CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07202416BELLMEREUpdated Oct 1, 2025

ESPB vs Intrathecal Morphine for Assessements of Quality of Recovery After Cesarean Section

An interventional study of Erector spinae plane block and Intrathecal morphine in Cesarean Section and Post Operative Pain, sponsored by AUSL Romagna Rimini. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-01.

Sponsored by AUSL Romagna Rimini · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Cesarean section is a surgical procedure that involves significant pain, which is managed through a multimodal pharmacological approach.The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the quality of hospitalization after cesarean section using the QRo11 questionnaire in patients treated with a postoperative Erector Spinae Plane Block compared to those treated with intrathecal morphine.

Read the detailed description

Cesarean section is one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide and is associated with significant postoperative pain. Effective pain control is crucial to enhance maternal recovery, improve mobilization, support breastfeeding, and reduce hospital stay. Traditionally, intrathecal morphine has been widely used as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen. However, its use may be limited by opioid-related side effects such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and respiratory depression.

Regional anesthesia techniques targeting the thoracic paravertebral space have recently been introduced to improve postoperative pain control while reducing opioid consumption. The Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block is a relatively simple and safe fascial plane block that has shown promising results in different surgical settings, including obstetric procedures.

The primary aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the quality of recovery after cesarean section using the validated Quality of Recovery-11 (QoR-11) questionnaire. Patients will be allocated to receive either a postoperative ESP block or intrathecal morphine as part of their analgesic protocol.

Secondary endpoints include postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, incidence of opioid-related side effects, time to mobilization, breastfeeding outcomes, and duration of hospital stay.

This study will provide new evidence on the role of the ESP block in cesarean section and may contribute to optimizing multimodal analgesia strategies for mothers undergoing this procedure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cesarean Section
  • Post Operative Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cesarean Section
  • Erector Spinae plane block
  • Quality of recovery
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 52 is below the median of 75 across 4,344 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

AUSL Romagna Rimini is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult women aged 18-45 years
  • ASA physical status II-III
  • Full-term singleton pregnancy scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA ≥ IV
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Emergency surgery
  • Preoperative infection (including infection at the ESPB puncture site)
  • Any contraindication to neuraxial analgesia
  • History of chronic pain
  • Use of opioids
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Hypersensitivity to any drug used in the study
  • Inability to understand or use verbal pain assessment scales
  • Refusal to participate in the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
52 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Erector Spinae Plane Block

    Patients in this group will receive an ultrasound-guided bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block at the end of cesarean section, in addition to standard spinal anesthesia without intrathecal morphine.

    Procedure: Erector spinae plane block

  • Active comparator
    Intrathecal MorphineITM

    Patients in this group will receive a standard dose of intrathecal morphine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. No additional fascial plane block will be performed.

    Procedure: Intrathecal morphine

Interventions

  • ProcedureErector spinae plane block

    Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block performed at the T9 level with 0,375%, ropivacaine 20 mL administered bilaterally at the end of surgery for postoperative analgesia following cesarean section.

    Also known as: ESPB

  • ProcedureIntrathecal morphine

    Intrathecal administration of 100 mcg of morphine in combination with a local anesthetic was performed at the time of spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.

    Also known as: ITM

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. QoR-11 questionnaire score

    Assessment of QoR-11 questionnaire score

    Time frame: day 1 after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores

    Assessment of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores both at rest and during movement. NRS 0-10. 0 mean a better outcome, 10 mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after cesarean section

  2. rescue dose

    Time to first rescue dose (interval between the block or intrathecal morphine administration and the first request for opioid analgesia).

    Time frame: day 1 after surgery

  3. complications

    Assessment of adverse events such as sedation, nausea, and other complications

    Time frame: day 1 after surgery

  4. breastfeeding latch

    Time from birth to first breastfeeding latch

    Time frame: day 1 after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 1, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07202416
Lead sponsor
AUSL Romagna Rimini
Responsible party
Domenico Pietro Santonastaso (MD, AUSL Romagna Rimini) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 1, 2025
Start date
Jun 18, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 1, 2025

Study contacts

Domenico P Santonastaso, MD
Contact
domenicopietro.santonastaso@auslromagna.it
+393492585491
Domenico P Santonastaso, MD
principal investigator · AUSL Romagna - M. Bufalini Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion