An interventional study of Faricimab and Ranibizumab in Age Related Macular Degeneration, sponsored by Singapore National Eye Centre. Recruiting at 1 site in Singapore. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-16.
Sponsored by Singapore National Eye Centre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), also called wet AMD, can cause serious vision loss. While anti-VEGF (anti Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor) treatments such as ranibizumab help many patients, about 20 40% have a suboptimal response. In this study, the investigators want to identify other factors (beyond VEGF) that might be driving the disease in these non-responding patients. By looking at samples from inside the eye (vitreous humor) and comparing "good responders" to "suboptimal responders", the investigators hope to find potential new treatment approaches or biomarkers for nAMD.
Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a leading cause of severe vision loss worldwide. Although intravitreal anti-VEGF injections have markedly improved outcomes, 20-40% of patients show a suboptimal response, indicating the involvement of additional molecular pathways. This study investigates whether profiling the vitreous humor can reveal alternative angiogenic pathways-beyond VEGF-that drive persistent disease. If such pathways are identified, switching from anti-VEGF monotherapy (ranibizumab) to a bispecific anti-VEGF/anti-Ang2 agent (faricimab) may improve disease control and provide better vision outcomes for patients with inadequate response to standard therapy.
Additionally, the dosage regimens (monthly injections over 24 weeks), and selection of treatment-naïve nAMD patients will minimize confounding variables. This approach ensures a clear comparison between good responders and suboptimal responders. By correlating clinical/imaging outcomes with vitreous biomarker profiles, the investigators aim to develop personalized treatment strategies for nAMD.
1,459 studies on the registry are indexed under Macular Degeneration; 238 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 117 is above the median of 56 across 985 interventional studies indexed under Macular Degeneration.
Browse Macular Degeneration studies →Singapore National Eye Centre is the lead sponsor of 87 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
nAMD characteristics:
Either:
Exclusion Criteria:
Any history or evidence of a concurrent intraocular condition in the study eye, including retinal diseases other than neovascular AMD, that, in the judgment of the Investigator, could either require medical or surgical intervention during the course of the study to prevent or treat visual loss that might result from that condition or that limits the potential to gain visual acuity upon treatment with the product
History of the following in the study eye:
Intra- or periocular use of in the study eye during the 6-month period prior to baseline:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.
Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Childbearing potential
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraception
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Investigational drug or device
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Corticosteroids (steroids)
Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.
Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hypersensitivity
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Clinically significant
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Drug: Ranibizumab
Drug: Faricimab · Drug: Ranibizumab
All treatment-naïve study eyes will start on the intravitreal ranibizumab loading phase, with the initial injection given within two weeks of the screening visit and overall of x 3 monthly injections. Previously treated eyes will not undergo an in-study loading phase (baseline, week 4 and week 8 visits), as pre-enrolment injections will be considered equivalent. At week 12, patients will be evaluated for their response following the loading phase. Patients who show an absence of IRF, absence of or ≤100µm subretinal fluid (SRF), and no new hemorrhage will be categorized as good responders and will continue with four further monthly intravitreal ranibizumab. Suboptimal responders (defined as the presence of subretinal fluid \> 100 µm, any intraretinal fluid (IRF), or a new hemorrhage) will switch to four doses of monthly intravitreal faricimab.
All treatment naive study eyes will start on the intravitreal ranibizumab loading phase, with the initial injection given within two weeks of the screening visit and overall of x 3 monthly injections. Previously treated eyes will not undergo an in-study loading phase (baseline, week 4 and week 8 visits), as pre-enrolment injections will be considered equivalent. At week 12, patients will be evaluated for their response following the loading phase. Patients who show an absence of IRF, absence of or ≤100µm SRF, and no new hemorrhage will be categorized as good responders and will continue with four further monthly intravitreal ranibizumab. Suboptimal responders (defined as the presence of subretinal fluid \> 100 µm, any intraretinal fluid (IRF), or a new hemorrhage) will switch to four doses of monthly intravitreal faricimab.
Difference in vitreous biomarker concentrations between responders and non-responders
Comparison of inflammatory and angiogenic biomarkers in vitreous humor measured at baseline and week 12.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change in concentration of inflammatory and angiogenic biomarkers in vitreous humor from baseline to week 12 (including IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, TNF-α, VEGF-A, PlGF, ANG-2, MMP-2, MMP-9, and complement pathway proteins)
Picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Proportion of eyes classified as suboptimal responders at Week 12
Time frame: 12 weeks
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Faricimab
Singapore National Eye Centre