CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07271979Updated Jul 15, 2026

Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Ropivacaine for Preperitoneal Infiltration Analgesia in Upper Abdominal Laparotomy

An interventional study of Liposomal bupivacaine and ropivacaine in Liposomal Bupivacaine, Preperitoneal Infiltration and Analgesia, sponsored by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-15.

Sponsored by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
146
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Upper abdominal open surgery is associated with significant trauma, and postoperative pain management poses considerable challenges. The inflammatory response triggered by peritoneal incision and the transmission of visceral pain via the vagus nerve are key components of "surgical stress" and pain. A potential intervention strategy involves the local administration of anesthetic agents to suppress peritoneal overreaction and block the cascade of pro-inflammatory cytokines in related nerves. Liposomal bupivacaine, as a long-acting local anesthetic, may provide more prolonged postoperative analgesia compared to ropivacaine. Therefore, this trial aims to prospectively compare the analgesic efficacy and anti-inflammatory effects of the two drugs when administered as pre-closure preperitoneal infiltration. Secondary endpoints include opioid consumption, complication rates, and postoperative recovery indicators, to comprehensively evaluate their clinical value.

Read the detailed description

Patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal open surgery often experience moderate to severe postoperative pain, which not only hinders early recovery but also significantly impairs their quality of life. Ideal postoperative analgesia requires a balance between efficacy and safety, and preperitoneal local anesthetic administration serves as an effective strategy to achieve this goal. Compared to conventional local anesthetics, liposomal bupivacaine-as a novel sustained-release formulation-enables continuous drug release, extending the analgesic duration to 48-72 hours. This study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic effects of preperitoneal injection of liposomal bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal open surgery.

This study employs a randomized controlled design. Participants will be stratified based on the type of surgical incision (midline or subcostal) and randomized into groups using a computer-generated random seed with permuted block randomization (variable block sizes of 2, 4). Prior to abdominal closure during surgery, the experimental group will receive liposomal bupivacaine injections into the preperitoneal space on both sides of the wound, while the control group will receive ropivacaine injections. Apart from this intervention, both groups will maintain identical protocols for anesthesia induction, maintenance, and postoperative systemic analgesia to accurately evaluate the relative efficacy of the two local analgesic agents.

02

Conditions studied

  • Liposomal Bupivacaine
  • Preperitoneal Infiltration
  • Analgesia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Agnosia

1,190 studies on the registry are indexed under Agnosia; 508 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 146 is above the median of 78 across 1,024 interventional studies indexed under Agnosia.

Browse Agnosia studies →

Lead sponsor

Qilu Hospital of Shandong University is the lead sponsor of 299 studies on the registry; 181 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Aged 18 to 75 years; for those >70 years old, a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score ≥80 is required.
  2. Scheduled for elective upper abdominal laparotomy.
  3. Surgical approach involving either a subcostal or midline incision.
  4. Incision length between 15 and 30 cm.
  5. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of I to III.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. ASA Physical Status Class greater than III.
  2. Pre-existing chronic pain with long-term opioid use (for >1 year).
  3. Significant hepatic or renal impairment, or underweight status, defined as:

    Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of \<40 mL/min/1.73m²; Child-Pugh Class C; Body Mass Index (BMI) \<18.5 kg/m².

  4. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to the investigational drug or any of its excipients.
  5. Pregnancy or lactation
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
146 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Liposomal bupivacaine

    Prior to abdominal closure, the subject received a preperitoneal administration of liposomal bupivacaine at the surgical incision site. The total injection dose did not exceed 266 mg. A volume of 1 ml of the drug solution was administered per 1.5 cm of wound length per side.

    Drug: Liposomal bupivacaine

  • Active comparator
    ropivacaine

    Prior to abdominal closure, the subject received a preperitoneal administration of 0.3% ropivacaine at the surgical incision site. A volume of 1 ml of the drug solution was administered per 1.5 cm of wound length per side.

    Drug: ropivacaine

Interventions

  • DrugLiposomal bupivacaine

    Prior to abdominal closure, liposomal bupivacaine is administered preperitoneally along the surgical incision and diluted with normal saline according to the incision length.

  • Drugropivacaine

    Prior to abdominal closure, ropivacaine is administered preperitoneally along the surgical incision and diluted with normal saline to a concentration of 0.3%.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. postoperative pain score(NRS)

    The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is an 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents the "worst pain imaginable." Based on this, scores of 1-3 indicate mild pain, 4-6 indicate moderate pain requiring intervention, and 7-10 indicate severe pain necessitating urgent treatment. In this study, the investigators primarily assessed the incidence of an NRS score ≥ 4 within 24 hours postoperatively and the worst pain experienced by patients during that period.

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to First Rescue Analgesia and Number of Effective Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA)

    The PCIA protocol (sufentanil 2 μg/kg in 100 mL saline, no background infusion, 3 mL bolus, 30-min lockout) was used. We recorded the time to first PCIA activation and the cumulative number of effective boluses within the first 72 postoperative hours.

    Time frame: Day 3

  2. the use of flurbiprofen axetil

    the amount of rescue analgesic drugs flurbiprofen axetil used

    Time frame: Day 3

  3. postoperative adverse events

    the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and vertigo after surgery

    Time frame: The first 3 postoperative days

  4. The Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire

    It uses a 0-100 mm visual analog scale, with higher scores indicating better sleep quality.

    Time frame: day 3

  5. Quality of Recovery-15 (QOR-15) scale

    The scores from all 15 questions are summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 150, with a higher total score indicating a better quality of recovery for the patient.

    Time frame: The first 3 postoperative days

  6. Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score

    This score is a patient-reported outcome measure for comprehensively evaluating the effectiveness of postoperative analgesic regimens, using a 29-point scale from 0 (best) to 28 (worst).

    Time frame: The first three postoperative days

  7. Changes in postoperative pain

    Changes in pain scores (NRS) within the first 3 days postoperatively, including scores at rest at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours, as well as the peak pain level during this 3-day period.

    Time frame: The first 3 postoperative days

  8. hospital length of stay

    The time between hospital admission and discharge

    Time frame: From date of hospital admission until the date of discharge,assessed up to 15 days.

  9. C-reactive protein

    The inflammatory marker of participants will be test after surgery

    Time frame: On the preoperative day and postoperative day 1

  10. White Blood Cell Count and Differential

    By analyzing the WBC profile-including both total count and cell type distribution-the inflammatory condition of a patient can be evaluated.

    Time frame: Day 1

  11. Postoperative Complications

    The probability of patients acquiring pulmonary complications after surgery.

    Time frame: One month after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
    Jinan, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Othman AH, Ahmed DG, Abd El-Rahman AM, El Sherif FA, Mansour S, Aboeleuon E. Effect of Preperitoneal Versus Epidural Analgesia on Postoperative Inflammatory Response and Pain Following Radical Cystectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Trial. Clin J Pain. 2019 Apr;35(4):328-334. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000679. PubMed 30829734 ↗
  • Colibaseanu DT, Osagiede O, Merchea A, Ball CT, Bojaxhi E, Panchamia JK, Jacob AK, Kelley SR, Naessens JM, Larson DW. Randomized clinical trial of liposomal bupivacaine transverse abdominis plane block versus intrathecal analgesia in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2019 May;106(6):692-699. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11141. Epub 2019 Mar 28. PubMed 30919948 ↗
  • Pedrazzani C, Park SY, Conti C, Turri G, Park JS, Kim HJ, Polati E, Guglielmi A, Choi GS. Analgesic efficacy of pre-emptive local wound infiltration plus laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection: results from a randomized, multicenter, single-blind, non-inferiority trial. Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3329-3338. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07771-6. Epub 2020 Jul 6. PubMed 32632489 ↗
  • Gasanova I, Alexander J, Ogunnaike B, Hamid C, Rogers D, Minhajuddin A, Joshi GP. Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Surgical Site Infiltration for Pain Management After Open Total Abdominal Hysterectomy. Anesth Analg. 2015 Nov;121(5):1383-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000909. PubMed 26252171 ↗
  • Beaussier M, El'Ayoubi H, Schiffer E, Rollin M, Parc Y, Mazoit JX, Azizi L, Gervaz P, Rohr S, Biermann C, Lienhart A, Eledjam JJ. Continuous preperitoneal infusion of ropivacaine provides effective analgesia and accelerates recovery after colorectal surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2007 Sep;107(3):461-8. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000278903.91986.19. PubMed 17721249 ↗
  • Tawfik MM, Mohamed YM, Elbadrawi RE, Abdelkhalek M, Mogahed MM, Ezz HM. Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Wound Infiltration for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2017 Apr;124(4):1291-1297. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001724. PubMed 27984230 ↗
  • Teo ZHT, Tey BLJ, Foo CW, Wong WY, Low JK. Intraoperative Celiac Plexus Block With Preperitoneal Infusion Reduces Opioid Usage in Major Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery: A Pilot Study. Ann Surg. 2021 Jul 1;274(1):e97-e99. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004883. PubMed 33856374 ↗
  • Ozer A, Yilmazlar A, Ozturk E, Yilmazlar T. Preperitoneal catheter analgesia is an effective method for pain management after colorectal surgery: the results of 100 consecutive patients. Local Reg Anesth. 2014 Oct 9;7:53-7. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S71476. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25336988 ↗
  • Alexander JC, Sunna M, Goldenmerry Y, Mootz A, O'Connor C, Ringqvist J, Bunker M, Joshi GP, Gasanova I. Comparison of transversus abdominis plane blocks with liposomal bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in open total abdominal hysterectomy. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 Jun 30;35(6):746-750. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2090798. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36304627 ↗
  • Ben-Saghroune H, Abdessadek M, Achour S, Kfal Y, El Bouazzaoui A, Kanjaa N, Sbai H. Assessment of the Safety and Efficiency of a Preperitoneal Continuous Infusion Using Bupivacaine after Abdominal Laparotomy in Digestive Carcinology. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2023 Oct 10;2023:8842393. doi: 10.1155/2023/8842393. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37854305 ↗
  • Rawal N. Current issues in postoperative pain management. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Mar;33(3):160-71. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000366. PubMed 26509324 ↗
  • Sammour T, Kahokehr A, Soop M, Hill AG. Peritoneal damage: the inflammatory response and clinical implications of the neuro-immuno-humoral axis. World J Surg. 2010 Apr;34(4):704-20. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0382-y. PubMed 20049432 ↗
  • Baeriswyl M, Zeiter F, Piubellini D, Kirkham KR, Albrecht E. The analgesic efficacy of transverse abdominis plane block versus epidural analgesia: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(26):e11261. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011261. PubMed 29952997 ↗
  • Ozturk E, Yilmazlar A, Coskun F, Isik O, Yilmazlar T. The beneficial effects of preperitoneal catheter analgesia following colon and rectal resections: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Tech Coloproctol. 2011 Sep;15(3):331-6. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0720-6. Epub 2011 Jul 19. PubMed 21769617 ↗
  • Joshi GP, Machi A. Surgical site infiltration: A neuroanatomical approach. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Sep;33(3):317-324. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.07.017. Epub 2019 Jul 25. PubMed 31785717 ↗
  • Mungroop TH, Bond MJ, Lirk P, Busch OR, Hollmann MW, Veelo DP, Besselink MG. Preperitoneal or Subcutaneous Wound Catheters as Alternative for Epidural Analgesia in Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2019 Feb;269(2):252-260. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002817. PubMed 29781846 ↗
  • Perniola A, Fant F, Magnuson A, Axelsson K, Gupta A. Postoperative pain after abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial comparing continuous infusion vs patient-controlled intraperitoneal injection of local anaesthetic. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Feb;112(2):328-36. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet345. Epub 2013 Oct 31. PubMed 24185607 ↗
  • Mungroop TH, Veelo DP, Busch OR, van Dieren S, van Gulik TM, Karsten TM, de Castro SM, Godfried MB, Thiel B, Hollmann MW, Lirk P, Besselink MG. Continuous wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery (POP-UP): a randomised controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Oct;1(2):105-113. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30012-7. Epub 2016 Jul 7. PubMed 28404067 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07271979
Lead sponsor
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
Responsible party
Jinying Zhang (Principal Investigator, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 9, 2025
Start date
Jan 4, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 23, 2026
Completion
May 23, 2026
Last update
Jul 15, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion