A Phase 2 interventional study of NAC and NAC 0mg/day (Placebo) in Carpal Tunnel Surgery, Trigger Finger Disorder and De Quervain Syndrome, sponsored by University of Arizona. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-17.
Sponsored by University of Arizona · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
This pilot asks whether peri-operative N-acetylcysteine (NAC) improves recovery after common outpatient hand/foot-ankle surgery-specifically, does NAC reduce pain and opioid use and enhance function by modulating redox-inflammatory pathways? Primary objectives are to establish feasibility (accrual, adherence, follow-up), estimate NAC vs placebo effects on pain, function, and opioid consumption, and characterize inflammatory signatures that may predict response.
Methods: a single-site, double-blind, 1:1 randomized trial (N≈80) comparing NAC 1,200 mg twice daily for 14 days (starting pre-op) vs matching placebo; daily e-diaries for POD0-14; standardized outcomes (PROMIS Pain Interference; QuickDASH or FAAM; PGIC; opioid MME); and small blood draws pre-surgery and at two follow-up visits for cytokine profiling.
93 studies on the registry are indexed under Trigger Finger Disorder; 22 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 66 across 75 interventional studies indexed under Trigger Finger Disorder.
Browse Trigger Finger Disorder studies →University of Arizona is the lead sponsor of 476 studies on the registry; 88 are open to participants now.
Of its 51 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (59%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraception
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Intervention: Oral N-acetylcysteine capsules, 600 mg twice daily. Timing/Duration: Begin the evening before surgery (≤24 h pre-op) and continue through Post-op Day 14 (total 15 days; bottle overfilled to cover missed doses). Administration: Self-administered at home; counseling at baseline dispense; pill diary + pill counts. Concomitant care: All peri-operative care per standard of care (SoC), including multimodal analgesia; no high-dose antioxidant supplements; nitrates excluded. Objective: Test whether peri-operative NAC improves early pain, function, and recovery via redox-immune modulation.
Drug: NAC
Intervention: Matched inert capsules (e.g., microcrystalline cellulose), identical in size/appearance/labeling to NAC. Timing/Duration: 600 mg-equivalent capsule count, twice daily, evening before surgery through Post-op Day 14. Administration: Same counseling, diary, and adherence checks as NAC arm. Concomitant care: Identical SoC allowances/restrictions as NAC arm.
Drug: NAC 0mg/day (Placebo)
Intervention: Oral N-acetylcysteine capsules, 600 mg twice daily. Timing/Duration: Begin the evening before surgery (≤24 h pre-op) and continue through Post-op Day 14 (total 15 days; bottle overfilled to cover missed doses). Administration: Self-administered at home; counseling at baseline dispense; pill diary + pill counts. Concomitant care: All peri-operative care per standard of care (SoC), including multimodal analgesia; no high-dose antioxidant supplements; nitrates excluded. Objective: Test whether peri-operative NAC improves early pain, function, and recovery via redox-immune modulation.
Intervention: Matched inert capsules (e.g., microcrystalline cellulose), identical in size/appearance/labeling to NAC. Timing/Duration: 600 mg-equivalent capsule count, twice daily, evening before surgery through Post-op Day 14. Administration: Same counseling, diary, and adherence checks as NAC arm. Concomitant care: Identical SoC allowances/restrictions as NAC arm. Randomization/Blinding: 1:1, stratified by surgery type (upper- vs lower-extremity); double-blind (participants, investigators, assessors). Primary comparisons: Early postoperative pain and function (e.g., PROMIS-PI/PF, QuickDASH or LEFS), opioid consumption; safety/tolerability.
PROMIS pain interference
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Pain Interference T-score metric: mean = 50, SD = 10 Higher scores = worse outcome (greater pain interference with daily activities, social, cognitive, emotional, and physical functioning)
Time frame: baseline; post-op (2-4 weeks); post-op (12 weeks);
PROMIS Physical Function
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function T-score metric: mean = 50, SD = 10 Higher scores = better outcome (greater ability to carry out physical activities such as mobility, self-care, and instrumental activities)
Time frame: Baseline; post-op (2-4 weeks); post-op (12 weeks)
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
0-10: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable Higher scores = worse outcome (greater perceived pain intensity)
Time frame: Baseline; post-op (2-4 weeks); post-op (12 weeks)
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Acetylcysteine