CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07172061Updated Sep 15, 2025

Sigh in Pressure Support Ventilation to Detect Respiratory System Compliance and Lung Recruitability

An interventional study of PSV + sigh (Clinical PEEP and Clinical PEEP + 3 cmH₂O) in Mechanical Ventilation, sponsored by AUSL Romagna Rimini. Completed at 2 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-15.

Sponsored by AUSL Romagna Rimini · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2024, registered Sep 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
110
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this physiological study is to determine whether ventilator-delivered sigh breaths during pressure support ventilation (PSV) provide a reliable bedside index of lung recruitability and can guide PEEP optimization.The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does respiratory system compliance measured at the end of a sigh (Crs_sigh) differ from compliance obtained with an inspiratory hold during an assisted breath (Crs_assisted), and can the Crs_sigh/Crs_assisted ratio indicate recruitability?
  • Does adjusting PEEP based on the sigh-derived recruitability index improve respiratory mechanics and gas exchange compared with usual clinical PEEP settings?
Read the detailed description

Background and RationaleInvasive mechanical ventilation is often necessary in critically ill adults but may contribute to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) if ventilator settings are not individualized. During assisted ventilation (pressure support ventilation, PSV), ongoing patient effort complicates the assessment of PEEP response, PEEP titration, and lung recruitability.Ventilator-delivered sigh breaths (i.e., brief sustained inflations) can improve gas exchange and promote alveolar recruitment, and may permit artifact-free assessment of respiratory mechanics in assisted modes. This study evaluates whether Crs measured at the end of a sigh provides reliable, clinically useful information on recruitability and whether the ratio of Crs during sigh to Crs during an assisted breath (Crs_sigh/Crs_assisted) can guide positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) optimization.Primary ObjectiveTo assess lung recruitability during PSV by normalizing Crs measured at the end of a sigh to Crs obtained with an inspiratory hold during an assisted breath.Secondary Objectives

  • To quantify the proportion of patients in whom Pplat during assisted breathing is not reliable (non-readable or unstable ≥3 s).
  • To determine whether adjusting PEEP according to the sigh-derived recruitability index improves Crs.

Inclusion criteria:Adults (≥18 years) receiving PSV with the ventilator's sigh function active.Exclusion criteria:

  • Clinical contraindication to increasing PEEP
  • Hemodynamic instability defined as SOFA cardiovascular score ≥3

Protocol OverviewEach participant undergoes two sequential, non-randomized steps:

  • Step 1 (Clinical PEEP): Measurements are performed after ≥15 minutes at the treating team's current PEEP.
  • Step 2 (Clinical PEEP +3 cmH₂O): PEEP is increased by 3 cmH₂O; measurements are repeated after ≥15 minutes of stabilization.

In both steps, a sigh is programmed as a sustained inflation at 30 cmH₂O for 3 seconds (pressure-controlled), per routine practice and prior literature.Sigh Setting

  • Sigh frequency: 1 sustained inflation every minute.
  • Sigh target: 30 cmH₂O for 3 seconds.
  • If end-inspiratory flow did not reach 0 L/min, the inspiratory time of the sigh was extended to ensure an end-inspiratory alveolar pressure of 30 cmH₂O.
  • The sigh pressure was identical in both PEEP steps.

Data CollectionBaseline demographics (age, sex, BMI), comorbidities, and hemodynamics are recorded. At the end of each 15-minute step (baseline and PEEP+3), we perform an end-inspiratory hold and an end-expiratory hold on a tidal assisted breath and measured:

  • Plateau pressure (Pplat): Pplat is considered reliable only if the pressure trace is visually stable (flat) during the inspiratory hold.
  • Static driving pressure: DP_st = Pplat - PEEP.
  • Dynamic driving pressure: DP_dyn = Pressure Support + (ΔP_occ × 0.75), where ΔP_occ is the difference between total PEEP and the low airway pressure during the expiratory-hold maneuver.
  • Tidal volume (Vt).
  • Respiratory system compliance on tidal assisted breath: Crs_tidal = Vt / DP_st.
  • P0.1.
  • Occlusion pressure (P_occ).
  • Pressure Muscle Index: PMI = P_peak - Pplat.
  • Ventilatory Ratio (VR).
  • Arterial blood gas (ABG). Compliance During Sigh and S/T IndexCrs during the mandatory sigh (Crs_sigh) is computed at each step using the sigh volume and pressure recorded once the inspiratory flow reaches 0 L/min and airway pressure (Paw) is visually stable.The S/T index is defined as the ratio Crs_sigh / Crs_tidal.Using baseline Crs_tidal, we estimate the sigh-induced volume (mL):V_sigh,expected = (Psigh_peak - PEEP) × Crs_tidal,baseline.We also derive a compliance valid for the pressure range above Pplat up to the sigh pressure ("over-plateau" compliance):Crs_overplat = (Vt_sigh - Vt_tidal) / (Psigh - Pplat).
02

Conditions studied

  • Mechanical Ventilation

Keywords

  • Assisted ventilation
  • Pressure support ventilation (PSV)
  • PEEP
  • Recruitment
  • Sigh
  • Respiratory system compliance
03

In context

Lead sponsor

AUSL Romagna Rimini is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults (≥18 years) receiving PSV with the ventilator's sigh function active.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical contraindication to increasing PEEP
  • Hemodynamic instability defined as SOFA cardiovascular score ≥3
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
110 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Clinical PEEP (baseline)

    Pressure support ventilation (PSV) at the clinical PEEP with ventilator-delivered sighs: one sustained inflation at 30 cmH₂O for 3 seconds every minute.

    Other: PSV + sigh (Clinical PEEP and Clinical PEEP + 3 cmH₂O)

  • Experimental
    Clinical PEEP +3 cmH₂O

    Pressure support ventilation (PSV) with PEEP set 3 cmH₂O above the clinical PEEP, with ventilator-delivered sighs: one sustained inflation at 30 cmH₂O for 3 seconds every minute.

    Other: PSV + sigh (Clinical PEEP and Clinical PEEP + 3 cmH₂O)

Interventions

  • OtherPSV + sigh (Clinical PEEP and Clinical PEEP + 3 cmH₂O)

    Each patient undergoes two sequential 15-minute steps: 1) pressure support ventilation at the clinical PEEP and 2) the same settings with PEEP increased by 3 cmH₂O. A ventilator-delivered sigh is programmed as one sustained inflation at 30 cmH₂O for 3 seconds every minute. All other ventilator parameters (trigger sensitivity, pressure support level, mandatory breath timing) remain unchanged. At the end of each step, inspiratory and expiratory holds are performed to collect respiratory mechanics and arterial blood gases; compliance during the sigh is calculated once flow is zero and airway pressure is stable.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sigh-to-Assisted Breath Respiratory System Compliance Ratio (Crs_sigh/Crs_assisted)

    Ratio of respiratory system compliance at the end of a ventilator-delivered sigh to compliance measured during an inspiratory hold on an assisted tidal breath. This normalized metric indexes recruitability during assisted ventilation; higher values indicate greater recruitability. The primary analysis is the within-patient change in the ratio from clinical PEEP to clinical PEEP +3 cmH₂O.

    Time frame: End of each 15-minute step within a single study session (clinical PEEP; clinical PEEP +3 cmH₂O).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patients with unreliable plateau pressure during assisted breaths

    Proportion of patients in whom Pplat cannot be reliably measured (non-readable or visually unstable for ≥3 seconds) during inspiratory hold maneuvers in assisted breathing at either study step.

    Time frame: Across both 15-minute steps within the single study session.

  2. Association between sigh-derived recruitability index and change in respiratory system compliance

    Correlation between the sigh-to-assisted compliance ratio at clinical PEEP and the within-patient change in compliance after PEEP increase

    Time frame: End of each 15-minute step within the single study session

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Ospedale Maurizio Bufalini
    Cesena, Italy 47521, Italy
  • Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori
    Monza, Italy 29000, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Shehabi Y, Chan L, Kadiman S, Alias A, Ismail WN, Tan MA, Khoo TM, Ali SB, Saman MA, Shaltut A, Tan CC, Yong CY, Bailey M; Sedation Practice in Intensive Care Evaluation (SPICE) Study Group investigators. Sedation depth and long-term mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill adults: a prospective longitudinal multicentre cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2013 May;39(5):910-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2830-2. Epub 2013 Jan 24. PubMed 23344834 ↗
  • Marin-Corral J, Dot I, Boguna M, Cecchini L, Zapatero A, Gracia MP, Pascual-Guardia S, Vila C, Castellvi A, Perez-Teran P, Gea J, Masclans JR. Structural differences in the diaphragm of patients following controlled vs assisted and spontaneous mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2019 Apr;45(4):488-500. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05566-5. Epub 2019 Feb 21. PubMed 30790029 ↗
  • Bianchi I, Grassi A, Pham T, Telias I, Teggia Droghi M, Vieira F, Jonkman A, Brochard L, Bellani G. Reliability of plateau pressure during patient-triggered assisted ventilation. Analysis of a multicentre database. J Crit Care. 2022 Apr;68:96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 21. PubMed 34952477 ↗
  • Bastia L, Amendolagine L, Pozzi F, Carenini S, Cipolla C, Curto F, Bellani G, Fumagalli R, Chieregato A. Reliability of Respiratory System Compliance Calculation During Assisted Mechanical Ventilation: A Retrospective Study. Crit Care Med. 2023 Oct 1;51(10):e201-e205. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005964. Epub 2023 Jun 16. PubMed 37326475 ↗
  • Mauri T, Grieco DL, Spinelli E, Leali M, Perez J, Chiavieri V, Rosa T, Ferrara P, Scaramuzzo G, Antonelli M, Spadaro S, Grasselli G. Personalized positive end-expiratory pressure in spontaneously breathing patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome by simultaneous electrical impedance tomography and transpulmonary pressure monitoring: a randomized crossover trial. Intensive Care Med. 2024 Dec;50(12):2125-2137. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07695-y. Epub 2024 Nov 11. PubMed 39527121 ↗
  • Jonkman AH, Ranieri VM, Brochard L. Lung recruitment. Intensive Care Med. 2022 Jul;48(7):936-938. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06715-z. Epub 2022 May 2. No abstract available. PubMed 35499759 ↗
  • Moraes L, Santos CL, Santos RS, Cruz FF, Saddy F, Morales MM, Capelozzi VL, Silva PL, de Abreu MG, Garcia CS, Pelosi P, Rocco PR. Effects of sigh during pressure control and pressure support ventilation in pulmonary and extrapulmonary mild acute lung injury. Crit Care. 2014 Aug 12;18(4):474. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0474-4. PubMed 25113136 ↗
  • Patroniti N, Foti G, Cortinovis B, Maggioni E, Bigatello LM, Cereda M, Pesenti A. Sigh improves gas exchange and lung volume in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing pressure support ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2002 Apr;96(4):788-94. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200204000-00004. PubMed 11964584 ↗
  • Albert RK, Jurkovich GJ, Connett J, Helgeson ES, Keniston A, Voelker H, Lindberg S, Proper JL, Bochicchio G, Stein DM, Cain C, Tesoriero R, Brown CVR, Davis J, Napolitano L, Carver T, Cipolle M, Cardenas L, Minei J, Nirula R, Doucet J, Miller PR, Johnson J, Inaba K, Kao L. Sigh Ventilation in Patients With Trauma: The SiVent Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023 Nov 28;330(20):1982-1990. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.21739. PubMed 37877609 ↗
  • Mauri T, Eronia N, Abbruzzese C, Marcolin R, Coppadoro A, Spadaro S, Patroniti N, Bellani G, Pesenti A. Effects of Sigh on Regional Lung Strain and Ventilation Heterogeneity in Acute Respiratory Failure Patients Undergoing Assisted Mechanical Ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):1823-31. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001083. PubMed 25985386 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data may be shared after reasonable request to the Principal investigator.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07172061
Lead sponsor
AUSL Romagna Rimini
Collaborators
Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori
Responsible party
Luca Bastia (MD, AUSL Romagna Rimini) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 15, 2025
Start date
Jul 30, 2024
Primary completion
May 31, 2025
Completion
Jun 30, 2025
Last update
Sep 15, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion