CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07229209Updated Feb 20, 2026

Oral Contraceptive Pills Versus Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System for Niche-Related Abnormal Uterine Bleeding

An interventional study of transvaginal ultrasonography and monophasic combined oral contraceptive pill in Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Cesarean Section Complications and Uterine Scar, sponsored by Benha University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-20.

Sponsored by Benha University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2025, registered Nov 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
166
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the clinical efficacy and niche morphological changes following treatment with combined oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) versus a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in women with symptomatic uterine niche-related abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB).

Read the detailed description

After eligibility and consenting, participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated block randomization list (block size of six). Allocation concealment was maintained using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes, which were opened after consent.

All participants had a transvaginal ultrasound-confirmed uterine niche ≥2 mm in depth. Residual myometrial thickness, niche depth, length, and width were assessed.

  • OCP group: Participants received a monophasic combined oral contraceptive pill containing 0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol and 3 mg drospirenone (Technospiron® 0.03/3 mg, Technopharm, Egypt), taken for 21 days starting on day 2 of menstruation for six consecutive cycles.
  • LNG-IUS group: Participants received a 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena®, Bayer, Oy Finland), inserted under transvaginal ultrasound guidance within the first three days of menstruation for 6 months.

Both treatments were provided free of charge. Participants could switch to the alternative method upon study completion. Because of the nature of the interventions, blinding was not feasible; hence, the trial was open-label. Assessments were performed at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months. Participants recorded:

  • Number of days of postmenstrual/intermenstrual spotting
  • Total bleeding duration per cycle
  • Pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea scores (10-point visual analogue scale)
  • Sexual well-being (FSFI-6 score)
  • Treatment satisfaction (satisfied/very satisfied vs. other responses)
  • Adverse events, complications, and reasons for discontinuation (including LNG-IUS expulsion) At 6 months, transvaginal ultrasonography was repeated to assess residual myometrial thickness, niche depth, length, and width.
02

Conditions studied

  • Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
  • Cesarean Section Complications
  • Uterine Scar

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • cesarean scar defect
  • Uterine niche
  • abnormal uterine bleeding
  • oral contraceptive pills
  • levonorgestrel intrauterine system
  • randomized controlled trial
03

In context

Metrorrhagia

95 studies on the registry are indexed under Metrorrhagia; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 166 is above the median of 109 across 73 interventional studies indexed under Metrorrhagia.

Browse Metrorrhagia studies →

Lead sponsor

Benha University is the lead sponsor of 356 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • women with at least one previous cesarean section.
  • presenting with postmenstrual or intermenstrual bleeding for ≥3 consecutive cycles lasting ≥2 days, and a total bleeding duration >7 days per cycle.
  • All participants had a transvaginal ultrasound-confirmed uterine niche ≥2 mm in depth.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • malignancy
  • other identifiable causes of abnormal uterine bleeding
  • abnormal cervical cytology
  • cervicitis
  • pelvic inflammatory disease
  • endometrial polyps
  • uterine fibroids
  • contraindications to either combined oral contraceptive pill or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system
  • desire for pregnancy
  • refusal to participate
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
166 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    combined oral contraceptive pill group

    Participants received a monophasic combined oral contraceptive pill containing 0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol and 3 mg drospirenone (Technospiron® 0.03/3 mg, Technopharm, Egypt), starting on day 2-5 of menstruation for 21 days followed by a 7-day hormone-free interval, for six consecutive cycles.

    Diagnostic Test: transvaginal ultrasonography · Drug: monophasic combined oral contraceptive pill

  • Active comparator
    levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system group

    Participants received a 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena®, Bayer, Oy Finland), inserted under transvaginal ultrasound guidance within the first 5 days of menstruation for 6 months.

    Diagnostic Test: transvaginal ultrasonography · Device: 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testtransvaginal ultrasonography

    At baseline and at 6 months after the start of treatment, transvaginal ultrasonography was performed to assess residual myometrial thickness, niche depth, length, and width.

  • Drugmonophasic combined oral contraceptive pill

    Participants received a monophasic combined oral contraceptive pills containing 0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol and 3 mg drospirenone (Technospiron® 0.03/3 mg, Technopharm, Egypt), starting on day 2-5 of menstruation for 21 days followed by a 7-day hormone-free interval, for six consecutive cycles.

    Also known as: Technospiron

  • Device52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system

    Participants received a 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena®, Bayer, Oy Finland), inserted under transvaginal ultrasound guidance within the first 5 days of menstruation for 6 months.

    Also known as: Mirena

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The change in the total number of postmenstrual and/or intermenstrual spotting days per cycle at 6 months post randomization from baseline.

    Participants had recorded daily bleeding data in structured, paper menstrual diaries that were prospectively given to them with proper guidance of how to fill them in a right way and then they were reviewed for completeness during follow-up visits/calls.

    Time frame: at baseline and at 6 months post randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. The total number of postmenstrual and/or intermenstrual spotting days per cycle.

    Participants had recorded daily bleeding data in structured, paper menstrual diaries that were prospectively given to them with proper guidance of how to fill them in a right way and then they were reviewed for completeness during follow-up visits/calls.

    Time frame: at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months post randomization

  2. Total bleeding duration per cycle

    Participants had recorded daily bleeding data in structured, paper menstrual diaries that were prospectively given to them with proper guidance of how to fill them in a right way and then they were reviewed for completeness during follow-up visits/calls. It includes days of menstruation plus days of spotting

    Time frame: at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months post randomization

  3. Pelvic pain scores

    Participants recorded this on 10-point visual analogue scale where 0 means no pain and 10 means intense pain.

    Time frame: at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months

  4. dysmenorrhea scores

    Participants recorded this on 10-point visual analogue scale where 0 means no pain and 10 means intense pain.

    Time frame: at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months post randomization

  5. Sexual function

    Assessed using the validated 6-item Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-6). The FSFI-6 score is the sum of the participant ordinal responses to the six items; the score can range from 2 to 30. Female sexual dysfunction is diagnosed if the total score is ≤ 19 (Isidori et al., J Sex Med 2010)

    Time frame: at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months post randomization

  6. Treatment satisfaction

    Participants recorded on a 5-point Likert scale (where 1 means very dissatisfied and 5 means very satisfied), then dichotomized for analysis as yes for "Satisfied/Very Satisfied" and no for other responses.

    Time frame: at 1, 3, and 6 months post randomization

  7. Anatomical Niche Changes

    Assessed via transvaginal ultrasonography including residual myometrial thickness, niche depth, length, and width.

    Time frame: at baseline and at 6 months post randomization

  8. Adverse events

    Participants reported this to the main investigator via follow up visits or telephone calls

    Time frame: at 1, 3, and 6 months post randomization

  9. Complications

    Participants reported this to the main investigator via follow up visits or telephone calls

    Time frame: At 1, 3, and 6 months post randomization

  10. Reasons for discontinuation

    Participants reported this to the main investigator via follow up visits or telephone calls

    Time frame: At 1, 3, and 6 months post randomization

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Benha Univesity Hospital
    Banhā, Qalyubia Governorate 13512, Egypt
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Naji O, Abdallah Y, Bij De Vaate AJ, Smith A, Pexsters A, Stalder C, McIndoe A, Ghaem-Maghami S, Lees C, Brolmann HA, Huirne JA, Timmerman D, Bourne T. Standardized approach for imaging and measuring Cesarean section scars using ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;39(3):252-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.10077. PubMed 21858885 ↗
  • Tulandi T, Cohen A. Emerging Manifestations of Cesarean Scar Defect in Reproductive-aged Women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):893-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Jul 5. PubMed 27393285 ↗
  • Vikhareva Osser O, Valentin L. Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;117(3):525-532. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318209abf0. PubMed 21343754 ↗
  • Donnez O. Cesarean scar defects: management of an iatrogenic pathology whose prevalence has dramatically increased. Fertil Steril. 2020 Apr;113(4):704-716. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.01.037. PubMed 32228874 ↗
  • Jordans IPM, de Leeuw RA, Stegwee SI, Amso NN, Barri-Soldevila PN, van den Bosch T, Bourne T, Brolmann HAM, Donnez O, Dueholm M, Hehenkamp WJK, Jastrow N, Jurkovic D, Mashiach R, Naji O, Streuli I, Timmerman D, van der Voet LF, Huirne JAF. Sonographic examination of uterine niche in non-pregnant women: a modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;53(1):107-115. doi: 10.1002/uog.19049. PubMed 29536581 ↗
  • Isidori AM, Pozza C, Esposito K, Giugliano D, Morano S, Vignozzi L, Corona G, Lenzi A, Jannini EA. Development and validation of a 6-item version of the female sexual function index (FSFI) as a diagnostic tool for female sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2010 Mar;7(3):1139-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01635.x. Epub 2009 Dec 1. PubMed 19968774 ↗
  • Stavridis K, Balafoutas D, Vlahos N, Joukhadar R. Current surgical treatment of uterine isthmocele: an update of existing literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jan;311(1):13-24. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07880-w. Epub 2024 Dec 16. PubMed 39680143 ↗
  • Klein Meuleman SJM, Min N, Hehenkamp WJK, Post Uiterweer ED, Huirne JAF, de Leeuw RA. The definition, diagnosis, and symptoms of the uterine niche - A systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Aug;90:102390. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102390. Epub 2023 Jul 15. PubMed 37506497 ↗
  • Murji A, Sanders AP, Monteiro I, Haiderbhai S, Matelski J, Walsh C, Abbott JA, Munro MG, Maheux-Lacroix S; International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Committee on Menstrual Disorders and Related Health Impacts. Cesarean scar defects and abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2022 Oct;118(4):758-766. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.06.031. Epub 2022 Aug 17. PubMed 35985862 ↗
  • You SH. The symptomatic cesarean scar defect with oral contraceptive pills treatment following evacuation of a cesarean scar pregnancy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan;62(1):181-183. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2022.04.012. No abstract available. PubMed 36720538 ↗
  • Chen YY, Tsai CC, Lan KC, Ou YC. Preliminary report on the use of a levonorgestrel intrauterine system for the treatment of intermenstrual bleeding due to previous cesarean delivery scar defect. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Oct;45(10):2015-2020. doi: 10.1111/jog.14060. Epub 2019 Aug 5. PubMed 31381242 ↗
  • Zhang J, Zhu C, Yan L, Wang Y, Zhu Q, He C, He X, Ji S, Tian Y, Xie L, Liang Y, Xia W, Mol BW, Huirne JAF. Comparing levonorgestrel intrauterine system with hysteroscopic niche resection in women with postmenstrual spotting related to a niche in the uterine cesarean scar: a randomized, open-label, controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jun;228(6):712.e1-712.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.03.020. Epub 2023 Mar 17. PubMed 36935068 ↗
  • Zhang X, Yang M, Wang Q, Chen J, Ding J, Hua K. Prospective evaluation of five methods used to treat cesarean scar defects. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Sep;134(3):336-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 Jun 30. PubMed 27473332 ↗
  • Zheng F, Chen S, Yang W, Li J, Huang Q, Qin H, Wei J, Lin J. Comparison of the efficacy of oral contraceptives and levonorgestrel intrauterine system in intermenstrual bleeding caused by uterine niche. Ginekol Pol. 2024;95(8):621-626. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2023.0067. Epub 2023 Jul 7. PubMed 37417378 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07229209
Lead sponsor
Benha University
Responsible party
Ahmed Abdel Latif Ahmed Alnezamy (Lecturer of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 14, 2025
Start date
Feb 5, 2025
Primary completion
May 1, 2025
Completion
Nov 1, 2025
Last update
Feb 20, 2026

Study contacts

AHMED ALNEZAMY, MD
principal investigator · Lecturer of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion