ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07267689AIRUpdated Jul 23, 2026

Evaluation of a Hypertonic Seawater Aerosol Therapy Solution in Adults and Children

An interventional study of Treatment (22‰ Hypertonic seawater aerosol therapy solution) in Upper Resp Tract Infection, Rhinitis Acute and Rhinopharyngitis, sponsored by Laboratoires Gilbert. Completed at 4 sites in Poland. Open to participants aged 2 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-23.

Sponsored by Laboratoires Gilbert · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
110
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
2 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the tolerance, the performance and safety of this device, 22‰ Hypertonic seawater aerosol therapy solution in unidose container, to treat adult and peadiatric patients with of upper respiratory tract infection such as rhinopharyngitis, rhinitis, acute rhinosinusitis or cold.

The main questions it aims to answer are to assess if the 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution used as aerosol therapy solution for inhalation:

  • improve nasal symptoms relief;
  • improve sleep quality;
  • improve mucus fluidizing;
  • is safe and well tolerated.

The study is none comparative and will assess prospectively the symptomatic and functional benefits, the tolerance and the general safety of the medical device when used as an aerosol therapy solution, measured by change from baseline.

Treatments will be done at home and participants will be required to perform two on sites visits and to complete questionnaires and scales for 7 consecutive days from the treatment starting.

Read the detailed description

Hypertonic seawater-based solution is a simple and well-known product. The performance of these solutions has been established in paediatric (infants, children), and in adult populations. The mode of action is based on the physical (mechanical) osmotic effect of the solution. Hypertonic saline induces an osmotic flow of water into the mucus layer, rehydrating the airway surface liquid and improving mucus clearance. Hypertonic saline also reduces viscosity and elasticity of mucus.

Hypertonic saline solution (seawater based or not) can be used for intranasal wash, or in association with a nebulization system as an aerosol therapy solution for inhalation. Inhalation via nebulization allows the formation of fine particles or liquid droplets in a gas.

In this study, 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution, in unidose container, manufactured by Laboratoires Gilbert will be used as an aerosol therapy solution for inhalation in the treatment of URTIs such as rhinopharyngitis, rhinitis, acute rhinosinusitis or cold. The investigational medical device 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution from Laboratoires Gilbert will be used in association with a nebulization system.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the tolerance, the performance and safety of this device, 22‰ Hypertonic seawater aerosol therapy solution in unidose container, to treat adult and peadiatric patients with of upper respiratory tract infection such as rhinopharyngitis, rhinitis, acute rhinosinusitis or cold.

The main questions it aims to answer are to assess if the 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution used as aerosol therapy solution for inhalation:

  • improve nasal symptoms relief;
  • improve sleep quality;
  • improve mucus fluidizing;
  • is safe and well tolerated.

The study is none comparative and will assess prospectively the symptomatic and functional benefits, the tolerance and the general safety of the medical device when used as an aerosol therapy solution, measured by change from baseline.

Treatments will be done at home and participants will be required to perform two on sites visits and to complete questionnaires and scales for 7 consecutive days from the treatment starting.

02

Conditions studied

  • Upper Resp Tract Infection
  • Rhinitis Acute
  • Rhinopharyngitis
  • Cold Symptom
  • Rhinitis Viral

Keywords

  • hypertonic seawater
  • upper respiratory tract infection (URTIs)
  • inhalation
  • nebulization
03

In context

Respiratory Tract Infections

751 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Tract Infections; 114 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 110 is below the median of 200 across 540 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Tract Infections.

Browse Respiratory Tract Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Laboratoires Gilbert is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult subject voluntarily given to investigation participation in writing encompassing consent to data recording and verification procedures.
  2. Minor subjects (7-17 years old) given informed assent to investigation participation in writing encompassing consent to data recording and verification procedures
  3. Male and female subjects, aged from 2 years old;
  4. Subject diagnosed with URTIs such as rhinopharyngitis, rhinitis, acute rhinosinusitis or cold based on the medical examination done by the doctor.
  5. Subject willing to adhere to the requirements of the protocol, including availability for follow-up visits
  6. Subject who agrees to no use decongestants, , antibiotics, allergen-specific immunotherapy, antihistamines, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), local nasal antiseptics, other nasal saline solutions or irrigations, nasal sprays, nasal creams or gels, systemic analgesics or antipyretics (except paracetamol if needed);
  7. Subject who is able to comply with the study requirements, at the Investigator's appreciation.
  8. For minor (\<18) subjects, parents/guardians willing and able to sign written consent
  9. Subject able and willing to use an internet-enabled device (computer, tablet, or smartphone) to complete study procedures (online questionnaires) and have regular access to a device with internet connectivity (personal or household device) for the duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Person with to seawater
  2. Subject who previously undergone bronchospasm
  3. Children under 2 years of age
  4. Pregnant and breastfeeding women
  5. Onset of URTI symptoms > 48 hours
  6. Subject with COVID or flu
  7. Subject presenting alarm symptoms (periorbital oedema/erythema, displaced globe, double vision, ophthalmoplegia, reduced visual acuity, severe headache, frontal swelling, signs of sepsis, sign of meningitis, neurological signs) at the day of inclusion
  8. Subject known to have allergy to the components of the masks that is used with the inhalation device;
  9. Subject with asthma,
  10. Subject presenting infection or pathology of the inferior respiratory tracts;
  11. Subject with chronic nasal obstruction (polypes)
  12. Subject who used any decongestants, , antibiotics or allergen-specific immunotherapy within 4 weeks prior to inclusion;
  13. Subject who used any antihistamines, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or local nasal antiseptics within 7 days prior to inclusion;
  14. Subject who used any nasal saline solutions or irrigations, nasal sprays, nasal creams or gels, systemic analgesics or antipyretics within 24 hours prior to inclusion;
  15. Subject with drug or alcohol abuse
  16. Subjects who is deprived for their freedom by administrative or legal decision
  17. Subject living in a social or sanitary establishment.
  18. Subject being in an exclusion period for a previous study or with a current or recent (\<3 months) participation in another study involving a drug or combined device with drug.
  19. Other condition preventing the subject to participate the study in the investigator's opinion: subject deemed unreliable or incapable of understanding and complying with the study assessment or unrealistic expectations of treatment results
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
110 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patient treated with 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution, used as aerosol therapy for inhalati

    5mL of 22‰ Hypertonic seawater per treatments, 14 treatments on 7 consecutive days

    Device: Treatment (22‰ Hypertonic seawater aerosol therapy solution)

Interventions

  • DeviceTreatment (22‰ Hypertonic seawater aerosol therapy solution)

    Treatment twice a day for 7 consecutive days with 22‰ Hypertonic seawater aerosol therapy solution used in association with a nebulizer

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. - Evaluate the performance of 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution, used as aerosol therapy solution for inhalation, on the evolution of nasal symptom relief using the WURSS-21 questionnaire in minor patients from 14 years old and adults.

    Change in global WURSS-21 score as measured in the morning before treatment on Day 1 and Day 3 .

    Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 3

  2. Evaluate the performance of 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution, used as aerosol therapy solution for inhalation, on the evolution of nasal symptom relief using the WURSS-K questionnaire in minor patients from 4 to 13 years old.

    Change in global WURSS-K score as measured in the morning before treatment on Day 1 and Day 3.

    Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 3

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the performance of 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution, used as aerosol therapy solution for inhalation, on the evolution of nasal symptom relief using the WURSS-21 questionnaire in minor patients from 14 years old and adults.

    Change in global WURSS-21 score as measured in the morning before treatment at Day2, at Day 4, at Day 5, at Day 6, at Day 7 and at Day 8 compared to Day 1 (before treatment) as baseline.

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7 and Day 8

  2. Evaluate the performance of 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution, used as aerosol therapy solution for inhalation, on the evolution of nasal symptom relief using the WURSS-K questionnaire in minor patients from 4 to 13 years old.

    Change in global WURSS-K score as measured in the morning before treatment at Day 2, at Day 4, at Day 5, at Day 6, at Day 7 and at Day 8 compared to Day 1 (before treatment) as baseline.

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7 and Day 8

  3. Assess the immediate benefit of 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution used as aerosol therapy solution for inhalation on nasal symptom relief.

    Change in VAS (Visual Analog Scale) score before and immediately after treatment (nasal symptom relief).

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 3, Day 5 and Day 7

  4. Assess the proportion of patients that note an immediate benefit of 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution used as aerosol therapy solution for inhalation on nasal symptom relief.

    Proportion of patients reporting improvement in nasal symptom relief (defined as a VAS increase of more than 3 points on a 10-point scale) immediately after treatment.

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 3, Day 5 and Day 7

  5. Assess the sustained benefit of 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution used as aerosol therapy solution for inhalation on nasal symptom relief.

    Change in VAS (Visual Analog Scale) score before treatment and 3 hours post-treatment (nasal symptom relief).

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 3, Day 5 and Day 7

  6. Assess the proportion of patients that note a sustained benefit of 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution used as aerosol therapy solution for inhalation on nasal symptom relief during the day.

    Proportion of patients reporting improvement in nasal symptom relief (defined as a VAS increase of more than 3 points on a 10-point scale) 3 hours post- treatment

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 3, Day 5 and Day 7

  7. Assess the benefit of 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution used as aerosol therapy solution for inhalation in improving sleep quality.

    Improvement in sleep quality defined as a VAS score increase of more than 3 points on a 10-point scale, in the morning following evening treatment compared to baseline (assessment at Day 1 before treatment regarding the sleep quality during the night between Day 0 and Day 1).

    Time frame: Day 1 before treatment, Day 2, Day 3, Day 5 and Day 7

  8. Assess the proportion of patients reporting an improvement of sleep quality following evening treatment with the of 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution used as aerosol therapy solution for inhalation.

    Proportion of patients reporting improvement in sleep quality (defined as a VAS increase of more than 3 points on a 10-point scale), in the morning following evening treatment with the device compared to baseline (assessment at Day 1 before treatment regarding the sleep quality during the night between Day 0 and Day 1)

    Time frame: Day 1 before treatment, Day 2, Day 3, Day 5 and Day 7

  9. Evaluate the performance of 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution used as aerosol therapy solution for inhalation on the improvement of mucus fluidizing

    Assess performance to improve mucus fluidizing (6-point Likert scale) 6-point-Likert scale: 0 (None) - 1 (Very mild) - 2 (Mild) - 3 (Moderate) - 4 (Strong) - 5 (Very strong). Lower score means a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 3, Day 5, Day 7

  10. Evaluate the overall patient's satisfaction.

    Assessment by the patient of the overall satisfaction through 5-point Likert scale ((1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied, and 5 = very satisfied)) at Day 8.

    Time frame: Day 8

  11. Evaluate the overall tolerance of 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution used as aerosol therapy solution for inhalation.

    Assessment by the investigator of the occurrence of adverse device effect related to the use of 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution when used as aerosol therapy solution for inhalation.

    Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 7

  12. Evaluate the overall safety of 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution throughout the study.

    Assessment by the investigators of the occurrence and severity of adverse events (AE)

    Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 8

  13. Evaluate the device related complications rates throughout the study.

    Assessment of the proportion of patients with at least one adverse device effect related to the use of 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution as an aerosol therapy solution for inhalation .

    Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 7

Other outcomes

  1. Evaluate the performance of 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution, used as aerosol therapy solution for inhalation, on the evolution of nasal symptom relief using the WURSS-K questionnaire completed by parents for the minor patients of 2 to 3 years old.

    Change in global WURSS-K score as measured in the morning before treatment on Day 1 and Day 3 .

    Time frame: At Day 1 and Day 3

  2. Evaluate the performance of 22‰ Hypertonic seawater solution, used as aerosol therapy solution for inhalation, on the evolution of nasal symptom relief using the WURSS-K questionnaire completed by parents for the minor patients of 2 to 3 years old

    Change in global WURSS-K score as measured in the morning before treatment at Day 2, at Day 4, at Day5, at Day 6, at Day 7 and at Day 8 compared to Day 1 (before treatment) as baseline.

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7 and Day 8

  3. Evaluate the satisfaction of use of the device.

    Assessment by the user (patient or patient's parent for minors) of the overall satisfaction of use with a satisfaction questionnaire

    Time frame: Day 8

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Centrum Medyczne PZU Zdrowie
    Kielce, 25-017, Poland
  • Centrum Medyczne Zdrowie
    Kielce, 25-713, Poland
  • Centrum Nowoczesnych Terapii "Dobry Lekarz"
    Krakow, 31-011, Poland
  • Krajmed Centrum Medyczne
    Warsaw, 02-743, Poland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07267689
Lead sponsor
Laboratoires Gilbert
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 5, 2025
Start date
Apr 21, 2026
Primary completion
May 18, 2026
Completion
May 18, 2026
Last update
Jul 23, 2026

Study contacts

Sebastian Kędzierski, Dr.
principal investigator · Centrum Medyczne PZU Zdrowie
Michal Tyrek, Dr.
principal investigator · Centrum Medyczne Pratia Częstochowa

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion