ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07211308ENDLESSUpdated Aug 17, 2026

Open and Closed Loop DTM SCS in Patients With PSPS Type 2: ENDLESS Study

An observational study in Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2, Failed Back Surgery Syndrome and Failed Neck Surgery Syndrome, sponsored by Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel. Recruiting at 5 sites in 2 countries. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-17.

Sponsored by Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2025; still recruiting 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Evaluation of the effectiveness of differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation for treatment of Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type II (PSPS-T2). Identification of clinical effective parameters concerning frequency, pulse duration, amplitude and battery consumption/recharge frequency and safety evaluation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2
  • Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
  • Failed Neck Surgery Syndrome
03

In context

Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

104 studies on the registry are indexed under Failed Back Surgery Syndrome; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 86 across 26 observational studies indexed under Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.

Browse Failed Back Surgery Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel is the lead sponsor of 375 studies on the registry; 107 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome type 2 (PSPS-T2), who will receive treatment with differential target multiplexed (DTM) SCS.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • having chronic pain as a result of PSPS-T2 that exists for at least 6 months with at least moderate pain intensity (4 or higher measured on numeric rating scale (NRS) or 31mm or higher measured on visual analogue scale (VAS) for the dominant pain location.
  • being offered treatment with DTM SCS
  • being at least 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Expected inability of patients to properly operate the SCS system
  • History of coagulation disorders, lupus erythematosus, diabetic neuropathy
  • Active
  • Addiction to drugs and/or alcohol (more than 5 units /day)
  • Evidence of an active disruptive psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact perception of pain, compliance to intervention and/or ability to complete questionnaires, as determined by the investigator
  • Immune deficiency (e.g. positive, immunosuppressiva)
  • \< 1 year
  • Local infection or other skin disorder at site of incision
  • Pregnancy
  • Other implanted active medical device
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • DeviceSpinal Cord Stimulation

    Differential target multiplexed stimulation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall pain intensity

    The primary effectiveness outcome measure is pain intensity measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (maximal pain) in electronic format. Two scales will be presented for low back/neck pain and for leg/arm pain. Ecological momentary Assessment (EMA) will be used to collect pain intensity scores for VAS, whereby pain intensity is measured for multiple times per day for 1 week to reveal patterns of transient or fluctuating symptoms in the environment and context of the patients' lives, without a recall bias.

    Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity for the lower back and leg pain or neck and arm pain component

    Pain intensity for the lower back and leg pain or neck and arm pain component will be assessed separately with the Numeric Rating Scale (0 to 10). Pain intensity for the last 7 days will be assessed in electronic format, with and without medication use.

    Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months

  2. Medication use

    Open question regarding the use of medication (collected through ecological momentary assessment for 1 week).

    Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months

  3. Negative affect

    Questions on a 9-point scale for negative affects, evaluated through ecological momentary assessment for 7 days.

    Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months

  4. Functional disability

    The Oswestry disability index (ODI; 0 to 100) or Neck disability index (NDI; 0 to 100) is used to measure functional disability due to abnormalities of the spine

    Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months

  5. Health related quality of life

    Health related quality of life, evaluated with the EuroQol with five dimensions and 5 levels

    Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months

  6. Patient global impression of change

    Patients will be asked to quantify the impression of change after treatment using the Patient Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC)

    Time frame: Evaluated at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months of DTM SCS

  7. Clinical holistic responder status

    This is a composite measure for success, relying on the combination of the above questionnaires.

    Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months

  8. Work status

    Work status is evaluated with a self-designed questionnaire

    Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months

  9. Pain catastrophizing

    The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) will be used to measure the level of pain catastrophizing

    Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months

  10. Anxiety and Depression

    The hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will measure symptoms of anxiety and depression

    Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months

  11. Patient expectations concerning SCS

    Self-constructed open question to evaluate patient expectations about SCS

    Time frame: Evaluated at baseline visit

  12. Patient unwanted stimulation awareness and satisfaction about the therapy

    investigated by self-reporting methods with 12 questions

    Time frame: Evaluated at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months of DTM SCS

  13. Time spent in body postures

    Based on the AdaptiveStim technology, the time spent in body postures can be recorded

    Time frame: The data will be extracted from SCS implantation up to 1 month of SCS, from 1 month of SCS up to 6 months and from 6 months up to 12 months

  14. (Serious) adverse events

    Systematically recording all adverse events

    Time frame: Throughout study period, an average of 1 year

  15. Proportion of successful DTM trials

    Time frame: Evaluated after final SCS implantation

  16. Technical IPG details (ECAPs etc.)

    Information from implantable pulse generators will be extracted.

    Time frame: Registration at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months of DTM SCS

  17. DTM SCS stimulation parameters

    Information from implantable pulse generators will be extracted.

    Time frame: Time Frame: Registration at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months of DTM SCS

  18. Battery consumption

    Information from implantable pulse generators will be extracted.

    Time frame: Registration at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months of DTM SCS

  19. Prevalence of technical issues with regard to DTM SCS programming

    Time frame: Throughout study period, an average of 1 year

  20. Actigraphy data

    A Garmin Venue series watch will be used to collect actigraphy data. Devices are worn for 7 consecutive days. This data will only be collected at Belgian sites.

    Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months

07

Study locations

4 of 5 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Dec 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2028, 24 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 7, 2024
First posted
Oct 7, 2025
StartActual
Dec 12, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jan 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jan 1, 2029
Last update
Aug 17, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07211308
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 7, 2025
Start date
Dec 12, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 17, 2026

Study contacts

Maarten TA Moens, MD, PhD
Contact
maarten.moens@uzbrussel.be
003224775514
Lisa Goudman, PT, MSc, PhD
Contact
lisa.goudman@gmail.com
003224775514

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion