An interventional study of Standard Conservative Therapy and radial ESWT in Lipedema, sponsored by Fatih Bagcier. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-20.
Sponsored by Fatih Bagcier · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) when added to standard conservative treatment in women with primary lipedema. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either standard conservative therapy alone or standard therapy combined with radial ESWT. The study will assess changes in pain intensity (VAS), limb circumference measurements, quality of life (SF-36), and patient satisfaction over an 8-week period. Evaluations will be performed at baseline, at the end of the 4-week treatment phase, and at 4-week follow-up. This trial seeks to provide evidence on whether ESWT offers additional clinical benefit in the management of primary lipedema.
Lipedema is a chronic, progressive adipose tissue disorder characterized by disproportionate subcutaneous fat accumulation, pain, tenderness, easy bruising, and functional limitations. It predominantly affects women and leads to impaired mobility and reduced quality of life. Current international guidelines recommend conservative therapies as first-line management, including manual lymphatic drainage, pneumatic compression, compression garments, targeted exercise programs, and patient education. Although these interventions improve pain and function, their impact on underlying fibrotic changes and tissue stiffness is limited, creating a need for adjunctive treatments.
Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has been shown to enhance microcirculation, modulate inflammation, improve lymphatic flow, and exert anti-fibrotic effects through mechanotransduction. Positive outcomes have been reported in conditions with similar tissue characteristics, such as cellulite, lymphedema, and post-liposuction fibrosis. However, no randomized controlled trials have evaluated the efficacy of ESWT specifically in primary lipedema. This trial aims to address this gap in the literature.
This prospective, randomized, evaluator-blinded, controlled clinical study will include adult women aged 18-65 years diagnosed with Stage I-II primary lipedema according to Wold criteria. Eligible participants will be recruited from the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic of Medical Point Gaziantep Hospital. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: (1) standard conservative therapy alone, or (2) standard conservative therapy plus radial ESWT. Conservative treatment will include manual lymphatic drainage, pneumatic compression therapy, Class II compression garments, and a home-based exercise program.
The ESWT group will receive additional radial ESWT using a BTL device with the following parameters: 2.0-2.5 bar pressure, 12 Hz frequency, 1000 shocks per region, 20-mm radial applicator head. Treatment regions will include the anterolateral thigh, medial thigh, and posterolateral calf. ESWT will be administered twice weekly for 4 weeks, totaling 8 sessions. Limb circumference will be measured at predefined anatomical points (thigh +10 cm/+20 cm above the patella, calf 10 cm above the medial malleolus, and ankle at the narrowest point).
Outcome measures will include pain intensity (VAS), quality of life (SF-36), limb circumference measurements, and patient satisfaction. Assessments will be performed at baseline (T0), immediately after completion of the 4-week intervention period (T1), and 4 weeks post-treatment (T2). The primary outcome is the change in VAS pain score from baseline to week 4. Secondary outcomes include changes in limb circumference, SF-36 scores, and satisfaction ratings, as well as the monitoring of any adverse events.
The study aims to determine whether adding ESWT to standard conservative management results in superior clinical outcomes compared with standard therapy alone. Findings may contribute to the development of evidence-based therapeutic strategies for women with primary lipedema.
85 studies on the registry are indexed under Lipedema; 32 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 50 is above the median of 35 across 42 interventional studies indexed under Lipedema.
Browse Lipedema studies →This is the only study on the registry with Fatih Bagcier as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Female patients aged 18-65 years Diagnosis of primary lipedema (Stage I-II according to Wold criteria) Stable body weight for the past 3 months Ability to comply with compression garment use Willingness to participate and ability to provide
Exclusion Criteria:
Secondary lipedema or severe venous disease (CEAP C4 or higher) Liposuction or similar procedures within the past 6 months Pregnancy or breastfeeding Active infection, inflammation, or thrombosis Use of high-dose anticoagulants to extracorporeal shockwave therapy
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Participants receive standard conservative treatment including manual lymphatic drainage, pneumatic compression, Class II compression garments, and a home-based exercise program.
Other: Standard Conservative Therapy
Participants receive standard conservative treatment plus radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) applied twice weekly for 4 weeks (8 sessions) to the thighs and calves.
Other: Standard Conservative Therapy · Device: radial ESWT
Manual lymphatic drainage, pneumatic compression, Class II compression garments, and a home-based exercise program.
adial extracorporeal shockwave therapy using a BTL device (2.0-2.5 bar, 12 Hz, 1000 shocks per region, 20-mm head), twice weekly for 4 weeks (8 sessions).
Change in Limb Circumference Measurements
Circumference will be measured at the thigh (+10 cm and +20 cm above the patella), calf (10 cm above the medial malleolus), and ankle (narrowest point). The change from baseline will be compared at Week 4 and Week 8.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), Week 4 (T1), Week 8 (T2)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). The primary analysis will compare the change in VAS score between baseline and the end of the 4-week treatment period.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), Week 4 (T1), Week 8 (T2)
Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Quality of life will be evaluated using the SF-36 questionnaire. Changes in physical and mental component scores will be assessed across time points.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), Week 4 (T1), Week 8 (T2)
Treatment Satisfaction (Likert Scale)
Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied to 5 = very satisfied).
Time frame: Week 4 (T1), Week 8 (T2)
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.