ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07278609Updated May 1, 2026

The RheumSafer Study: Improving Medication Appropriateness in People With Rheumatic Conditions

An observational study in Rheumatic Diseases, Inflammatory Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erthematosus (SLE), sponsored by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-01.

Sponsored by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this prospective observational quality improvement study is to determine if a physician tool, MedSafer, combined with educational brochures for patients, can help to reduce the use of 'potentially inappropriate medications' (PIMs) in adults aged 60 and over with rheumatic conditions and polypharmacy (taking 5 or more regular medications).

Researchers will follow participants during usual rheumatic disease care. They will compare the rate of PIM deprescribing (stopping medications or reducing the dose) before and after the introduction of the following interventions:

  • MedSafer reports provided to treating physicians
  • EMPOWER consumer brochures provided to participants

Participants will complete 4 study visits over 18-20 months during which researchers will collect information on medication changes, serious adverse events (emergency visits or hospitalizations), and quality of life.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES AND PURPOSE The primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of provider-facing MedSafer reports, combined with patient-facing educational brochures, for deprescribing PIMs in adults aged ≥60 with rheumatic diseases who have polypharmacy (taking 5 or more regular medications).

HYPOTHESIS MedSafer reports combined with consumer-facing brochures could safely increase PIM deprescription above usual care, improving medication appropriateness.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Prospective before-and-after quality improvement quasi-experimental study within the outpatient rheumatology clinic at the Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Canada. All participants will be followed during 'control' and 'intervention' periods, and all participants will receive the intervention, acting as their own control.

DESCRIPTION OF INTERVENTION

  1. Physician-oriented individualized deprescribing opportunity reports are created for each patient within MedSafer by cross referencing a patients' medical conditions and medications (https://www.medsafer.org/public). Deprescribing opportunities are categorized as "high risk" for adverse drug events if the drug is continued, "intermediate risk" (harms must be weighted against the benefits) and "low risk" for harm (but with little to no added value to continue). Specific tapering instructions, including for sedative hypnotic medications, are provided to complement deprescribing reports. Deprescribing decisions remain at the treating physicians' discretion, and no physician will be obligated to act on a deprescribing suggestion.
  2. Patient-oriented educational material, available to the public for routine use (https://www.deprescribingnetwork.ca/patient-handouts).

    • All participants receive a deprescribing fact sheet in either French or English.
    • Participants taking specific PIMs will also receive consumer-facing bilingual 'EMPOWER' educational brochures (French or English).

STUDY PROCEDURES

Pre-screening and recruitment The study will recruit approximately 100 participants during routine clinical visits. A research team member will pre-screen participants for eligibility by previewing clinic lists using the electronic medical record and reviewing medications lists contained within prior clinical notes.

During regular routine clinical visits, a member of the research team will approach consecutive eligible individuals and invite them to participate in the study. See Eligibility section for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants will be aware that the study will evaluate medication use and changes over time, but will be unaware of the specific details of the intervention or which medications will be studied.

Informed Consent Informed consent will be sought from participants. At the time of consent, potential participants will be informed that they can withdraw their participation from the study at any time, including during the intervention period.

Study visits:

All participants will participate in the 'control' and 'intervention' periods (each approximately 10 months duration), with 2 in-person study visits (occurring concurrently with routine scheduled clinical visits) and 2 virtual visits conducted with a study team member outside usual care visits.

'Control' period (Visit 1 to Visit 2) Visit 1 (index control visit; in-person) will be the recruitment and enrolment visit. After informed consent, participants will complete a baseline questionnaire collecting self-reported demographics. Rheumatic disease diagnosis and year of diagnosis will be collected from medical records. A research team member will record demographics, medications with doses, and medical history into the MedSafer application, and generate deprescribing opportunity reports. However, the treating physician will not receive the reports. Medication lists will be accessed as usual from clinical records as part of best practice for clinic visits, and deprescribing will be left to 'usual care'.

The 5-level version of the EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) will assess baseline quality of life (index score from 0-1, where 1 indicates perfect health).

Visit 2 (in-person or virtual) will take place approximately 4 months (+/- 1 month) following Visit 1. A research team member will review medical records for any medication changes (cessation, initiation, change in dose), and record emergency department visits or hospitalizations (diagnoses, outcomes of the visits). Participants will complete EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. If a routine clinical visit is already taking place during the Visit 2 study window, Visit 2 can also occur in-person at the time of this visit.

Participants may have additional clinical visits during the 'control period', as dictated by their treating physician and their clinical condition, during which no study procedures will take place.

'Intervention' period (Visits 3 and 4) Approximately 2 weeks prior to switching to the intervention period, treating physicians will be introduced to the intervention format and procedures.

Visit 3 (index intervention visit; in-person) will be participants' first returning visit to the rheumatology clinic for usual care during the intervention period. Prior to this visit, a research team member will update current medications within the MedSafer application to generate deprescribing opportunity reports. Treating physicians will then receive personalized deprescribing opportunity reports at the patient visit. Physicians will not be obligated to act on deprescribing opportunities, which require clinical judgement.

Participants will complete the EQ-5D-5L, and receive the intervention bundle.

Visit 4 (virtual/telephone) will be approximately 4 months (+/- 1) following Visit 3. As in Visit 2, a research team member will review medical records and contact participants to ascertain any medication changes (cessation, initiation, change in dose), record emergency department visits, and any hospitalizations, along with details (diagnoses, outcomes of the visits). Participants will complete EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. If a routine clinical visit happens to occur during the Visit 4 study window, this visit can also occur in-person.

Criteria for discontinuing or modifying the intervention There will be no interim analysis. The MedSafer ruleset will remain unchanged throughout the study. In an individual participant, any medication can be re-started or dose escalated at a physicians' discretion on clinical grounds. Re-starting or re-escalation that occurs during the study period will be captured in the study outcomes, along with serious adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWEs).

Strategies to promote uptake of the interventions At the start of the intervention period, the study team will send an introductory notice to the rheumatologists caring for study participants. This document will contain an overview of how study interventions will integrate with the existing workflow, and the expectations for the treating rheumatologist (to review the MedSafer report at the time of performing a medication review, perform any relevant deprescribing). We will provide sample MedSafer reports to physicians (including residents), so they can familiarize themselves with the report format prior to the intervention commencing.

SAMPLE SIZE An expected 5% of participants will undergo deprescribing during usual care (control period), based on prior studies. A sample size of 90 participants will permit detection of a 15% absolute increase in deprescribing during the intervention period, with 80% power to detect a 2-sided alpha of 0.05, accounting for up to 10% loss to follow-up.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES The primary analysis will be restricted to those who have clinical visits during both control and intervention periods. Researchers will summarize study population characteristics, including baseline demographics, disease characteristics, co-morbidities, number of medications, and PIMs (number and medication class).

Primary outcome: the proportion with ≥1 PIM deprescribed during the control and intervention periods will be compared with the McNemar test for paired proportions.

Secondary outcomes:

The paired Student's t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test will compare the number of regular medications taken at the end of the control and intervention periods.

Event rates for SAEs and ADWEs will be calculated as the number of events during the control or intervention periods divided by the person-time of observation during each period.

Researchers will convert raw EQ-5D-5L scores into index values using a Canadian value set. Change in index scores and VAS during the control and intervention periods will be categorized as deterioration, no change, or improvement using established minimally important differences. The proportion with unchanged or improved EQ-5D-5L values and VAS will be compared between control and intervention periods using the McNemar test for paired proportions.

Additional analyses:

  1. A per-protocol analysis will exclude participants who were not exposed to any part of the intervention (e.g. physician did not receive deprescribing reports, participant did not receive deprescribing brochures).
  2. Stratified analyses of the primary outcomes by sex (female and male), gender-related variables (e.g. education, employment), age (\<75 vs >75), rheumatic condition (i.e., inflammatory arthritis vs systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease), baseline number medications (\<10 vs ≥10) will be performed if sufficient group sizes exist. Exploratory analyses will also stratify secondary outcomes according to these characteristics.
  3. Exploratory logistic regression analyses will evaluate factors associated with deprescribing ≥1 PIM, considering age, sex, other demographics, physician, rheumatic condition, number of medications for inclusion, and intervention period in models.
  4. Medication re-starts or dose re-escalation following deprescribing will be reported descriptively for the control and intervention periods.

METHODS TO HANDLE PROTOCOL NON-ADHERENCE AND MISSING DATA The primary analysis will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle: participants returning for a clinical visit during the intervention period who do not receive the intervention (ie, the physician does not receive or review the electronic decision support, a participant does not receive a relevant educational brochure, if indicated, or the participant is no longer taking a PIM) will be included in the analysis. However, participants who do not return at all for clinical follow-up (ie no virtual or in-person visit) during the intervention period will be excluded from the analysis, as they would not have an opportunity to receive the intervention or have medication data collected. A sensitivity analysis (above) will exclude participants who attended a visit during the intervention period but did not receive the intervention (per-protocol analysis). Every effort will be made to reach participants and/or to ascertain reason for not returning to clinic during the intervention period. In study participants do not return for clinical follow-up during the intervention period but can still be contacted, medications and SAEs will still be collected. No imputation of missing data will be performed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatic Diseases
  • Inflammatory Arthritis
  • Systemic Lupus Erthematosus (SLE)
  • Vasculitis
  • Muskuloskeletal Diseases
  • Systemic Autoimmune Diseases

Keywords

  • Deprescribing
  • Potentially inappropriate medications
  • Rheumatic Diseases
  • Polypharmacy
03

In context

Rheumatic Diseases

264 studies on the registry are indexed under Rheumatic Diseases; 60 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 225 across 90 observational studies indexed under Rheumatic Diseases.

Browse Rheumatic Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre is the lead sponsor of 421 studies on the registry; 105 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants will be recruited from patients attending usual follow-up care for chronic rheumatic diseases at the McGill University Health Centre

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged ≥60
  • Followed by a rheumatologist at MUHC for an inflammatory arthritis (such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, spondyloarthritis), a systemic rheumatic disease (such as systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory myositis, systemic sclerosis, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, Sjogren syndrome, systemic vasculitis), or another chronic musculoskeletal or rheumatic condition (such as crystal arthritis and osteoarthritis)
  • Currently taking ≥5 regular medications and ≥1 PIM
  • Anticipated ongoing clinical follow-up in rheumatology at an interval of every 3-9 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide
  • Acute life-threatening illness or \<12 months
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • All participants

    Each participant will serve as their own control and will be followed during control and intervention periods of the study

    Behavioral: MedSafer deprescribing opportunity reports, EMPOWER brochures

Interventions

  • BehavioralMedSafer deprescribing opportunity reports, EMPOWER brochures

    1. Deprescribing opportunity reports: The MedSafer software generates reports by applying embedded "rules" to medication lists, reflecting best practice recommendations. Deprescribing "opportunities" are classified into high risk (for adverse drug events), intermediate risk (harms must be weighed against benefits), and low risk for harm (but with no added value to continue). Reports include the rationale for deprescribing, tapering instructions, or safer drug alternatives (if relevant), and are provided to clinicians at the point-of-care. 2. Patient-oriented educational material: 1. Deprescribing fact sheet (all participants) 2. Consumer-facing bilingual 'EMPOWER' educational brochures for specific PIMs (e.g., gabapentinoids, proton pump inhibitors, benzodiazepines) if applicable

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PIM deprescribing

    The proportion with ≥1 PIM deprescribed (stopped, switched to a safer class, significantly dose-reduced) during the control period compared with the intervention period.

    Time frame: Measured at 4 months (+/- 4 weeks) after the index control and index intervention visits

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total number of regular medications

    Change in median total number of regular medications taken during the control and intervention periods

    Time frame: Measured at 4 months (+/- 4 weeks) after the index control and index intervention visits

  2. EQ-5D-5L (quality of life)

    Proportion with stable or improved EQ-5D-5L and VAS scores during the control and intervention periods

    Time frame: Measured at 4 months (+/- 4 weeks) after the index control and index intervention visits

  3. Serious adverse events (SAE)

    Any unplanned emergency department visit, hospitalization, or death

    Time frame: Measured at 4 months (+/- 4 weeks) after the index control and index intervention visits

  4. Serious adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWE)

    Any SAE attributed to deprescribing a PIM, adjudicated by two independent reviewers, blinded to intervention exposure period, using the Leape and Bates Likert scale. In the primary analysis, scores of 5 or 6 (probably or definitely caused by withdrawing a medication) will define ADWEs. A third blinded reviewer will resolve discordant rankings.

    Time frame: Measured at 4 months (+/- 4 weeks) after the index control and index intervention visits

Other outcomes

  1. Medication re-prescribing

    Proportion of medication re-escalation or re-initiation following deprescribing during control and intervention periods

    Time frame: Measured at 4 months (+/-4 weeks) after the index control and index intervention visits

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre
    Montreal, Quebec H3G1A4, Canada
    Recruiting
    • Arielle Mendel, MD MSc · Contactarielle.mendel@mcgill.ca · 514-934-1934
    • Jeannette Bere, BSc · Contactjeannette.bere@rimuhc.ca
    • Arielle Mendel, MD MSc · Principal investigator
    • Ines Colmegna, MD · Sub investigator
    • Emily G McDonald, MD MSc · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Participants do not consent for their IPD to be shared with other researchers

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07278609
Collaborators
The Arthritis Society, Canada
Responsible party
Arielle Mendel (Assistant Professor/Investigator, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 12, 2025
Start date
Oct 29, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
May 1, 2026

Study contacts

Arielle Mendel, MD MSc
Contact
arielle.mendel@mcgill.ca
5149341934 ext. 47284
Jeannette Bere, BSc, LPN
Contact
jeannette.bere@rimuhc.ca
Arielle Mendel, MD MSc
principal investigator · RI-MUHC/MUHC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion