ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07257679GT-BCRLUpdated Dec 2, 2025

Gentle Touch for Post-Mastectomy Lymphedema

A Phase 4 interventional study of Gentle Touch (GT) Lymphatic Drainage (ANDOS technique) and Passive Mobilization and Active-Assisted Exercises for the Upper Limb in Lymphedema, Breast Cancer, sponsored by I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia. Recruiting at 2 sites in Italy. Open to female participants aged 30 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-02.

Sponsored by I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 75 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This is a single-blind, parallel-group Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) comparing the efficacy of a specialized manual technique, Gentle Touch (GT), versus a control intervention, both added to the usual rehabilitative care. The study investigates 36 women aged 30 to 75 with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL). The primary objective is to evaluate the reduction of lymphedema volume in the upper limb. Secondary objectives include assessing the improvement in patients' quality of life and the potential reduction in care burden and costs. The treatment protocol involves 10 bi-weekly sessions over 5 weeks.

Read the detailed description

Breast cancer (BC) treatment often leads to lymphedema, a condition affecting up to 40% of survivors and negatively impacting their quality of life due to swelling, pain, and functional limitations. Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD) is a proven treatment method. This study focuses on the Gentle Touch (GT) approach, a specific tactile stimulus applied to the skin intended to promote emotional support, relaxation, and stress alleviation.

The Primary Objective is to evaluate the efficacy of the Gentle Touch-based MLD in reducing the volume of upper limb lymphedema in women who have undergone surgery for BC.

The Secondary Objectives are to evaluate whether the GT approach can improve the quality of life of the treated women, including emotional, psychological, and social aspects and reduce the care burden and costs compared to the control group, potentially by reducing the number of treatments required compared to conventional approaches.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lymphedema, Breast Cancer

Keywords

  • Lymphedema
  • Breast Cancer
  • DLM
  • Gentle touch
03

In context

Breast Cancer Lymphedema

124 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Cancer Lymphedema; 40 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 36 is below the median of 48 across 97 interventional studies indexed under Breast Cancer Lymphedema.

Browse Breast Cancer Lymphedema studies →

Lead sponsor

I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia is the lead sponsor of 56 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Gender: Women.
  • Age: Between 30 and 75 years old
  • Surgical History: Women who have undergone surgery for breast cancer (BC). This includes being subjected to one of the following interventions: Axillary dissection with removal of all 3 lymph node levels; Axillary dissection with removal of only one lymph node level; Removal of the sentinel lymph node only.
  • Clinical Lymphedema: Clinically evaluated lymphedema symptoms, defined as a circumference difference of greater than 20mm between the two arms

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concurrent Diseases: Concomitant diseases that may interfere with the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
36 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Gentle Touch (GT) Lymphatic Drainage + Usual Care

    Participants in this arm will receive the Gentle Touch (GT) lymphatic drainage technique, which is based on the ANDOS manual technique, in addition to their existing rehabilitation pathway. The GT is a tactile stimulus applied to the skin aimed at promoting relaxation, improving pain, sleep management, and therapeutic participation. The treatment involves 10 sessions administered with a bi-weekly frequency.

    Other: Gentle Touch (GT) Lymphatic Drainage (ANDOS technique)

  • Active comparator
    Passive Mobilization and Active-Assisted Exercises + Usual Care

    Participants in this arm will receive 10 sessions of passive mobilization and active-assisted exercises for the upper limb. This is provided in addition to the existing rehabilitation program. The sessions will be carried out with the same frequency (bi-weekly) as the experimental group.

    Other: Passive Mobilization and Active-Assisted Exercises for the Upper Limb

Interventions

  • OtherGentle Touch (GT) Lymphatic Drainage (ANDOS technique)

    This intervention involves the application of a specific tactile stimulus (Gentle Touch) to the skin. This stimulus is designed to promote relaxation, alleviate social isolation and stress, and provide emotional support. The goal is to stimulate fluid movement in the skin, increasing lymphatic flow, attenuating fibrosis, and reducing pain. This approach (GT-based ANDOS technique) is added to the participant's existing rehabilitation program. The intervention is administered by a specifically trained physiotherapist. Dosage: 10 sessions. Frequency: Bi-weekly.

  • OtherPassive Mobilization and Active-Assisted Exercises for the Upper Limb

    This intervention consists of passive mobilization and active-assisted exercises for the affected upper limb. This intervention is given in addition to the participant's existing rehabilitation program. This is the control intervention to which the experimental GT approach is compared. It is administered by a specifically trained physiotherapist. Dosage: 10 sessions. Frequency: Bi-weekly (same as the experimental group).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of Upper Limb Lymphedema Volume

    The volume of lymphedema will be measured volumetrically, comparing the difference in volume of the affected limb relative to the contralateral limb.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), 5 weeks (T1), and 2-month follow-up (T2)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Lymphedema-Specific Quality of Life (LYMQOL)

    Measured using the Lymphoedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (LYMQOL) score. Scores on the LYMQOL range from 1 to 4 for each item, with a total score ranging from 21 to 84; higher scores indicate a worse quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), 5 weeks (T1), and 2-month follow-up (T2)

  2. Change in Upper Limb Function and Disability (DASH)

    Measured using the total score of the Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH). DASH scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater disability and thus worse upper limb function and quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), 5 weeks (T1), and 2-month follow-up (T2)

  3. Change in General Health (SF-36)

    Measured using the scores of the SF-36 Questionnaire general health. SF-36 scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better health status (i.e. better perceived quality of life / functioning)

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), 5 weeks (T1), and 2-month follow-up (T2)

  4. Change in Well-being (PROMIS-29)

    Measured using the scores of the PROMIS-29 Questionnaire, to assess general physical and mental health status. PROMIS-29 provides scores for seven health domains. For each domain, raw scores range from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate better outcomes for physical function and social participation, and worse outcomes for pain, fatigue, depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbance.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), 5 weeks (T1), and 2-month follow-up (T2)

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS
    Roma, RM 00179, Italy
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site.

  • Santa Lucia Foundation, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care
    Roma, RM 00179, Italy
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Loibl S, Andre F, Bachelot T, Barrios CH, Bergh J, Burstein HJ, Cardoso MJ, Carey LA, Dawood S, Del Mastro L, Denkert C, Fallenberg EM, Francis PA, Gamal-Eldin H, Gelmon K, Geyer CE, Gnant M, Guarneri V, Gupta S, Kim SB, Krug D, Martin M, Meattini I, Morrow M, Janni W, Paluch-Shimon S, Partridge A, Poortmans P, Pusztai L, Regan MM, Sparano J, Spanic T, Swain S, Tjulandin S, Toi M, Trapani D, Tutt A, Xu B, Curigliano G, Harbeck N; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org. Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2024 Feb;35(2):159-182. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.016. Epub 2023 Dec 13. No abstract available. PubMed 38101773 ↗
  • Fu MR, Ridner SH, Hu SH, Stewart BR, Cormier JN, Armer JM. Psychosocial impact of lymphedema: a systematic review of literature from 2004 to 2011. Psychooncology. 2013 Jul;22(7):1466-84. doi: 10.1002/pon.3201. Epub 2012 Oct 9. PubMed 23044512 ↗
  • Thompson B, Gaitatzis K, Janse de Jonge X, Blackwell R, Koelmeyer LA. Manual lymphatic drainage treatment for lymphedema: a systematic review of the literature. J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Apr;15(2):244-258. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00928-1. Epub 2020 Aug 15. PubMed 32803533 ↗
  • Sezer Efe Y, Erdem E, Caner N, Gunes T. The effect of gentle human touch on pain, comfort and physiological parameters in preterm infants during heel lancing. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2022 Aug;48:101622. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101622. Epub 2022 Jun 22. PubMed 35759976 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07257679
Lead sponsor
I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia
Collaborators
Comitato A.N.D.O.S. di Roma odv.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 2, 2025
Start date
Nov 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 2, 2025

Study contacts

Diego Piatti, PT
Contact
d.piatti@hsantalucia.it
0651501479

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion