CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07227506Updated Jul 27, 2026

Utility of Mucosal Impedance Device in Chronic Esophageal Disorders:

An observational study in Gerd and Eosinophilic Esophagitis, sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-27.

Sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2025; still recruiting 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background \& Significance Chronic benign esophageal disorders such as Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and eosinophilic esophagitis are common gastrointestinal disorders affecting nearly 20% and 0.1% of the population, respectively. Although these conditions are frequent, the diagnosis of GERD or EoE requires complex decision making involving endoscopic examination, histopathological examination, and esophageal pH testing. This translates into significant economic burden; For example, burden due to GERD is about $24 billion annually. Additionally, there may be a delay in the diagnosis of GERD or EoE as Investigators might have to do multiple procedures such as upper endoscopy, esophageal pH testing, etc for the same participant for confirmation of the diagnosis. In addition, there could be overlay between GERD and EoE in the diagnosis which make cause delay in the diagnosis and decision making.

Aim:

Here, Investigators will plan to identify the diagnostic utility and cost-effectiveness of this novel Mivu device(FDA approved) in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease or chronic esophageal inflammatory disorders in participants with reflux symptoms or chronic esophageal symptoms.

Read the detailed description

Diagnostic Utility of Mucosal Impedance Device in participants with GERD and chronic esophageal disorders:

Background \& Significance Chronic benign esophageal disorders such as Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and eosinophilic esophagitis are common gastrointestinal disorders affecting nearly 20% and 0.1% of the population, respectively. Although these conditions are frequent, the diagnosis of GERD or EoE requires complex decision making involving endoscopic examination, histopathological examination, and esophageal pH testing. This translates into significant economic burden; For example, burden due to GERD is about $24 billion annually. Additionally, there may be a delay in the diagnosis of GERD or EoE as Investigators might have to do multiple procedures such as upper endoscopy, esophageal pH testing, etc for the same participant for confirmation of the diagnosis. In addition, there could be overlay between GERD and EoE in the diagnosis which make cause delay in the diagnosis and decision making.

In summary, current diagnostic testing for GERD lead to several challenges:

  • Delayed diagnosis, particularly in cases where participants undergo normal endoscopy but still experience symptoms.
  • Increased healthcare costs, with GERD alone accounting for an estimated $24 billion annually in the United States.
  • Diagnostic overlap between GERD and EoE, which complicates clinical decision-making and contributes to further delays or misdiagnoses.

Since majority of the participants who undergo upper endoscopy for GERD, have normal endoscopic visualization of esophagus, esophageal pH impedance or wireless pH testing are essential to make the diagnosis of GERD. Hence, Esophageal Mucosal impedance (Mivu) is a measurement tool that can evaluate if the structure of the esophageal mucosal tissue as a one-stop solution testing. MI is performed using an FDA approved endoscopic tool called "Mucosal Integrity Conductivity Test System" (Diversatek). The Mivu system software uses the collected data to determine if there is evidence of GERD.

Prior studies have demonstrated a positive correlation between low mucosal impedance and conditions such as GERD and EoE. As such, Mivu offers the potential to:

  • Serve as a single-procedure diagnostic approach.
  • Reduce diagnostic delay and resource utilization.
  • Improve accuracy in differentiating between GERD, EoE, and functional heartburn.

Aim:

Here, Investigators will plan to identify the diagnostic utility and cost-effectiveness of this novel Mivu device(FDA approved) in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease or chronic esophageal inflammatory disorders in participants with reflux symptoms or chronic esophageal symptoms.

Methods:

Study:

This is a prospective study aimed at evaluating chronic benign esophageal disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux disease and eosinophilic esophagitis. All the participants with reflux symptoms or dysphagia/esophageal symptoms who undergo upper endoscopy will be enrolled into the study.

Step by Step Procedure:

  1. During routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) visit, consented study participants will be given GERD questionnaire.
  2. During endoscopic evaluation of the esophagus as a part of standard of care, Investigators will make sure there is no esophageal stricture or malignancy.
  3. Subsequently, original single channel Mivu catheter (FDA approved) advanced to the distal esophagus.
  4. Measurements of mucosal impedance will be taken at proximal, mid and distal esophageal locations for 5 seconds each.
  5. Once the mucosal impedance data have been recorded, the assembly will be deflated and removed by the investigator.
  6. The study procedure will add approximately 1-5 minutes of procedure time for each research participant.
  7. Participants will undergo further diagnostic testing as per standard of care.
  8. Those participants who are diagnosed with Grade C or D esophagitis at the initial visit will return for a follow-up visit after treatment with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy to determine whether or not esophagitis has healed as part of their standard of care.

Clinical Parameters that will be collected:

Clinical:

  1. Demographics (age, sex, race, and body mass index).
  2. GERD questionnaire.
  3. Dysphagia symptom severity using Mayo Dysphagia Scale and hypervigilance questionnaire.

Endoscopic:

  1. Presence and size of a hiatal hernia.
  2. Presence and severity of esophagitis (graded by the Los Angeles Classification: A, B, C, or D).
  3. Novel Mucosal impedance data: proximal and distal esophageal sensor.
  4. Endoflip data if done as part of standard of care- esophageal distensibility index.
  5. Standard esophageal pH and impedance testing if done as part of standard of care: Proximal and distal acid exposure times over the study period, nocturnal basal impedance.
  6. Pathology Data if done as part of standard of care: Eosinophil count (proximal and distal esophageal counts).
  7. Esophageal manometry if done as part of standard of care: esophageal contractility integral, relaxation of lower esophageal sphincters.

Clinical Outcomes:

  1. Diagnostic utility of mucosal impedance in the diagnosis of GERD; correlation of esophageal pH parameters with mucosal impedance data.
  2. Cost-effectiveness of Mivu compared to the standard diagnostic testing tools such as esophageal pH or Bravo testing.
  3. Correlation of esophageal inflammation in benign esophageal inflammatory disorders such as eosinophilic esophagitis and mucosal impedance values from Mivu.

Analysis:

This study will compare questionnaire scores and mucosal impedance scores in participants with GERD. All the categorical and numerical variables will be compared by Fischer's exact and Mann-Whitney test, respectively. Diagnostic utility (sensitivity and specificity of the new Mivu device will be calculated against the gold standard- endoscopy and esophageal pH testing. Sample size calculation after initial data collection of 50 participants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gerd
  • Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Keywords

  • gerd
  • eosinophilic esophagitis
03

In context

Gastroesophageal Reflux

1,067 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux; 188 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 180 across 298 observational studies indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux.

Browse Gastroesophageal Reflux studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical College of Wisconsin is the lead sponsor of 540 studies on the registry; 119 are open to participants now.

Of its 71 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 56 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All the patients with reflux symptoms or dysphagia/esophageal symptoms who undergo upper endoscopy will be enrolled into the study.

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with chronic esophageal symptoms such as atypical or typical reflux symptoms and dysphagia, is here for upper endoscopy testing.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of esophageal stricture
  2. Unstable patients who cannot undergo this testing.
  3. Patients on anticoagulation on the day of procedure.
  4. Presence of esophageal cancer.
  5. Pregnancy.
  6. Minor patients.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • True GERD

    Positive endoscopy findings or esophageal pH results based on Lyon 2.0

    Device: MuVI Esophageal mucosal impedance testing

  • Functional Heartburn

    Negative endoscopy and negative esophageal pH testing results

    Device: MuVI Esophageal mucosal impedance testing

Interventions

  • DeviceMuVI Esophageal mucosal impedance testing

    Esophageal mucosal impedance values are checked in both groups

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of MuVI

    Sensitivity and Specificity of MuVI

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Diagnostic utility of mucosal impedance in the diagnosis of GERD

    Correlation of esophageal pH parameters with mucosal impedance data.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Froedtert Hospital
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Choksi Y, Lal P, Slaughter JC, Sharda R, Parnell J, Higginbotham T, Vaezi MF. Esophageal Mucosal Impedance Patterns Discriminate Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis From Patients With GERD. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 May;16(5):664-671.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.12.020. Epub 2017 Dec 14. PubMed 29248733 ↗
  • Patel DA, Higginbotham T, Slaughter JC, Aslam M, Yuksel E, Katzka D, Gyawali CP, Mashi M, Pandolfino J, Vaezi MF. Development and Validation of a Mucosal Impedance Contour Analysis System to Distinguish Esophageal Disorders. Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(6):1617-1626.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.253. Epub 2019 Jan 31. PubMed 30711626 ↗
  • Maresova P, Rezny L, Hruska J, Klimova B, Swanstrom LL, Kuca K. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease - a systematic review of cost-effectiveness and economic burden. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):1351. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11781-8. PubMed 39501242 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual data will not shared as per IRB policy due to potential HIPAA violation

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07227506
Lead sponsor
Medical College of Wisconsin
Responsible party
Gokulakrishnan Balasubramanian (Associate Professor, Medical College of Wisconsin) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 12, 2025
Start date
Nov 20, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 27, 2026

Study contacts

Gokulakrishnan Balasubramanian
Contact
gbalasubramanian@mcw.edu
414-805-3827

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion