ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07172984Respi-IRUpdated Oct 7, 2026

The Value of Standardized Respiratory Rate Monitoring Exercises During Rheumatological Injection Procedures

An interventional study of Anesthesia and breathing group in Rheumatological Injection, Pain Management and Respiratory Monitoring, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Metropole Savoie. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-07.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Metropole Savoie · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
136
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of standardized breathing control exercises on perceived pain during rheumatological injections procedures compared to standard care consisting of the addition of a local anesthetic. The study population will consist of patients scheduled to undergo therapeutic ultrasound-guided joint or periarticular injection. The main question it aims to answer is:

  • Non-inferiority of breathing exercises compared to the addition of local anesthetic on pain and anxiety experienced during an infiltration procedure.
  • Correlation between the reduction in pain and anxiety experienced during a procedure and the cardiac coherence score obtained.

Researchers will compare the anesthesia group (Arm A), which will receive local anesthesia with 5 cc of lidocaine before the infiltration procedure to the breathing group (Arm B), which will receive instructions before the injection procedure on how to perform 5-minute breathing cycles to facilitate the achievement of cardiac coherence to see if the pain perceived in Arm B is not greater than the pain perceived in Arm A.

Participants will be kept blind to their randomization group. Arm A (anesthesia) will receive SHAM breathing exercises, while Arm B (breathing) will receive a placebo injection of anesthetic.

Read the detailed description

This randomized, controlled, single-blind, single-center non-inferiority study aims to evaluate the impact of local anesthesia and breathing exercises on pain and anxiety management during joint or periarticular injections. Participants are patients referred to a rheumatology consultation or referred by an outside physician for injections requiring local anesthesia, such as those performed on the shoulder, elbow, knee, hip, or ankle.

Patients will be kept blind to their randomization group. In both groups, continuous heart rate recording will be performed during the procedure using the EmWave PRO device (to assess cardiorespiratory variability and calculate a cardiac coherence score).

In the "anesthesia" group, local anesthesia with 5 cc of lidocaine will be administered before the infiltration procedure, and the patient will receive breathing instructions as part of "SHAM" management, which will prevent them from achieving cardiac coherence.

In the "breathing" group, patients will perform 5-minute breathing exercises before the procedure (10-second cycles: 5 seconds of inhalation and 5 seconds of exhalation) to enable them to achieve the expected analgesic cardiac coherence. The practitioner performing the procedure will use 5 cc of saline solution instead of the usual anesthesia.

After infiltration, participants' pain, anxiety, and satisfaction will be measured using EVA scale.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatological Injection
  • Pain Management
  • Respiratory Monitoring

Keywords

  • rheumatological injection
  • local anesthesia during intra-articular injection
  • respiratory rate monitoring
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Metropole Savoie is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient scheduled to undergo therapeutic ultrasound-guided joint or periarticular injection.
  • Patient able to sign an form to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient able to sign an form to participate in the study - - Allergy to the injection product or anesthetic.
  • Injection not allowing the use of a local anesthetic due to insufficient joint volume (e.g., fingers/toes).
  • Epidural injection via the sacrococcygeal hiatus.
  • Pregnant women
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
136 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Anesthesia group

    Receives local anesthesia with 5 cc of lidocaine before the infiltration procedure.

    Procedure: Anesthesia

  • Experimental
    breathing group

    Explanations for performing 5-minute breathing cycles that facilitate the achievement of cardiac coherence, with visual feedback.

    Procedure: breathing group

Interventions

  • ProcedureAnesthesia

    Receives local anesthesia with 5 cc of lidocaine before the infiltration procedure.The patient will receive breathing instructions as part of "SHAM" treatment, which will not allow them to achieve cardiac coherence.

  • Procedurebreathing group

    The procedure will use 5 cc of saline solution instead of the usual anesthesia. Explanations for performing 5-minute breathing cycles that facilitate the achievement of cardiac coherence, with visual feedback.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain during rheumatological injection

    Pain perceived during rheumatological injection measured using the Visual Analog Scale between 0 to 10 (the higher score mean the worst outcome) and compared between groups.

    Time frame: during injection

Secondary outcomes

  1. anxiety during procedure

    Anxiety experienced during the procedure, measured by the Visual Analog Scale between 0 to 10, the higher score mean the worst outcome and compared between groups.

    Time frame: during the procedure

  2. Cardiac coherence score

    Cardiac coherence score during injection (0 to 100, the higher score mean the better outcome) , provided by the EMWAVE device, compared between the breathing group and the anesthesia group.

    Time frame: during procedure

  3. pain correlated with cardiac coherence score

    Pain measured using the Visual Analog Scale ( 0 to 10, the higher score mean the worst outcome) , correlated within the experimental group with the cardiac coherence score.

    Time frame: end of intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Sep 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2028, 36 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 8, 2025
First posted
Sep 15, 2025
StartActual
Sep 19, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 20, 2028
CompletionEst.
Sep 20, 2028
Last update
Oct 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: identifiers and verification date
1 update, last Oct 7, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 7, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 2 other changes: identifiers and verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07172984
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Metropole Savoie
Collaborators
Université Savoie Mont Blanc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 15, 2025
Start date
Sep 19, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 20, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 20, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 7, 2026

Study contacts

leo blervaque
Contact
urc@ch-metropole-savoie.fr
+33 4 79 96 58 13 ext. +33

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion