ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07257965MIST4Updated Mar 27, 2026

Clinical Study to Assess Minimum Mosquito Bites for P. Vivax Infection in Thai Adults

An interventional study of Mosquito bite (1 or 2 or 3) in Plasmodium Vivax Infection, sponsored by University of Oxford. Recruiting at 1 site in Thailand. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-27.

Sponsored by University of Oxford · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
20 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a human challenge study to assess the minimum infective mosquito bite dose in a controlled human malaria Infection (via P. vivax sporozites) in healthy volunteers. The results will inform the development of a P. vivax mosquito-delivered CHMI trial platform, supporting safer and more accurate vaccine efficacy assessments. Conducting the trial in individuals genetically and immunologically similar to the target population will also enhance the relevance of findings to real-world endemic settings.

This study is funded by the UK Wellcome Trust. The grant reference number are Oxford/MORU: 212336/Z/18/Z and 212336/Z/18/A, and Mahidol University: 212336/A/18/Z and 212336/A/18/A.

Read the detailed description

Controlled Human Malaria Infection (CHMI) has become an essential approach in the accelerated development of malaria vaccines and therapeutic interventions. This methodology involves the inoculation of human volunteers with malaria parasites, either via mosquito bites or direct administration of sporozoites or parasitized erythrocytes. CHMI facilitates the evaluation of vaccine and drug candidates in well-controlled early-phase clinical studies, enabling the selection of the most promising candidates for further evaluation in malaria-endemic regions.

While intravenous injections of parasites can be employed in such studies, the natural route of infection via mosquito bite has notable advantages, particularly in stimulating immune responses at the site of infection in the skin and closely mimic the natural infection process, allowing both liver and blood stage infections to develop. Additionally, mosquito-based challenge models provide a valuable platform for the evaluation of pre-erythrocytic (sporozoite) vaccine candidates. Effective sporozoite vaccines are expected to induce the production of serum antibodies capable of neutralizing sporozoites before they invade hepatocytes, thereby preventing liver-stage and blood-stage malaria.

Historically, numerous challenge studies using P. falciparum-infected mosquito bites or malaria parasite have been conducted in well-established research centers, including the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Sanaria Inc., the University of Maryland, Seattle Biomedical Research Institute, University of Oxford, and Radboud University Medical Centre. These studies have involved large cohorts, with over 45 trials involving P. falciparum-infected mosquitoes. However, studies utilizing P. vivax-infected mosquito bites have been fewer in number, with 8 trials conducted in regions such as Colombia, the UK, and Thailand.

P. vivax is the most prevalent malaria species outside of sub-Saharan Africa and represents a significant cause of malaria in countries such as Thailand. Given the substantial burden of P. vivax in Thailand and Southeast Asia, an international collaborative research team has proposed to advance the development and evaluation of P. vivax malaria vaccine candidates in an endemic region. This initiative is designed to include volunteers with genetic and immunological characteristics similar to those of the target population, thereby ensuring the relevance and applicability of the findings.

The first human challenge study in Thailand using P. vivax sporozoite infection known as "Malaria Infection Study in Thailand 1 (MIST1)," is currently being conducted at the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, an institution internationally recognized for its expertise in malaria research. The study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of P. vivax sporozoite human challenge in the local population. It represents a critical milestone in supporting the development and evaluation of effective malaria vaccines in regions where P. vivax is endemic.

Majority of malaria sporozoite challenge studies (75%, 39 out of 52 studies) have traditionally relied upon the bites of five infected mosquitoes to induce malaria. The rationale for using 5 mosquito bites is based on the extensive previous experience with P. falciparum, where sporozoite inoculated by fewer than five mosquitoes has led to inconsistent infections in malaria-naïve volunteers. However, this pattern does not appear to hold for P. Vivax-infected mosquito, as most studies demonstrated 100% infectivity rates using 2-4 mosquito bites and 5 mosquito bites. One study using P. Vivax-infected mosquito reported that 1 out of 18 participants did not develop malaria infection following a mosquito challenge. However, since antimalarial drug level were not measured in that study, the cause of this outcome remains inconclusive. Notably, no study used as few as one mosquito bite to induce P. Vivax malaria.

Individuals rarely bitten by more than one infected mosquito per night under natural condition, except in settings with very high malaria transmission intensity. In a very low transmission site on the Thai-Myanmar border a recent study reported a geometric mean of 57 sporozoites per mosquito (range 9-11,428). This compares to earlier studies in Africa and PNG where endemicity was higher and geometric means were >4000 (range 150-10,000). The probability of infection increases with the number of infectious bites. There are relatively little data on the number of sporozoites in naturally infected mosquitoes. It has been demonstrated that highly infected mosquitoes being more likely to have caused infection than lightly infected mosquitoes in a dose-response relationship.

The MIST1 study initially employed five mosquito bites to ensure consistent infection in a small cohort of six volunteers. However, using five mosquito bites may create an unrealistic challenge and could hinder the assessment of true vaccine efficacy. One out of five volunteers in the MIST1 study developed a relapsed Plasmodium vivax infection, suggesting that the standard challenge involving five Plasmodium vivax -infected mosquitoes might contribute to an overwhelming infection.

The primary aim of this study is to determine the minimum number of Plasmodium vivax-infected mosquito bites required to reliably induce malaria infection in healthy individuals. This study will begin with a challenge dose of one mosquito bite, as only a limited number of studies have evaluated challenge models using as few as 2-4 infected mosquitoes, and some involved small sample sizes. Furthermore, no study has used as one mosquito bite to induce P. vivax malaria.

The investigators aim to confirm whether 1 - 3 bites are sufficient to consistently induce P. vivax infection while maintaining a challenge model that more closely reflects natural transmission, avoids excessive parasite exposure, and could undermine the vaccine efficacy assessments. If at least one volunteer who receives one mosquito bite is not successfully infected, the investigators will increase the challenge dose to two bites. If at least one volunteer remains uninfected after three bites, the investigators will not escalate the challenge to four bites as reducing from standard five bites to four may not provide a meaningful advantage as suggested by the Steering Committee.

The study will provide important information for the development of P-vivax mosquito delivered CHMI trials platform, enabling a safer and more accurate assessment of vaccine efficacy in malaria research. Moreover, conducting this trial in a local population will enhance the applicability of the findings to real-world endemic settings

02

Conditions studied

  • Plasmodium Vivax Infection

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Malaria
  • Mosquito bite
  • Plasmodium Vivax Infection
03

In context

Malaria

1,184 studies on the registry are indexed under Malaria; 79 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 252 across 937 interventional studies indexed under Malaria.

Browse Malaria studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Oxford is the lead sponsor of 812 studies on the registry; 119 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

inclusion criteria

  1. Healthy adult aged 20 to 55 years with weight more than 50 kg.
  2. No recent malaria infection.
  3. Red blood cells positive for the Duffy antigen/chemokine receptor (DARC).
  4. CYP2D6 alleles consistent with normal metaboliser status.
  5. Normal level of Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) enzyme activity by the WHO definition.
  6. Women only: Must practice continuous effective for the duration of study period until 3 months post-challenge.
  7. Agreement to refrain from blood donation during the course of the study and for 1 year after the end of their involvement in the study.
  8. Willing to take a curative antimalarial regimen following challenge.
  9. Willing to be admitted in the Hospital for Tropical Diseases for clinical monitoring until antimalarial treatment (chloroquine) is completed and their symptoms are settling.
  10. Willing to reside in Bangkok for the duration of the clinical part of the study, until all antimalarial treatment has been completed.
  11. Willing to be followed up for 1 year post treatment initiation.
  12. Reachable (24/7) by mobile phone during the period between challenge CHMI and completion of all antimalarial treatment.
  13. Able to read and write in Thai and able to answer ALL questions on the questionnaire correctly.
  14. Provided written informed consent to participate in the trial.
  15. Cardiovascular risk assessment is low (less than 10% in the next 10 years according to the cardiovascular risk assessment from Thai NCD Division, DDC, MoPH (2016)
  16. Educational level: has at least a bachelor's degree.

The volunteer MUST NOT enter the study if any of the following apply:

  1. History of clinical malaria.
  2. Positive malaria PCR OR malaria film OR malaria serology (recent exposure by Multiplex Bead Based Immunoassay)
  3. History of severe allergy to mosquito bite
  4. G6PD mutation
  5. Presence of any medical condition (either physical or psychological) which in the judgment of the investigator would place the participant at undue risk or interfere with the results of the study (e.g. serious underlying cardiac, renal, hepatic or neurological disease; severe malnutrition; congenital defects or febrile condition)
  6. Presence of chronic disease or chronically use of medication.
  7. Plan to travel outside of Bangkok within the period of challenge until 3 months after.
  8. Use of systemic antibiotics with known antimalarial activity in the 30 days before challenge (e.g. trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, doxycycline, tetracycline, clindamycin, erythromycin, fluoroquinolones and azithromycin).
  9. Use of immunoglobulins or blood products (e.g. blood transfusion) at any time in the year preceding enrolment.
  10. Receipt of an product or any vaccine in the 30 days preceding enrolment (D0), or planned receipt during the study period.
  11. Prior receipt of an investigational vaccine likely to impact on interpretation of the trial data or the P. vivax parasite as assessed by the Investigator.
  12. Any confirmed or suspected or immunodeficient state, including infection, asplenia, history of splenectomy, recurrent, severe infections, and chronic infection.
  13. Immunosuppressant medication within the past 6 months preceding enrolment (D0) (inhaled and topical are allowed).
  14. History of allergic disease or reactions likely to be exacerbated by malaria infection.
  15. Female participant who is pregnant and, lactating during the course of the study, or planning pregnancy within 1 year post-challenge.
  16. to the use of antimalarial treatment (e.g. chloroquine or primaquine or atovaquone / proguanil, DHA piperaquine).
  17. Use of medications known to have a potentially interaction with antimalarial drug that will be used in this study (chloroquine or primaquine or atovaquone / proguanil, DHA/ piperaquine).
  18. Use of medications known to cause prolongation of the as state in the section of prohibited drugs that may have effect on prolongation of the QT interval.*
  19. Known existing positive family history in both 1st AND 2nd degree relatives \< 50 years old for cardiac disease.
  20. Family history of congenital QT prolongation or sudden death.
  21. Any clinical condition known to prolong the QT interval.
  22. History of cardiac arrhythmia, including clinically relevant bradycardia.
  23. Screening demonstrates a QTc interval ≥ 450 ms
  24. Suspected or known or history of alcohol abuse
  25. Suspected or known or history of drug abuse.
  26. Concurrently participating in another clinical study, at any time during the study period.
  27. Finding on safety laboratory values as defined below:

    • Abnormal [>upper normal range]
    • Abnormal serum creatinine [>upper normal range]
    • Clinically significant abnormalities in corrected calcium and magnesium blood levels
    • \< 11 g/dL
    • >upper normal range
  28. Thalassaemia disease or haemoglobinopathies.
  29. Positive surface antigen or seropositive for virus, or HIV, Syphilis, HTLVI/II
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(15)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Number of mosquito bite (1 or 2 or 3)

    Number of mosquito bites assigned sequentially based on the adaptive design

    Other: Mosquito bite (1 or 2 or 3)

Interventions

  • OtherMosquito bite (1 or 2 or 3)

    Successful feeding of 1, 2, or 3 Plasmodium vivax-infected mosquitoes

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The minimum number of infected mosquito bites.

    The minimum number of infected mosquito bites needed to reliably result in a P.vivax infection in all 8 participants at a given bite dose group, as defined by two consecutive positive qPCR results or presence of parasitemia on malaria blood film

    Time frame: Up to 21 days after the individual CHMI

Secondary outcomes

  1. Prepatent period across different groups.

    Measurement of the prepatent period (time from challenge to first qPCR-positive result) in participants across different mosquito bite groups.

    Time frame: Up to 21 days after the individual CHMI

  2. Humoral immune responses

    Characterisation of humoral immune responses (antibody titress) to Plasmodium vivax infection, stratified by the number of mosquito bites received.

    Time frame: Up to one year after antimalarial initiation

  3. Humoral immune responses

    Characterisation of humoral immune responses (Cytokine response) to Plasmodium vivax infection, stratified by the number of mosquito bites received.

    Time frame: Up to one year after antimalarial initiation

  4. Cellular immune responses

    Characterisation of cellular immune responses (T-cell profiles) to Plasmodium vivax infection, stratified by the number of mosquito bites received.

    Time frame: Up to one year after antimalarial initiation

  5. Cellular immune responses

    Characterisation of cellular immune responses (Neutrophil) to Plasmodium vivax infection, stratified by the number of mosquito bites received.

    Time frame: Up to one year after antimalarial initiation

  6. Gametocytaemia across different groups

    Quantification of gametocytaemia measured by quantitative PCR (qPCR) across different groups

    Time frame: Up to 21 days after the individual CHMI

  7. AEs stratified by groups

    Incidence, severity, and duration of AEs stratified by number of mosquito bites administered.

    Time frame: Up to one year after antimalarial initiation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University
    Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
    Recruiting
    • Borimas Borimas Hanboonkunupakarn, MD · ContactBorimas@tropmedres.ac · (02) 354-9100
    • Borimas Borimas Hanboonkunupakarn, MD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — With participant's consent, suitably anonymised clinical data and results from blood analyses stored in the database may be shared according to the terms defined in the MORU data sharing policy with other researchers to use in the future.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: After completion of trial activities and once the study data have already been used for the study purposes, including publication.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.tropmedres.ac

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07257965
Collaborators
Mahidol University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 2, 2025
Start date
Feb 2, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 27, 2026

Study contacts

Nicholas Day, MD
Contact
nickd@tropmedres.ac
+66-(0)2-3549170
Jetsumon Sattabongkot Prachumsri, Ph.D
Contact
jetsumon.pra@mahidol.ac.th
+66-(0)2-3549100 ext. 2022
Nicholas Day, MD
principal investigator · University of Oxford
Jetsumon Sattabongkot Prachumsri, Ph.D
principal investigator · Mahidol University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion