CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07280533Updated Dec 12, 2025

Accuracy of Virtual Surgical Planning Versus Traditional Technique in Zygomaticomaxillary Fracture Reduction

An interventional study of Virtual surgical planning and 3D model printing and Prebent titanium miniplates in Facial Bone Fracture, Maxillofacial Injury and Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture, sponsored by Suez Canal University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-12.

Sponsored by Suez Canal University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the accuracy and outcomes of virtual surgical planning (VSP) compared to the traditional surgical technique in the reduction of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures. Twenty patients with ZMC fractures will be randomly assigned into two equal groups: one treated using virtual planning and prebent titanium miniplates, and the other treated conventionally without virtual planning. Clinical evaluation will include facial symmetry, eye movement, and postoperative complications, while radiographic assessment will be performed using CT scans three months after surgery to measure bone formation and alignment accuracy. The study seeks to determine whether virtual surgical planning improves anatomical restoration, esthetics, and functional outcomes compared to traditional methods.

Read the detailed description

Background:

The zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) is one of the most frequently fractured regions of the facial skeleton due to its prominent anatomical position. Improper reduction can lead to functional impairment, facial asymmetry, and poor esthetic results. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) and 3D printing have recently been introduced to enhance surgical precision through preoperative simulation and prebending of fixation plates. However, the clinical superiority of this technique over traditional surgical methods remains under investigation.

Objective:

To compare the accuracy and clinical outcomes of virtual surgical planning and prebent titanium miniplates versus conventional open reduction and internal fixation techniques in the management of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures.

Methods:

This randomized clinical trial will include 20 patients diagnosed with unilateral ZMC fractures, divided equally into two groups.

Group I: Patients treated using virtual surgical planning with 3D model reconstruction, virtual reduction, and prebending of titanium miniplates.

Group II: Patients treated using traditional open reduction and fixation without virtual planning.

All surgeries will be performed under general anesthesia using standard approaches. Clinical evaluation will include assessment of facial symmetry, eye movement, enophthalmos, diplopia, wound healing, and postoperative complications. Radiographic evaluation will be conducted by comparing postoperative 3D CT scans (after 3 months) with preoperative virtual models to assess reduction accuracy and bone formation.

Statistical Analysis:

Data will be analyzed using SPSS software. Descriptive statistics will be presented as mean ± standard deviation. Independent t-tests and ANOVA will be used to compare outcomes between groups, with significance set at p ≤ 0.05.

Expected Outcomes:

It is anticipated that virtual surgical planning will yield superior anatomical accuracy, improved facial symmetry, and reduced intraoperative time and complications compared to conventional techniques.

Ethical Approval:

Approved by the Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, on 30 September 2025 (Board Status: Approved).

Study Start Date: October 2025 Estimated Completion Date: October 2026

02

Conditions studied

  • Facial Bone Fracture
  • Maxillofacial Injury
  • Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture

Keywords

  • Zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture
  • ZMC fracture
  • Virtual surgical planning
  • 3D printing
  • Prebent titanium miniplates
  • Facial symmetry
  • Computer-assisted surgery
  • CT evaluation
  • Traditional surgical method
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults (≥18 years) with clinically and radiographically confirmed ZMC fracture.
  • Fit for general anesthesia and able to undergo CT imaging.
  • Willing to sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic diseases impairing bone healing (osteoporosis, cancer, long-term steroid use).
  • Noncompliance or inability to attend follow-up visits.
  • ASA class IV-VI.
  • Previous facial deformities or fractures.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP) - Prebent Miniplates

    Patients allocated to this arm will undergo preoperative CT segmentation and 3D reconstruction, virtual reduction of the zygomaticomaxillary complex, and 3D printing of the reduced model. Titanium miniplates will be prebent on the 3D printed model before surgery. Surgical fixation will then be performed under general anesthesia using the prebent titanium miniplates.

    Procedure: Virtual surgical planning and 3D model printing · Device: Prebent titanium miniplates

  • Active comparator
    Traditional Open Reduction and Fixation

    Patients allocated to this arm will undergo conventional open reduction and internal fixation of the ZMC fracture under general anesthesia without prior virtual surgical planning or 3D-printed models. Titanium miniplates will be contoured intraoperatively by the surgical team and used for fixation at the appropriate sites.

    Procedure: Conventional open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) · Device: Titanium miniplates and screws (Anton Hipp)

Interventions

  • ProcedureVirtual surgical planning and 3D model printing

    Preoperative CT segmentation, virtual reduction of fracture fragments using 3D planning software, and printing of the reduced 3D anatomical model for plate prebending.

  • DevicePrebent titanium miniplates

    Titanium miniplates prebent on the printed model and used for rigid internal fixation at standard zygomatic fixation points (frontozygomatic suture, infraorbital rim, zygomaticomaxillary buttress) as indicated.

  • ProcedureConventional open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF)

    Standard surgical exposure and manual reduction of fracture fragments with intraoperative confirmation of alignment, followed by contouring and application of titanium miniplates and screws for fixation.

  • DeviceTitanium miniplates and screws (Anton Hipp)

    Surgeon-contoured titanium miniplates applied intraoperatively at the necessary fixation points.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of Fracture Reduction

    Measurement of the 3D linear discrepancy (in millimeters) between the postoperative CT model and the preoperative virtual reduction model using surface-based 3D superimposition (color-map deviation analysis). The mean deviation (mm) will be automatically calculated by the 3D analysis software.

    Time frame: 3 months postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Facial symmetry

    Measurement of midline deviation and the distance (mm) from facial midline to the most lateral point of the malar eminence on both sides using standardized frontal photographs. Symmetry is expressed as the absolute difference in millimeters.

    Time frame: 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively

  2. Eye Movement (Diplopia in Gaze Positions)

    Number of the 9 standard gaze positions in which the participant reports diplopia during clinical examination. The examiner will assess ocular motility in primary position, up gaze, down gaze, right gaze, left gaze, and the 4 oblique gaze positions. Diplopia will be recorded as present or absent in each position, producing a total score from 0 to 9.

    Time frame: 1 week and 3 months postoperatively

  3. Postoperative Complications

    Number of participants developing postoperative complications including infection, wound dehiscence, trismus, or sensory deficit. Each complication will be recorded as "yes/no" for each patient.

    Time frame: Up to 3 months postoperatively

  4. Surgical Time

    Total duration of surgery recorded in minutes from initial incision to final wound closure using the operating room timing system.

    Time frame: Intraoperative (single measurement)

  5. Bone Healing

    Radiographic assessment of bone healing using postoperative CT. Bone union will be scored using a standardized 4-point CT bone healing scale (0 = no healing, 3 = complete cortical continuity).

    Time frame: 3 months postoperatively

06

Study locations

1 site
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Longeac M, Depeyre A, Pereira B, Barthelemy I, Pham Dang N. Virtual surgical planning and three-dimensional printing for the treatment of comminuted zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Sep;122(4):386-390. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2020.05.009. Epub 2020 May 18. PubMed 32439600 ↗
  • Abdul Lateef Hassan T, Abbood Mohammed D. Virtual Surgical Planning and 3-Dimensional Printing for the Treatment of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex and/or Orbital Fracture. J Craniofac Surg. 2023 May 1;34(3):e218-e222. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009056. Epub 2022 Oct 11. PubMed 36217233 ↗
  • Committeri U, Magliulo R, Carraturo E, Arena A, Abbate V, Salzano G, Troise S, Barone S, Germano C, Vaira LA, Giovacchini F, Cataldo R, Grassia MG, Califano L, Piombino P. Virtual surgical planning in tripod zygomatico-maxillary complex fractures: A prospective comparison between two different strategies. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2024 Dec;52(12):1497-1504. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2024.08.020. Epub 2024 Sep 29. PubMed 39349348 ↗
  • Dubron K, Van Camp P, Jacobs R, Politis C, Shaheen E. Accuracy of virtual planning and intraoperative navigation in zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: A systematic review. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Nov;123(6):e841-e848. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Jul 7. PubMed 35809796 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol, analysis plan and consent form · Sep 30, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07280533
Lead sponsor
Suez Canal University
Collaborators
Suez canal university hospitals
Responsible party
hossam shaban (Principal Investigator, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Suez Canal University, Suez Canal University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 12, 2025
Start date
Dec 25, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 12, 2025

Study contacts

Hossam Shaban El Fadly, principle investigator
principal investigator · Suez Canal University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion