CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07248384Updated Nov 25, 2025

The Efface of Ketamine vs. Lidocaine in the Management of Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

A Phase 1 interventional study of IV ketamine 0.5 mg/kg and IV Lidocain 60 mg/kg in Pain, Postoperative, sponsored by Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-25.

Sponsored by Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2023, registered Nov 2025).
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
76
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective interventional study conducted at Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College compared the analgesic efficacy of ketamine and lidocaine in managing postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Total of 76 ASA I-II patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups (Group K: Ketamine, Group L: Lidocaine) using a sealed-envelope method in a double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Standard anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, and atracurium was administered, and all patients received postoperative diclofenac sodium and ondansetron. Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. The study aimed to compare the pain-relieving effects of ketamine and lidocaine, contributing to improved strategies for postoperative pain management following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Read the detailed description

Effective postoperative pain management is essential for promoting patient recovery, reducing stress response, and improving overall outcomes following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This prospective interventional study was conducted at Department of Anesthesiology at Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College to compare the analgesic efficacy of intravenous ketamine and lidocaine in managing postoperative pain among patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

A total of 76 ASA grade I and II patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease were enrolled after obtaining written informed consent and ethical approval. Using a sealed-envelope randomization method, patients were divided into two equal groups: Group K (n=38) received ketamine, and Group L (n=38) received lidocaine. The study followed a double-blinded, placebo-controlled design to ensure unbiased assessment. Patients with ASA grade III-V, chronic pain, psychiatric illness, pregnancy or lactation, major hepatic, renal, or cardiovascular dysfunction, or a recent history of opioid or NSAID use were excluded.

All participants underwent standard preoperative preparation, including overnight fasting and pre-anesthetic evaluation. General anesthesia was induced with propofol and atracurium and maintained with isoflurane. Standard intraoperative monitoring of pulse rate, blood pressure, ECG, SpO₂, and end-tidal CO₂ was performed. Following surgery, residual neuromuscular blockade was reversed with neostigmine. All patients received intravenous diclofenac sodium every 8 hours for baseline analgesia and ondansetron to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. Patients who reported pain received intravenous Kinz 5 mg as rescue analgesia, with timing recorded by nursing staff.

This study provided valuable insight into the comparative analgesic effects of ketamine and lidocaine for postoperative pain control following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, emphasizing their potential role in multimodal analgesia protocols to enhance patient comfort and recovery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Postoperative

Keywords

  • Ketamine
  • Lidocaine
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Pain
  • Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
  • Analgesia; Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
  • Anesthesia
  • Pain Management
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 76 is close to the median of 75 across 4,344 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18-65 years.

ASA physical status I-II.

Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy planned under general anesthesia.

Normal baseline renal, hepatic, and coagulation profile.

Able to give informed consent and communicate pain scores.

Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing age.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA III-V patients.

Allergy or hypersensitivity to ketamine, lidocaine, or related drugs.

History of psychiatric illness or substance abuse.

Chronic use of opioids, benzodiazepines, or MAO inhibitors.

Pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Chronic pain disorders or use of analgesics within 7 days pre-op.

Major hepatic, renal, or cardiovascular dysfunction.

History of myopathy or seizure disorders.

Patients with atrioventricular block or on calcium-channel blockers.

Conversion to open cholecystectomy during surgery.

Inability to understand or report pain postoperatively.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
76 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Ketamine Group

    The ketamine dose was calculated as 0.5 mg/kg of body weight, diluted with normal saline to a total volume of 10 mL, and administered intravenously as a stat dose during anesthesia reversal, following the completion of surgery.

    Drug: IV ketamine 0.5 mg/kg

  • Active comparator
    Lidocaine Group

    A total of 3 mL of 2% lidocaine was diluted with 7 mL of normal saline to prepare a 10 mL solution, which was administered intravenously as a stat dose at the time of anesthesia reversal, immediately after completion of surgery.

    Drug: IV Lidocain 60 mg/kg

Interventions

  • DrugIV ketamine 0.5 mg/kg

    Patients in the Ketamine group received intravenous ketamine at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg body weight, diluted with normal saline to a total volume of 10 mL. The prepared solution was administered as a single (stat) intravenous injection at the time of anesthesia reversal, immediately after completion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The drug was administered under aseptic precautions by an anesthetist who was blinded to group allocation. All patients received standard postoperative care, including intravenous diclofenac sodium 75 mg every 8 hours for baseline analgesia and ondansetron 4 mg IV for nausea prevention. Postoperative pain intensity was recorded at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patients reporting significant pain were administered intravenous Kinz 5 mg as rescue analgesia, and the timing of administration was documented.

  • DrugIV Lidocain 60 mg/kg

    Patients in the Lidocaine group received 3 mL of 2% lidocaine, diluted with 7 mL of normal saline to prepare a 10 mL solution, which was administered intravenously as a stat dose at the time of anesthesia reversal, immediately after surgery. The intervention was given using the same protocol and blinding method as the Ketamine group to maintain uniformity. Similar to Group K, all patients received standard postoperative medications, including IV diclofenac sodium and ondansetron. Pain assessment was performed using the VAS scale at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. Patients requiring additional pain relief were given IV Kinz 5 mg as rescue analgesia, with the time of each administration noted.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Score

    Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and duration of analgesia between the ketamine and lidocaine groups. These time intervals were selected to monitor both the early and late postoperative pain responses during the first 24 hours of recovery.

    Time frame: Postoperative pain was assessed at the 1st, 6th, 12th, and 24th hours.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Liaquat National Hospital, Anesthesiology Department
    Karachi, Sindh 74800, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 25, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07248384
Lead sponsor
Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College
Responsible party
Mustafa Hussain Imam (Mustafa Hussain Imam, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 25, 2025
Start date
Jul 15, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 20, 2025
Completion
Oct 30, 2025
Last update
Nov 25, 2025

Study contacts

Mustafa Hussain Imam, Mbbs
principal investigator · Liaquat National Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion