CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07246759NEUTROFLOWUpdated Nov 24, 2025

Neutrophil Biomarker Test for Predicting Clinical Benefit From Immunotherapy Based on Flow Cytometry Analysis

An observational study in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), Melanoma (Skin Cancer) and Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), sponsored by OncoHost Ltd.. Not yet recruiting at 3 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-24.

Sponsored by OncoHost Ltd. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
600
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The NeutroFlow study is a multi-center clinical trial designed to develop a computational model that converts flow cytometry results into a prediction of clinical benefit. The study analyzes Ly6Ehi neutrophils in biological samples from patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors to evaluate their likelihood of benefiting from treatment. Blood samples are collected prior to treatment and used to support the ongoing development of the algorithm.

Read the detailed description

The recent introduction of cancer immunotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionised the treatment landscape for a broad range of cancer types. However, response to ICIs varies widely between patients, with the majority experiencing resistance to therapy. Moreover, the increasing use of these costly drugs coupled with management of ICI-related toxicities creates a substantial economic burden. Current biomarker tests for determining eligibility for ICIs have limited predictive performance, and many require invasive tumour biopsies. Thus, novel (and preferentially non-invasive) biomarkers for predicting ICI clinical benefit are desperately needed for better guiding clinical decisions. NeutroFlow directly addresses this unmet need. The neutroFlow study is based on a comprehensive academic research describing a flow cytometry assay for measuring a novel predictive biomarker in the blood - Ly6Ehi neutrophil - that accurately predicts therapeutic benefit from ICIs, outperforming the approved PD-L1 biomarker.

The objective of the NeutroFlow study is to develop a clinical decision-support tool that includes an antibody panel for detecting Ly6Ehi neutrophils using standard flow cytometry (FC) and a computational model that converts the FC readout into a prediction of clinical benefit.

Patients will provide a single blood sample before starting treatment, and clinical data will be collected from their medical records.

In the first phase of the trial, blood sample data and clinical information will be used to develop the antibody panel and train the prediction algorithm. In the second phase, the algorithm will be validated by comparing its theoretical predictions with the patients' actual objective response rates.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
  • Melanoma (Skin Cancer)
  • Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)
  • RCC, Renal Cell Cancer
  • HNSCC

Keywords

  • Immunotherapy
  • Biomarker
  • Neutrophils
  • Flow Cytometry
  • Immune checkpoint inhibitor
03

In context

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

6,488 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; 1,632 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 600 is above the median of 161 across 949 observational studies indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung.

Browse Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung studies →

Lead sponsor

OncoHost Ltd. is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

At least 600 treatment-naïve patients due to be treated with a first line regimen that includes PD- 1/PD-L1 inhibitors with the following diagnoses are planned to be enrolled in the study over a period of 3 years or as needed: 1. Stage IV or Stage III-unresectable NSCLC 2. Stage IV or Stage IIIb-d malignant melanoma 3. Stage IV HNSCC 4. Stage IV RCC 5. Stage IV TNBC

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients newly diagnosed with advanced-stage/metastatic NSCLC, melanoma, HNSCC, RCC, or TNBC, who are due to receive first-line treatment with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor, either as monotherapy or in combination with other agents, according to current standard-of-care regimens, including (but not limited to) the following approved options: NSCLC. Monotherapy: Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Cemiplimab. Combination: Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy; Nivolumab + Ipilimumab; Cemiplimab + chemotherapy; Atezolizumab + chemotherapy + Bevacizumab.

Melanoma. Monotherapy: Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab. Combination: Nivolumab + Ipilimumab; Nivolumab + Relatlimab.

HNSCC. Monotherapy: Pembrolizumab, Cemiplimab. Combination: Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy.

RCC. Combination only: Nivolumab + Ipilimumab; Nivolumab + Cabozantinib; Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib or Axitinib; Avelumab + Axitinib.

TNBC. Combination only: Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy.

  • Male or female aged at least 18 years
  • ECOG PS: 0/1-2
  • Normal hematologic, renal and liver function:

Absolute neutrophil count > 1500/mm³ Platelets > 100,000/mm³ Hemoglobin > 9 g/dL Creatinine concentration ≤ 1.4 mg/dL, or creatinine clearance > 40 mL/min, Total bilirubin \< 1.5 mg/dL ALT + AST levels ≤ 3 times above the upper normal limit

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any concurrent and/or other active malignancy that has required systemic treatment within 2 years of the first dose of treatment.
  • For NSCLC: presence of activating EGFR, ALK, ROS1, RET, NTRK alterations linked to an approved first-line targeted drug.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
600 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with stage IV or stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

    Patients with stage IV or stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment

    Other: Blood sample collection

  • Patients with stage IV or stage IIIb-d malignant melanoma

    Patients with stage IV or stage IIIb-d malignant melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment

    Other: Blood sample collection

  • Patients with stage IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)

    Patients with stage IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment

    Other: Blood sample collection

  • Patients with stage IV renal cell carcinoma (RCC)

    Patients with stage IV renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment

    Other: Blood sample collection

  • Patients with stage IV triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)

    Patients with stage IV triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment

    Other: Blood sample collection

Interventions

  • OtherBlood sample collection

    Blood sample collection prior treatment initiation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quantification of Ly6E high (Ly6Ehi) neutrophils in blood using the NeutroFlow flow cytometry assay

    Peripheral blood samples will be collected from patients up to 1 month prior to treatment initiation. Ly6Ehi neutrophil populations will be quantified using the NeutroFlow multiparametric flow cytometry assay

    Time frame: Baseline (up to 1 month before treatment initiation)

  2. Prediction of clinical benefit rate using baseline Ly6Ehi neutrophils levels

    The patients clinical benefit (CB) will be defined according to RECIST 1.1 criteria to one of the following categories: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD). Baseline Ly6Ehi neutrophil levels will be used as input in a computational predictive model to estimate the likelihood of CB for each patient. The model will be trained and validated with independent patient cohorts, using cross-validation and ROC AUC metrics to assess predictive performance. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value will also be calculated. Predictions will be assessed at multiple timepoints: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-initiation of anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. Subgroup analyses will include age, sex, cancer type, disease stage, and treatment line.

    Time frame: Baseline (blood draw) to 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post treatment initiation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical benefit rate across individual cancer types

    The clinical benefit rate described in Outcome 2 will be evaluated separately for each cancer indication (e.g., NSCLC, melanoma, HNSCC, RCC, TNBC) at several time points (6, 12, 18 and 24 months post treatment initiation). At least 50 patients per indication will be included to ensure adequate statistical power. ROC AUC values and predictive model performance will be computed for each subgroup. Additional exploratory analyses will examine potential modifiers, including tumor burden, prior therapies, and immune-related biomarkers, to evaluate heterogeneity of response

    Time frame: Baseline to 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post treatment initiation (per indication)

  2. Clinical benefit rate by PD-(L)1 treatment regimen

    The clinical benefit rate will be assessed across various anti-PD-(L)1 regimens, including monotherapy and combination protocols. Treatments are classified according to indication and line of therapy: NSCLC: Monotherapy: Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Cemiplimab. Combination: Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy; Nivolumab + Ipilimumab; Cemiplimab + chemotherapy; Atezolizumab + chemotherapy + Bevacizumab. Melanoma: Monotherapy: Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab. Combination: Nivolumab + Ipilimumab; Nivolumab + Relatlimab. HNSCC: Monotherapy: Pembrolizumab, Cemiplimab. Combination: Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy. RCC: Combination only: Nivolumab + Ipilimumab; Nivolumab + Cabozantinib; Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib or Axitinib; Avelumab + Axitinib. TNBC: Combination only: Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy. In cases where treatment changes occur during follow-up, two scenarios will be considered: 1. the patient exits the analysis at the time of treatment change; or 2. the new treatment marks a new baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post treatment initiation

  3. Correlation between Ly6Ehi neutrophil levels and PD-L1 status (TPS/CPS)

    Evaluation of the association between baseline Ly6Ehi neutrophil levels and PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue, measured as Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) and/or Combined Positive Score (CPS), depending on standard of care and assay availability. PD-L1 will be assessed by IHC using validated assays per standard of care. Subgroup analyses will explore correlations within different cancer types and treatment regimens. These analyses will provide insight into whether Ly6Ehi neutrophils complement or enhance PD-L1-based patient stratification.

    Time frame: Baseline (PD-L1 and neutrophils assessed prior to treatment)

  4. Correlation between Ly6Ehi neutrophil levels and other clinical response-associated parameters

    Exploratory analyses will assess correlations between baseline Ly6Ehi neutrophil levels and other parameters associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response, including Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB), Microsatellite Instability (MSI), Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP), and ECOG performance status. Multivariate models and correlation analyses will evaluate whether Ly6Ehi neutrophils provide independent predictive value. Subgroup analyses will include cancer type, treatment regimen, and prior therapy exposure. This outcome will help determine the broader immunological and clinical context of Ly6Ehi neutrophil levels

    Time frame: Baseline (clinical parameters collected prior to treatment)

07

Study locations

3 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Alturki NA. Review of the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Context of Cancer Treatment. J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 27;12(13):4301. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134301. PubMed 37445336 ↗
  • Man J, Millican J, Mulvey A, Gebski V, Hui R. Response Rate and Survival at Key Timepoints With PD-1 Blockade vs Chemotherapy in PD-L1 Subgroups: Meta-Analysis of Metastatic NSCLC Trials. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Jan 27;5(3):pkab012. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab012. eCollection 2021 Jun. PubMed 34084999 ↗
  • Martins F, Sofiya L, Sykiotis GP, Lamine F, Maillard M, Fraga M, Shabafrouz K, Ribi C, Cairoli A, Guex-Crosier Y, Kuntzer T, Michielin O, Peters S, Coukos G, Spertini F, Thompson JA, Obeid M. Adverse effects of immune-checkpoint inhibitors: epidemiology, management and surveillance. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep;16(9):563-580. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0218-0. PubMed 31092901 ↗
  • Hurwitz JT, Vaffis S, Grizzle AJ, Nielsen S, Dodson A, Parry S. Cost-Effectiveness of PD-L1 Testing in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Using In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Versus Laboratory-Developed Test (LDT). Oncol Ther. 2022 Dec;10(2):391-409. doi: 10.1007/s40487-022-00197-1. Epub 2022 May 13. PubMed 35556235 ↗
  • Lei Y, Li X, Huang Q, Zheng X, Liu M. Progress and Challenges of Predictive Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Blockade. Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 11;11:617335. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.617335. eCollection 2021. PubMed 33777757 ↗
  • Arora S, Velichinskii R, Lesh RW, Ali U, Kubiak M, Bansal P, Borghaei H, Edelman MJ, Boumber Y. Existing and Emerging Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Immunotherapy in Solid Tumors. Adv Ther. 2019 Oct;36(10):2638-2678. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01051-z. Epub 2019 Aug 13. PubMed 31410780 ↗
  • McKean WB, Moser JC, Rimm D, Hu-Lieskovan S. Biomarkers in Precision Cancer Immunotherapy: Promise and Challenges. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2020 May;40:e275-e291. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_280571. PubMed 32453632 ↗
  • Benguigui M, Cooper TJ, Kalkar P, Schif-Zuck S, Halaban R, Bacchiocchi A, Kamer I, Deo A, Manobla B, Menachem R, Haj-Shomaly J, Vorontsova A, Raviv Z, Buxbaum C, Christopoulos P, Bar J, Lotem M, Sznol M, Ariel A, Shen-Orr SS, Shaked Y. Interferon-stimulated neutrophils as a predictor of immunotherapy response. Cancer Cell. 2024 Feb 12;42(2):253-265.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.12.005. Epub 2024 Jan 4. PubMed 38181798 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 12, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The clinical information and results generated as part of the study may be shared with other researchers and doctors, national and international regulatory agencies as well as in scientific repositories, always ensuring the necessary conditions of quality, security and confidentiality.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07246759
Lead sponsor
OncoHost Ltd.
Collaborators
European Institute of Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 24, 2025
Start date
Nov 15, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 24, 2025

Study contacts

Michal Harel VP of Translational Medicine, PhD
Contact
Michal@oncohost.com
97248537558
Shani Raveh Shoval VP of Clinical Affairs, PhD
Contact
shani@oncohost.com

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion