ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07240142SLDUpdated Nov 20, 2025

Neurotransmitter Levels in Children With Specific Learning Disorder

An interventional study of Blood Product and Elisa test in Specific Learning Disability and Healthy (Controls), sponsored by Dilara Ulger Ozbek. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 7 Years to 14 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-20.

Sponsored by Dilara Ulger Ozbek · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 years 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2019, registered Sep 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
7 Years to 14 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this clinical trial was to measure how specific neurotransmitter levels in children with Specific Learning Disorder (SLD) change compared to controls. The relationship between these markers and the measured markers will be determined both theoretically and experimentally using various neuropsychological tests. The fundamental questions it aims to answer are

Did neurotransmitter levels increase or decrease in the patient group? Are the neurotransmitter levels measured in the neuropsychological tests related? Can the measured neurotransmitters be used to predict the disease?

Participants:

A single visit to the clinic, a blood sample, and neuropsychological tests will be administered on the same day.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this investigation was to assess the levels in serum of key neurotransmitters and their precursors (glutamate, L-arginine, and nitric oxide) in children with SLD and also to integrate these biochemical results with molecular docking analyses of their interactions with phospholipase A2 (PLA2) and N-methyl D-aspartate receptors (NMDA), both of which play significant roles in learning function in these patients.

The research group consisted of 20 children aged 7-14 years who had been diagnosed with SLD using DSM-5 criteria, as well as 20 age-matched, gender-matched, and educationally matched healthy controls. The children in the study group underwent the Stroop Test [Total Error Scores, Total Time Scores, Total Correction] and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV) subtests, and the results were scored. The serum concentrations of glutamate, L-arginine, and nitric oxide (NO) were determined using ELISA. The diagnostic ability of the biomarkers was evaluated using ROC analysis. Additionally, the interactions of glutamate and L-arginine with the PLA2 enzyme and the NMDA receptor were examined using molecular docking analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Specific Learning Disability
  • Healthy (Controls)

Keywords

  • Specific learning Disorder
  • Glutamate
  • L-arginine
  • nitric oxide
  • molecualr docking
03

In context

Specific Learning Disorder

24 studies on the registry are indexed under Specific Learning Disorder; 4 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 153 across 16 interventional studies indexed under Specific Learning Disorder.

Browse Specific Learning Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Dilara Ulger Ozbek as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 14 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Study group: no additional mental disorder except a specific learning disability,
  • The control group had no mental illness.
  • Having no head injury or neurological illness for all groups.
  • There is no drug that might possibly alter cognitive functions for all populations.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The study group had a mental disease other than a specific learning disability and ADHD.
  • The control group had any mental condition.
  • Having a head injury or neurological illness in all categories.
  • Using drugs that may impair cognitive functioning in all groups those with additional diseases
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Collection of blood samples

    A 5 ml blood sample will be taken from the left arterial vein of the individuals in the study group, and serum will be obtained from it. The neurotransmitter concentrations specified in the serum samples will be measured with an ELISA test kit.

    Procedure: Blood Product · Other: Elisa test

Interventions

  • ProcedureBlood Product

    Collecting 5 ml blood samples from the left atrial vein, after that obtaining serum from it.

  • OtherElisa test

    Measurement of glutamate, nitric oxide, and L-arginine concentrations in the blood samples obtained using an ELISA test kit.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mesurment of serum neurotransmitters levels

    Serum Glutamate Levels (measured in µmol/L by ELISA at baseline) Serum L-Arginine Levels (measured in µmol/L by ELISA at baseline) Serum Nitric Oxide (NO) Levels (measured in µmol/L by ELISA at baseline)

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI)

    Change in Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) score from baseline to 6 months.Points on a scale (range: 40-160; higher scores indicate better performance)

    Time frame: 6 month

  3. Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI)

    Change in Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI) score from baseline to 6 months. Change in Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI) score from baseline to 6 months.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Working Memory Index (WMI)

    Change in Working Memory Index (WMI) score from baseline to 6 months. Points on a scale (range: 40-160; higher scores indicate better performance)

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Processing Speed Index (PSI)

    Change in Processing Speed Index (PSI) score from baseline to 6 months. Points on a scale (range: 40-160; higher scores indicate better performance).

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Stroop Test Performance

    Change in Stroop Test total errors, total time, and total corrections from baseline to 6 months.Seconds (for time) and number of errors/corrections; lower scores indicate better performance.

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Full Scale IQ (FSIQ)

    Change in Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) score from baseline to 6 months.oints on a scale (range: 40-160; higher scores indicate better performance)

    Time frame: 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Molecular docking analysis

    Binding affinity values (in kcal/mol) of Glutamate and L-Arginine ligands to NMDA receptor and PLA2 enzyme active sites will be evaluated using molecular docking analysis. Lower binding affinity (more negative kcal/mol) indicates stronger interaction.Lower (more negative) binding energy indicates a stronger binding affinity.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. ROC analysis performance of biomarkers

    Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis will be performed to determine the diagnostic performance of selected biomarkers. Parameters include Area Under the Curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, cut-off value, and Youden Index. AUC value (range 0-1); higher values indicate better diagnostic performance.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sivas Cumhuriyet University
    Sivas, Central 58146, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2019 to primary completion in Oct 2020, 11 months.

Of 15 interventional studies with no phase under Specific Learning Disorder, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 22. This study's 11 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 30, 2025
First posted
Nov 20, 2025
StartActual
Oct 22, 2019
Primary completionActual
Oct 21, 2020
CompletionActual
Apr 16, 2021
Last update
Nov 20, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 20, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07240142
Lead sponsor
Dilara Ulger Ozbek
Responsible party
Dilara Ulger Ozbek (Dr., Cumhuriyet University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 20, 2025
Start date
Oct 22, 2019
Primary completion
Oct 21, 2020
Completion
Apr 16, 2021
Last update
Nov 20, 2025

Study contacts

Dilara ULGER OZBEK, Dr.
study director · Cumhuriyet University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion