, 2026

Study contacts

Andreas N Glud, Associate Professor
Contact
andglu@rm.dk
+4523882213

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion