ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07233694CSB-PAINUpdated Nov 18, 2025

IM İnjection-PAIN-Cold Spray and Stress Ball

An interventional study of cold spray gruop and stress ball gruop in Pain, Procedural, Acute Pain and Injection Site, sponsored by Erzincan Binali Yildirim Universitesi. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-18.

Sponsored by Erzincan Binali Yildirim Universitesi · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Nov 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Brief Summary:

Intramuscular (IM) injection is a widely used method for drug administration, with over 12 billion applications globally each year. Despite its therapeutic advantages, IM injection often causes pain, which can negatively impact patient comfort and lead to injection fear, non-compliance, and avoidance of healthcare services. Effective pain management during IM injection is an ethical and professional responsibility for nurses. This randomized controlled study aims to compare the effectiveness of cold spray and stress ball squeezing methods against standard practice in reducing IM injection-related pain. The study will be conducted in the emergency department of a university hospital in Turkey between March and June 2025, involving 66 patients prescribed IM diclofenac sodium. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: cold spray, stress ball, or control. Pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) within the first minute after injection.

Read the detailed description

Study Description

Brief Summary:

Intramuscular (IM) injection is a widely used method for drug administration, with over 12 billion applications globally each year. Despite its therapeutic advantages, IM injection often causes pain, which can negatively impact patient comfort and lead to injection fear, non-compliance, and avoidance of healthcare services. Effective pain management during IM injection is an ethical and professional responsibility for nurses. This randomized controlled study aims to compare the effectiveness of cold spray and stress ball squeezing methods against standard practice in reducing IM injection-related pain. The study will be conducted in the emergency department of a university hospital in Turkey between March and June 2025, involving 66 patients prescribed IM diclofenac sodium. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: cold spray, stress ball, or control. Pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) within the first minute after injection.

Detailed Description:

Intramuscular (IM) injection is a fundamental method for delivering drugs directly into muscle tissue for systemic circulation. It is one of the most common invasive procedures in clinical practice globally, with over 12 billion applications annually. While offering faster absorption and higher bioavailability compared to oral and other parenteral routes for various pharmacological agents like vaccines, analgesics, sedatives, and antibiotics, IM injection can cause pain during administration, affecting patient comfort. This pain is a frequently reported side effect and can lead to injection phobia, non-adherence to treatment, and avoidance of health services. Consequently, managing pain during IM injections is a crucial ethical and professional responsibility for nurses.

Various non-pharmacological methods have been developed in nursing practice to reduce IM injection pain, and their efficacy has been extensively evaluated. These interventions include ShotBlocker, manual pressure, acupuncture, air-lock, distraction, and cold application. Cold application is a commonly preferred method for acute pain management due to its non-pharmacological effect and ease of clinical application. Cold sprays, in particular, offer significant advantages in clinical practice due to their minimal preparation, rapid effect, and low cost. These medical agents, derived from liquefied gases, rapidly evaporate from the skin surface, reducing local temperature and providing temporary superficial anesthesia. Their analgesic effects are achieved by inhibiting the activation of ion channels involved in pain transmission or by reducing the sensitivity of pain receptors. Limited studies have investigated cold spray use for IM injection pain control in adults. Comparative studies with ShotBlocker have reported that cold spray significantly reduces pain, but no significant difference was found between the two methods.

Distraction methods are effective nursing approaches that aim to reduce pain perception by shifting cognitive focus away from painful stimuli. The stress ball squeezing method, used within this strategy, has been applied in various invasive procedures and found effective in pain control. However, only one study has specifically evaluated its effect on IM injection pain. This study, conducted during Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination, reported no statistically significant effect of stress ball squeezing on pain levels.

Despite numerous studies on IM injection-related pain, it remains a prevalent clinical issue. Cold spray and stress ball squeezing offer practical options for pain reduction. However, studies evaluating their direct effects on IM injection pain are limited, and no direct comparative studies exist. Addressing this gap is crucial for evidence-based nursing care and improving patient experience.

This study aims to develop effective and applicable strategies to enhance care quality by comparatively evaluating cold spray, stress ball, and standard practice for reducing IM injection-related pain. Specifically, it aims to compare the effects of cold spray and stress ball squeezing methods on injection pain during IM injection and to examine their effectiveness in reducing pain compared to standard practice.

The research hypotheses are:

H1. The application of cold spray to the injection site during IM injection reduces the intensity of pain caused by the injection.

H2. Squeezing a stress ball during IM injection reduces the intensity of pain caused by the injection.

H3. Cold spray application is more effective than stress ball squeezing in reducing injection pain.

Study Design and Participants:

This study is a three-arm parallel-group, single-blind, randomized controlled experimental design, conducted in accordance with the CONSORT 2010 guidelines. The research will be conducted from March to June 2025 in the emergency department of a university hospital in Turkey. The sample will consist of 66 patients who present to the emergency department and have been prescribed IM diclofenac sodium. The sample size was calculated using G Power 3.1.9.7, based on variance values from a relevant article, with a 95% confidence interval, 0.05 error rate, 80% power, and an effect size of d=0.63, determining 22 participants per group.

Randomization and Allocation Concealment:

Participants will be randomly assigned to the cold spray, stress ball, or control group using a random number table generated via

https://www.random.org. Numbers from 1 to 66 will be written on separate slips of paper, placed in opaque envelopes, and sealed. Each eligible participant who consents to the study will select an envelope, and the number drawn will determine their group assignment.

Data Collection Instruments:

Data will be collected using a Patient Identification Form and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Patient Identification Form will gather sociodemographic and clinical information such as age, gender, marital status, education level, body mass index, and chronic health conditions. The VAS is a valid and reliable 10-centimeter linear scale used to assess pain intensity, ranging from "no pain at all" (0) to "unbearable pain" (10). It is widely used in clinical studies due to its ease of application and effectiveness in evaluating pain reduction methods.

Intervention Materials:

Cold Spray: Galena® brand, aerosol form, containing butane, propane, and isobutane, which rapidly evaporates to reduce skin temperature and provide temporary superficial anesthesia.

Stress Ball: Approximately 10 cm in diameter, medium firmness, made of high-quality silicone, designed to change shape when squeezed and return to its original form.

Data Collection Process:

Before data collection, eligible patients will be informed about the study's purpose and content, and written and verbal consent will be obtained. All participants will complete the "Patient Identification Form" before the intervention. All IM injections will be administered by the same researcher following a standardized protocol to minimize variability. The injection side (right or left ventrogluteal region) will be randomly determined for each participant. Pain assessment will be performed within the first minute after injection by an independent nurse blinded to the patient's group, using the VAS.

Standard Intramuscular Injection Protocol:

Drug: Diclofenac sodium (3 mL)

Needle size: 21 Gauge

Syringe volume: 5 mL

Injection site: Left or right ventrogluteal region

Skin cleansing: The injection site will be cleaned with an alcohol swab in a 5 cm diameter, using circular movements from inside to outside, and 5 seconds will be waited for the area to dry before needle insertion.

Air-lock: 0.2-0.3 mL

Insertion angle: 90∘

Aspiration: Yes (5 sec)

Drug injection duration: 30 sec (1 mL / 10 sec)

Waiting time before needle removal: 10 sec

Post-injection application: Light pressure will be applied to the area for 15-20 seconds.

Pain measurement: Pain level will be assessed with VAS within the first 1 minute after injection and recorded.

Intervention Groups:

Cold Spray Group: Before the injection, cold spray will be applied for 5 seconds from a distance of 15 cm to an approximately 10cm 2 area at the planned injection site. The IM injection will then be performed within 15 seconds, following the standard protocol.

Stress Ball Group: Participants will be instructed on how to use the stress ball. After the injection site is randomly determined, a medium-firm stress ball will be given to the participant's non-injection hand, and they will be asked to rhythmically squeeze and release it throughout the procedure. The injection will be performed according to the standard protocol.

Control Group: Participants in this group will receive only the standard IM injection protocol without any additional interventions.

Ethical Considerations:

Ethical approval was obtained from Gümüşhane University Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee (2024, E-95674917-108.99-291198) and written application permission from Van Provincial Health Directorate before data collection. Informed written and verbal consent will be obtained from all participants after explaining the study's purpose and content. Principles of informed consent, respect for participant autonomy, and confidentiality of personal information will be maintained during data collection. All participants will be informed of their right to withdraw from the study at any time.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Procedural
  • Acute Pain
  • Injection Site

Keywords

  • muscle intramuscular injection
  • Nursing
  • Nursing practice
  • Pain
  • stress ball
  • cold spray
03

In context

Pain, Procedural

241 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Procedural; 64 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 66 is below the median of 90 across 227 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Procedural.

Browse Pain, Procedural studies →

Lead sponsor

Erzincan Binali Yildirim Universitesi is the lead sponsor of 23 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Adults aged 18-65 years

Receiving intramuscular injection

Voluntarily agreed to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Skin disease at the injection site

Allergy to cold spray

Cognitive impairment preventing cooperation

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
66 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    No additional intervention will be applied to the participants in this group; only the standard IM injection protocol will be followed.

  • Experimental
    Cold Spray Group

    Prior to the injection, cold spray was applied to an approximately 10 cm² area at the planned injection site from a distance of 15 cm for a duration of 5 seconds. Following this procedure, the intramuscular (IM) injection was administered within 15 seconds, and the entire process was completed in accordance with the standard protocol

    Procedure: cold spray gruop

  • Experimental
    Stress Ball Group

    Participants in this group were informed in advance about how to use the stress ball. After the ventrogluteal (VG) injection site was randomly selected, a medium-firm stress ball was placed in the hand on the non-injection side. Participants were instructed to rhythmically squeeze and release the ball throughout the procedure. The injection was then administered according to the predetermined standard protocol

    Procedure: stress ball gruop

Interventions

  • Procedurecold spray gruop

    Arm Description: Before skin cleansing; cooling spray will be applied to a 10 cm2 area in the injection area from a distance of 15 cm for 5 seconds and diclofenac sodium injection will be applied within 15 seconds (Çetin and Avşar, 2022; Cevheroğlu and Büyükyılmaz, 2023). • IM injection protocol will be followed.

  • Procedurestress ball gruop

    The patients in the group will first be told how to use the ball. After the VG area to be injected is determined, a stress ball will be given to the patient's hand opposite the injection area and they will be asked to squeeze and loosen the ball. They will be told to repeat this until the procedure is completed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessment of Pain Intensity Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Following a Cold Spray Intervention

    Pain intensity will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a 100-millimeter horizontal line where 0 mm represents 'no pain' and 100 mm represents 'the worst imaginable pain'. A lower score on the VAS indicates a better outcome (less pain).

    Time frame: Immediately after intramuscular injection (0-5 minutes)

  2. Assessment of Pain Intensity Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) During a Stress Ball Intervention

    Squeezing a stress ball during intramuscular (IM) injection reduces the intensity of injection-related pain. Pain will be measured using the VAS.

    Time frame: During intramuscular injection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of Pain Intensity Scores Between the Cold Spray and Stress Ball Intervention Groups

    The mean pain scores, as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), will be compared between the group receiving the cold spray intervention and the group using the stress ball. The VAS is a 100-millimeter horizontal line where 0 mm represents 'no pain' and 100 mm represents 'the worst imaginable pain'. A lower score indicates a better outcome.

    Time frame: Immediately after intramuscular injection (0-5 minutes)

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ayinde O, Hayward RS, Ross JDC. The effect of intramuscular injection technique on injection associated pain; a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021 May 3;16(5):e0250883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250883. eCollection 2021. PubMed 33939726 ↗
  • Basak T, Demirtas A, Yorubulut SM. Virtual reality and distraction cards to reduce pain during intramuscular benzathine penicillin injection procedure in adults: A randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2021 May;77(5):2511-2518. doi: 10.1111/jan.14782. Epub 2021 Feb 19. PubMed 33608955 ↗
  • Cmc S, Lord H, Vargese SS, Kurian N, Cherian SA, Mathew E, Fernandez R. Effectiveness of physical stimulation for reducing injection pain in adults receiving intramuscular injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Feb 1;21(2):373-400. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00590. PubMed 36758552 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to privacy concerns and institutional data protection policies. The data collected in this study are intended solely for the purposes of this specific research.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2025; primary completion for Nov 2025, 0 months later.

Of 141 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Procedural, half reached primary completion within 7 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15. This study's planned 0 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 141 studies reached it within 7 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 14, 2025
First posted
Nov 18, 2025
StartEst.
Nov 25, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Nov 30, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 10, 2025
Last update
Nov 18, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07233694
Lead sponsor
Erzincan Binali Yildirim Universitesi
Responsible party
handan aydın kahraman (Asistant Professör, Erzincan Binali Yildirim Universitesi) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 18, 2025
Start date
Nov 25, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 10, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 18, 2025

Study contacts

Handan AYDIN KAHRAMAN, PHD
Contact
haydin@erzincan.edu.tr
+905077469889
Handan AYDIN KAHRAMAN, PHD
Contact
haydin@erzincan.edu.tr
+90 507 746 9889
Handan AYDIN KAHRAMAN, PHD
principal investigator · Erzincan Binali Yildirim Universitesi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion