ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07245108ProCholUpdated Nov 24, 2025

The Pro-Chol Study

An observational study in Gallstones, Gallstone Attack and Uncomplicated Cholelithiasis, sponsored by Nordsjaellands Hospital. Recruiting at 7 sites in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-24.

Sponsored by Nordsjaellands Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2024; still recruiting 2 years 9 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
800
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective clinical cohort study will include patients with gallstones and abdominal pain scheduled for surgery (laparoscopic cholecystectomy). Data on quality of life, abdominal pain, gallstone disease, and patient characteristics will be collected before surgery. The outcomes will be assessed three months following surgery and will primarily be determinants for resolution of pain. The aim is to make a prediction score that may aid clinicians and patients in decision making about surgery.

Read the detailed description

Cholecystectomy is the surgical removal of the gallbladder and the only definitive treatment for both symptomatic complicated and uncomplicated gallstones. Surgery rates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy have been rapidly rising in European countries the past decades. Over 9000 cholecystectomies were performed in Denmark in 2016. Symptomatic outcomes following surgery have not been with the intended resolution of symptoms and remaining symptoms are reported in about 35% of patients. This indicates clinical challenges in selecting the patients that will benefit the most from surgery.

The quality of symptomatic outcomes following laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be assessed in a Danish population reflecting current clinical practice for selection of patients with symptomatic uncomplicated gallstones for surgery. Development of a clinical prediction tool for pain relief including both patient-reported and readily available objective variables could aid future patient selection and minimize overall health-care costs and unnecessary surgery risk in patients with symptomatic uncomplicated gallstones.

The aim is to perform a prospective assessment of the symptomatic outcomes of elective laparoscopic intended cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic uncomplicated gallstones and to develop a prediction model for a pain-free state.

This is a prospective observational study that will be performed across the general surgical hospitals in healthcare regions of Denmark. Consecutive consenting patients will be included from each site until required sample size has reached.

Eligible patients will be identified through screening lists of outpatient clinics and of operating theaters. Patients will be approached for consent and data collection at either the outpatient clinical visit where cholecystectomy is scheduled or at a later timepoint before surgery. Follow-up for symptomatic outcome will be performed three months after surgery. Data collection at both study entry and follow-up will include access to the electronic patient record and answering an online patient questionnaire. If patient questionnaires remain unanswered after one week, the patient will be reminded through an online re-invitation. Data collection at entry will also include the patients' medical history and clinicopathological variables. Data will be stored in a purpose-build database in the clinical research platform REDCap.

The study will be run by a steering committee including senior surgeons acting as local investigators from each of the participating centers. The local investigator will ensure completion of data forms and follow-up procedures. An additional collaborator from each center may further be appointed responsible for patient identification and data collection.

This study is purely observational and no alterations to standard patient treatment will be performed.

A prediction model with high internal and external validity requires model development and validation to be performed in two independent sets of data. To ensure this, half of patients will be included for model development and the other half for model validation.

Based on a previous report, 60% (57%) will become pain-free following cholecystectomy. With a prediction model containing up to 12 exposure variables and a parameter to outcome event ratio of 1:20, the required sample size is 400 patients for model development. The total sample size will be 800 patients for both development and validation of the model. It is estimated that each center will identify about 20 eligible patients each month and the required inclusion period is therefore about two to three years. Sample size may be reduced if prediction model includes fewer variables.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gallstones
  • Gallstone Attack
  • Uncomplicated Cholelithiasis
  • Cholecystolithiasis

Keywords

  • Cohort study
  • Prospective clinical study
  • Cholecystectomy
  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Pain relief
03

In context

Gallstones

199 studies on the registry are indexed under Gallstones; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 800 is above the median of 200 across 70 observational studies indexed under Gallstones.

Browse Gallstones studies →

Lead sponsor

Nordsjaellands Hospital is the lead sponsor of 89 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The population will include patients referred to outpatient clinics either from primary care general practitioners or from a hospital department. Currently six hospitals are included from four out of five Danish health care regions.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Ultrasound examination with presence of gallstones and description of size, number and presence of stones in infundibulum or cystic duct
  • Abdominal symptoms believed to be caused by symptomatic uncomplicated gallstones
  • Indication and candidate for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Above 18 years of age
  • Ability to give oral and written consent
  • Ability to understand, speak and read Danish
  • Ability to receive digital post

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of complicated gallstone disease including acute cholecystitis, pancreatitis, common bile duct stones, or cholangitis
  • Previous sphincterotomy
  • Abnormal liver function test (ALAT/ASAT, alkaline phosphatase, ) without magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound to rule out common bile duct pathology
  • Indication for urgent cholecystectomy
  • Current pregnancy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
800 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with gallbladder stones and biliary pain that undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    Patients are included if they have gallbladder stones on abdominal ultrasound examination, abdominal pain expected to be due to gallstones by the clinician and scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients with either a history including biliary interventions or complicated gallstone disease such as pancreatitis, cholecystitis or bile duct stones will be excluded.

    Procedure: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureLaparoscopic cholecystectomy

    A surgical removal of the gallbladder through laparoscopy

  • ProcedureLaparoscopic cholecystectomy

    The intervention is intended laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients that undergo conversion to open (traditional) cholecystectomy will still be included. Patients scheduled for open cholecystectomy will not be included.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prediction model for resolution of pain

    To build and validate a prediction model for resolution of pain (VAS≤4) following laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    Time frame: From baseline before surgery to follow-up at three months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in symptoms following surgery

    To explore the changes in symptoms following cholecystectomy as defined through 1. core symptoms of the GIQLI questionnaire (such as dyspeptic symptoms, diarrhea, and constipation); 2. GIQLI quality of life total scores.

    Time frame: From baseline before surgery to follow-up at three months after surgery

07

Study locations

7 of 7 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Latenstein CSS, Hannink G, van der Bilt JDW, Donkervoort SC, Eijsbouts QAJ, Heisterkamp J, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Schreinemakers JMJ, Wiering B, Boermeester MA, Drenth JPH, van Laarhoven CJHM, Dijkgraaf MGW, de Reuver PR; SECURE trial collaborators. A Clinical Decision Tool for Selection of Patients With Symptomatic Cholelithiasis for Cholecystectomy Based on Reduction of Pain and a Pain-Free State Following Surgery. JAMA Surg. 2021 Oct 1;156(10):e213706. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3706. Epub 2021 Oct 13. PubMed 34379080 ↗
  • Lamberts MP, Lugtenberg M, Rovers MM, Roukema AJ, Drenth JP, Westert GP, van Laarhoven CJ. Persistent and de novo symptoms after cholecystectomy: a systematic review of cholecystectomy effectiveness. Surg Endosc. 2013 Mar;27(3):709-18. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2516-9. Epub 2012 Oct 6. PubMed 23052498 ↗
  • Bray F, Balcaen T, Baro E, Gandon A, Ficheur G, Chazard E. Increased incidence of cholecystectomy related to gallbladder disease in France: Analysis of 807,307 cholecystectomy procedures over a period of seven years. J Visc Surg. 2019 Jun;156(3):209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 18. PubMed 30573436 ↗
  • Lunevicius R, Nzenwa IC, Mesri M. A nationwide analysis of gallbladder surgery in England between 2000 and 2019. Surgery. 2022 Feb;171(2):276-284. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.10.025. Epub 2021 Nov 12. PubMed 34782153 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07245108
Lead sponsor
Nordsjaellands Hospital
Collaborators
Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev, Aalborg University Hospital, Viborg Regional Hospital, Zealand University Hospital, University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Regionshospital Nordjylland, Regionshospitalet Viborg, Skive
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 24, 2025
Start date
Jan 22, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 24, 2025

Study contacts

Daniel Mønsted Shabanzadeh, DMSc, PhD, MD
Contact
daniel.moensted.shabanzadeh.01@regionh.dk
+45 48295796
Felix Alfred Graabæk, MD
Contact
feg@regsj.dk
Daniel Mønsted Shabanzadeh, DMSc, PhD, MD
principal investigator · Dansk: Offentligt hospital (inkl. universitetshospital)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion