An interventional study of Implant placement using Conventional static surgical guide and Implant placement using AI assisted surgical guide in Accuracy of AI App and Accuracy of AI Assisted Surgical Guides, sponsored by Suez Canal University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-17.
Sponsored by Suez Canal University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the accuracy of conventional static surgical guide and AI-assisted static surgical guide in implant placement in the esthetic zone of partially edentulous maxilla , This study will be carried out on patients seeking implant placement in partially edentulous esthetic zone of maxilla, selected from those who were referred to outpatient clinic of the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University. The main research question is assessing what the difference is upon using AI-assisted surgical guide in terms of the accuracy of implant angular and linear deviation, and implant depth. The expected outcome is that The use of AI-assisted surgical guide in implant placement may provide higher accuracy and less deviation than the conventional static surgical guide. This clinical study will be conducted on 20 surgical guides for placement of 20 implants, divided into 2 groups: Group 1: 10 conventional computer-guided static guides for placement of 10 implants (as control group) Group 2: 10 AI-assisted static surgical guides for placement of 10 implants (as study group) The selected patients will get a pre operative CBCT scan and an intraoral scan then the guide design and generation will be performed using conventional software or AI integrated software according to randomization chart generated by "www.randomizer.org", and after the surgery of implant placement through the prefabricated guides the patients will get an immediate post operative CBCT scan.
Wide research has been conducted to enhance the accuracy of implant placement within the bone while adopting more conservative techniques to improve overall success rates. The digital workflow for computer-aided implant surgery includes a range of steps leading to generation of a prosthetically driven, 3-dimensional virtual plan, and generation of static surgical guide. The use of AI integrated software decreases those steps drastically and seems to be a time saver. This study aims to evaluate and compare the accuracy of conventional static surgical guide and AI-assisted static surgical guide in implant placement in the esthetic zone of partially edentulous maxilla. This clinical study will be conducted on 20 surgical guides, divided equally and randomly via (www.randomizer.org) into 2 groups: Group 1: 10 implants will be placed using 10 conventional surgical guides which are made using traditional manual planning \& designing (control group). Group 2: 10 implants will be placed using 10 AI-assisted surgical guides crafted with the help of machine learning-based planning software (study group). AI integrated software performs thorough analysis of the patient's anatomy \& a personalized and precise approach of implant placement. By automating the planning process, AI-assisted guides help reduce human error, planning time and provide precise, data-driven recommendations for implant placement position.
Objectives of this study is
Radiographic assessment through:
6 months post operative CBCT for measuring marginal bone level
Clinical assessment through:
Suez Canal University is the lead sponsor of 164 studies on the registry; 38 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Procedure: Implant placement using Conventional static surgical guide
Procedure: Implant placement using AI assisted surgical guide
Conventional digitally planned surgical guide used for guided implant placement.
AI assisted surgical guide for guided placement of dental implants
Higher accuracy of AI assisted surgical guide
The deviation between the planned and the actual implant positions will be measured in three dimensions: 1\) 2) Angular deviation calculated in degrees. Linear deviation at implant platform and implant apex in millimeters. 3) Implant depth in millimeters The less the deviation, the higher the accuracy
Time frame: Within 24 hours after implant placement
Successful Osseointegration
Implant stability will be measured using an Osstell device (Implant Stability Quotient - ISQ). 6 months Post-operative CBCT for measuring marginal bone level \& peri implant bone density.
Time frame: 6 months postoperative follow up
Plan to share: No — There is no plan to share individual participant data due to institutional policies and participant confidentiality.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Start is estimated for Jul 2026; primary completion for May 2027, 10 months later.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.