ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07210281OsteogenonUpdated Nov 28, 2025

Osteogenon in Orthopedics and Traumatology

A Phase 4 interventional study of received an ossein-hydroxyapatite complex in Patients With Fractures, sponsored by University of Opole. Recruiting at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-28.

Sponsored by University of Opole · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2024, registered Sep 2025).
  • Started Nov 2024; still recruiting 2 years later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 13 studies in Fractures, Bone with a site in Poland — 2 open to participants now, 3 under way, none of them phase 3. Fractures, Bone · Poland.

Planned enrollment
9th of 10
150 · median 387
Started
2024
the only one that year
Phase 4
Only one
of the 13
Registered
13th of 13
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 13
University of Opole

Among the 13 studies in Fractures, Bone with a site in Poland, this one is the 9th largest by planned enrollment of the 10 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2024, is the only one in phase 4, and was the 13th registered.

Fractures, Bone

724 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Bone; 115 are open to participants now.

Browse Fractures, Bone studies →

Open to participants now

2 of the 13 studies in Fractures, Bone with a site in Poland are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 2 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Poland have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Poland →

Who these studies take

Of the 71 Fractures, Bone studies recruiting now, 36 (51%) set no upper age limit and 21 (30%) stop at 75 or younger; 17 take children under 18; 14 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 85 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 13 studies in Fractures, Bone with a site in Poland, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The aim of this study was to evaluate the supportive effect of the ossein-hydroxyapatite complex in fracture healing. The investigators hypothesized that the ossein-hydroxyapatite complex would positively impact fracture healing outcomes.The assessment covers clinical, radiological and biomechanical parameters.

Read the detailed description

The role of ossein-hydroxyapatite complex in fracture healing requires further research.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of ossein-hydroxyapatite complex (Osteogenon) as an adjunctive treatment on the outcome of conservative and surgical fractures treatment via comprehensive clinical, radiological and biomechanical assessments. The investigators aimed to reject the null hypothesis of the absence of beneficial effect of ossein-hydroxyapatite complex on fractures treatment outcomes. This would fill the existing gap in the scientific literature and enable a more widespread use of Osteogenon in the treatment of fractures in many trauma centers.

Patients in the study group with fractures received an ossein-hydroxyapatite complex (830 milligram [mg] of ossein-and-hydroxyapatite complex, with 444 mg of hydroxyapatite, equivalent to 178 mg of calcium and 82 mg of phosphorus) throughout the entire period following fracture healing. The tablets were taken orally, one tablet twice daily.

The drug Osteogenon used in our study had been approved for fracture treatment. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and all applicable laws and regulations. All patients had provided their written informed consent and were informed of a voluntary nature of their participation in this study.

Patients participating in the study, both in the study and control groups, had to meet the inclusion criteria. The randomization method used was to evenly recruit the study and control groups as patients who met the inclusion criteria were recruited. Randomization took into account the equal distribution of gender and age in both groups.

Patients from both the experimental and control groups received the same recommendations regarding rehabilitation and had the same clinical and radiological follow-up protocol.

The following clinical, biomechanical and radiological parameters were assessed in the study: the period of immobilization, rate of bone union, analgesic use at the beginning of treatment, analgesic use during the follow-up, time to achieving pain relief, pain in 100 millimeter [mm] Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), number of patients declaring pain relief, rate of complications, time to resuming normal physical activity, grip strength, muscle strength during joint movement.

The period of immobilization was defined as the total number of days during which cast immobilization was maintained. The time to resuming normal physical activity was expressed in days and defined as the period from injury to return to work or school and normal everyday activities.

The rate of bone union was determined based on the percentage of patients who achieved clinical and radiological criteria of bone union. The radiological criteria of bone union were the presence of a minimum of 3 out of 4 consolidated cortical bone layers or trabecular transition between bone fragments on X-rays in 2 views. Clinical bone union was defined as the lack of pathological mobility, pain, or deformity during attempts to perform movements in the wrist area at the fracture site. Nonunion was defined as failure to meet the above criteria for 6 months after the fracture .

The investigators also assessed the number of patients on any analgesics (paracetamol, ibuprofen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, tramadol) at the beginning of treatment and at the final follow-up. During regular follow-up visits, patients were asked about their pain intensity using the NRS (Numerical Rating Scale). A period of discontinuation of any pain medication was equivalent to a patient rating their pain level as 0 on the NRS. Time to achieving pain relief was expressed in days and defined as the period from the beginning to end of taking any analgesic drugs.

Complications were assessed based on medical and radiological records. The evaluated complications included nonunion, delayed bone union, fragment displacement, persistent pain, persistent swelling, limited range of motion, vascular damage, nerve damage, the need for revision surgery or repeated reduction and immobilization.

03

Conditions studied

  • Patients With Fractures

Keywords

  • fractures
  • Osteogenon
  • ossein-hydroxyapatite complex
  • distal radius fractures
  • lower leg fracture
  • proximal humerus fractures
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • no to taking Osteogenon
  • a follow-up period of more than 3 months after treatment completion
  • complete medical and radiological records
  • a written
  • not taking any other medications that could affect bone tissue remodeling
  • not taking other medications that interact with Osteogenon
  • no other limb pathologies (inflammatory or neurogenic)
  • absence of comorbidities that could affect bone union

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age under 18 years or over 85 years
  • to the active ingredient or to any of the
  • severe renal failure and dialysis therapy
  • hypercalcemia
  • hypercalciuria
  • calcium-based kidney stones or tissue calcifications
  • a follow-up period shorter than 3 months after treatment completion
  • a lack of
  • a lack of cooperation with the patient
  • absent or incomplete medical and radiological records
  • taking medications that could affect bone tissue remodeling
  • taking medications that may interact with Osteogenon (e.g. thiazide diuretics)
  • metabolic disorders
  • post-traumatic skeletal deformities
  • neuromuscular disorders
  • post-inflammatory deformities
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Osteogenon

    received an ossein-hydroxyapatite complex

    Drug: received an ossein-hydroxyapatite complex

  • No intervention
    Control

    did not receive an ossein-hydroxyapatite complex

Interventions

  • Drugreceived an ossein-hydroxyapatite complex

    Patients in the study group with fractures received an ossein-hydroxyapatite complex (830 mg of ossein-and-hydroxyapatite complex, with 444 mg of hydroxyapatite, equivalent to 178 mg of calcium and 82 mg of phosphorus) throughout the entire period following fracture healing. The tablets were taken orally, one tablet twice daily.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. period of bone union

    assessed by data linkage to medical and radiological records

    Time frame: at 6 months after randomisation

  2. Achieving bone union

    assessed by data linkage to medical and radiological records

    Time frame: at 6 months after randomisation

Secondary outcomes

  1. pain assessment

    100mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) * 0 mm indicates "no pain" * 100 mm indicates "worst imaginable pain" * Higher scores on the VAS indicate a worse outcome (greater pain intensity).

    Time frame: at 6 months after randomisation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Morasiewicz P, Zaborska M, Sobczak M, Tomczyk L, Leyko P, Bobinski A, Kochanska-Bieri J, Pili D, Kazubski K. The Use of Osteogenon as an Adjunctive Treatment in Lower Leg Fractures. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Nov 14;17(11):1531. doi: 10.3390/ph17111531. PubMed 39598441 ↗
  • Morasiewicz P, Zaborska M, Sobczak M, Tomczyk L, Pili D, Kazubski K, Leyko P. The Use of Ossein-Hydroxyapatite Complex in Conjunction with the Ilizarov Method in the Treatment of Tibial Nonunion. J Clin Med. 2025 May 12;14(10):3353. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103353. PubMed 40429349 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The data collected during our study are our own efforts and will be used to prepare our publications. Other authors are encouraged to conduct their own research.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2027, 27 months after the start.

Of 19 phase 4 interventional studies under Fractures, Bone, half reached primary completion within 34 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 75. This study's planned 27 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 29, 2025
First posted
Oct 7, 2025
StartActual
Nov 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Feb 2, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2027
Last update
Nov 28, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 28, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07210281
Lead sponsor
University of Opole
Responsible party
Piotr Morasiewicz (Professor, University of Opole) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 7, 2025
Start date
Nov 1, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 2, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 28, 2025

Study contacts

Piotr Morasiewicz, PROF
Contact
piotr.morasiewicz@uni.opole.pl
+48504549666
Monika Zaborska
Contact
zaborska.monika.pl@gmail.com
+48692706595
Marek Gierlotka, PROF
study chair · University of Opole

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion