An observational study in Gerd and Eosinophilic Esophagitis, sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-27.
Sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin · Observational
Background \& Significance Chronic benign esophageal disorders such as Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and eosinophilic esophagitis are common gastrointestinal disorders affecting nearly 20% and 0.1% of the population, respectively. Although these conditions are frequent, the diagnosis of GERD or EoE requires complex decision making involving endoscopic examination, histopathological examination, and esophageal pH testing. This translates into significant economic burden; For example, burden due to GERD is about $24 billion annually. Additionally, there may be a delay in the diagnosis of GERD or EoE as Investigators might have to do multiple procedures such as upper endoscopy, esophageal pH testing, etc for the same participant for confirmation of the diagnosis. In addition, there could be overlay between GERD and EoE in the diagnosis which make cause delay in the diagnosis and decision making.
Aim:
Here, Investigators will plan to identify the diagnostic utility and cost-effectiveness of this novel Mivu device(FDA approved) in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease or chronic esophageal inflammatory disorders in participants with reflux symptoms or chronic esophageal symptoms.
Diagnostic Utility of Mucosal Impedance Device in participants with GERD and chronic esophageal disorders:
Background \& Significance Chronic benign esophageal disorders such as Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and eosinophilic esophagitis are common gastrointestinal disorders affecting nearly 20% and 0.1% of the population, respectively. Although these conditions are frequent, the diagnosis of GERD or EoE requires complex decision making involving endoscopic examination, histopathological examination, and esophageal pH testing. This translates into significant economic burden; For example, burden due to GERD is about $24 billion annually. Additionally, there may be a delay in the diagnosis of GERD or EoE as Investigators might have to do multiple procedures such as upper endoscopy, esophageal pH testing, etc for the same participant for confirmation of the diagnosis. In addition, there could be overlay between GERD and EoE in the diagnosis which make cause delay in the diagnosis and decision making.
In summary, current diagnostic testing for GERD lead to several challenges:
Since majority of the participants who undergo upper endoscopy for GERD, have normal endoscopic visualization of esophagus, esophageal pH impedance or wireless pH testing are essential to make the diagnosis of GERD. Hence, Esophageal Mucosal impedance (Mivu) is a measurement tool that can evaluate if the structure of the esophageal mucosal tissue as a one-stop solution testing. MI is performed using an FDA approved endoscopic tool called "Mucosal Integrity Conductivity Test System" (Diversatek). The Mivu system software uses the collected data to determine if there is evidence of GERD.
Prior studies have demonstrated a positive correlation between low mucosal impedance and conditions such as GERD and EoE. As such, Mivu offers the potential to:
Aim:
Here, Investigators will plan to identify the diagnostic utility and cost-effectiveness of this novel Mivu device(FDA approved) in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease or chronic esophageal inflammatory disorders in participants with reflux symptoms or chronic esophageal symptoms.
Methods:
Study:
This is a prospective study aimed at evaluating chronic benign esophageal disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux disease and eosinophilic esophagitis. All the participants with reflux symptoms or dysphagia/esophageal symptoms who undergo upper endoscopy will be enrolled into the study.
Step by Step Procedure:
Clinical Parameters that will be collected:
Clinical:
Endoscopic:
Clinical Outcomes:
Analysis:
This study will compare questionnaire scores and mucosal impedance scores in participants with GERD. All the categorical and numerical variables will be compared by Fischer's exact and Mann-Whitney test, respectively. Diagnostic utility (sensitivity and specificity of the new Mivu device will be calculated against the gold standard- endoscopy and esophageal pH testing. Sample size calculation after initial data collection of 50 participants.
1,067 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux; 188 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 180 across 298 observational studies indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux.
Browse Gastroesophageal Reflux studies →Medical College of Wisconsin is the lead sponsor of 540 studies on the registry; 119 are open to participants now.
Of its 71 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 56 (79%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
All the patients with reflux symptoms or dysphagia/esophageal symptoms who undergo upper endoscopy will be enrolled into the study.
1. Patients with chronic esophageal symptoms such as atypical or typical reflux symptoms and dysphagia, is here for upper endoscopy testing.
Exclusion Criteria:
Positive endoscopy findings or esophageal pH results based on Lyon 2.0
Device: MuVI Esophageal mucosal impedance testing
Negative endoscopy and negative esophageal pH testing results
Device: MuVI Esophageal mucosal impedance testing
Esophageal mucosal impedance values are checked in both groups
Diagnostic accuracy of MuVI
Sensitivity and Specificity of MuVI
Time frame: 1 year
Diagnostic utility of mucosal impedance in the diagnosis of GERD
Correlation of esophageal pH parameters with mucosal impedance data.
Time frame: 1 year
Plan to share: No — Individual data will not shared as per IRB policy due to potential HIPAA violation
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Medical College of Wisconsin